Chulin 119

Today's is and we are about 20 lines from the bottom of so we're still in the beginning of which although is deals with laws of specifically that are discussed in and that is appendages to foods. How do they relate with regards to hilar and the Mishna immediately made a distinction between and is your classic food that can become to within the laws of Tomyra. A person can become a item of food can become tummy as well. It could be a lma to a reve to. And the question is if you have something that's attached to that food, how does it relate with regards to toma? The same is something that needs to be discussed with regards to noa. Na is meat. So by definition it is food as well. But it has a very special place in the is of noa is in it of itself a source of in addition to ana being it's also and that was the question appendages to foods whether it's whether it's how do we look at it and the Mishna and discussed three categories of appendages and then appendages that are neither yadice or a yad would be for example the stem of a fruit or certain bones of meat. Being that they're used to handle to carry the food, they would be considered a yad. A sho is something that's attached to the food, but it also protects the food. So, if the stem of the fruit is a yad, the peel of the fruit, which protects the underlying fruit, would be considered a shymer. And then you would have things that could be attached to the fruit that are neither a yad or a shimer. For example, the here, the fuzz that you'll sometimes find on fruit. It's not a yad. We won't pick up the fruit by that fuzz. It also doesn't protect the fruit. As a result, it's neither a yad or a shy. A yad has a special place in a sh has a special place in. and something that's neither a yad or a shy also to a degree has a special place in the primary topic of yesterday's d was the very first which mentioned as it relates to anything that's a not has an ability to be to that means if food was and it touched the food will now become it has an ability to be mighty to it also has the in the event that it's to and now it touches a datar that would be to stating that the yad is not to the so if you don't have food which is that's the but it together with the you would have a is although the is that to that degree as it relates to we look at the as being but to bear that it wouldn't be able to do a is more than a yad and Being that is more than it's meaning it's and it's in addition to that it also has the ability to bear and the discuss how do you know all this and it bo in this week's par tucked away at the end of and there were two shot in the mas very hard but the mascot what exactly the is to these which is but it's not a matame And it is either way today's daf is a little bit lighter no a little bit lighter not much that continues to discuss the and of as it relates to again more infashi had a sonashi who was aashi said over something that he heard in the name of he said even you find this that there's something called a so the stem of a fruit is considered part of the fruit with regards to it could be and it could be but in order for fruit to become it first has to be so this is where meets so it has to be which means it has to become wet what happens if the fruit itself didn't become wet it was the yad of the fruit the stem of the fruit that became what said that even though so is considered part of the fruit in that it could be but it's not considered part of the fruit in that if it was only the beame we should say oh it's as if the fruit became nobody could be or you can explain that is So what was the to the that there's something called a with regards to so the in the end he said and we said the word is that even the iss considered part of the food. Now this is going back on [snorts] the previous thing mentioned in the P and that was so you see if falls on which is even so the food is now going to become the question is is the word also going back on the first thing mentioned in the right essentially the said two things if water falls on the food then falls on the food water fell now it's fell Now it could be. So is for sure going back on. The question is it also going back on the thing that it said previously. Now believe it or not this is a with global ramifications. Really? How so? Yeah. We had this in many times but so if you have a in this case the word it's going back on the previously mentioned thing which is if the falls on the food even the food's going to be but is it going as well is it going back in very simple if it's going back in then you see y this is even with regards to being if that it's only going back on but it's not going back on it could be that's they're arguing in this or it could be this is not such a global but rather it's more of a specific to the of specific to the of and that is that of regards to the question is when food becomes do we look at the state of becoming as the beginning of it becoming or do we not look at it as the beginning of becoming do we say or no being that in order for food to become it first has to be so when it becomes we actually look at it as if we look at it Tommo and Yod were included. They were to with regards to tommo then the boy would apply to as well. If is part of the tommo then the boy of applies to if is not part of then it's not going to