Chulin 26

Today's stuff is and we are at the Mishnah, the second Mishnah on so is the last stuff of the first paragraph of and as we've seen although the majority of the first paragraph of the dealt with the of or at the very least may at the very end of the paragraph the paragraph digressed and discussed that have nothing to do with the course of the again if you just follow the trail of what exactly happened we were discussing the Mishnah then compared and contrasted with very similar is to what is to once we mentioned the Mishnah discussed the that deals with the the two types of birds and the Mishnah said that if you want to describe the relationship between the and the and the and the and the and the and the and the and the and the and the and with that the Mishnah digressed and went ahead and discussed different completely unrelated to what we're talking about where you find this type of relationship what's here is and what's here is here I think this is very similar to the first paragraph of with the Mishnah discusses in being a division and then it digresses to discuss different things so it's very similar to the things we have a digression regardless in today's the last we're going to have a whole sport of we're going to learn a little bit about the of the we're going to learn about the we're going to learn about we're going to learn about the that a father once upon a time was allowed to sell his daughter as an as as long as she's a we're going to learn about the Kanas of we're going to learn about Meon, we're going to learn about Chalitza, and then we're going to learn a little bit about Havdalah. Regardless, Zok the Mishnah. But before the Mishnah, a little bit of an introduction. And that is, we know that the basic Halacha of Maaser Sheni is that it had to be eaten in Yerushalayim. What happens if somebody has Maaser Sheni, it's going to be impractical for him to make it to Yerushalayim, and by the time he makes it to Yerushalayim, the peros that he has is going to spoil. So, the Torah says there's a plan B, there's an option. You can be podeh the Maaser Sheni, you can transfer the Kedusha from the peros onto the money, and then the money doesn't go bad. When you have an opportunity to go up to Yerushalayim, you'll take that money, and you'll buy food with the money. You'll eat it with Kedusha and Tahara in Yerushalayim. And the Mishnah says that as far as what kind of food you're allowed to buy, it's almost everything. There are very few exceptions. One of the exceptions is water. So, for example, you can buy a beverage of your choice, but Mayim is not considered a qualified food that you'd be able to use to purchase with your Maaser Maaser Sheni. That's the first Halacha. The second Halacha is, we know that a Mikvah, in order for it to be kosher, has to have 40 Sa of Mayim Geshamim. If the water was Mayim She'uvim, it was taken from a well, then the Halacha is it's going to be pasul. What happens if you have a Mikvah that has 40 Sa of Mayim Geshamim, meaning it's a kosher Mikvah, but you added on top of the 40 Sa Mayim She'uvim. So, it depends. If you had the 40 Sa of Mayim Geshamim, and then afterwards you added the Mayim She'uvim, then it's okay. The Mayim She'uvim is always going to be bottle to the kosher Mikvah, it's never going to disqualify the Mikvah. If, however, you had a Mikvah that was chaser, it wasn't 40 Sa, even if it was chaser kartav, it was missing a tiny bit, but it wasn't the full sheer of 40 Sa, and then you go ahead and you add three lugim of Mayim She'uvim, the Halacha is it would pasul the Mikvah. What happens if you would add three lugim of some other beverage such as wine or something else it would have possible to make for. This halacha of gimel lugim mayim shuvin disqualifying the mikvah if it was put into the mikvah before you had the full complement before you had the 40 sa'ah mayim gishumin is only true if it's water. It's not true if it's not water. With that hakdama have temed. In the wine making process after the grapes were pressed so the wine makers would take the pressed grapes they would soak it in water leave it there for an extended period of time. With time the grapes would be nice and plump into the water. Eventually it would ferment and it was used as an inferior grade of wine. Says the Mishnah if somebody has temed he has grapes it's been soaking in water. Achila chimetz if it's been soaking but not long enough for this liquid to actually ferment so the halacha is we look at it as water and as a result eno nikach b'kesef ma'aser you can't use sheni money to buy this temed cuz as we said before you can't use ma'aser sheni money to buy water. U'pasel l'asot mikvah. Additionally it's going to be considered water so that if it's shuvin three lugim of it that go into a mikvah before you had the full 40 sa'ah it's going to make the mikvah pasul. Mishicha once it ferments nikach b'kesef ma'aser then the halacha is that it's considered wine. Being that it's considered wine you can use your ma'aser sheni money to buy it. Additionally eno pasel l'asot mikvah it's not going to disqualify the mikvah because again it's wine it's not water and it's only gimel lugim of mayim shuvin that pasel the mikvah but if it's yayin then you don't have that halacha it's going to pasel the mikvah. Another halacha and before the next halacha again a little bit of an introduction. That is we're all familiar with the mitzvah of machatzis hashekel. Once upon a time when there was a Beis Hamikdash there was an obligation for every yid between the ages of 20 60 women leviim sugiyos in Maseches Shekalim but the point is there was a mitzvah as they write so for a year to give a machatzis hashekel. The