Bechoros 35

You probably know Ribsilli Bournestein from the DAFF. Now Ribbsi brings his signature depth, clarity, and energy to Kamisha Torah. Don't just learn Kumish, experience it like never before. Just click the banner or find it under their category on the Lakewood Dafomi app or on whatever platform you're listening from right now. Today's is and we are at the Mishna four lines from the top of so the topic is had it be given to a had to take it to the bd bring it as a carb if it developed a that was deemed either by a shiml or by a that's a then is that the can't put it on the he gets to keep it and he can eat it as but we saw a very important in the and that was that the only time aar that develops a becomes is if it developed a on its own if however the would on his own give it a then the is he wouldn't be able to shed how long will this is apply is either way the gar continues on that note of how an can develop a yet will not be what it usually is and that is that a is there was a story there was an old ram it had very long hair [snorts] and a Roman officer seized this old ram say he went to the and he said why is this so old. How come no one cut it here? Looks a little lot they told him it's a and is we don't have a now we can't take the and bring it as a carbon. As a result, what we need to do is wait for it to develop and it's only once it develops that it's never developed. It was never and it's for that reason we can't check it. We also can't even cut it here. is in is giza. So when the Roman officer heard this knocked out, he took his spear and he hurt its ear gave it and it then had a the story came to the and said that it's okay to go ahead now and to eat this animal meaning now it had a and being that it had a now it was going to be okay after the Roman officer heard that what he had done allowed the Jews to be able to eat this animal. So he started going around finding that people were waiting for them to develop a mum. He gave them they went went to the same and said is it okay for me to eat this and said that it's not going to be okay meaning the first one they were m but after that they weren't mid anymore a similar story there were children that were playing in the field and they tied the tails of sheep to each other and one of these sheep their tail came off that's And it turned out that it was a [snorts] and the story came to the and were mim said that it's okay to treat this as a when the children saw that they were mum. So the kids said wow this is good look at what we were able to accomplish. We were playing in the field and now these suddenly became so they went and they did this with other animals. Those already said is not going to be okay. What's the difference? So you have two stories similar stories. In the first case there was a Roman officer who went and gave the owner of the went to he asked him is it okay for me now to treat this animal as if it's a he said yeah. So he the Roman officer saw that the yid was allowed to now eat this because of what he had done. So he did it over and over and over again. Then the said no that already is not going to be okay. The second story was there were children that were playing with sheep. Turned out one of them was accidentally the tail snapped off which is considered a said that it's okay not to treat it as when they realized what they had done and the outcome of what they had done. So they did it again and again and again said all the other ones are going to be asked. So what's the difference? The difference is very simple. The first time the Roman officer gave the animal a first time the children gave this animal they didn't realize what they were doing. They were not aware of the fact that they were being m so being that it wasn't done in the sense to be mate to take it from it's for that reason that it was once the Roman officers saw that the rabbis were m this once the children saw that what they had done allowed the now to eat from this. So what they did the second time was considered badass in the sense that they realized what the outcome of what they were doing was going to be and it's for that reason it was going to be the Mishna had mentioned two story mean the two stories are similar the reason the Mishna is telling us a story is not just to tell us a story that relates to the sis that we're learning the reason the mission is telling us a story is obviously because there's something to be learned from it why do we need both stories I mean the principle is the same the first time it was mut second time it was why zah So why do I need the same context of I'll tell you why had we only had I would think that over the first time the guy did it being that he didn't realize he was being was considered because there's nothing really to worry about meaning there would have been a to say maybe even though the guy did it still it should be why a of some sorts what are you going to make by a guy a guy is not m in these So like why should we go ahead and make it us to say why maybe you should make such a even though now he's a now he's not he did it anyways but when he gets older it's going to be very important for him to know you now say you would have thought that maybe we should be in the case of the for reason therefore the Mishna told us the