be that way was the other says where you find that the laws of being parallel the laws of actually becoming that is just like something that's is not something it doesn't have the ability to bemo either. But what we need is the where it says you can't have a yad on food that's mikaz and you can't have a on food that's from a pull. A pull is a beam. So what does this mean? Now we know that in order for food to become to or to transmit to it has to have a shear of a kabaya. So the truth is if you have food that's such as a kazas right what's the relationship between a kazas and aa according to most aa is double the kazayas so aas is half a is that is a third of a a way we're messiah the kazum when it comes to eating matzah and mitzvah when it comes to kaz is we work with the bea so if there's two zim in the bea so you know that the Zas is always the the half a stating that brings the Ramita and the Ramita and that is that the Zas is not a half a but rather the Zas is a third of a but either way the Zas of course is smaller than a BA so if in order to have the has to be a so what's this that is saying there's no the everything that we're discussing that first is not if you have food less than food less than a it's not because there's no mb. So Rashi addresses the question and Rashi says you have to say we're talking about where there were a few foods that together combined to so you had a few foods that together combined to now each food individually had the question is how do you look at the of each individual food said that if you have one item of food that's part of the combination that makes up a that's not treated as a meaning is not if however that part of this combination of food is a soad and then the is the would be able to be grapples. He's not sure how exactly it's possible to take foods, combine them together without making them one food and yet somehow they'll bear. But for now, we're going to take Rash's word that there's such a concept of taking foods that are disparate items combining them without making them one, but at the same time having now the question is each individual food it's does it have the kashivas of Yad? Does it not have the kashivas of of y does it have the kashivas of shime or not said it depends if the food is no. Yeah. If it's a kaz clearly ra is saying whatever make a pull as it relates to the is smaller if it's a pull which says it's less than half of a it's a much smaller then you don't have a but as long as it's a the size of a pull you would have a say there is and there is makes a it's an important and that is didn't lump it all together even has two groups he says And implied from what then is the is a pull there is a shear of how big the food has to be in order for it to have a and that is a pull it's only by which means even it doesn't matter how small it is still it it's going to be considered a shy either way the garra is going to ask four kashes on and as we're going to see the first two questions are really questions questions on as well. For some reason, the Gomorrah is going to ask only on bothered in the why it is that the Gomorrah picked the first two questions only on because as we'll see it's very clear the cash will be as well. Rashi says that that's just what the Garra did. But either way, four kashes that the Garra is going to ask on this is and the first one is from a that deals with a this is where meets A. We had meets Mir. This is where meets A. We're gonna have to figure out at some point why. But for now, says the two bones and the two bones had on them each a half a zas of boser. Now is that kaz boser of a mace is like a mace. So it's metamoas specifically it's Tomaso. So if somebody would be under the same roof as a kazas of the flesh of a dead person, that person would be. What this person did was he took two bones. Each one had on it a half a zas of boser. You have to hold cup and he took the two bones, put them into the roof, but not the entire bone. The parts of the bone that had no buster on it. So essentially he took two parts of bones, put them under a roof. Each bone that he put part of it in had in it. But the part that was under the roof was the part that didn't have the inra terminology. It means he took the he took the ofas and he put it on the roof. But he took two of them. So being that he took two of them he now have a question. What's the habas is going to be to why is the bias going to be Tommy? Because at the end of the day I have the of the isma it's so it's technically as if the itself is in the B. I don't need it to be stiff to share. I have to share through the two. All I need for the to do is to be able to be mus has an ability to be. That's the first mission of say for that reason the issold of is a yad. Thus I have a full over here holds that. What do you mean? I have the two could bear. Why can't the others bear? Now, at first glance, it sounds like the holds. I mean, that was one of the two that we just mentioned between. So at first glance it sounds like that's the if that's the if that's true then is going to have to be one of the two and is going to have to be one of the two could easily ask this question on how you going to explain that how you going to explain this but the doesn't do that asks the how you going to explain this if the price is talking about that which is the