money went to the Beis Hamikdash, to the enterprise called the Beis Hamikdash. The purpose of the money was to to finance the carbonos tzibur. A carbon tzibur had to belong to the tzibur. So how do you make sure that every member of the tzibur has a a chelek in the carbonos tzibur? You use the machatzis hashekel that were contributed by every member of the tzibur. As a result, every single carbon we look at as belonging to every single member of the tzibur. Chachamim made a takanah and they said that being that sometimes the silver of the coin that was the half a shekel would erode, there was a chashash that maybe when you're giving your machatzis hashekel you're not actually giving a full machatzis hashekel. That's a mitzvah d'oraisa. You [snorts] have to give machatzis hashekel. If it's a little bit less, you're not yotzei to the mitzvah. So the chachamim made a takanah that you should be moisef a kalbon. Kalbon is a small amount of silver. Add a little bit of silver l'hotzei miliban shel tzedakah. In the event that it's not a full machatzis hashekel, like this you're going to be able to get away with it. Stating that the halacha is that the only time you had to be moisef a kalbon is if you're giving your own machatzis hashekel. But let's say Reuven is giving machatzis hashekel on behalf of Shimon. You're giving it on somebody else's behalf. Then the halacha is you don't have to be moisef a kalbon. So if you're giving it for yourself, you have to be moisef the kalbon. If you're giving it for somebody else, then you don't have to be moisef a kalbon. Next halacha. We're familiar with ma'aser beheima. A series of halachos. It's a gezeiras hakasuv that if you have a partnership, two people they own a business together, and they own cattle, they don't have to give ma'aser beheima. So an individual that owns animals, he has to give ma'aser beheima. But a shutfus does not have to give ma'aser beheima. With that I want to mention achim hashutfin. There were two brothers and they yarshun their father. So the father died, he left over an estate. He left over money, he left over cattle. There was an estate now. So the question is when the brothers go ahead and they are now going to determine whether or not they have to give ma'aser beheima, or whether the brothers are going to determine now you know they want to give ma'aser shakal from the estate. Should they be ma'aser of a carbon, should they not be ma'aser of a carbon? They have a little bit of a question. The question is how do we look at their relationship with the money? Do we look at it as if they are taking their father's money, their father's cattle, and from that they're giving ma'aser shakal, and that they're being mafresh ma'aser beheima, or maybe not. Being that the father died, there's two brothers now yerushas is d'oraisa. Issur goes m'meila. Even a cotton could be a yo'resh m'd'oraisa. You don't have to do a ma'aser kinayan to be a yo'resh. So we look at them as two individuals. So says the mishna really depends. If they went ahead and they actually divided the estate, so now we look at half of the estate belonging to one brother, the other half of the estate looking at the other brother. If they decide that they want to join forces, so it's no different than Reuven and Shimon deciding together that they want to be partners. If however they didn't divide the estate yet, it's what it it it's in what's known by Chazal as the t'fusas ha'bayis, it's still in the estate form, they actually didn't go ahead and divide it, so then we look at it as belonging to the father. So how does it impact halachas? So says the mishna achas achas shutfim k'ish achas b'carbon. In the event that they're going to be chayavin carbon, which would mean that they divided the estate, and as a result when they give ma'aser shakal, they're giving their own thing. Thus they're chayavin carbon because we said in the introduction, you only give carbon if you're giving your own thing. If you're giving somebody else's thing, you don't have to give the carbon. Then p'turim ma'aser beheima. They're going to be part of ma'aser beheima because shutfim part of ma'aser beheima. K'ish achas b'ma'aser beheima. If however they didn't divide it yet, therefore it's looked at as belonging to the father, not them the shutfim. The father is the sole proprietor, he's one person. As a result there is a chiyuv ma'aser beheima. P'turim min a carbon. Then if they give ma'aser shakal, so we look at it as they're giving ma'aser shakal from the father's estate, and as a result they're going to be p'turim min a carbon. Either way, the Gemara from here until the end of the mishna is going to discuss not the safe of the mishna, the ratio of the mission. So, going back to the ratio of the mission, the mission said if you have 10 men, again, what's 10 men? You have grapes that were pressed and soaking in water right now. Once it ferments, it's going to be treated as wine. The question is do you look at it as wine or do you look at it as water? Can I use my mice of shiny money to buy if it's wine I could, if it's water I can't. If I have three lug in my shoe then it goes into a mix for that's casa. Does it pass for the mix for now? If it's water it's going to pass for the mix for now. If it's wine it's not going to pass for the mix for now. What does the mission to say? It depends. What is the determining factor? Was it mix or was it mix? Did it ferment or did it not ferment? If it fermented, if it was mix, so then the mix will look at it as wine. If it was like mix, it did not ferment, then we look at it as water. Who's the kind of our mission? Well, who that first glance will be who though will be who though. It would