story we only There's a to say that maybe cotton is more because if you see that we're matter when a cotton is no one's going to confuse a cotton with a god but if you're going to be m when a guy does it being that although he's a god but he's a godle so you may confuse him with a god said as far as this way as far as that way that's what told me the story both by and The original story was the castor, this Roman officer sees an old ram, very long hair, no one ever trimmed it here or groomed it a little bit and he's bothered. He said, "What's what's going on over here?" So they told him that there's something called Bkar and a Bakar has kadusha even bis had there been a Bikash we would have brought it as a carbon dunk the Romans. We don't have a ba mikt and as a result we have to wait for it to develop a blemish and when it develops a blemish at that point we'll be able to groom it we'll be able to eat it but up until that point we have to treat it as sacred there's nothing we can do he hears that the Roman does he takes this spear and he gives it to the said that it's going to be mut now it's interesting the Mishna said that the reason it was mut is because we assume that the officer did it in fact after the m he did it again and again and again And those because clearly the Roman officer realized the outcome of what he was going to do. Now it's a little interesting just when you read them just learning forget about it. It'd be a little hard to understand the what do you mean he did he asked why no one's touching this? They said because it doesn't have a so he went ahead and he gave it a said in the name of Katina that just to understand you have to add a little bit of hes and that is the Mishna was talking about where the told him that it's going to be in if it develops a therefore the Roman officer was not really being led to believe that if he would make a mum it would become mut cuz if he would make a mum it wouldn't ha meaning it wouldn't be a situation where the developed but rather he's creating the he's doing it proactively but said had the told this Roman officer that I want you to know that if you if someone makes a or you make a that it's going to be that it's command as if he told him to do it in that case it would be deemed that he did it and in that case it wouldn't be okay meaning was bothered with this he said what do you mean it Das what was the exchange? The exchange was we're not eating it cuz it doesn't have a m. So he goes ahead and he gives it a cult. Ter says yeah because what they told him was it becomes mut if it develops a that was what they told him had they said it becomes mut if someone gives it am and then he would have done it then for sure you would assume that he's doing it because what he had told him said I disagree. No one ever told the guy what to do. They were just telling him what is therefore mali mali nasa I disagree with those semantics I don't think it matters had the told him [clears throat] it becomes when it develops a or it becomes m if someone gives it a meaning even had they told him it will be if someone gives it a being that it wasn't a direct nobody ever told him to do it it was sort of in a roundabout way in all cases we would assume that the first time that the guy gave it he did it therefore before it was going to be mut. So the Mishna said that the first time the go did it the first time the did it was because it was after they realized the effect of what they had done what happened subsequently that was already done. We know whenever you find the lashing of so is always coming the rabbi something of what's it going to be it's going to be marb that if someone creates a carbon is that it's going to be if it was done what's that coming what would be if someone told the guy but he didn't tell himirect directly question answer. But it was that he allowed the to know the and then he went ahead and he gave it is considered and is going to be if somebody was being chased by a he turned around he was afraid of the animal so he kicked the animal self-defense and now he gave the animal that was chasing him is going to allowed to he's going to be allowed to eat this animal. Meaning the seven that if somebody himself gives up is according to the you have to wait for it to develop a new in this case the owner of the animal gave his animal but being that he did it in self-defense he didn't do it with the to be mate that wasn't his intent it's for that reason it's going to be okay this is only true if he kicked the animal literally while he was chasing him. But if he kicked it after it was chasing him, meaning the animal chased him, he somehow survived. He lived to tell the story and then a couple of hours later he sees the animal, he gives it a and now, right, he's and now the animal developed in that case, you don't have the of course you're a regular like the you're not going to be able to. I mean, it's obvious while you're being chased. That's the hat because he chased you yesterday. [snorts] Yeah, it could have been such a hav. I would have thought sorry when you saw the animal, you got a little spooked. It reminded you of your trauma. So as a result, it's a little sweet revenge [laughter] against the animal that was hunting you down. So either way, maybe it's not considered