way we just explained it ratio How do you understand this says the two I thought you said that but the has another possibility maybe this bone is not a maybe this bone is a a shy so the truth is we mentioned this very subtly a few times a bone can be a yad it could also be a sh what's between a yad and a shy again a yad is a handle a shy actually protects usually you think of a bone it's the yad right you carry the the steak with the bone. But the truth is the many bones have meat inside it. I mean that many of the bones the mach right there's meat inside the actual bone. So as a result you could look at the bone as a as well. So it says maybe this bone is a maybe it's it's not a if it's a that's why it could bear even because what was in but you have a so that would explain the you would understand the reason even though it's still because the problem is and he understand the because what say from if we're talking about then I understand it's possible that is not from but ra holds is so how's Rav going to explain this price how could Rav's work with both and this if the price is discussing a bone that's a ratio and if it's discussing says very simple you're It's talking about a yard and you're right can't with both Rav only with the second sheet in the Buda said that the two bones are not because that's another way of saying what said and in fact will not say or you can tell me he's talking about and being that it's a and you're rights very nicely with the holds that even it Because you're right was picking sides. was like in other words the question this is the shak of it's a hard but it's a simple shak of very simple the wanted with both in the that's with both raims either with one or with the other you want the bra to be talking about heims with the second if you want the ba to be talking about a heims with the first says the how's [clears throat] going to understand This says the is going to learn for sure that the entire price is talking about a holds it's going to be going according to the asks why is have to say that it's talking about why can also say it's talking about for sure can't work with the second was held that even is so there's there's No map. So the or at least so why there's no way with the second could only work with the tanakama but the tanama holds that it's so theor says is going to say the price is talking about where it was a and say it was a sh is also so says it's true but even so why did the bry pick a case where they were say better is more than a pull because a pull is less than half of Kazayas. So if that's the case, say even a bigger where they were smaller from the fact that we picked it sounds like it was at the very least more than a poll which sounds like we're not talking about because even if it's either way according to either has to be talking about says coolest that's the thigh bone. So the kulus is considered at first glance aadma. So through the kus if someone comes in contact with the bone he could become because of the that's attached to the argu they say you know doesn't have to have a even if all there is is a pull it could be again at first glance what does it sound like this is also known as so what does it sound like this is sounds like in order for the kas to be a does it have to be a not seems to hold seems to say I First glance is but again is going to ask on Rav. It sounds like only works with for some reason in the wants to be able to sh with if the culus is a tell me it's talking about why does it have to have a so the same thing, you're right. There's no way to make Rav work with both. However, you can learn that the Bryce is talking about uh Yad and that's the case with Yehuda who said there has to be a that's of you could say it's talking about you do have and if that's the case with what say as long as there's a Paul because that's the what about going to learn this of is going to say that the entire is talking about a now if it's talking about a there's no way to make work with the ratio says you have to have a kaz if it's a you don't have to say you don't have to have a kazord if it's you certainly don't have to have a kazim and he's going to go according to said you have to have a pull you have to have a pull how could he tell me with and it's talking about what was even when it comes to said at the very least you have a pulse when said was it wasn't a real shar was getting involved in shar what was the shar of the tanakama also mentioned the share mentioned a smaller share to show that it could be smaller but the is said that way proof to that the Bryce is talking about meaning according to we said the Bryce is discussing according to we said but ra said it's very mash that we're talking about a shy why because the the bryer said kulus the kulus the thigh bone is a shy fact so we know we're talking about meaning if the vishna just said bone like the previous bryer that discussed the two that entered the so over there over there You can debate is it a bone that has that has marrow? Is it a bone that doesn't have marrow? Is it a bone that's a that's a yad? But the cul we know what it is. We're identifying the bone and the culus is a thus it makes sense that that's what's going on as it relates to what was again the buser kis if there's the the coolest bone. If there's a pull a buser said you have a