seem to be not who though or it's not the mission of this mix. If somebody was making 10 men and he was soaking these grapes in water, he wanted to make this 10 men. The [snorts] master mind of what he did was he measured very precisely how much water he had in his mixture. So, he had a gallon of water and now he adds grapes. Once he comes back three days later and he found there's still a gallon. So, the kind of the mission to say potter. The kind of to be true mix of this from this mixture because obviously all you have is water. Because if you had more than water then the volume of the liquid would have gone up a little bit. You started with a gallon. Now you fight to have a gallon. What does that mean? That means there's nothing inside it. Nothing with mix. Even if there's time, but it's time there's no mix inside and as a result there'd be no obligation to be true mix of this. You would have to do this now. I don't care. As long as it's been soaking inside, that would be enough to be another mission over here. With the mission seems to be saying that if you look at 10 men and you want to know is it wine or is it water? The mission of this is discussing with regards to the obligation to be matters to my mind what does it depend on so according to sounds like you're always going to be high that says even if you didn't increase the volume of the liquid you're going to be high according to the depends if you increase the volume of the liquid then we look at it as wine otherwise if it's the same you found it exactly the way you left it nothing changed then you're going to be partner another words we have a determining factor of how do you know whether it's water or wine but it's not the same determining factor as we had in the mission. What is it it's two sheets according to the government you have to measure it according to the it's always going to be viewed as wine as money who is the time of our mission is it is the I forgot the mission said that it's we look at it as one that's actually if it was and the volume remained the same we're going to look at it as water and here and if it's even if it didn't ferment should be that it should be treated as wine meaning our mission makes it totally in the mission. Why in the mission is this two sheets according to one sheet it's always wine and according to the other sheet it depends on the volume so who is the time of our mission is it you have to say that the and the and that mission mission is discussing that where it was and it's only when it was that [snorts] there's even a discussion amongst the whether we should look at it as one or not one what's the according to the if it's the same volume even if it was we look at it as water and according to the as long as it was the I don't care what happened I don't care what the volume is it doesn't interest me the bottom line is as long as it was the we're going to look at it as one the time of our mission is according to the if it's it's always looked at as one and that is the sheet of the mission as long as it's says the mission is and the time of our mission is the mission of the mission of the mission if somebody bought with my second and at the time that he bought it it was not yet Hametz. It was Hametz. And then he has this Hametz sitting in his house and eventually it was Hametz. So the Halacha is kind of nice. I mean even though initially when he bought it it was like Hametz. And based on the Halacha in the Mishna, you're not allowed to buy Hametz that was like Hametz with my second money. But if it was like Hametz, so then like Hametz the transfer of Kedusha from the money onto the Hametz goes into effect. My timer, what's the reason? It's like Hametz already at the period. The Mishna says a lot of this. The lot of this is that we look at it as says Rashi the Hametz already. We look at it as if like at the time that the person bought it it was already wine. The Hametz already wine. It was already wine. It just wasn't wine yet. The wine already. And we look at it as a regular wine. The bottom line is that even though at the time that you bought it it wasn't maybe wine yet. But if it later becomes wine it's like Hametz already at the period that it was wine at the time that you bought it. Says the Gemara already. It's in the Mishna already. It's in the Mishna already. I don't understand the Mishna already. What did the Mishna say? The Mishna says you're not allowed to buy Hametz [snorts] actually Hametz with my second money. And in the Mishna it's like what would be if you bought What would be if you actually bought Hametz like Hametz with your my second money? It sounds like the Kedusha wouldn't transfer. You don't have to worry about the Hametz. There's no Kedusha. Right? If you can't buy it with your my second money, then that means there's implications on the Kedusha level. It means that the Kedusha doesn't transfer from the money onto the What happens when you buy the my second money? So the Kedusha goes from the period my second money onto the money. When you then buy something with the my second money, the Kedusha transfers again. It transfers now from the money onto the thing that you're buying. If the Mishna says that Hametz is not wine with my second money actually Hametz, it sounds like the Kedusha doesn't transfer. Right? The Gemara, how could you just go ahead unequivocally state that there's no Kedusha? Maybe if you're going to let it sit around do my second money have Hametz. Maybe it would become Maybe it would ferment later. It's like my second money already. That you can just assume that it's never going to be means we're never ferment or never fermented and you don't have the glory of the Muslim that