a regular. So maybe that should be in fact some had a reversed gear. So don't think that the only time it's going to be okay to based on this moment if it happened what's the reason because we assume this which was a in the first of the is the in the second of the it's okay to be in a before it's born. Meaning even though the is that is very very stating that when it comes to a that's a fetus it's still inside the womb of its mother is there's no and this is really based on earlier in where it's that the comes about when the animal is born. So it's only after the that it has its full thus the which of course is related to the of the will not be in effect says I'll give you an example of how you could be before as it relates to a a g a baby goat it's possible to be masic its ear before it's born and as a result that would be an example of being if it's a baby sheep you would not be able to make the m in its ear meaning once the ear is exposed to the point that you could be there it's already too late it means it was born already the was already complete the way you'd be able to do it with a sheep is in its lips it' be possible to do it with a sheep as well in its ear in the event that it came out with its face sideways so it' be possible to touch its ear before the head is completely outside of the meaning before we have what's considered aically deemed later said another with regards to what if an animal has a m it's inside its mouth now when it eats it you can't see the but when it opens up its mouth then you're able to see the mum is that would be considered a meaning is and this is really a later in the says that the only time is considered a mum to bear is if the mum is you're able to see it but if you can't see the mum it's not considered a interesting so only if the mum is it considered a otherwise not said what happens if you have a mum which sometimes is baloy and sometimes is such as something inside an animal's mouth while it eats you don't see it but when it opens it mouth you do see it So said very simply it's going to be and that seems like aesh because you could have argued that you don't always see it maybe it's not considered but say isn't the outer gums the gums that are more exposed that you're able to see of the animal. So if they're nif or nigm they're somehow severed a little bit is considered a as it relates to the inner gums the gums that are not visible there they have to be completely uprooted but when they're uprooted it's considered a why you can't see it must be because even though usually you look at a person you don't see the back of his guns but if he opens his mouth if he's in a dentist chair then maybe you will be able to see but it's possible to see it I mean that it's possible to sometime times see it. You see it's considered a isn't that so why do I need to tell me something that's already without the sounds like saying but it's a was coming to explain the meaning was explaining the mission just says the Mishna just says that as it relates to the gums the inner gums the ones that you can't see once the near that considered a why I it's not ra was coming to explain the and it was important to know the time of the because the is something that you may be able to apply in other areas as well another mission any that's possible for a person to inflict so there are some that one can afflict to an animal there are others that's not possible just a very obvious example Michel is going to list an animal that has five legs is considered a mo. So you can't give an animal a fifth flag. But an animal that has a cut in its ear that's something that could have happened that's something that you yourself could have done. Which means that every single time an animal has a mum and you go to the or you go to the tribunal the overseeing the and they're going to decide now whether it is a m there's two things they need to factor into consideration. Number one, is it a is it the is it kabu? Is it what in the moment? That's a whole as we've seen a little bit and we're going to learn a lot of that talk about specific that are going to mirror the anatomy of an animal as it relates not to but as relates to the laws of m of that's coming. But the point is that there's another thing you have to take into consideration and that is was this m something that happened or did somebody go ahead and actually create the because if somebody created the m that's the on it's not so push that just because it has a m even a m even if it's that now it's going to be you also have to determine the history the genesis of the m had this m happen did it happen on its own Okay, that's great. But if it didn't happen on its own, then it's going to be a problem. Very important any which is possible that could have happened. So Bezda now is going to have to do a little bit of due diligence to determine the history of the mo. Okay. So what are they going to do? They're going to go to the shepherd. They're going to go down to this person's field and they're going to try to determine exactly what had happened. So the first person they're going to interview is probably the shepherd himself. Is he believed or is he not? Is he believed to say that it happened or is he not believed to say that is always believed for somebody else, he's just