Chulin 27

Today's and we are at the very top of Zion a new peric the second per of so the topic of the second paric of is the same as the topic of the first paric of that is the laws of in fact the very first Mishna of the second paric discusses some of the most basic fundamental as it relates to I don't think there's too much in this first Mishna that's going to come as much of a shock this entire first is a very very foundational daf as it relates to understanding the very basics of the laws of somebody one sim of a bird or two of the is going to be. So when it comes to you have to sh one simmon two. What are the sim the ka and the vet? As it relates to the behemoth, the two sim are obviously both the ko and the vash. As it relates to the one simmon, you get to pick the ko or the is it da the ko or maybe it's the vet. That's actually a discussion in the Gmorra in one of the upcoming but the basic we already knew it's one when it comes to it's when it comes to the Misha continues and says that when it comes to you don't have to the entire but works this is one of the areas in where we says that that when it comes to shing there's a that it's not enough to sh the but you also have to sh the veren so the veriden are veins in the chest area of the rahuda's is that the is not complete unless you also sh the viden this is something that will be discussed in detail again in the upcoming dafim In the event that somebody shacked only half of one of the sim by a knife or if somebody shacked one and a half of the by the is going to be possible if you did of one of the by knife or of two of the by the in that instance the is going to be kasher if you did half of the sim so you didn't get the whole sim you didn't even get rid of the sim If you did one and a half of the behemoth, so one of them you got, but the other one you didn't get entirely, you didn't even get R. If you got R, then already it's going to be okay. Either way, the Mishna seems extremely wordy. Feels like we repeated ourselves. Throw in the recaps. We really repeated ourselves. But the basic gist of what the Mishna is saying is that is you don't have to sh the entire sim as long as you get that in and it of itself is going to be okay. throw in who holds that when it comes to it's not enough that you sh you have to as well said and we know this very much from the first par it's a right sounds like in the event that you it's going to be okay says the word sounds like it's going on everything that's mentioned right in the beginning of the Mishna you're telling me that only how much do you want this person to meaning the starts off with the that it sounds like the that we're about to present is a now what that I could hear. Why? because maybe but there's nothing else to how could that be says two would be really inaccurate but poetic symmetry we wanted to say so We said also you're going to tell me that's way too wordy for the of the ina maybe but for a Mishna no way and being that as it relates to that is what's said or you could say that That's not and for that it wouldn't say. So why does it say it's for the next line not for the but this that we rely on we rely on when it comes to the that's not something that's only something that's so the bottom line as straightforward as the begins with it sounds like it's and the is struggling to understand which part of this is it's for sure not because there's nothing more to will be on. So the garra says to even meaning as much as we know but it's only it's only as much as we know ripe works but it's something that's only going to be it's interesting if you take a look at the in this is the first of the ra's laying down the basic law of the the in the middle of the throat from the sides. That was a mission in the first part. This is what we need. What is the trachea and the esophagus respectively? says the perfect is that you should check both of the even and that's what the should try to do says the of one by the two by the in that instance the is going to be. So the says what's the means 100% and by the side by the so is to get both and one sim also is going to be okay. What's the mart? You're supposed to sh the entire and even by the entirety of both of the it's the first of the second. But if you notice like both that's also at first glance when you learn the gam it sounds a little bit like the gave two had to explain the pick this or that but there's no option C of all of the above the ra actually went all of the above because the ra held that both of the are true it's just but in terms of how you want to be. You want to say the is referring to the we're referring to the next line of the was never both of these are true because you're supposed to both 100% and either way how do we know that is supposed to be from the throat? So up until this point we're already almost a month in. We've been taking for granted that how exactly does work the you come from the even from the not from the behind right because that's Malika whatever is Malik we know is if somebody would ask you today what's the you would say right I think so that's been the vibe up until this point you have the five specific that govern the way works but the which is mentioned cryptically in the seems to be governed by truth is that's the right answer as we're about to see but it's not 100% the right answer as we're both about to see in fact the from here until the end of the daf is going to present five potential makers from the alain to the idea of maybe having an actual source that is supposed to be rafkahana is the cuff of the shin and he starts us off. says the says it says this in it's talking about specifically the carbon the fifth what does mean so literally means right but more specifically it's a nutri it's an acronym for sh