Chulin 31

Today's daff is and we are at the Mishna on lamid. So a loaded daffishn somebody was shacking and with one slice he shacked two animals says the two people were holding on to a knife and they shacked it together. Even if one she did on the top of the other one on the bottom of this is going to be we already in yesterday's discussed this part of the brought had to understand this part of the does the mean as inal two people are holding on to the very same knife one person is holding it on top the other person is holding it on the bottom or does the mean there are two people holding two different knives and they're bothing at the same time. Regardless, the Mishna says if the rather than in a slicing motion, he checked it in a chopping motion. Rashi says the way somebody would cut a piece of meat or the way somebody would cut a vegetable is its known as we've mentioned many times. This is one of the five that govern the laws of if the person checked it meaning he wasn't he didn't press he didn't cut the animal the way you cut a vegetable rather he sliced however and in one slice he severed the animal as opposed to what as opposed to being right the perfect is you're and you're so what this person did was he was but he wasn't Maybe or we'll see in the end of the Mishna he was maybe and he wasn't say he wasn't but at the same time he wasn't maybe he says the depends it depends on the length of the knife to determine whether this is going to be a if the length of the knife is like the width of the neck of the animal and thear is going to explain what it means is that there's an additional length of the knife that equals the width of the animal so it has to be two times the width of the neck of the animal in order for it to be. If it's smaller than that, it's going to be possible as if somebody was and he shed the two animals at the same time. The first line of the Mishna said, but what this person did was he wasn't he was only or he was only just like we said in the previous case that if you're and you're not maybe it could be it's going to be as long as the knife is long enough. How long does it have to be? In addition to the width of the neck of the animal, it has to be another maloid safer. It has to be the width of the neck of a second animal. That's going to be true if you're shacking one animal. It's also going to be true if you're shacking two animals. Meaning there would have been that if you're shacking one animal, then the additional length of the knife should be. But if you'reing two animals, maybe the additional length of the knife has to be of two animals that if it's one, it just has to be an additional savver. In that case, it's going to be caution. Mishna says again all this conversation of how long the knife has to be but if you did a proper even if the knife is very very small we'll see what that means even if you use a scalpel is it's going to be cautious we have another very important that discusses 101 the basic of how has to be done number one we saw in the Mishna that you could check two animals with one soup addition whatever that means the mentioned of that has to be but you're not allowed to press against the you can't be but rather what you're supposed to do is you're supposed to be now if you do it in the way you're supposed to do it doesn't matter what the size of the knife is it's always going to be a culture the Mishna says even an even a scalpel that's not a knife even something like that as long as it's sharp sharp enough to sever the sim without causing the animal to be a tra before you sever the sim. It's going to be cautious in the event that you weren't dy you also were maybe so you didn't mess up. It wasn't Jasa but you also didn't do the perfect you were but you were a mi or you were maybe you were Is it cauter? It depends on the length of the knife. If the knife is long enough that in addition to the width of the neck of the animal it has an additional width of the neck of the animal. It's an additional doesn't matter if you one animal if you two animals is that it's going to be if it's smaller than that it's going to be how do you know that the perfect is learned from the following it says so we compare to an arrow and just like an arrow you push you pull back the strings of the want just you pull back the strings of the bow and that causes the arrow to move forward. So there's a concept has to be done in that way when it says in the word means you have to be how do you know that? So there's two number one the says and this is a and what it means over there is it's beaten up gold. So what the smiths used to do is they would beat up gold. They would soften it and then they would slop it in different directions depending on the form that they wanted the gold to take on. See see the word means to be and the says the we brought previously that is like and just like you take the bow string you pull it that causes the to move forward. concept had we only had the first you would think that maybe the word over there doesn't mean beaten it's not you're going to be dissolve in the direction that you want to form it but rather maybe the word is made up of two words it's from the word a thread and maybe the point is that it was referring to gold that was spun like a thread that's why we have a second that says the context over there is not the context over there is a and you see we compare the toita thus just like the has the motion so has the emotion was once an arrow and he a Wall was flying. So he was demonstrating for and he says watch what I could do. So he took an arrow he was to make sure there were no piggy. You have to be from a you have to be