gazer but according to if there's a pull shear a buser that's a a bean a large bean. So there's a large beans worth of meat on it. That's enough for it to be. We just said that holds that pull is Africa because the coolest is a said according to Rav it's going to be said it's going to be that's what the said amongst said this said that when said Paul it was a real wasn't a real mention. He also mentioned the but really the isma the third question. So this is a we're making our way through. This is Mishna and the Mishna over there discusses the of a pod. So a pod you have beans in a pod and the pod was emptied of its beans. The question is is the pod now or is it not? Is it in a state where being that there's no beans inside it could be or not? So is like this is [snorts] he says that if the pod would have in it one bean but the bean would be a pull it would be a large bean is it would be to if however it was a small bean it was a kitten then is if it's to came in contact with the pod then it would become to so the pod somehow can transmit If it has in it a small bean, not if it has in it a large bean. What's the reason? He explained he said he said very and this the way the gar understands it initially. Then the gar is going to have a different understanding of it. But the initial understanding is the pod from a perspective is the yad of the bean. The bean is the food. The pad's not the food. But the pod is like the stem. It's the yad. So here's the question. Do we look at the pod as a yacht of the bean or not? A larger bean you can carry. You can put in your hand. As a result, you don't look at the pod as being a yacht. A smaller bean you can't really carry. And as a result, you would look at it as a yacht. Thus says a little counterintuitively, the pod of the larger being is not a if you have a bean inside of it. It doesn't have an ability to bring in as opposed to if it's of a smaller being. What's the kasha? The kasha is the pull is the big being the kitten is the small being. If that mean if that's true then by definition a kitten is smaller than a pole. If a kis is smaller than a pole and rebel the great rebel right said that there's a on a means of cash said you see from here that there is so says I'm sorry I'm sorry I made a mistake I made a mistake we're talking not about y that's the Second shot we're talking about. Verify the question is because that would be a as well. It's a we're talking about and that's the question. The question is do you look at the pod as being a or do you not look at it as being a same just not. So the question is for a larger being we don't look at it as it doesn't need the but for a smaller it does need. So you see from here that which works for it doesn't work for we don't mean what we mean is you're right if we were dealing with because and this hness by definition is the smaller being the pole is the larger That means that the kess is but we don't mean what we mean is yat. So how does that change anything? Y this year is even worse. Right? Y has to be even bigger. So if it's too small for it to be considered a shy then it's certainly too small for it to be a yad. What's the terret? The terret is that if you're looking it as being a a shy then you have to look at the individual being that it's protecting. If you look at the yah then you're looking at the stem. You're not looking at the pod. Then you can take the entire pod into consideration when you look at the so as long as the stem is now holding a pod with the bean inside of it. That is the shear of what you need in order for it to have a yad even a kaz maybe then that would be enough for it to be. If you're looking at the pod as being the to the bean, so then you're going to tell me the bean is too small for it to have a that's the but that's not what you're looking at. You're actually looking at the stem of the pod. So it's not the pod relative to the bean. It's the stem relative to the pod and the bean inside of it. So it's true you need a bigger share, but you may have the biggest share. As long as you have the biggest share because everything together is a gaz that would be enough. one last caller. So that's the that we started with in the beginning at the very end of of the very end of Sunday. So the was from there we learned that it's not but it is so we learn from there. So you see for example if you take adash lentils of par is told so you take lentils and you would have it together with its kalipa is the kipa would you' have it would be for the now the assumption is that there's no way you're going to get a a lentil that's going to be the proper for it's a very very small thing what do you have to say it's going to be mitarif with other foods the problem is how could the sh be mitar I thought there's a din So it's gri you can say that that's a barrier that it's a barrier just like we had barrier in we had barrier in different already said there's a concept there's a concept of of barrier being that it's a it's a it's an organism on its own so it's for that reason is different and even though ordinarily make over here you can have If you have two, could they be let's clarify the question. Do you mean to say [snorts] where you have one on top of another? We know that that's the first of the so the question is could two have a have a double layer. Do both layers count