means bends means cleanse. Actually has two shot means we're picking one. So the essentially is saying that the way you're supposed to kill the animal is go to the mim go to the place that it bends which is its neck and what you should do is you should cleanse it. You should remove the blood. That's where you're supposed to make the incision. That's where you're supposed to slaughter it. That's the way is supposed to be. That's how you know it's first things first. How do you know that the word means to cleanse looking for this? Number one, it says this is in the parish of so supposed to clean out the house from all the things that are there means to cleanse saying purify me give me. So you see that the word means to cleanse means to bend. That's how you know is supposed to be. But the says maybe it means you're supposed to kill the animal by its tail. The tail also wags, right? It uh bends. So maybe that's what it means. So the says implies it sounds like we're dealing with a part of the anatomy that sometimes is and sometimes is that's the area that you're supposed to go and supposed to do the the place where it sometimes bends as opposed to the tail. That's an area that's always cuff. It's always shock. As a result, it doesn't qualify. Maybe it means the ears of the animal, right? The animal could sometimes uh you know do its thing with the ear. So maybe that's an ear that sometimes is zuck, sometimes it's shak maybe that's what the incision is supposed to make. But the says we know this already from other sources of say that the of required dam to come out of the animal for to do and we know that the had to be done with dames. Not all dam is considered dam is damatis right but the dham that was used for had to be dam and the dham that comes out of the ear is not dam based on it couldn't mean even the ear but I know from elsewhere that the had to be done with and you're not getting from the ear but the say not true maybe what you're supposed to do is you're supposed to do the by the ear and then you do this huge incision until you get to an area where you're going to actually get says I hear let me ask you another before you even get a chance to answer that what's the you have a riot to this from the pic says the you know you don't right must be the whole idea of and to the extent that we're already forced to say that there are that govern exactly the way works, we might as well say that's probably also so this whole of the number one there's a on it because maybe it means and number two let's be honest anyways have to come on to because of the five so it's you're talking that's also if that's the case so sounded like we had some sort of drussia going on over here of should something be extrapolated from that? The answer is yeah, you know what the is coming to tell me not what you should do but rather what you should not do and that is you could have thought with that when it comes to so you do you should make it into a gist. So we've seen this word gist a few times chop it into two pieces you make an incision you don't chop it into two pieces when the garra says which is going to repeat a few times now on this doesn't mean you're not allowed to make it into a gist or it doesn't mean you don't have to make it into a but regardless says took the first crack at trying to figure out is there a he said yeah mimok at the end of the day had a flaw because maybe it means the all the way to the at the end of the day says you're right the is there anything to be taken out of this the answer is yeah what is that either you can make it into a or you don't have to make it into a number two raar he's the me of the mesh raier says in the and the rest of the is the which is the source to the way it says we learn from there from the place that dam flows you should break the animal so has now I know that because that's an area where if you made an incision don would flow and you're supposed to break it in such an what's to the idea that means to break right that's the acronym how do you know the latter part of the acronym it's based on don't be afraid and don't break so you see that was afraid How do you know that the is the maybe it means the nose, right? A running nose of blood. Sometimes you have such an in says it's true that blood sometimes runs from the nose, but it happens on its own. We're talking about an area where the only time the blood is going to flow is if you break it. It's after the the that's what's going to cause the blood to flow. That's not true by the that is true by the maybe it means the heart right if you would stab it in the heart the short blood is going to flow says I hear and besides how do you know that right you're not learning that from that like you have to say how do you know this is also going to be says if really the is from what is the coming to tell me like we had in the first it's coming to tell me that either you're not allowed to make it into a you don't have to make it into a but says can't be why because number one maybe it's and besides let's be honest you have to come to anyways you might as well say that as well either way what was the it was what was What was the issue with it? because maybe it's and therefore you have no clar that it actually means and besides you know you have to come on to the so that's more what then is the coming to teach me the the third and this is the shin of the shin and it stands for the shin of the third mar it says this is the same Pikah started us off with so it's three but really it's the talks about right at the beginning of and learned don't read it as if it said so switch out the shin with a sin one of the oldest tricks in the books right so don't make it make it instead okay what does mean so it's not what it means is it means to to talk