Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Short on the Matter, short chapters for
people with heads, hosted by Israel
Yosekovich and attorney Avi Blum.
>> Avi Blum, we are one day after the
polls closed. How do you see the rather
complex picture that is becoming clear
before our eyes?
>> Listen, first of all, it's a puzzle,
not a picture—meaning, every second
another piece of the puzzle enters. So
let's talk first about Netanyahu, and I
think that in his entire career,
including '96 and 2015. You can't say
it's his biggest victory because he
didn't win, but in my opinion, it's his
greatest achievement. After October 7th
and the judicial reform, when everyone
thought he was at his lowest, when it
looked like he was crashing, he managed
to bring about a personal vote of
confidence. A deficit of 11 mandates is
not an achievement, and it was also
expected; it was discussed, and
whenever they spoke with Filber,
he said he didn't see the ten mandates
that left the Likud, so here are the 10
mandates that left the bloc.
>> There aren't ten according to the
numbers.
>> Let me finish—although the Likud
managed to drink the remaining mandates
from its bloc partners, there are 11
mandates here. Last time it was, like,
64 mandates; now, according to the
emerging results, even before counting
the double envelopes, we see 11
mandates. Last time they were at 64,
now they stand at 53—that is a 11-
mandate deficit for the bloc.
>> Israel, it seems to me you are rounding
the numbers a bit, because last time
they received—if you look at the real
numbers of the Likud, 28 mandates—
they received the rest of the votes
because of votes that went to waste,
which this time were on the right side,
so the Likud didn't lose its power. One
can talk about Shas or the partners,
but the Likud did not lose its power.
What I wanted to say about this is
something else that you might like to
hear. Everyone comes with
predispositions from home; even Bibi,
in the end, if you give him a choice—
if he wants to replicate a narrow
government of 61 when Ben-Gvir is
holding him, locking him in like that
with Smotrich and also the Haredim—
maybe he prefers this constellation; he
has nothing to lose. If they go to
elections, he will probably come out an
even bigger winner. Unity will be his
pardon. I'm not sure he wants to exit
the map as a prime minister of a
minority that polarizes half the nation
, and it could be that, in hindsight,
it will turn out well for him.
>> First of all, regarding the numbers,
you might be right numerically if you
look at...if you crunch the numbers.
But at the end of the day, we are
facing monster turnout percentages, and
therefore, ultimately, when we...we
need to look at the mandates. So in
terms of mandates in the Knesset, he
arrives at the Knesset with 11 fewer
mandates for his bloc. But wait,
according to what you are saying now,
could there be an even more ideal
result? That he really is the one who
always said he liked a wing in all his
governments since 2009—he liked
having a left wing, to have a left wing
in the government, whether it was Ehud
Barak and later Tzipi Livni, Yair Lapid
, and so on and so forth.
>> This time it's half the vehicle.
>> But based on what we saw in his speech
yesterday, we did see that he is still
aiming, first and foremost, to
consolidate his bloc, and this raises
suspicion that he will try to secure
defectors rather than form a unity
government. We are already hearing in
the last few hours about his attempts
to recruit various defectors, like Eli
Avidar, to try and exploit their
principles regarding not relying on
Arab parties, the anti-Zionist parties,
and use that to bring them to his side.
I don’t know how successful this will
be, but what is succeeding is the
atmosphere. From a situation where he
could have, the bloc could have been
proud that they are light-years away
from 61 seats, he is actually creating
a perception that he is the one
initiating, he is the one on the attack
, he is the one you constantly need to
be wary of, while the other side is
always on the defensive despite having
67 seats in the Knesset, and that
really plays into his hands. I think,
however, that this is more than just
political theater, because there is
still a possibility that they will form
a government and remove him from the
Prime Minister's office—although I
don't see that happening. Anyone who
does that will lose seats, and Bibi
knows that too, and he said yesterday:
"Let's see them try." It is more the
story of the other side, which felt it
had placed all its bets, with
incredible turnout percentages, flights
from abroad, and also excellent voter
turnout in the Arab sector, and in the
end, you fail to bring down Bibi’s
numbers on a personal level. Here is
some kind of breaking point, or perhaps
a turning point, where in the end they
realize there are so many voters behind
him and it cannot be ignored; therefore
, in this sense, I think that is what
causes the feeling of despondency in
the "change camp" more than the numbers
themselves.
>> So let me tell you, the issue, in the
end, is Benjamin Netanyahu. For better
or worse, he is always the one
initiating, he is always the one
playing the game, and everyone else
runs to his court and tries to block
him. We saw this throughout the
election campaigns, certainly in the
last election campaign, and we are
seeing it now: that everyone is
constantly busy with what he is going
to do and how we will stop him. The
bloc right now, at least in the last
few hours, we see it struck dumb,
stunned, going underground, not trying
to initiate. As I understand it, there
aren't even any serious talks taking
place between them to try and see how
they can realize and leverage those 67
seats as a blocking bloc. There are no
talks whatsoever. Liberman has cut off
contact with his partners in the bloc,
and he has been briefing journalists in
the last few hours, telling them he
does not intend, on one hand, to go
into a unity government under any
circumstances. "By hook or by crook,"
as they say, with Benjamin Netanyahu,
he will not sit. But on the other hand,
he says that anyone who thinks he will
support a minority government is living
in La La Land. He has no intention of
doing that; he intends to play bunker.