the gazakans. He checked the arrow under the sun. Right? It was perfect. And now he says take a look. And there was a bird that was flying. He shot the bird. Perfect. He nailed the simmon says the how in the world could be on such a why aren't you worried that even if after he saw the bird he saw that he hit it perfectly and it was a perfect but maybe the arrow went into the bird first then it checked the which we know was not good that's means it was borrowed you have to make sure that you checked it from the outside not from the inside so the he was able to see from the feathers that incision came from the outside. It wasn't from the inside. A bird a bird in like a requires the blood must have splattered all over the place. So how did he do maybe he went he collected the the blood right then he was able to pull it together but is not enough that you cover with dirt has to be offered underneath it as well. You say you learn from there. You have to sandwich the blood in between the offer. And we learn from there that what you need to do is is you need to prepare offer initially because technically all the ground is offered right for the most part. But Rashi says you need you need loose offer softer which would have had it been prepared previously. Doesn't sound like a prepared for him to be able to do the says the you have to say the mazeris. No, Raa prepared for this. Everything was set up. He knew what he was trying to do. He knew that the blood was going to splatter. He had all the in ready. He did a perfect. He was able to see from the feathers that there was no he used an arrow which is a that you could use an arrow even though it's not a the bottom line is says the he says that don't sue this to the children from that we always speak out are you allowed to go hunting says that you shouldn't hunt because that was that was it sounds like rubb's hunting he says obviously This was different. He was demonstrating I thought that was worth mentioning. Either way said, so he saw in the Mishna that let's say somebody and he wasn't. So the perfect it's supposed to be like the just like the that's the way the is supposed to be. It's supposed to be but at the same time it still could be if you were a how. So the Mishna said that if the sack was meal it was the length equal to the width of the neck of the animal that would make it cautious. Rab said that the way you have to read the mission is meaning it has to be equal to the but it has to be even longer than that. How much longer? It has to be an additional meaning the way you read the Mishna is if the has an additional it's going to be meaning it has to be equal to trait maybe means said that if somebody did two animals at the same time which the first line of mission said is okay here the mission doesn't say here it adds the says the more doesn't mean that the knife just has to be that can't be because said that when you're going to be it has to be more than a then it's two animals it has to be more than a when the Mishna says It means in addition to it being the length of two because in this case two animals it has to be an an additional if that's the case then in the ratio when only one animal and we said it has to be more than the how much more. So what's the bottom line? The bottom line is is it doesn't matter how small the knife is. It could be a scalpel. It could be a mash as we'll see in the in a second. Anything is going to be if you then it depends on the length of the knife. How long does the knife have to be? So it has to be two times the length of the neck of the animal that you'reing. So whatever that is, that's the that's how much you have to have. The that the Mishna said is that if you'reing two animals at the same time, all you need is one maloy saber extra. You don't need a maloy saber extra for each animal that you'reing. But if you were what the Mishna say last line said that when the Mishna says it means a scalpel that has no horns. So Rashi says so they used to put these little horns little protrusions on the top of the scalpels. It was done simply because it made it look nice. Now those car with it. a little hook and we're afraid that it may go into the sim and it may render the animal a before you're able to do a so the only time it's to use an is if it's an are you allowed to use a needle a no you can't use a needle because we're afraid that it's going to make a nick and it's like a it's going to cause the animal to be a what about the needles or the blades that People that made leather used to use says the sides of it are very very sharp. They used to cut leather with it. That's a different type of instrument. Is that I think yes. You know why? Because the Mishna says the Mishna says that if it's coming to be something presumably it's probably what it's coming to be. In other words, even though it's not foolish anywhere, but I think that's what the Mishna means when it says the says maybe what the Mishna means when it says great thing about the Mishna says the Mishna says so maybe the way you read the is meaning really the Mishna is saying one thing it's not talking about this when it says it means and the which it sometimes does is what it says it says if you maybe anything is Okay. Meaning even in it just explained that by adding the words is okay once the says is good apparently is a big that you can use then says it's not a rag because it could be even had the told me you wouldn't know. So I would have thought that was worse. What do you mean it's a sharper blade? It's a cleaner blade. The reason is because the gar previously said that only certain are that doesn't have those hooks. But an example that has the is