from the place that the person talks. You're supposed to go ahead and you're supposed to cleanse it. Where does the person talk? It's the the throat. That's where the vocal cords are, right? It's the that's how you know it's supposed to be from the so is very similar to he's learning from the word. What's the difference said with a shin and what is saying is with a says you're telling me it's from the place that a person talks the tongue plays a role in speech. So maybe that's what it's referring to. But the being if you're going to cut the tongue, you're not going to get the maybe you're supposed to do such an incision. You start with the tongue and you make it all the way until you're going to get I think we get getting the feel for it already. You have to say that's learned from. Okay. So if this is really not coming to teach me because that's because otherwise maybe it means the tongue. So what then is the makardistra? Again, it's coming to tell me that all you're supposed to do is cleanse it, but you're not supposed to chop it into two pieces or you're not allowed to chop it into two pieces or you don't have to chop it into two pieces. Pick your choice. But the bottom line is this concludes the very very first part of today's d. And that is we know the sim now stands for the is and they all came with the rafana said from where the animal bends that's where you're supposed to cleanse it where does it bend it bends ultimately the gmorra knocked it out because the gmorrah says that maybe It's not referring to the that's not the only area that it actually bends, right? It's could be another area as well. Maybe it means the right. What was the issue with the you're not going to get the dam? Maybe you're supposed to cut it so much until you're going to get the thear rejected said must be that was just coming to tell me as opposed to the second shot was he learned it from what's an area that dam would flow when you break it it's but the said maybe that's not what it is maybe it's referring to the le maybe it's referring to the hearts you're right must be What then is coming to teach me just uh break it but don't sever it was he also learned it from but he didn't the place that the person speaks says maybe it's referring to the tongue the said I hear based on that must be really it's What then is the coming to teach me? Like we said either way the is going to bring more these makers are not included in the sim because we're going to see that the signon of how the gar is going to address these other a little bit different. So these first three rafar and raish were all approached in the identical way. Hence they got their unique sim right you would think the sim would be more inclusive and the reason is because we're about to learn additional but the ter those three were the same maybe it's it is what's it coming to tell me the now this one's going to be a little bit different the following learned it from somewhere else we learned how is supposed to be the says and the so this is it's talking about the carbon specifically the mitzvah of so we know carbon was unique you had to skin the animal you had to chop it into pieces and then you had to take all those pieces you had to be murder So the Pik says that the after he already has all these pieces that were done based on yesterday's maybe by the ley I don't know but it was all chopped off. So the now takes those he takes the he takes the and he puts it on his very wordy. Why do you have to single out in this over here the and the it was mentioned already that he's supposed to take all the the and the are part of the so why did the have to single out that the are included in the says I'm going to tell you why because if you look earlier when the mentions of it says that's the rest of the and then it goes ahead and says You could have thought ain't I could have thought that the only time there's a mitzvah of the only time there's a mitzvah to be is if it's a of the animal that actually had that had a heft. How do you know that the rush that was already severed at this point? How do you know the ro was severed at this point? This is going to be the river. But how do you know that the was already severed at this point? And if that's the case, it's not included in the mitzvah of how do you know that's included in the that's why the had to say that's why the needs to single out that even the is included in the mitzvah. It's included in the mitzvah of says you want to know why the terra is singled out. You have to do with the cuz it's a little bit mash the and only that. But what about that was not included in the you didn't take it and chop it into pieces. How do you know that's also included? Such as what? such as the oh that's why the had to go ahead and single out the fact that the had to go ahead and tell me single out that when it comes to the of the because you would have thought that it was severed it's not part of the rest of the so it's not included in the so therefore maybe it's not included in the what do you see from here that at some point the head got severed when the head got severed never said ever the head said. So you see from here that so this is a very roundabout from the but from the fact that we need a to tell me that there's a mitzvah with the of the there's something unique about the what was unique about the it's not included in the why would it not be included in the because the says take whatever is left of the and do the this is not left of the it was already seed when was it seed must be not and that's when ended up being severed. This is the right. But the asks one technical question. If you're holding and that is you go back to the started with a it says this and the question was four times, right? But why do you have to single