not believed when it comes to his own thing. Way too much says someone that's on something. So if you wouldn't trust him for his own animal, you can't trust him for somebody else's animal. Because if you're for something, you can't be a dying to judge that type of Indian you're not to be an aid for that either. Either way, the said that do you trust or do you don't trust the said that was the said you always believe somebody else you just not believe for yourself. Rome said that for anything that you not believe for somebody for yourself, you can never say even for a third person. So two things number one what is and that's the first question the second question is it's not so clear what the three and the are specifically and seem to be saying the same thing we're not sure who said what but we know held one way held another way in terms of had to understand the mission once said that when the mission says what it means is that if you have he's going to be believed even if he's working in the house of a meaning the definition of Israel means a shepherd who's a Israel that he's not a when it says that not believe what it means is a shepherd that's a kayen is not believed and the gor explains why is a believed because aa that's a is not in the Bakar business. He doesn't get a Bakar. A gets a Bakar doesn't get a Bakar. So let's think what would be his he works for let's say a C and the C gets he has a B right now. If the BR has a then the is going to he'll eat it and the most the will get is he'll be able to participate. be possible like that heals allow to eat from the so the most that he's going to get he'll get a flesh from this for that little thing that he's going to get we're not worried so there's no reason for him to lie so when the says it means when the shepherd himself is as relates to even if he's in the house of he's not believed you know why he's going to say right if you have that's working in the house so now the has this and it's not clear what You know why the lawyer may lie? Because he's a cayenne and he may be hoping that his boss is going to give him the give him the animal. So being that he's a he has a what's the say it has a now you're allowed to eat it. As a result we don't trust the same would be true if you had a roy working in a kayen's house. Now here the of getting thear doesn't apply because a kay doesn't give thear is gives the bkar to the kay. here his boss is a but still the could be there's a to say that the person will lie because in his mind they'll say you know I'll do my boss the a favor and one day you know what it's going to come around then he'll do me the favor again when I need somebody to say on behalf of one of I get bakar so if I need someone to say on behalf of my bakar so maybe he'll do the same thing for me but the point is the believe because he has no he's not in the bur business he has no horse in this race pun intended as opposed to as opposed to the royal he has a vested interest in the if he's working for maybe he's actually going to get the and even if he's working for I'll do you a favor one day you'll do me a favor as a result of the second no you always believe for somebody else wasn't lying for somebody else for himself yeah that's a different But is not worried about these of and and maybe he's going to get it. Yeah. A person is not just going to go ahead and lie. Say no one's get one of the ten commandments. It's not so clear that a unless he has a real real incentive to do it. This is not enough of an incentive. Didn't really explain yet is going to do that later in the one. What's another how else could you learn the Mishna that when it says what it means is it means of so if the royal is working for a Israel not the shepherd is a Israel but a shepherd even if he's a that works for Israel is going to be believed why is he going to be believed if the shepherd is a cen and he's working for Israel maybe he's going to lie because he wants to get thear so No, that's not a knows that at the end of the day, he's a and his boss probably wants to give the to why is he going to give it to me? I'm just a shepherd. So in his mind, he never thinks he's going to get it anyway. There's not enough of assume that he's going to lie. However, but if the roy was working for a even if he's in and there is not going to be believed because being that he's working for a thear and being that the has a he wants to lie because he wants to benefit from it. He thinks that maybe he's going to get part of this part of the certainly if was working for number one. Now there's two spars where maybe he's going to lie. Number one, he wants to participate in the suda. Number two, being that he's a kayen, he thinks that maybe one day he'll get it from someone else. And if I lie for you, you're going to lie for me. But either way, the point is is that what matters is not whether the Roya himself is a or but what matters is whether he's working for he's working for anyway. There's two very distinct ways how to learn the Mishna. The first shout is that when the Mishna says, what we're discussing is the himself is the is the is believed because why shouldn't he be believed? He's not in the business. Why would he lie as far as maybe he'll get this bakar, maybe he'll get a different some other day. So