at the time they would have already won. Rabbi Ben which who's this so it's from the beginning of this family time we don't know good to be honest so we said before that mikvah in order for it to be kosher has to have 40 saw of May shalom. What happens if you had 40 saw of May shalom and then my falls into the mikvah doesn't matter. What happens if you had a mikvah that didn't have the full 40 saw of May shalom and then my fell in it's a problem. When is it a problem if three of my would fall into that mikvah it would be interesting to mention discusses where you had a mikvah that was kosher. You also had three of my that was kosher. Then a little bit of wine fell into the of my and my reacts. So now you have three and it looks like wine enough for the mikvah and it fell into a mikvah that was kosher it didn't have the 40 saw so it doesn't make the mikvah why cuz in order for the mikvah to be three of my you don't have three of my you [snorts] have three kosher the has shalom of it was with the with my the same exact case where again you have a mikvah that's kosher and now you have three of my that's kosher and a little bit of not wine falls into the three but a little bit of milk falls into it. What's the difference between wine and milk? When wine falls into the mixture it doesn't look like water anymore. Now it looks like wine. If milk falls into it it's going to look like water. It will then fall into the mikvah it doesn't make it possible [snorts] again because even though it looks like water it's not water. It's mostly water, a little bit of milk. The halacha is it has to be three lug of my I disagree. Meaning it depends. In the first case where it looks like wine, it's not going to pass. But in the second case where it looks like water, even though it's not 100% water, it's only mostly water, but being that at the end of the day the entire mixture looks like water, because it's all of that was mashlim. Over there the halacha is it is going to pass all the mixtures. It says to you What do you see from this as in that when you want to determine what something is, it's not enough to look at what it is chemically, physically. You also have to take the appearance of it into consideration. Thus, if you have which and you add milk where the mixture still looks like water and we treat it like water. We're going to look at we're going to look at what this mixture looks like. The time of my meaning if you would buy my sir, if you would buy with your money and then later would be at the time that it's later, it's it's a but until the time that it's at this moment right now, we still look at it as water. The reason we still look at it as water because right now right now it looks like water and if right now it looks like water according to the mission is going according to that's why the mission says that we look at what it looks like at that state. I don't care what happens later. Meaning according to the that argue with there's a concept of but the mission is going according to and that's why the mission doesn't care about what was because even if it was but at the end of the day the it still looked like water and if it looked like water, has to treat it like water regardless of what Nachman said to explain our mission. we started off with money masis. The mission says that it's temed wine or is it temed water? It depends if it was >> [laughter] >> Then we come over to mission masakis ma'aseros that had two shitas. According to one shita, it depends on the mida, you have to measure it. According to the other shita, no, temed is always treated as wine. The more so money masis, what did Rav Nachman say? The mission is going according to Rav Yehuda. Rav Yehuda only said his halacha that temed is treated like wine when it was that that Rav Nachman said is according to Rav Elozar. Then Rav Elozar you have Rav Elozar said that everybody agrees, meaning Rav Yehuda and the mission in that mission masakis ma'aseros >> [snorts] >> who argue whether or not you could be truma and ma'aser from this temed where who is matza kedei mida say the volume of the mixture didn't change. Could you be or are you obligated to be Rav Yehuda said that. But even Rav Yehuda said Rav Elozar only said his halacha with regards to being ma'aser minei ubei from the temed itself. But he agreed that you can't be minei ubei it fermented. Why? Because Rav Yehuda holds that really it's even Rav Yehuda only said his halacha minei ubei. And even Rav Yehuda only said his halacha minei ubei. And even Rav Yehuda only said his halacha minei ubei. And the reason is Rav Yehuda when Rav Yehuda even Rav Yehuda had said that there's a to be truma and ma'aser, he only said minei ubei truma and ma'aser because being that it was yet, so he was afraid maybe you won't be and as a result maybe you'll be also that you won't really truma and ma'aser. So he said minei ubei to be that you do because if it's going to be so you will and if it's not going to be so then you never had an obligation to be but if you want to use this temed to be from truma and ma'aser or something else that you can't do because what happens if this is going to be and then it's going to come out that you will but not because it was and never became but what do you see from Rav Elozar? All we need is one piece of Elozar. the clearly understood the Rabbi >> [snorts] >> and the even cuz he said that when said is a below that there's an ending to give to my stress on this time that he only said cuz otherwise you're running into bottom line is you see that he held not like said from statement it is clear that he held the water like one more on this no machine it is a lot of water becomes there's a special that