out the isn't it already included? So what was the question? Why does it say the words? So the gar says I'm going to tell you why. And the says oh that's why says no no we're trying to figure out why it says not. I mean it sounds very similar but it's not the same thing. In fact where does it say? That's imposse. So we're trying to figure out why it says of trying to figure out why it says and then it was told me why it said come this way you have to read the brace we have to do a little surgery here the meant to say that why did the have to say right cuz I would have thought that was not included so that's the and really the way the is supposed to read is not because those are the words that we were trying to figure out why the terror mentioned now the continues Why did the mention of meaning about the as it relates to so why did it says that's for a different reason how do you know that when it comes to being the first ones that you're supposed to be the that's what that's coming to teach me you're right the focus of this was why it says the and the answer is because it's not included in the that is thought it's not included in the it is but once we mentioned why you said we also mentioned why mentions it's for a whole different reason that's to teach me that when it comes to you're supposed to start with the and everything else goes afterwards now we started with and that is when it says why did it say it's included So what was the answer is has it's not part of the you could have thought that's not part of anymore it's not included that answers doesn't answer right the are the fats of the animal so what about the say now the pedro I know why I said that to tell me that comes first right first and second respectively but the ped so that why did the tyrus And for the this could be explained with even another took the of the and he put it on. How did he do it? He would take the and he would use it to cover the way he did the reason he did it in this way because this is the respectful way of doing it. So you want to know why the terrorist says ped because when you milo the ro you have to be milo the ped with it. That's why the and the ped come together. Not that there's a mitzvah and a oned I would have known that anyways was but there was no and the reason we mention the ped is because the ped actually needs to be hooked. Either way, we just got ourselves, if you're keeping score, a fourth to the idea of all three of those were rejected, by the way. And now we have the fact that the tyran needs to single out the of the of must be the was you see from there that the must have beheaded the thus this is a supposed to be now is going to bring even a fifth the following brought a says in the So this is in the context of all the kosher and the non-coosher animals that we're going to be a lot more familiar with as we make our way through but for now a very general poss and is an similar to specifically just from the context over there it sounds like we're dealing with the laws of and if that's the case for sure where do you find that and are the same and let me show you why I don't think they're the same and if that's the case love the wordiness so again seems to be equating the of a and the it's not the same a completely so you know it's coming to teach me just like a how does it become meaning how do you prevent it from becoming an avail you do a bashita So this is going according to the that holds which is the topic of tomorrow's but either way that is what is coming to teach me when it comes to so if you're learning from should be the same thing it says we know is always exclusionary and it's from the exclusion of that I know that only by two when it comes to it's only This first part of the BRA feels pertinent to our discussion. It's actually not the reason we brought the right didn't say anything about it said a lot about tomorrow's this is a very but in today's related rabb right it's not what it is we're talking about. We need the next part of the I'm going to ask the cash a little differently. You want to know what way is similar to let me tell you just like when it comes TO AN OF HOW are you do it you do right it's so whether it's whenever you're going to do it's always going to be oh you're learning from so maybe it should It says but Dr. You want to know what the Z Paris is coming to teach me? We're not coming to learn from behemoth. Just the opposite. We're learning from and just like is that's how I know from let's just close the loop here. What does he do with the word Zeiss, right? in the word what does he do with the word had not said I would have thought if you're learning from so the other way around say that just like in as well that's why it says to teach me that no that's really not the way it is right the tanakama went the other way said that why does it say to teach me you're learning from so you would have thought that is too is also simil the world we're learning from life. So you would have thought is also that that is not the way it is. The bottom line is this is a fifth already to the that so again let's uh revisit this. What is the that is supposed to be? If you add up the birth five, we had not but rather Shass. Then we had the from the beginning of with the fact that the had to be the fact that the had to be the of the must be because it's somehow different. Oh, because it was as it was severed. See the must have been. And then we have just like was always going to be. So it's five makar stating that the first three were rejected right first three were knocked out and what did say as it relates to the first three at the end of the day right it's really soar ended up being all those were just and seem to be the two that we ended up says the put the between the behemoth and the