the bottom line is is that we have no one way or the other from the whether this is okay or [snorts] it's not okay. Ver again this is a loaded daf and depending on how much time we have at the end we'll see how much raid we have an opportunity to speak at either festing him if a was holding a knife and then the knife slipped out of his hand oops and lo and behold it perfect money and we learn from and the emphasis on there's it HAS TO COME YOU HAVE to do a that causes the to go into effect but if the happens on its own because the knife slipped out of your hand is it's not going to be a thus says the a very obvious and a very profound It sounds like that the only reason this was not good is because the sakin literally slipped that in the hands of the person that was holding it. What would be if the person would have thrown the sake on the ground without any intention of doing it would have came it sounds like it would have been right. The issue is that it wasn't you didn't do the it fell out of your hand. THERE WAS NO YOU DIDN'T even perform an action. There was no misa. But let's say you would do a misa without intending to do a you would throw it on the ground because you're upset and lo and behold there was an animal there and you and it was perfect. Where was the by the way? It was a long knife. You don't have to have it sounds like you would be okay even though you had no if somebody was throwing a knife he wanted it to stick in a wall and on its way in route to the wall it encountered an animal and it did a perfect says it's caution because you don't need to do the say it's possible because you do need to do said ra you don't need to do he's the time of our mission because according to that you need to do even it should come out then then even if it the person threw the knife to the ground it wasn't just even then it would be possible the mashma only is said it must be the time of the Mishna is and by the way the says for whoa continued and said why did have to make this in our and point out that this is and that is like said it already earlier in the time we learned in the very first says that even that are considered benedas If they do and it's going to be okay obviously they could be a from today till tomorrow they don't have that. So what do you see from here that you don't need said yep it's a great and the time of the first so why would rab have to comment and say that the if he already commented and said that the Why do have to make this twice as we only had the I would have thought cuz at the very least are having but over here when a person just threw the knife to the ground you would have thought that even holds it's not Okay, that's why Ra wanted to make the dick and point out that you don't need even if you didn't have to do anything. You just had to throw a knife on the floor. That's also going to be okay. in we only had this I would have told then maybe the only time is true that you don't need is if at the very least the person who did the be without was someone that is a but in the case of where they are physically not you would think that that makes it worse and even according to it won't be okay that's why wanted to clarify that of said that it means that even if the person doing the is not even capable of having and it means even if you didn't have any to do any you weren't even trying to throw nothing you just threw it on the ground that's all you did it doesn't matter is that so the is going to digress now for about an omit and then at the end of the we're going to see why the did what it did We're discussing a woman who's aid. She has to go to the mikvah in order to become she went to the mikvah but she went to the mikvah. So at the very end of the d it's really going to be on tomorrow's damar is going to explain exactly what the case was with this but for now all we need to know is that this ended up in a mikvah but she ended up in the mikvah. The question is does work or does not work. So you said I heard from that is as follows. She's considered meaning she's says she's allowed to go back to her husband but at the same time if she's anious she wouldn't be able to eat she's not allowed to eat. She's not allowed to go to her husband at all. So according to is not a at all according to it depends as it relates to it's not considered a as it relates to her husband is considered according to it doesn't make sense you know why to her husband is an that eats shuma is we know that carus and are not the same thing in In fact, is more than so how's it possible that she's allowed to go to her husband meaning it's considered for the but she's not it's not considered as it relates to the is of this has nothing to do with or that's not the point the point is not one is more than the other because if that's the case you're right a need being with her husband is much more than a eating you know what the point is her husband True and requires meaning held that it's not regarding. So a woman towards her husband as it relates to as it relates to says we need him a car for this. Here's the digression. Uh we learned in the mission somebody was standing on the side of the ocean and then this monster wave came it had 40 g was a wave it detached itself from the ocean. this for it's coming there was a man standing on the side of the ocean and he was standing next to and it fell on him if he was or if the were everybody is says my the put and together sounds like that there's some between the two as it relates to how they become do when they go into the mikvah to become um no because so maybe we can prove from here that doesn't need but the says how do you know that maybe we're talking