being that he has a vested interest in him, we don't trust and therefore he's not going to do. The other shot was a is believed. But if the roy is working for a that's where his not believes according to the second that a royal that works for a is always believed whether he's a Israel or whether he's a then we can understand what say and that's in contrast to the meaning according to the second When is a believed? Aoya is believed if he works for Isra doesn't matter if he's or if he's a kayan holds if you're a working for whether you're or you're a kite, you're going to be believed. The second he says is always believed unless it's your own thing, you're always going to be believed. What's Rome say? Rome says that being that you wouldn't trust a ken for his own. So you can't trust him somebody else's. Okay. So as it relates to Ra arguing with the Tanakama, he knocked out one of the two kouglas of the Tanakama. Kama said if I'm a working for I believe doesn't matter if I'm or said no if you're a working for you're not going to be believed because if you're not believed for yourself like okay but as it relates to the the first the and are going to agree the point is is the between ram and the tanakama is a roy that's working for Israel the tanakama said every royer that works for Israel is going to be believed Doesn't matter if you're a It doesn't matter if you're Israel that works for Israel is going to be believed. But a that works for Israel is not going to be believed. So there's three shittas in the but according to the first the first says that when it says it means if the roy is if the roy he's not believed what's the tanama and tanama holds that believe the co is not believed and also said believe the tanama is not believed so and co does not believe so could You have to say there's going to be something else to the so till now we're discussing the himself the shepherd is the shepherd believed does he have an amus the shepherd not believe exactly what it means and what would be forget the there's a a person he has a he's a and the question and there's a sh is Did the mum happen or did somebody actually give it to he said two number one you need two people to say you need in order to say but those two could be even that's where between the meaning the tanakama was talking only about tanakama had no fundamental problem with a he had according to the first mahalakra an issue with a but as it relates to aim per se no one said that can't say in fact if he wasn't a if this was going to be with somebody else you'd have to maybe be okay was a whole new av transcends the laws of as we're going to see in tomorrow's it's neg so to the extent that when it comes to maybe being not believed to say for their own animal that would mean that they wouldn't be in our Mishna's case of there really is no between the where the plays itself out is where it wasn't a where you want to somebody else to say which was as relates to that either way address what would be if there's a in the house of a and we want to determine the history of that it has did it develop or did somebody That's the first is the no person's son a person's daughter is believed to say to say that the moon happened on its own said I disagree if you remember the house even 10 wouldn't wouldn't be okay so what's he's arguing with he doesn't agree with but he also doesn't agree with said you need two holds all you need is but whereas said believe not so there's three holds you need two let's go backwards hold even goes even further he says Now the of was talking about a received as a gift. It's let's say he has to wait for it to develop a before he'll be able to do anything with it. Now it has a we're trying to determine did it develop the on its own or did somebody actually give it the said but it can't be a it can't be a family member. What would be in the case where has a mo or has a bakar and he's waiting for it to develop a mo that won't be the case has akar he has to give it to the cases where it's not aar but it's a bakar and these were also is in the beginning what happens when has a bkar so you don't have to give it to but at the same time being that it may be aaricar you have to wait for it to develop a so now the is the one that's sitting around and waiting for it to develop a said in the All of you need to again to say that the happened on its own. Who's that like just like said it with regards to the in of the same would be true for a that's in the said no that when it comes to a sufficar in the house of Israel everybody agrees even the himself could say meaning the owner we don't even ask questions you come to the it has a the not even going to ask you how did this develop the bum is believed on meaning all the issues that we have, we don't trust you. That's all in the house of the but in the's house. Even the is keeping it's he gets to keep it is not because if you're not going to say that as it relates to you have to bring it as a carbon once it develops you get to keep it. Here's the cash. If you're gonna get to keep it, who's going to be able to say on the that it developed them all? Assuming that you don't trust the BM that means all the bims in the world are not ne if no one's a neon for themselves, then no one's a neon for somebody else either. said who