as they're both protecting. What do you say? I don't need two layers. One is enough. Well, no. Maybe you need extra security. So that that's the question. The question is if you have two says the we know that there was no reason for to ever declare such a question because this is a where's the an onion has three layers the innermost layer. It doesn't matter if the layer is whole or there's a puncture in the layer. It's because it's part of the onion. It's just part of the food. It's not a it's not a yet. It's part of the food. And is not part of the onion. Thus, the reason is because the middle layer is aimer. So, if it's a shimemer, if there's a breach in the security, then it's not a shy. The outer layer either one. So uh either way it's going to be why because it's a it's just the second layer. So it doesn't matter. The second layer is never everybody knows this [laughter] is the outer layer is is there's never his question was something else. What happens as how to learn this? We're going to learn the way Rashi learns. It's talking about you had a you had that had a and together with the wasar. We know that that works. Then you cut the apple in half. You cut the food into two. So now it's two separate parts. The question is is the still we saw right in the beginning of the not sure how it works exactly but you could take foods and you can bear them and talk. So what should be the problem? It's back of the envelope arithmetic. You can take food and is mitarif to the food. So I have the food and the everything is mitarif and this is wonderful. The problem is as the maybe foods could be mitarif but a can't be mitarif and here's a lumbus maybe in order for a to be part of the bea it has to be shy on the entire bay. So if it's shymer on all the food then it works being that the food was broken into two parts the shy of one half of the food is not protecting the other half of the food. So even though there's a longar the two foods but practically speaking I can't make the on this half protect the other half. So that syrup maybe works for the foods but maybe it doesn't work for the that wasn't this this was so says one second I'll bring you a ride that's talking about and the reason is nature see what holds that if you have one bean in a pod the is long as it's a small bean the pot itself is what does it mean that it's so the thinks like it thought in the not the way we explained it the way what thought in the and that is the pot is a is a now that's the little bean with the is not going to be a star of a few so what do you see the beans and thear says, "Yeah, that would be true if you learned that Bryce is referring to doesn't mean it means and we don't mean the pod relative to the beam. We mean the stem of the pod relative to everything that it's carrying." And that's how this work says the one final We learn from here. [snorts] So what do you see from there? You see that if you take let's just pick that place or whatever it doesn't matter. take the food and you could be you they their is going to bear the question is it's going to be so if it's going to be you're going to bear it you're going to put a bunch together the ways and you can make the out of it the problem is if you're going to use the I thought on this and that can't bear you but you can't bear like the highway the highway so don't you have a from which is the that it does works as the explained that the discussion is the stem of the pod and the stem is everything in the pod a similar to says what we're talking about here is is we're not talking about the little grain and a husk but rather what we're talking about is the entire ear of graves. I'll just read the art scroll note just to explain the technicality of what's going on here. I think that's a little bit simpler. It's note 1519 B2. Either way, i.e. just as explained above that Mishna deals with a stem that is a single yad for all the pods. So too we may explain that the deals with a whole ear of grain that is a single shr for all the kernels on it. An ear of grain has numerous kernels arranged around it in several rings, one above the other, with bristles interspersed among them. The tight arrangement of the kernels and bristles causes them to be held in place. Since if even one kernel would fall out, the entire arrangement would collapse the whole ear kernels, bristles, and husks is considered a single shimmer for all the individual kernels. the does not provide a source for the notion that several sh are being combined for what we're dealing with over here is is a in but it's an entire ear of grain and being that they all need each other in order for the kernels to remain intact inside the grain. So we look at everything as being for the kernels. Everything's been for everything essentially. So this is one big and food and that's where you have the now wouldn't bear you wouldn't have a but as long as then everything could be deemed a and if everything could be deemed a that's how it works. But the says does that make sense? I understand that the kernels on top need the kernels on bottom because if the kernels on bottom would fall out of place then the whole domino effect everything would fall but why do the kernels on bottom need the kernels on top it's talking about where this was such a big ear of grain that on one row forget about upper and