you can be retired the water by taking the water and touching a big so if you take the water you do what's called you make contact with a that's enough but if you have some other liquid like wine or something else then you wouldn't be able to do it so it's that by water not by something else so the same time it we've been discussing do we look at it as water do we look at it as wine could I buy my honey could I use my honey to with it again is it water or is it wine it's three of it of mine that's a possible depends if you look at it as water or wine do I have to be true miss from it again depends is it water or wine now you have a fourth can I be the with or not so it's a actually it's like our mission until it fermented cuz you look at it as water once it ferments and I shake it you cannot do on my something like I wish you come to my house the Robert said okay Robert said that the only time it's true that actually you [snorts] could go ahead and you could do a that's only if the camera was then it became meaning it was in a state of it became I will but let's say it started off the water was then you mixed it together with the grapes then it became even if it was like if you want to go ahead now be you can't do that. Give me big souls. He heard what said. He told and he asked cash. He said what's the reason that if the water was tamid then it became tamid. It was the is that it's a problem that you can't do even though it was yet and treats it as water. Presumably the because you're worried that I did the year shot me or coffee you're just worried that it says that the water may have sunk to the bottom. Sunk to the bottom when you do the it could be it's the part that's making the contact with the mikvah. It's not the part that's making the contact with the mikvah. And that is not working for the water. He but give me big soul said if that's the case what's the difference if it was first or later doesn't change. Affects on a spiritual level but it doesn't affect it on a physical level. You must be you have to say it all gets to mish. It all becomes one big bill ball. So here to which will be a bill ball and the say where responded but regardless this concludes the first part of the fight. That the Torah says that a father has a right to sell his daughter but only while she is a once she becomes a once she turns 12 years old certainly if she is a she is older than 12 that is he is not allowed to sell her anymore. Another a that is or someone is or a the Torah says you have to give a and the goes to the father. Says the any girl that's of age that the father could sell her she is that means that she's too old for the for the she's too young for that to be and if this is not going to be what's the reason because you could sell her and you get for a so if she's the age of that means by definition she's a if she's an age of that means she's an that means the father can sell her even though it sounds very simple but the truth is it's really a you have to trust this that I say that even a who has also has this is mentioned actually says but it's really the first of all it's right in the beginning of the year has which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have which means that there's going to be in other words the is she does not have Okay, yes but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you [snorts] mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean right now but I don't know what you mean so you mean walking she yesh and me. So what's me on? If a girl gets married mid rabon. So you know mid riso a father could sell his daughter. That was the previous mission. A father also has a right to marry his daughter off as a team a father could be condition on behalf of his daughter that's mid riso but only the father could do it. What about a brother a mother one of the other relatives? They don't have the right to do that. Today we need to come and said that just like mid riso the father could be a daughter. The brothers mother the shower could be condition a girl condition but being that condition is only there's a tremendous cooler and that is the what happens if this girl decides one day she's not interested in staying married to this man anymore. She could walk away from the marriage. On a day riso marriage the only way to terminate it is if the husband gives a get. But being that this condition is only condition so the law says she could be my mind she could decide she's not interested in being married anymore. It's what's known as me on and me on gives her right to walk away. Khalisa we know it. Says the mission call me she yesh me on if the girl could do me on that means she's a katana cuz only a katana could be me mine which means in khalisa cuz a katana can't do khalisa. We have she yesh khalisa she could do khalisa which by definition means she's already and then so she's too old already to do me. I will say yesh me on and walk in khalisa. The Tanya who's this? The mayor surprise I must have run out of time I think a girl do me on I should probably stay silent until she makes two sides the mayor the mayor said no that even after she already becomes until the shower is the love one it's a later age until that point she still has the right to do me. Meaning the mission that says that only a katana could do me on is what the mayor but the mayor argues argues and argues Huda holds that even a good luck at home young there is a maximum age, but it's older than it's not true that she is married in the incidentally another thing you see in the mission is that a cannot do that's also a mayor so a mayor message is of course where the mayor sheet is that cannot do how we do can do so the message