in the world can possibly say anyone is technically to have his own animal everybody could have their own as a result they're all once you're so who's must be not said you see from here that is not a only says no one second could be by you believe there's no this is that we had in shabas Because by there's always a there's like a migu you have that if you wanted you could have taken all your animals given them before you made them see once you have an animal that's you can't give it a soar is born unless you do there's no way to be mate without violating because doesn't become until when it goes that's when it gets So if you would give it a before it went it'd be to be without actually being so for that reason this is to say that people wouldn't lie when it comes to being because if you're such a shak and you're looking for loopholes you're looking for ways out then you might as well just do it in the kosher way and you might as well just be mum before it actually got its kadusha. So maybe over there you're right, but that's not a riot. Don't bring me a riot from Bakar. But the says you're right. I'll bring up's proof was really from somewhere else. What he meant to say was according to mayor who's going to say maybe according to mayor has no meaning that keeps according to mayor for sure nobody should be able to say because we're all says okay maybe by safar according to mayor there's no way is that so hard to fathom says yeah it's a fatish we spent a lot of time together. If you have a now it do you have to give it to or do you not have to give now if there's a whether or not you give obviously did it andor is one of the that discuss clearly holds you how you how do you know that the happened clearly we're trusting somebody how could you trust somebody every is on and on must be is not what's the is mean this is the proof but what's the when it comes to these things is not when it comes to who said that even a son and a daughter is to say that the happens that has developed on Who said that you can't be a car like what would be if the owner the who has this was standing outside and the walked into the house and then few moments later it walks out and suddenly it was damaged. So the people that are in the house can say that and we're going to be now it sounds like the people in the house are the right who's in your house. The assumption is not a soup kitchen. This is a family and the family members that are in the house are the ones that are going to say How could the family members say? I thought was the case was not where only the balabos was standing outside. All the family members were outside. Everybody was outside and whoever was inside was not part of the family. It entered it walked out. Whoever's inside is say but what's the sounds like someh over here? If the is not that then what is the in this case this certainly looks a little fishy right here you have the whole family is outside at that moment it developed it looks like something was being set up over what but there's enough here to make us a little bit uncomfortable to maybe not trust whoever's inside that we trust what's the bottom line said so we need now the skin that believed either way before we end today's daff just to go back and speak out some raid that relates to the beginning of the daft that's also a ham to some of the raid that we spoke at earlier in the week. So the daft began with there was an old ram that lived in Jerusalem had very long hair. It was clearly very unckempt and there was a cast a Roman officer that saw it and he went to the that were living in the and he asked them why is this so old how come nobody's taking care of it so he said I'll tell you the truth this animal is a and we would take this animal we'd be on the today we don't have a bdash and despite the fact that we don't have a bd thisar still has to what we need to do is we need need to wait for it to develop a when it develops a then it's going to be the Roman officer heard that he took a spear out he pierced its ear gave it a and were m stating that the mission said the only reason the matter is because the cut the castor this officer did not realize what the outcome of what he had done was going to be but as soon as he realized when he did it again and again at that point already because even a guy that's it's only if he does a that it becomes but If a guy would do it, it would be in other words, we have a with a and some that discuss a that's doesn't become or does it not become a that develops on its own is if you yourself go and you're it's what if a guy did it he did it is it going to be is it going to be so it's a and it comes out pretty clear as means even if I didn't tell the guy to do it he's doing it his own as long as he knows he has an understanding of what the of what he's doing is going to be that would be enough to say that it's going to be so again when how does it relate to these is does it become or does it not become what the sugi doesn't seem to be discussing at first glance and again only at first glance is whether there's an isser to tell a guy to be or whether there is no to tell a guy to be meaning it says in there's an to be in fact the said it says and we learn from the extra word that not only is it to go ahead and be but even it's going to