now where it says that you have to know the end of the P right this is again another classic ray that the g expects us to know when you're 15 you started learning you're 10 years into your mikra cycle by the time you started learning which obviously means fish, right? So the put the between the and the fish. Why not? So says the says to tell me that requires just like a you can't say you know why because it says next to you can't tell me that doesn't need any like the fish that it's next to next in other words had a nice from the fact that the is in between the dock that's how I know is always it's next to the which would suggest a bonafide two it's next to the fish fish doesn't eat any which one is it is it two or is it nothing that's a pretty obvious compromise I'll meet you halfway so it's going to end up being one and that's how you know when it comes to all it is is how do you know that you don't have to shack fish so we take for granted that you don't have to shack fish no string is gl kosher fish right so what's the why don't fish require is from the following. It says so this is in the context of the so tells you're going to see there's going to be so much that they're going to have to and there's going to be so much fish that they're going to be able to just gather from the sea. What does it sound like as it relates to the in the bucket that requires? But as it relates to the fish, all you have to do is say by the it said they gathered the you tell me they didn't do right. That can't be. Why not? was an you just told me that for sure you have to do when it comes to an says no that you don't have to do because it also says by the is not that it says the dick is that in the same verse it says and only by the fish. So that obvious distinction is the basis for the fact that the would say because maybe after the we have to go ahead and do the is the end of the day what's the fish don't require. It's this. So there was a traveling um person who came from the gal right he was from the gal. So there was an that was created from the ground. Shem made the so the way you go ahead and you kill it, the way you make it is by taking out two as opposed to fish that were created from the water. The water is not as strong as the dry land is. So therefore, it doesn't require as much in order for you to go ahead and do the therefore you don't have to do anything. The birds that were created from the mud. So it's au voice of and so it's somewhere in between came from said I'll prove to you that the were created from the raak meaning they were created from but also from the can because you find that there are that have scales just like fish do why do fish have scales So you see also not 100% but from says the one last there was a certain Roman official that asked the following question there's a says there's a right in the beginning of time You see from here as relates to the they were created from water right that the came from but there's another says so you see that they were created from dry land. So this Roman officer ask a steerim that I mentioned right in the beginning of the per one seems to say that were created from the and the other suggest that was created told this that I'm going to tell you what The answer is they're both true. Sometimes that's the way you answer. They're both true. meaning it was from an area that had hence but it also had it was an area of as told this to the saw right they were looking at each other they started rolling their eyes as if this is really what the just said turned to them and he said right I understand that uh you don't like what I said but don't worry about it. What I told him was picash I was just trying to deflect him. I wasn't giving him the the real honest answer which by the way this is an idea. This is a whole for itself that sometimes you find they didn't want to talk in learning to the hegmans they didn't want to talk to them in learning right now let the about this so sometimes would be he says I was just that's not really what I meant okay so they said what's the why is asking a decent question so what is the answer so he told them really they would create him okay so then what is the what does that I mean it sounds like they were created really in other words if you look at the right after that. So peric and what does the continue in other words the reason that we're mentioning over here the is not because the was really created the was not created the was created like it episode from earlier who was created minim. Only reason we're throwing it into this PK is because of what it says in the he is that Hashem takes all these animals that were created like we mentioned several earlier like I said in the beginning of this P and brings all these animals to to but the point is is that the reason we throw in is not because it's directly related to what it said in the beginning of No, because that was only we threw in the even though it's not really attached to because was included in what the rest of the what the next says and that is that now takes all these things that were created brings them to should call them names. Some say that the way this exchange went down between this Roman officer and between was actually just the opposite. Meaning and some say that when the Hegman asked the question, he asked him the steo what he told them was is what in the first version he told the when the started rolling their eyes he says I know that's not the real answer. You want to know what the real answer is? The real answer is it was and the reason that's the the real answer is because let's be honest when it says it doesn't sound like it's only referring to what it says in the second part of the sounds like it's referring to what it says in the first part of the as well