about a person who's waiting he's hoping when's this wave going to finally come he wants the wave to fall on him because he wants to be in other words he is having right he's saying and if that's the case that he has we can prove just the opposite maybe has to Although maybe also the only time to come to it's true that can't have but maybe the owner of the has to have but if you're going to remember what's the of this case someh in this story that a person was waiting for a wave to fall on him and or he wasn't waiting but but the point is there's some sort of that this is a good if you're supposed to walk away from this Mishna saying and just like don't have that doesn't have to have das that's there's a kadesh that you don't have to have das when you're mire yourself in a mikvah but if you're going to tell me you do have to have das when you metire yourself in a mikvah so what then is the kadesh in a mish no I'll tell you what the kadesh is in fact I'll tell you two number one I would have thought is that if it's raining and now this rain water that's coming down a mountain very very fast and you're standing on the bottom of the mountain this 40 of rain water it falls on you Because me shaman is only if it's in one place. But if it's running water, it's what's known as the is it doesn't work. And being that this wave is eerily similar to the rain water that's coming down the mountain. So maybe you would have thought that this whole case of the Mishna is dead then on arrival because you would think that this is too similar to the and that's the Mishna that it's okay anotherish is Russian keeping because as we'll see in a moment the only time it's kash if someone's met himself or his kale in the wave is if the person stays on the ground or the kay's on the ground and then the tip of the wave lands on the person while he's on the ground. But let's say you have this gala nitl this 40 this monster wave that's up in the air and you have a kay that's so you throw the kali into the gal is it's not going to bear [snorts] so another kadesh the is you would have thought that being that it only works in lus and if you're on the ground but it doesn't work if you throw it into the air so maybe we should be goer Russian when you're on the floor when it's in the air by the way how do you know that the only time this gausian works is if the kale or the person's on the ground but not in the and the reason is the bottom line is that we have no ri from this inv that's discussing the gaus to this shil whether requires cababana or tila does not require cababana says the [snorts] if that's the case we need him how do you Oh, that for does not require says that we know from another somebody had fruit and they fell into water and then the person went into the water, stuck his hands in, he wanted to pull the fruit out. Just so happens that his hands were and he pulled the fruit out. His hands now become tar. Why? Because his hands were in water. And even though he didn't have to clean his hands, why do he put his hands in the water to pull the fruit out? It doesn't matter. At the end of the day, his hands became tar. What about the fruit? Is that if later one of the falls on top of the fruit, the fruit? What do you mean they became wet? Is that the only time fruit becomes is if the fruit were first wet, but you were you were happy. You were satisfied with the fact that it became wet. In this case, there was no satisfaction. Number one, when the fruit fell into the water, it just fell in. You weren't even happy about it. You right away wanted to pull it out. Now, you'll tell me, we had this earlier in, and this is 101, that you don't need to be satisfied with the water on the fruit. As long as you're satisfied with something becoming wet, that in and of itself is enough. So maybe you can make the argument that the fruit should be because when you put your hands into the water, your hands became so there's a now from the water obe on your hands and that should then say that if that same water was on the fruit as it was now the fruit is but that doesn't work. You know why? Because when you stuck your hands into the water you never had daz to be met your hands either. That's something that you found out later. But you never had come. So there was never there was no for the fruit to become clean. There was no for your hands to become as a result even though your hands are because you don't need for your hands to bear. But let's say you stuck your hands into the water to clean your hands. Certainly your hands are over here. Why? Because you have for the water not on the fruit but on your hands. But that's enough. But what do you see from here? You see from this Mishna that if you stick your hands inadvertently into water and they would tell me when you pull your hands out they're going to be. So you see clearly that works from a somebody was now says over here means he had to hand but he's not let says it sounds like the only time that works that works is a few. So you see clearly you have to have say this is the way you read not you don't have to be you don't have what it means that even if you had still it's going to be another if someone didn't have it's doesn't mean it's as if you didn't at all not even say it's as if you didn't but it is considered so was asking asking these cautious to and was deflecting all the cautious that when was discussing this with he walked away thinking no no I think I'm asking good cautious deflecting it but it could be I'm right says but then he went through the and he found someone and he didn't have any So bottom line. So we had a between who ends up in a and she now is is it a