be to be and the Gmorra's case of GM is you're not let a cake on the ear of an animal to entice a dog to go take a bite out of the cake and then take a bite out of the ear of the that's included in the so is it to go ahead and do it for you or not? That's not something that was in the stating that early in the week we spoke out that it would seem to perhaps be a between and the that being that the says that if someone's if somebody would tell go listen to me and I want you to take this spear or take the tails and go play with them like in the case of our Mishna and a m would come about you'd be this because you caused it to happen and even though there's no for it's not that the is to me but at the end of the day I caused it to happen so I'm not worse than a gr and is awesome so this is going to be awesome but said you would tell a to do it or let's say to do it then you wouldn't have this because being that the even the non-Jew is a so he's acting once he's acting it's not considered that I caused him to do it. We assume he did it on his own and there's not even going to be a stating that we set over foresh who in a gorgeous with regards to mitzvah speaks out again and again and again that if you tell a guy to go ahead and do something even though but that he's only doing it because of me. So I'm a and if I'm a wherever there's a he wanted to be this mitzvah if we have time we'll speak a little bit more about that later. He wanted to be at his growit and as a result if you tell a good do a mitzvah for you could be it if I did the mitzvah I could I could even make a all the rate that we spoke at earlier in the week but the point is that if I tell even though he's a and he does it for me it's going to be considered if I tell going to go ahead and do it now it's is it or is it not says clearly in p it's not seems to say that it would be but the truth is the truth is we have to take a step backwards and really there's a this is a classic rape we know there's an in so if is threshing you're not allowed to put a muzzle on its mouth the gar is it okay to tell a non-Jew to go ahead and do the on your behalf. I'm not doing it myself. I'm telling a non-Jew to do it on my behalf meaning is there when it comes to what's do you say that's when it comes to shabas which is only a light or perhaps there's no difference the rush in the seventh par on that it's says as follows the this sh of whether it comes says der if that's the case we go why because being that only it's only so comes out it's a you're going to go even though that you're not allowed to be with that somehow that not only if a do you not have the to eat it but there's actually an in to go ahead and tell a guy to do it so you have to know where the rush but that's what the rush so says the rush even though it's what's the you see that there's a which is it says in the it's not says the rush you have to say that being that we're dealing with you can't bring any from here in other words the only you see and for you have to say that this is and for that reason it's going to be different but bottom line what do you see in the rush you see two things number one you see from the rush that it's also to tell a guy to be for you. But you know what else you see in the rush? that the is not the is the same reason you're not telly to be it's for that same reason you can't tell to go ahead and be so much so that the rush is bothered with that why is the right says only you don't have when it comes to a regular but the point is number one it's awesome to tell a guy to do it and number two the is going to It's the end of so the apparently told that I have a from a rush that it's to tell to be and it sounds like there are two number one that it's and number two that it's only it's not going to be says It's a brut and and there's nothing I could say stating that says even though but I want to point out to you why it's such a meaning I have a rush that says it's why because when it comes to it's learned out from so THEN WHY IS I WOULD THINK SAYS that is more than just a gram. If I tell A GUY TO DO it for me, I have more involvement in what happened than in your classic. So if they'd be mock to say that this should be I'll prove it to you. You know what my is classic. This is mishb every single word in the gar the garra said that what happens if a guy goes ahead and he's going to be also then the said two words that if you went ahead and did it's also going to be says what does it sound like from the said that if the iss Not only that, I'm going to even tell you a bigger you know what the bigger is even it why is a bigger so you see it says that somehow is to me than is because if it's in the reverse then is coming to be that you don't even see in the without wouldn't know grandma I would only know if a guy does it how do you know grandma so he says is really more than he has arrived from as well. But the point is that even though in I don't really hear I don't really hear why telling a guy to do something should be less than and if someone's think but at the same time you see that way the bottom line is the rush is clear. The rush says that if you would tell a guy to go ahead for you is you would not be of all it is everybody knows is only why not in a so there's a real but at the end of