Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Okay, good morning everyone of Shabis.
Welcome to the Shirum on Parasy.
Today's Shirim are dedicated by Mrs.
Judy Gautib
in honor of the yard site of her husband
Ben Nyak
whose yard site is the Shabas
for his whole family.
Okay, we're continuing on in our series
that we started last week. We have this
temporary name. We'll see if it holds
no of the theme identifying the theme of
parasyak.
Now
let's begin in the following way. First
of all, I could take you to today's
check out um the email. If you're not
subscribed, you could subscribe to our
email. Go to our site rabidgi.com and
subscribe.
And I'm going to take out I'm going to
show you the mar here. Okay. And we're
going to offer another theme for
boracious and this will help us
understand the theme of nyak. As we
mentioned, this is somewhat of a
courageous
attempt. We don't find early sources
that there is specifically a theme for a
para.
However, it's mostly predicated on the
uh on common sense that everything in
order for it to be considered an entity
has to have something that ties it
together. So, what is the theme of
parasy?
Again, to say the theme is the mul would
definitely be shortsighted and
inaccurate since the m does not occupy
even the majority of the para. So what
is the theme of paras?
Last week we offered three uh
possibilities.
We explained that the theme of boracious
is
either it re it's a uh
recounting Hashem's patience with
mankind on three different occasions
whether it's the sadas k or he and then
at the end of boracious the deno
we we offered that the theme of
boracious is that it's uh establishing
the creation of man. It speaks about the
boracious is the uh the creation of man
as the para begins with um of
and it talks about the philosophy that
cayenne and he held of man and
ultimately of what she held of man and
this week we're offering uh another
approach to bacius the theme of
boracious and this will help us
understand noyak
The theme of paras is
it speaks about the beginning. Exactly
what the name of the para is. The theme
of boracious is the beginning. So
question then what defines the
beginning? Why would the beginning speak
about 10 generations of world history?
How does that make the beginning? What?
How do how is the first generation first
10 generations of world history together
described as the beginning? Well, the
answer is
let's let's clarify. It is the first
attempt of the creation of the world and
then Hashem said this is not working.
This is not going to uh this is not
going to work. Therefore
the um the
paras is madura alf of bria. It was the
first attempt of the creation of the
world like it says in.
So now we come to parak and we have two
possibilities.
Possibility number one is based on the
safer dakashem.
In the darashemal
teaches that after the sin of Adam
Marishine
mankind plummeted to a substandard
level. Mankind was degraded and
descended to a level dramatically lower
than the way Hashem created man. Now,
Hashem wanted to give man the
opportunity
to elevate itself
that one day it could revert back to the
level of Marishan before the and Hashem
gave a timetable,
a juncture of time that man would be
able to raise itself up so that anyone
could come along and render themselves
eligible that they and their children
forever and ever have that opportunity
to revert back to the level of before
the the Ramal calls this the period of
roots
after which time all the descendants
would be an branches.
Now the opening, the juncture of time
that Hashem gave that there could rise a
man or a family that from him would
ultimately lead to a period of time uh
that from him would lead to descendants
that have the opportunity to raise
themselves up to the level.
That time frame was shine until the
dhaaga at which point the gates were
closed, the doors were slammed shut and
never again can anyone raise themselves
up to rectify the sin of Adamish.
And the Ram says that nobody stood up,
nobody rose to the plate, nobody
actually rendered themselves eligible.
That he should be the progenitor of a
nation that has the opportunity to
elevate themselves to rectify the sin of
other that is with one exception.
Abrahamu
Abrau became the shy from which his
descendants could rectify the sin of
Misha. Nobody else. Meaning if somebody
today from any other nation would want
to say, you know what, I would also like
to rectify the sin of other I also want
to go on the pack path of rectifying
other Marishine.
They're ineligible. The only thing they
could do is they could be ma themselves.
They could graft themselves onto the
great tree that is Marishia uh that is
Abrahamu.
So basically in the aftermath of the mul
parasyak
is take two madura
of the creation of man and this second
creation of man. In other words, if you
want to know what is paras,
it was it begins so to speak
and there is one guy so to speak in a
ganed called the tva and this is the
second opportunity for someone to arise
to be the man who hashem intended that
Adam should be and then the gates were
shut closed
When Abrau
stood up, the gates were closed forever.
Paras, you want to know what the subject
of paras was the second opportunity
given to man to reach the level that
Hashem intended man to reach when he
created. So bacious is take one on the
creation of man. Noak is take two. With
the end of parasyak, it was forever
closed. In other words, it was forever
closed. the gates of becoming eligible
to rectify the sin of other marish. So
parasy is take two of the creation of
man. It ended with the da
that is one approach to paras.