lower on one row itself you had enough for a shea as long as you take everything into consideration by virtue of the fact that we deem it all a shar is it possible to have So the says in the times of quotes there was so much that there were that were literally the size of the two kidneys of a he says but these are very big kernels very big kernels in the world of of it's possible to have one row where it's going to be the if we're going to go down that road which road we're going to talk That's an easy way out to a lot of the questions we discussed. Then you can say you don't have to get involved with rose and things. You could say it was one together with the somehow with its husk with its somehow you already have the the how you can have one with its husk. You have a yeah if it's you don't need the whole ear of grain. You could say it's just one strand together with this hus and you're going to have a shear. Exhale. Either way, just to end today's da or really the last three dawson on a light note. So, we're learning clearly is hard. [laughter] It's the last inn. It's also a kamura. So what came to mind is a gamarra in the end of hyius which illustrates that even in the world of literally the personalities that are in the even they considered to be a difficult and I think it's to mention a story which is a fascinating story it's about an of we won't go through the whole thing at the very end of gimlid base up to so the context over there is the gar was discussing that when the Nazi would walk into the base everybody had to stand up for him the he was the smartest man of the generation and the self-explanatory they were given covet as well but not the same level of cover that was given to the Nazi so the ni was on a pedestal he was giving more covet more status than was the and the of says that that really developed in a very interesting context. And here's the background. So of course he came from the family of he was from the raor was the he was the the greatest sage of that and was the says would walk into everybody would stand up would walk into everybody would stand up for them as well said I mean at the end of the day I understand is the is the best but I'm the so wouldn't it seem befitting that I should be given more covet than given to says so used his power and he made it he said that from here forward is going to be you stand up for the but you don't stand up for the you can't give him the same level of cup it says instituted that the next day when they came to so they walked in he saw that they wasn't standing up for them in the regular way they said my what's going on like why like what happened so they told him made that only the is going to get this level of but are not going to get it turns he says I don't understand right we know who we are. I think we should take matters in our own hand. I think we need to somehow show that what he did was wrong. And the way we're going to do that is by exposing even gets more cover than us cuz he's the nasi. As if he knows how to learn better than we know how to learn. Let's expose him. Let's show everybody the that doesn't know how to learn as well as everybody thinks he knows how to learn my sob what are you thinking so he said I have a very good idea let's come tomorrow walks into say I want you to give on what [laughter] say that's the punch line so he said say from here till the end is all commentary NO HE SAID SAY THE LESSON because I know that doesn't And when you're going to say doesn't know, you know what we're going to tell him? The says and we learn from who's worthy of of saying the of being only someone who knows everything and being that doesn't know we're going to show everybody that he's not worthy of being the and based on that there's going to be a coup. We're going to take is not going to be the ni anymore. Now who's going to be the ni? So told the it's an unbelievable say there was a one of the overhears this conversation taking place and he realiz and he's going to be very embarrassed when the story goes down. So he went and he sat himself by the attic of that night sits down to learn and and all of a sudden he hears screaming and learning in the background. What was he learning? He was learning. He sat down with and he said he started learning was trying to do his thing but he couldn't. So if you can't beat him you join him. So he sat down and he listened to the kids stayed up all night learning. The next day he comes in to ask the same you want. He said understood what happened over here. He realized that this was all a setup and he said he said I realized clearly that if not for the fact of did this for me I would have been embarrassed. He looked into what happened. He heard that it was I mean they were the ones who asked them to say so it's pretty obvious it came from men and he asked to please leave and they weren't allowed back in. says the they participated in the they participated in the sh but they had a stand outside of base medish whenever they had a write the question down on a piece of paper and they would submit it into into the medish any question that they had an answer for was answered anything they didn't know an answer before so right respectively so they knew had to learn more So very often they would ask questions no one knew answer and they themselves would have to contribute