the day you have a rush you have a rush and the rush would seem to therefore be mash like the and not like the hearts but the truth truth is if you think about it I think there's a there's a very very very just throwa out there a little bit of food for thought and that is everyone knows of is now going to tell a guy to go ahead and do for you on what's the said there's different but the is he asked the man on the street why is he said on means and as a result you now got to go ahead and and tell a to do for you on Shabas but is a is a special institution that you find is according to only by such as Shabas not only Shabas but the point is that on Shabas you're not allowed to tell a go to do for you and the reason is because of it's a are you allowed to do a on can I do a that's going to cause so the truth is like The Gomorrah says, it says in the Torah, but it says and the Gmorra says I can't do if it's a direct but if it's only it's going to be but that just means there's no there's no there's no it's not what about almost all the hold that it's going to be awesome. So this says that's only in level but [snorts] if you do this is a very very long but the short answer is you're not allowed to do it's true but that's on the level that's on the level on the steel level but as it relates to going to be so I ask you a question if telling a is the way And in the way said for sure it should even be more. So what do you need for should be because of So why do I need a new a new OKAY it's the same it's the same you get all the coolers it's [laughter] so what's the difference if it's or if it's a so what's everyway is going to be a what's in the rush and no if you tell a girl to do something it's not considered it's not so you have to come on to a new par even though it's not but it's but is saying for he's answering all these kashas based on this you say that when you tell a guy to do something it's considered so it's considered every should be gr just to ratchet up the kasha a little bit the and this is not but this is the it's he brings a tremendous from the was one of the in the late 19th century early 20th century so he said a he said a beautiful he says that says that if you do grow so he said That's going to be true for every but one. Why? Because we know if somebody's over there's why that's the one say with regards to that single out why the singled out one says tell me there's a special for each of the none says that according to the hold if Someone's going to light a fire on why because being that it's not included in is that is not it doesn't follow the because of because it it's excludes different not. So when it says in the it means everything but it means everything but is so it's not included in so you don't have as a result what's going to come out is if somebody would go ahead and he would light a fire it would be you would have all the if that's the case it should be to tell a to light a fire if you want you tell go to light a fire on okay but I'm right? ious times where is but that's based on the fact that telling a guy to do something is only awesome again just if according to the himself brings according to this that when it comes to if maybe there'd be to tell to light a fire for you on that same piece brings a a tremendous from the the context of the wasab is a well-known when you learn the says he said I found a hidden scroll in the house and it said in this scroll there's 39 only one it wasn't clear what wants so the gar discussed it a a little bit and the concluded that what it said was there's 39 and for one of the is so if you do anyone of the 39 and the Gar has a whole discussion which one of the 39 one said it's this it's that he said what's the DISCUSSION IN THE SAID SO which one is not there's a that says if it's a regular and if that's the case [snorts] which is the one of the shabas that doesn't invol IT'S one line says is thearish. He says, "Cuz I think that according to the man that holds the lavatis is one other that's also going to be the you know what that is and are two sides of the same coin. The is when you light the fire is when you extinguish the fire that the mand holds is ku is also going to be is also going to if that's the case it's not 38 it's only 37. That's how couldn't be going according to that mand because the mand that holds the but the point is if that's the case if is also like so in that the says that that is not included because it doesn't have the of sorry it's not included because it doesn't have the of that it's going to come out is not even going to So you have two lav on two of the that are technically not. So again it should come out that if somebody tells a guy to go light a fire on chabas that says that it's not included is going to be awesome or if someone would tell a to be who is and who said that if you hold then it could be if you hold that anytime you tell a guy to do something there's then look maybe there'll be so we're leaving with two cautions number one what do you need for it's that if you tell a guy to do something even though there's no but being that he's doing it because of you it's so what do you need for it anyways so typically with the it could be there be two should be awesome and we is that if I'mma and it can impact tremendously Just a hura.