said to tell me is just referring to the next words that's that can't be the real answer that was the bash. You want to know what the real answer was? It was really the of what the first listen had. Either way, this concludes today's daf. today's was pretty focused and that is basic laws of I mean the first thing we learned in the in the was is that even though we know and even though we know it's only one sim when it comes to but based on the very very first in the says that's only that's the that's the first word of the but really you're always supposed to do and not just but you're supposed to sever the entirety of the then we had the Five Mistas, three of them knocked out the Simmon Kitten. But the five MC, how you know that is really supposed to be. We also had a little bit of as relates to how do you know that? How do you know that fish doesn't require as well? And we even had a little bit of a related to that that the which was created is strong and as a result require the fish that were created from the thus the very weak doesn't require at all and the which was created from a mixture of so that's somewhere in between that requires only one is that true by the way that the were created There seems to be aim if it was created in one of the answer is it was created in another was real 100% that seems to suggest it was created in the whole mention of is referring to the second half of the p it's not really referring to the first half of the ping either way as it relates to raid I think it's kadai you know where this is going to go back to the raid of the last few days and to talk a little more about shvet ley. So the topic of the raid on and was the unique role of [ __ ] ley and what we learned to zamin was that shvet ley like the ram says of in the beginning of perkim of hilikdash was separated from amongst the rest of Israel to do the mikdash what's his role number one to watch he's from the number to there were that was they were responsible to open the doors and close the gates. There were those that were mashra when there was the were in the midbar and also the parish that we're learning right now then the levim had a very important role and that is they had to take care and be in charge of all the logistics of all things associated with the transportation. We also spoke about an idea that's not although once you are made aware of the idea you see it but something that talk about in different places and that is that the leim from a high level were the assistants of the we mentioned in par in the par the and really once you start looking you'll see it scattered around of different places where they were literally the assistance of and anything that needed to do that didn't have to be done by anything that was just he would farm out to the and that's why you find that in paraglid that's talking about the carbon pest that was brought by and perl hey the carbon pes that was brought by and vav the carbon pest that was born in the beginning of you find the Levim are assisting the kayan because are so overwhelmed and the are coming and they're chiming in. It's because that is really part and parcel of the job of what the lady's supposed to do. His role is to assist the kay. In fact, if you want to crystallize the idea, the cen's role in the Bikash is to serve Hashem. And the le's job is to assist the coen almost serve the ken if you could say that but assist the coen in the ken service of hashem that inbar says that's why the always refers to the as being and you never find such a thing the kahun are all but mus is not kadesh even that it's a But it's it's because as opposed to the LEY IS TASH AND SEE 26 WHERE it's that kadusha is kadesh but the tashmish is not kadesh at all. That's a very high level very brief sikun of some of what we we spoke about the last few days but the truth is there's another very critical role that sha ley play now just to be mocked the Indian that we're going to talk about now is something that we've spoken about several times over the years but and that is in what's arguably the most famous in certainly in medish Certainly in the in the very end of this is the says why is it that Ley was excluded from being able to get it's because Ley was separated to serve Hashem. additionally was set aside to teach to the masses as the says it's for that reason Ley was set aside from the ways of the world they don't have to wage wars like the rest of the Jews do they don't inherit says, "You want to know why Ley doesn't have cuz Ley is different. He was set aside. He was separated." What was the that's number one? Is number two. Now that we know that's the we just did of the last few days of raid the what's the second thing. So the truth is brings a for this. Now what does it say that one of the things that tells which literally means that your are going to be the ones that are going to teach in fact says you will never find Ley. How do I know? There's a different but says that Ley was going to be that Ley was going to be from the and the Ram includes this one which in the Ram's world is not a toy. It's an a in his definition of was number one that is number two. Now you have to be mad the rama very carefully. The Rambam says that Ley was that this that Ley has a job to teach is not just a job. There was a it's part of what separates Ley from the rest of right the rama when he begins his parim oft and he talks about the role of the ley but the ra is saying that the of was not only as it relates to ley is going to be different is going to serve the mikdash is a manifestation of this between and between the other. The question is when did that happen? But as is referring to the service of the mik what talks about when do you find that ley was with regards to this of this is but the