>> He also blames Gadi.
>> Yes, and he tells Gadi to go for a
unity government, I...
>> A few things: first, by echoing
Bibi’s campaign and saying he would
work with the Arabs, he boosted
Bibi’s campaign. Secondly, the "big
party" campaign ultimately served
Netanyahu more than anyone. Because, as
you say regarding the numbers, it’s
true that the Likud brings a larger
Zionist majority, but the Haredim,
Goldknopf and Gafni—well, not Gafni,
but if it weren’t for the
non-Zionists among us, you know, you
know the texts—but when you have
numbers like 27 versus 20, that’s
dramatic. And here they are indeed
blaming Gadi Eisenkot. I must say that
Gadi Eisenkot, who conducted himself
well, stumbled yesterday. He stumbled
both in the campaign and in not
committing to all the things he spoke
about during the campaign in his
victory speech. Wait a minute, like
Bibi? Wait, speak a little. He is a
great general, no doubt, but a
political novice, and that also affects
the scenarios and the situation.
>> A good man, a nice man, though it’s
hard to say he’s a great general and
certainly not a politician.
>> He was Chief of Staff, but in politics,
he's a novice. To that, yes, that is an
answer. Perhaps the Israeli public also
has quite a few people who feel
that’s what they’re missing at this
time, but bottom line, we are facing a
real deadlock here. I see fatigue on
both sides among the citizens to go to
more elections, to go to more rounds,
when they could really form an amazing
national unity government here, leaving
the extremists on both sides out:
Ben-Gvir on one side—by the way,
because of whom 19 Arab seats were
reached—and on the other side, Yair
Golan.
>> Yes, this time he handed out chocolate
ornaments to the Arabs.
>> And simply establish a national Zionist
government here that can truly, finally
, bring healing to Israeli society. It
could work; I’m hearing rumors in the
last day that people are saying
President Trump intends to do this,
from what I understand.
>> Tell me, if Trump really turns to it, I
think that in coordination between the
two presidents, Herzog will go for it
all the way. He is not Ruby Rivlin; he
won't let another failed election cycle
happen on his watch, and he will
involve Trump if necessary; the
disconnect will turn into a hot line.
If Herzog is a bit smart and knows how
to work—and he does; he proved he
knows how to play politics—he needs
to approach Netanyahu now, grant him a
blanket pardon, and remove this whole
trial story, without ifs, without buts,
and without conditions. Simply not to
give up, to say: Israeli society has
truly entered a real crisis here, not
least because of those same 1000, 2000,
4000 cases—some will say they are
framed, some will say they are
problematic and complex, and some will
say, let the trial speak for itself.
But ultimately, Israeli society can no
longer carry on its back those same
cases, that same trial that has been
dragging on for so long. A blanket
pardon must be granted. It is very
possible that we will see Netanyahu
return to his big numbers at that very
moment when he forms a government.
>> Israel, I want to save a minute for
something from your world. Allow me to
ask you: the Iranian story, what are
the chances we’ll see it? After all,
yesterday Gadi Kadmon called on the
security cabinet not to cooperate with
reckless moves—I am paraphrasing in
my own words. What are the chances that
Bibi, after Trump's midterms on
November 6th, might be seen next week
launching a short campaign in Iran
while still in a transitional
government as Prime Minister?
>> Yes, President Trump himself is already
talking about the need to prepare for
another campaign. We are also seeing US
forces that are steadily increasing in
the region. I don't know to what extent
this is really just posturing, or if
it's something practical. Either way,
we can expect some really difficult
hours and difficult weeks regarding
this matter. Our own system is also
truly very tense. What will the bottom
line be? I don't know yet.
>> Yisrael Yosefkowitz, we will conclude
this episode. We haven't talked about
the Haredim; let's leave something. We
do two episodes a week, so let's leave
something for next week when I travel
to the midterms in New York.
>> Hopefully, by then you will be in
Washington, the clouds here will have
cleared, and we will actually see a
unity government because it is the
order of the hour.
>> Do you think that can happen in such
short timeframes?
>> I am convinced that with a little real
maturity and a true desire, the
citizens of Israel will finally achieve
peace and internal unity if both sides
rise above all the disputes and just do
it. By the way, I think it will also be
good for us Haredim, because a
recruitment arrangement can only be
reached through consensus, when it
isn't perceived as a sword used to
strike the other side, but...
>> Undoubtedly, and that is even before we
talked about the great collapse of Shas
, but that is for the next episode.
>> Oh, that needs a podcast, not 10
minutes; the Torah, Shas—a one-hour
podcast.
>> Undoubtedly, Avi, thank you very much.
>> Thank you very much, Yisrael, good
night.
>> Good night.
>> You’ve been listening to "Katzar al
HaInyan"(Briefly on the Matter) from
Mishpacha Podcasts. I’m Yisrael
Yosefkowitz, and I was joined by
Attorney Avi Bell. Thanks to content
editor Tehila Siton, production manager
Ayala Goldstein, and sound editors Dvir
Mivizel, Daniel Avin, and Hila Vilar.
All series and episodes are waiting for
you on the Mishpacha website, on all
podcast apps, or on the phone line at
077-22. Extension 77. See you in the
next episodes.