is the mayor on the first part of the mission as it relates to me and that only a could do me and I could do cannot do me do the mayor the truth is the second part of the mission I think is also I am sure you will miss that only that holds that cannot do according to a kind of either way the mission of writer call say yes to Kia and have dollar the mission of have dollar and so what exactly are these years So again a little bit of background and the background is a good morning and a pair of leaking it's obvious that the flame of a base tone around so once upon a time there was a minute that Shabbos as Shabbos was coming there was someone that was set aside in every Kahila he would blow shofar so that the oil would know that Shabbos is coming and the message is there was six years that this guy would blow in Shabbos Shabbos the first one was the half to tell me what you thought the first one was the people that were far away they were working in the field they had to hear this here they should know it's time to start coming into the city the second one was the half to hear people that were living in the cities the people that had stores the they should know to close their stores the third one was the son of to know that it's time to time to light the very good with the third one was once upon a time everybody would wear all that so you need to take it all so the third one was to give you enough time to take your film. The Shulchan Aruch says that cotton or then the kid would wait a little bit. How much time to make final preparations for Shabbos? The say that you see from this Gemara that the time to light the ner isn't momish right before Shabbos. It's supposed to be enough time where you can even make some preparations before. Right, 18 minutes. But you see even more than that. You see that you look allowed to make preparations after you light them and then the Rush says you see from here that when a woman lights candles Friday night, the men still light it in the morning. Because after the missioner says, the third tekiah, what was the purpose of the third tekiah? It was like a ner. It was so that the ladies should go light candles and then they would wait for the second cotton. Or you could pass the time and then we'll take care of Maria with the tekiah true. It's given Shabbos. Anyway, that was the halacha. Our mission discusses what happens when Yom Tov and Shabbos fall out Smuchin Zman Zeh so Yom Tov falls out on a Friday or Yom Tov falls out on a Sunday. So, if Yom Tov falls out on a Friday, that's poshit that they would blow shofar on Thursday. Just like they blew shofar before Shabbos, they blew shofar before Yom Tov. It's the same thing. You can't do melacha on Yom Tov just like you can't do melacha on Shabbos. The question is did they blow shofar on Yom Tov before Shabbos was coming? Because Shabbos is more chomer than Yom Tov. On Yom Tov you're allowed to do melacha nefesh and on Shabbos you're not allowed to do melacha nefesh. So, the question is was this shofar on Yom Tov when Yom Tov is Erev Shabbos? Again, it's Friday afternoon, it's Yom Tov. It's Shavuos. Now Shabbos is is coming. So, the question is on Shavuos itself are they going to blow shofar or not? So, the missioner says that she took here in the missioner of the missioner explains something that Erev Shabbos Yom Tov that falls out on Erev Shabbos they can they would blow shofar. And why would they blow shofar? So, Rashi because Shabbos is more humra than Yom Tov. Because on Shabbos, you're not allowed to do melacha tzorech hanefesh. On Yom Tov, you're allowed to do melacha tzorech hanefesh. >> [cough] >> So, even though they don't have to blow shofar, we'll see it wasn't six kids. You don't have to blow shofar to get people to come in from the fields, cuz nobody's working on the field. It's Yom Tov anyways. But at the same time, you still need this separation between Yom Tov and Shabbos cuz on Yom Tov, you're allowed to do melacha tzorech hanefesh, and on Shabbos, you're not allowed to do melacha tzorech hanefesh. At the same time, v'lo yima'avdilu, but there's no havdalah. Right? You don't make havdalah when you go from Yom Tov to Shabbos, even though you're going from kedusha to kedusha. One is kedushas Yom Tov, the other one is kedushas Shabbos, but there's no havdalah between them. Motzei Shabbos, what happens if Yom Tov falls out on a Sunday? So, then you already ma'avdilu and there is havdalah. Right? You make havdalah on Motzei Shabbos, even though you're going from Right? When you make kiddush, Yom Tov night, Motzei Shabbos, you make havdalah. But at the same time, v'lo yitaken. But on Shabbos, you didn't blow shofar, even though it was Erev Yom Tov. Kitzad ma'avdilu? What was the nusach havdalah? What are you supposed to do when you make havdalah going from Shabbos to Yom Tov? Hamavdil bein kodesh says bein kodesh chomer l'kodesh kal. You're supposed to emphasize the fact that Yom Tov is not as kodesh as Shabbos. Thus, you don't just say hamavdil bein kodesh l'kodesh cuz that would seem to equate the two levels of kedusha. No, it's two two different levels. Thus, he's supposed to say bein kodesh chomer l'kodesh kal. Says Rav Yechiya Teitelbaum. When you blow shofar on Yom Tov, which is also Erev Shabbos, so that the oilam should know normal melacha tzorech hanefesh. How exactly did they blow shofar? Meaning, it was understood that you didn't follow exactly what the Gemara says in Shabbos daf lamed aleph beis. A shinui you were supposed to do. What was the shinui? Amar Rav Yehuda said, tekiya umoriah umitachas ke'il. What he would do is, the mouth of the ke'il would blow a tekia and a teruah, and the teruah would come from the ke'il. Like