rest of the story is a mafur and this is a ram that's in the conversation of being maybe even more famous than the ram that we just mentioned. The RAM we just mentioned is we're not ranking Rambams based on popularity but the Rama that we just mentioned is the Rambam is in the beginning of the beginning of the Rambam goes through the history of and yet he talks about how it all began in the fast forwards to Nimrod and to who grew up in the house of he was and he would think about Hashem in the morning and the night until finally he came to Akari he realized that there's one creator and it's that one creator that a person is responsible to to serve and to worship and as soon as he came to that voice and he started traveling around the world and he started preaching and teaching his story the Ram continues towards the end of the first parak and the Ram says that Abramu when he came sue to So he taught it to whoever wanted to listen but specifically he taught it to his son and then went into the family business. He also started teaching the fact that exists taught it to his son and he appointed him to be a and he would go ahead. He would teach it to anybody again that wanted to listen. Here's what we need. The love of and went and he taught it to all of his sons. But he set aside and he appointed him to be the leader of this and he put him in yeshiva. He commanded his children that there should never be a from the family of generation after generation through the family of what happened was there was a all of a sudden a nation until unfortunately the Jews regress happened in Egypt and they went back to bear because they knew that they had this very important role and they were the only ones that held on to what the mission was. And then the Ram says you should know was never but I heard this from in the end of the first paragraph says when the Ram says in the end of that ley is separate they're cast aside they're a whole different right what does mean let's just appreciate this we make on Shabas we're was between the between Ley and the rest of is on that level. It's heavy. It's on that level. Just like we understand the there's a between who is not from Ley and between that's from Ley. And that of has a definition. What do you mean I'm I'm different? There is a night and day is by day you can see by night you can't see is the whole world right what's the ley has a job but when did that take place after that was from the went to when did this take place that's the end of the first thatdah happened so again the ra says says I'm saying there was two of number one number two where was the where was the of the second part of that's in the end of the firstd traces itself ALL THE WAY BACK to the buty he was my but here's the point ley has a huge role in terms of what it is he has to do in the ba mikdash but in addition to that ley has a huge role in terms of what he has to do outside of the basikt nothing to do with the basikt as a matter of In fact, it's in the base of that's the job of of they're responsible for the of they're responsible to make sure that are behaving properly and the are doing what they're supposed to do. I once thought that we know is referred to as when they're in the mad they're referred to as when they're ley's job is to look out for the roles there's no question but also they're responsible for the responsible to bear of the craven but also to bear the and the truth is that that ram in the end of the first of that define The abd of Ley Ley was doing the job of who was doing the job of who was doing the job of what was Abrau's job teaching the world teaching the world that was he wasn't saying this what he was doing was he was literally teacher because that's also included in Ley's responsibility ley's job is trumps out of this over here in the end of the first paragraph But what comes out is at this in the in the one is and the other one is and they're both crystallized so beautifully. The last of Denim was the Novi Mali Mali. He's the last of Denim. The very last of the trays migillid who exactly Malahi was one. I think it's Ra says Malaki was Ezra. It's a big sh we don't know 100% of Malaki is but one thing I can tell you. If you open up a safe from Mali it's very short. It's three proim 55im. Some of the most famous are mentioned in say for in g to the after listen to the he says a son naturally respects his father and a servant respects his master if I'm a father why are you not treating me like a You want to tell me I'm not a father? Okay. I'm the master of the universe. Who are literally embarrassing my name? Says the respond. In what way are we embarrassing you? We're not treating you like a father. We're not treating you like uh a master says because you're taking disgusting bread and you're putting it on my altar and you respond how so I'll tell you how because you're acting and behaving in a way as if the you animals that are deformed, animals that are and you put it on the try doing that to one of your local officers. Give the such a and he goes on, I'm not interested. I'm not going to be with your Literally from sea until shining sea. My name is so great amongst the nations. Somebody's sound familiar. I tell you, half of we know. This is after P after Pekk 15 or so. We are the Nvi giving over the message of akadeshu is giving very harsh rebuke to the kayan and then and then in middle of this musmoose it takes a little bit of a pivot smack in the middle. This is per we started. This is per smack in the middle. You know, I had a deal with the I had a good thing going with them. As a matter of fact, the early says They were preaching. They never said anything that was inaccurate. They were being of people. They saw people that were doing that were bringing them BACK because the