Here's another approach another theme
that runs throughout the para and it's
based on the malbum.
The mumm has an amazing observation and
it's an observation that really runs
throughout the entire parasy
and it goes like this.
The mam is troubled.
It says the word four times. How many
times does it have to say
also? Why does it have to say that had
three children? We know he had three
children. It says it at the end of
batious
says the malim.
Everything in this world produces
fruits.
Everything in this world has pays.
Man is comprised of three main
components. His nama,
his g and that which ties the two
together.
The nama needs to produce fruits. Those
are
intellectual realizations and an
awareness of Hashem's presence. The body
needs to produce fruits. Biological
children. And the nephesh which ties the
body and the soul together also needs to
contribute to society.
A told these are the children of Nyak.
Noak. All three of his components had
children.
He was a man of righteousness.
He conducted his affairs with
righteousness and justness and therefore
his nephesh produced fruits to society.
Then
soul produced
fruits. Namely, he lived with an
awareness of Hashem. He lived with fear
of Hashem. He lived with recognition of
Hashem.
And
finally, Nyak's body also produced
fruits.
So the reason why the Torah delineates
Nyak's children, even though it already
mentioned it at the end of BC, is for a
very simple reason here. It's indicating
that all three aspects of Nyak produce
fruits. This theme continues throughout
the par the para because then the theim
delineate that the world was corrupt but
it says three times. It says
it says
and then it says
and the malam continues to explain
their
fruits of their soul was corrupt.
They did not devote themselves to
studying Hashem's reality in the world.
That's the attachment of the body and
the soul. And then
that's they were corrupt in their the
fruits of their physical entity.
And then the para continues that when
nyak came out of the table, it again
mentions the three children of Nyak
and it mentions them by name and it says
and
it says
and why does it have to sayan? Everybody
knows is a father ofan. So again the
Malam says that when Noah's three
children came out of the TVA each child
separated and focused on their
particular arena of focus. Shame focused
on muscolas
spiritual endeavors and his descendants
went in that path until it led to Abrau.
Yes's
descendants focuses on what Yees
specialized in namely Inyan Hamadini
community society and then
focused on the body and look where that
led him. It led him to be so immersed in
physicality that he actually violated
and abused his own father. I wanted to
add to the malab that the story of the
mikdal babel continues
this
uh this understanding of the different
types of children you could have into
the world. We know the family of yeas
was focused on contributing to society
at large.
But that's very dangerous. The ambition
of focus of the on the society as
opposed to one's own spiritual pursuit.
The danger is it could lead you to have
political ambition, ambition of grand.
And it led them to want to create a
universal sovereignty. It created them.
It it led them to create the mdal.
And this was a result of the fact that
the tlda of nyak nephesh was taken by
yees and it was guided specifically to
focus on the inion of the nephesh which
is society and look where it led them.
So this is a common theme throughout the
para the so I would say in two words if
you wanted to know what is the theme of
parasyak this second mahalak is
no's children there are three kinds of
children they have to be the focus needs
to be on spiritual pursuit there has to
be contribution to society also one has
to have biological children but each
area has to be focused on with the
correct balance okay and then one more
idea
of the theme of paras. In other words,
what what gives it its specific entity?
Very simple. Parasy
is day two of creation.
What does that mean? Paras is day two of
creation.
The Gumar Des says the first 2,000 years
of world history areu
the next 2,000 years are are
2,000 years of Tyra. The next 2,000
years are Mashiach. So from the
beginning of the world until
until Abrainu
who was Mak Hashem in the year 1996.
It was the it was
the world was toyuvo. But actually the
Ramban in last week's parish explained
that the first 2,000 years of toyo could
be categorized as the first thousand
years and the second thousand years. The
first thousand years although there was
no one who disseminated Tyra but it
wasn't complete emptiness because the
first a thousand years corresponds to
and that corresponds to the creation of
Adam and at least in the times of Adam
was hashem and Adam was not
so the first a thousand years which are
not discussed in par
were the light of the
second 2000 thousand years beginning in
the year
of the flood
come which was 1656
going until
we'll call it Arau
those thousand years these are
it was the the second day of creation
was misho
It was the years of the flood. It
corresponds to the second day of
creation where Hashem did not say
it was full of water. It was full of
flooding. It was full of mdala. In other
words, parasy is really the second
20,000 years of creation, which was the
second day of creation. That's in a way
what was thematic to paras. It was the
there was no
Okay, these are three possible
for
um the theme of paras
again number one take two of the
opportunity for man and giving man one
last opening to rectify the sin of the
marishine or It's the subject of is
the progeny of all aspects of or it's
day two. It's what day two of creation
brought to the world. Okay. And we'll
hold it here.