we have a shvarim teruah, it's a shvarim and a teruah one after the other. So, it would be a tekia teruah, but instead of pausing between the tekia and the t'ruah, it would be a t'kiah t'ruah. It says the Gemara, R' Assi and R' Nachman say t'kiah u'maria. Very, very similar, but one difference. Ben Ish Chima Achas. Meaning, whereas R' Yehudah said that he didn't even pause between the t'kiah and the t'ruah, R' Assi says he would pause between the t'kiah and the t'ruah. He would pause, but at the same time, despite the fact that he was pausing, he had to be cognizant of making sure that he didn't breathe. Pause, yeah. Breathe no. The point is, it was Ben Ish Chima Achas. Iskin R' Assi b'chutzo k'shmaite. R' Assi, by the way, paskened l'halacha l'maaseh chutzo, to do it his way. Maaseh v'eiden kashya d'chulius. B'eish Shabbos, t'kiah u'maria. You're supposed to blow a t'kiah, you're not supposed to blow a t'ruah. May love remain clouds. Sounds like not like any amira. R' Yehudah said do it my way, R' Assi said do it his way. Here you have a braisa that says there was no t'ruah. According to both shitos of the amira'im, there was a t'ruah. Says the Gemara, R' Yehudah b'daas R' Tanchuma, R' Assi b'daas R' Tanchuma. R' Yehudah b'daas R' Tanchuma, l'ei maria'in. What doesn't mean don't blow a t'ruah at all. Rather, what it means is b'fi atzmo, don't blow a set of a stand-alone t'ruah. Ela u'mei t'kiah. It should come from the t'kiah. R' Assi b'daas R' Tanchuma, l'ei maria'in b'shtei n'shimos, ela b'nishima achas. Motzei Shabbos, amantza Shabbos. So, there was no t'kiah. Right, you don't blow a t'kiah from Shabbos Yom Tov. But at the same time, you do you make Havdalah. The Mishna said, Keitzad mavdil? What was the nusach? You're not going to say amavdil bein kodesh l'chol at the end of the Havdalah. Of course, it's not You're not going from kodesh l'chol. You're going from kodesh l'kodesh. So, the question is, what's the nusach? So, the Mishna said two shitos. Amavdil bein kodesh l'kodesh. R' Doisa said bein kodesh l'chomer u'kodesh l'chal. Says the Gemara, heichal. Where Where are you supposed to add those words? Bein kodesh l'chomer u'kodesh l'chal u'bein kodesh l'kodesh. Amar lo amar R' Yehudah. So, R' Yehudah said b'chasima. It's at the end. When you say amavdil bein kodesh l'chol. No, not amavdil bein kodesh l'chol. Bein kodesh l'kodesh u'kodesh l'chomer u'kodesh l'chal. K'ein Nachum b'chasima. Sheish b'yom ha'zeh u'yom ha'ba. Af b'psicha. Even when you're going through the psicha, amavdil bein kodesh l'chomer u'bein kodesh l'chal. even here you don't say you insert if you have to fall down on a Tuesday and you making up you should say and then you say all these have dollars my timer say to remind even though for example the doesn't seem appropriate that makes sense when you making up but you making up the real have dollar is being but once we mention one have dollar like we do even on we throw in all the have dollars said that this is not just true but my you also have the whole list of have dollars even despite the fact that we're not being been but rather what we're being is being and on that note I call the >> [laughter] >> ended on a very different note that it started we started we ended up talking about so just to pick from all the that we learned speak a little bit of rain on the last mission so the last mission was predicated on a bit of this that says once upon a time when lived in the total so there was about [snorts] to care whose job was every Shabbos he had to blow it [snorts] was a true true true true true seem to serve a purpose but the general purpose of what was being done was was that the should know that it's it's time to get ready for Shabbos how you know it's Shabbos you working in the field so I mean that's clocks watches phones, so how is he going to know what time it is? So, this dude was a mooner, his job was to to blow shofar, and it was through the shofar that the moon that it was time to make shabbos. This is brought down to shulchan aruch. It's in hilchos shabbos. It's in siman nun vov. Says the shulchan aruch when the yidden were shulchan, the good old days, how you take shabbos kiyos. They would blow six kiyos on erev shabbos kiyos. havdala melacha. Says the rama, the minhag b'kehilas hakodesh that the minhag still is in the kehilas hakodesh shabbos kiyos if you're within a half hour an hour of shabbos shabbos shabbos there's a shabbos there's someone who's appointed this is his job shabbos he goes and he makes a ram call that the should know that it's time to prepare for shabbos. But who had kiyos be a man and this is in lieu of what once upon a time with the kiyos as mentioned in shabbos and then the rama concludes the minhag makom. I've seen this minhag in the kehilas hakodesh but the truth is he says it's appropriate for every single kehila to take upon this minhag that there should be someone whose job it's going to be to go and to be to so that they should get ready for shabbos. The mishna brura elaborates on this. The mishna brura says as follows kehilas hakodesh in the very very large kehila very difficult to have one person who's going to blow shofar so loud or he's going to start knocking on everybody's doors. It's just it's just it's not practical. Says the mishna brura anashim hamisnadvin lelech zariz he says you should try to get a group of people there's one person not going to do this job and he should start running through the streets. Al das kiyos to make sure that the stores are closed. And to make sure that the women light neros and to make sure that the women light neros. Okay, says the chofetz chaim, nowadays came to come as a yoresh kiyos they were actually said