the lips of a is what's supposed to protect the of right. We know this, but what's the in this? Because he's a and he gives over the word of God. You're not bringing people back. You corrupted the he says and it goes on and on and on. He's giving to the and if you go through the there's two that he's giving him the first is he says you're supposed to do it's the fact that the carbonus are not being brought in the right second half of the is this is the original means you're supposed to be to give over thee over What are these two? It's because Ley had two jobs. Ley was moved and he was also moved. He was moved on the end of to be the one that's going to go with the message that's AND THE CORRUPTED BOTH OF THOSE JOBS. SO WHEN HE'S GIVING him it's there's a and the is the end of the first of which is like the ra says and who was the one that was it's posh that's what's going on over here in mal it's the two of the ley it's the two bris him. It's the two jobs of the ley. The ley has two jobs. One job that the ley had was to dod the other job of the ley was he was for the Israel. Once upon a time they were and they would walk around with a chip on their shoulder knowing that they had a responsibility to make sure that the yid were behaving. And if they saw a Yid that wasn't doing the right thing, their job was to go and the job was to be of that was his responsibility. That was his responsibility. And it didn't matter whether that person was a big go and al and he needed help understanding something or if that person was a shabas. It didn't matter if he was on the level of Israel or if he was on the level of Yakov. Either way, that was the because the came from a andd was avoid of and was say a thousand different times WAS AN OF TEACHING people and that's all inclusive. It's part and parcel of what of the ley is. And by the way, if you're not sure this is true, who is the patriarch? Who is the it's right? The Mishna says a person should be right. That's a was to be I saw in his on the he said that when a is which is obviously very but when aid is so he has to make sure that he's the to the not the to the was a big theme in his he said you don't negotiate with thera is what thera is you don't bring thera close to the You bring the person close to the now it's obvious that a person who's being exposed to the for the first time can't be expected on day one to be able to keep mitzvah. That's just like a child said who's coming to learn how to read for the first time. So you can't expect him the first day all of a sudden to go through right. You have to teach him and then eventually he'll be able to read the It's not something you get to right away. There's a process of how you learn but the objective has to be not to the and his punchline was who is the paradigm of who do we know about it's paras for the it's this week's para for the rest of us it's next week's parish was and he was He did it from a PLACE OF HE BROUGHT THE CLOSE TO the but he was never me of the he never brought the to the but this is the he getting involved in this FOR THE TERRORIST IS PART AND PARCEL OF and is I think another which is the perkim says how was he talks about the khan right but the other says I don't know if there's any between When it comes to the second I think are all the same, right? It's the is the and I think any ley is bats and all one and the same. But here's the bottom line. The bottom line is once upon a time you had a ley who's walking in the street and he saw who needs and doesn't matter how far or how close he was he took and of but at the same time he took the whether he was a yak of or he was a and he was just to end maybe we could say and that is over the years we mentioned so So many times what the go says in many different places we found it in Sanhedrin and that is when the bik was destroyed the says and the goyan said that that means that with mikt not only did we lose the of but we lost the of as well. The world stands on three when the mage was destroyed. Obviously, we lost the but said in addition to losing the we also lost the and it's in this and over the years we've said over why was there all of a sudden a but could be what do the words mean? just a t it's poetry obviously but Mala the kings her kings and her ministers went into exile in Tyra it sounds like the dogish over here is not that the goal per se it's the leaders of the and rash saysrael where did rash get that from SO RASH'S TING BUT why the way everyone understands means unfortunately because season not so MUCH is making this the problem was is that the leaders weren't there and because the leaders weren't there as when there was a peskto there were but when there was a pesk there were also that would walk down the streets like a and was and when he saw he was and when we went to gus we lost all this we lost the ban we lost we lost the le we lost the of what was supposed to look like and because we didn't have the ley anymore so we're lacking in the the we don't have the that's the it's the we don't have that ley anymore that's when the mik was we lost the ley of perig gimmel and perdal of mikdash and when the ba mikt was we also lost the ley of peric of we lost both of those of the could be that's the either way the will be rebuilt we'll have the oft and it's going to be the same we'll have the ley that's rooted in the already made that's in the end of the first and then it's going to be and you know who said that you know who said that said that and that's where it comes full circle gives he gives to the he says you're not doing the you're not teaching the and because of that right Now who says that I'm not interested in all your carbon but one day and the ley is going to do the same is going to do his job and then he said amen Please.