their own terra. You see they know the answers to that questions. We don't know the answers to that question. How could let's bring them back in however we're going to cancel them that even though we're going to allow them back in but we're not going to say over anything in their name and it was from that day that became I saw incidentally in the safe he says why they Ra he says it was a ling we know Rome theorah says in the bans came from Nero of the Roman Empire fame. So Romeo was a descendant of Nero. It says we know that felt that what did to him was inconsistent with the of try to embarrass him. So he said that it must be you know where you get that gene from you know where it comes it comes from it comes from and that's why they called this is just the opposite he says mayor it's unbelievable mayor right it down is so you don't want to say but at the same time he was mayor which is even better than which is even better than mayor as it relates to I saw the inio says he says we know whenever brings two he brings a brings never like so that was the point you're now yeah but only in the sense either way the continues and the say both had a dream and they had the same exact dream the dream was the say said I don't care that I had a dream. He said either way the gar continues another whole but at the very end and this is the segue to the ones. So the garra ends as follows. The gummor says that what was the in the ra I mean the obvious takeaway from this I mean this is a story that's way above our pay grade we're talking about sadik so it's very hard to understand exactly of what exactly is going needed to cover of course not of were plotting to expose of course not so exactly how you understand the story I'm not sure but a few takeaways and one of them is how hard is which I think at the very least validates what we're all feeling these days but in terms of in terms of one interesting takeaway that the Gmorra says is let's look at it from the l's perspective what was the husband meaning felt that was not fit to be the held that it is okay no it's fine says you know what the husband is held. This is the age-old question. What's the mart to it? It's the last the very end of how does why does end with it's the segue to this last story. So this is the whole then the very last part of because that was the you have to know even if you don't know the last it's like you don't know the first just like everyone knows you have to know the you have to know as well it doesn't matter everyone has to know everything you don't have to know everything is the That's going to be oh this was stinking what was ra and mukar what was the mar toito they said so wonder could be follow we all know the in the end of the first you may have heard this before he said I always wanted to say, but I couldn't do it. >> [laughter] >> is there was to be the said is the love of the said what's the [clears throat] is can mean everything or all the it can mean It means it means quantitatively even more days. Not just the days of not just the 6,000 but even all the days quantitatively another day and another day literally for eternity. Whereas Ben held not quantitatively but rather called qualitatively the day itself which is made up of day and night. So usually the day part of the 24-hour period would be qualitatively not only the day but also the night. It's so held is quantity. It's where is quality. It's not only what does mean you have to know everything. You have to know you have to know. You have to know everything. He helped. So if other what does mean it's not it's whatever you know you have to know well you have to know like with the that's what means it's not quantitatively it's it's qualitatively that is the it's just to end with one that my son told me that is that there's a well-known gamar he's learning but everybody knows this gamar the garamar is discussing feels like a long time ago that said and discusses. Why are we getting so excited about something that said I mean if said like somebody that we should reckon with and then he continued he said you know once wrote a letter and in the letter he quoted a and he didn't make that you can't write three words without so not only make a case said I know for a fact he's not a because he once wrote a letter and he violated something that said and if he violated something said that's a that he's not a so why are we getting so excited about what said well and he says just because somebody doesn't know something that said he means he's not would have tripped up in a he wouldn't understand an Indian he would know. So that makes them not a but this is a me it's a have to know every from the fact didn't know a something said that was a he's not a he said if you wouldn't know then I agree but because he doesn't know something said that means he's not he said he said that we know this is in the or we just said it's on the one hand on the other hand. really really is not it's says who holds he said that if didn't have he didn't know something said that's not he said we're getting excited about besides he says I know FOR A FACT THAT HE DIDN'T KNOW something He's not he was his like his old riot that he's I could then it would be very good. But and is going with the shittita of his rebi who holds >> gavar >> or gavar here. [laughter] Right. Very good.