the how many years what was the function of this to make sure that the keeps Shabbos. Says the give them a brocha. So brocha from the and they'll be for this in the what's the brocha He says that in the of them being eating this Kadusha. He says I give I wish them all that they're going to be bottom Israel. So why bottom Israel? The elaborates a little bit. Says the Chofetz Chaim that I'm basing this really on two memory chaza. The first is well known, the second not so well known. Says the Chofetz Chaim that you see from here that if somebody is careful as of the means the Shabbos You see it's a school My son who for himself If somebody is other people for sure it's a school with that bottom of the column. But he says I have another and that is Elkanah. Elkanah as in his husband as in his father. I am He used to get other people to also come be regular. You wanted to be Israel We He also be manageable. Right, we so much about what Hannah did to merit have a son and that like that is allowed to be a modern broach. Right, with all the rate and the lump this and that good. Right, how many rushes from behind the pulpit were given on what Hannah did to merit have a son Shmuel. But Elkanah also had a son, right? So what did Elkanah do? He was the father. Say this is the rest of the story. That when Elkanah used to go beyond the regular, he used to be people. So he says you see that if someone is a school to have a son that's a godel. She was to Shmuel. So it says the that we talked away, right? Says the that between the two things I can make it possible. That if you see that when it comes to her regular manner having a regular and when it it comes to be a regular Elkanah was to have a son Shmuel who was a godel because he was a regular so if you are people in regular these says the this is where I'm coming from. He gives them a asher. Welcome. He had a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular [laughter] manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular brings the shame that in the Shabbos. It's a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular says the regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular >> [snorts] >> the regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having a regular manner of having has also that the rabble banner have a bundle of I'll tell you a nice smart moment that I found. And that is that this idea of a rabble banner have a bundle of specifically that a woman should die when she likes candles Friday night cuz it's a founded in the it's it's in parshas Yisro. But if you take a look at back here and you can show me as up he seems to say it a little bit differently. The context is a well-known part of the mission Allah by the way cuz I'm a busy person I get to live in Israel. Says back here cuz I'll say the Jacob in the nation. So why we talking to the nation and why are the nation mentioned first? Cuz I'm a busy person first talk to the women that is the nation and only afterwards the the base Israel says the rabbinic behind but so he should have to he see the Torah that a woman plays a bigger role in her children growing up and waxing nice to be a miracle than a father does. She he has been all this magic cuz she can talk her son into going to Shiva. The reason she is simply just practical she's home more. The human soul of not just that but she has that kind of nation of money become a minute ago in the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation of the nation do it more than the man? It's because this is her thing. Because this is she's more of a she actually has more control over the outcome of her children. We want her to be the one that's going to do it. And her feeling should be now why when she lights candles says because when a person does a mitzvah it's a nice and it's a nice that he can into a sham and a sham's going to answer his okay has a better chance of being answered because and then throws it or by the way there's a connection between and between but it's it's an add-on that's not the punchline. You're not the punchline says he is because when a person does a mitzvah it's a tremendous it's it's a nice that his feeling can be more answered. It happens to be that lighting candles Friday night is a school of that's a mitzvah that the woman does. We want the woman to and it's because it's her so she's really the one that's supposed to be saying this feeling but the point is the point is it's not the school of so much of this is actually a lesson that's more much more and that is when a person does a mitzvah the man does a mitzvah that that's coming that's not an easy mitzvah for him to do. It's it's a nice and it's a time that a person has a right to stop and be okay feeling because by the way it happens to be a school of so regardless the says brings it in and that's of course the it's the minute you stroll that a woman davens at the when she lights candles Friday night that she should be what's the source for it? The source for it is is based on the message of Shabbos where the says having that's what the mission will bring. But this already has the shining. The is the fire and adds two beautiful things. He says number one, the reason the woman is the one that says this feeling and not the man is because first the afterwards. And the reason is issue had to he see the Torah. The good the good wife She's the one that has more of a on the outcome of her children even more so than her husband does. And why at the time of lighting candles? Of course it's because candles are related. But that's on the school level. On a more practical level because when a person does a mitzvah, it's a tremendous for a person's to be answered.