good feeler or is it not a good feeler? Ra said it depends. [snorts] She's to her husband but she's not. What's the difference? her husband is considered with regards to is not considered as relates to said it's not a not for it's not certainly not going to be for and after the went through many and bry and gamoras the garra came out ra a bryer that seems to support raf the bry said clearly if someone And he had no to do it. says, "What's the next question that the Gar is going to ask can't argue with and this is a says that you don't have to have so he told him it's true with this but there is a who is and and the context over there is a begged that has a nega. So a person could become a bias could become a mess and a beggar as well is if a begg has a nega you bring it to the kayen the cayenne looks at it he washes it he tells you to wait seven days if after seven days the nega is still there he washes it a second time and the over there says it's discussing the second time we're washing this bag without all the details of the and it says it's going to be and asks I mean if you're if you're holding listening to the you know already up to the second so why have to say it says the first has had to happen last the is going to res preside over this washing he's going to be standing there he's going to say you have to wash it you can't just punct fall into a mikah. No, no, no. It's something that the has to oversee. Now, by the second doesn't say that, but we learn the first the presided over. Maybe the second says, well, the last word in the puzzle is to tell me somebody has to have not. But what do you see from here? You see that kimos needs. This was then he obviously argues with that price because our B said that doesn't over here we're discussing cleaning this bag even and unless somebody has d at the time that you wash the nega out of this bag it's not going to be considered a so you see it's not it's a little different but tahra leads d bottom line is this is a that supports says the gimar maslim We have one problem and now it ties back into our did really say is it true is it possible that holds that is and even though there's that says he holds like this one sheet who brought a from the laws of that has you know what the problem is our but it's not we learned enough only because the sack fell out of the hand. There was no he would have dropped it on the floor. There would have been would have been and we said that you don't have to have now our Mishna is discussing right. So we're discussing you see that is interesting we know is like every we have it's true but is all who so why then should yet first two different one we're discussing who's it or [snorts] is it not here we're discussing obviously in the there's some commonality between and between we're not going to have time to talk about this today on Sunday but for now what we need is the gammor thinks It's that both in one case and the other case you'reing for yet in our you see and we know like every single and here holds like who holds that is says the you have to say it comes to is going to agree thus it's not going to be Meaning there is a between and between how do you know that? Meaning what's the premise for that doesn't like it. So we need a says the I'll tell you why we know that if someone was somebody but he didn't realize he was doing it's and the learns it out from a that's really the punch line of the gar says and we learn from there it's learned out from a pos now if every single was not a good you know what you see from you see when it comes to it's different. So it's true holds that he learns it out from a he also holds that he learns it out from as well the says is the that is in other words who argue with the who hold that is right our mission we said is argue what now that we have a what with that says it's true. You see from that P that only by is massic possible mean only by you have to have to do but see so you could prove from there that you don't have to have to do a quote unquote but at the very least you have to have to do a to be cutting a piece of but if you just threw a knife on the floor then you didn't even have for to do a that's going to be worse and ra concludes this discussion as far as we're concerned the mark continues but for Now that it's that last line where was able to prove the wrong why meaning you're acknowledging that there's a that says so you see there's an idea of that's what are the going to say it's true you don't need but you do need it it doesn't say anywhere in the where you coming up with spout that you need. You just don't even it says in the hear but it doesn't say that what we should be concerned with is not I don't know has nothing to do with anything said and said raba said that that was the checkmate argument you see all the like why was right he said you think would have been right overn because he had a great argument What was his argument that you see from that must be wanted to be between said had it said in the I would accept that but it doesn't say the word anywhere in the as a result it's either or it's no and if you see that massic apostle must be that boy period so a lot that we can focus on on the doc that we just learned but I think it's to go back to some raid that we spoke at the beginning of the it's already a month ago and without many many and that is in his second so it's the asked on the all the quote in the beginning of So let's just read the of the and we'll get into it says as follows. So there was most of the refer to him as he was from he emerged one day in the he said that he lives in a far away village. He spoke about the Sabbat river etc etc. We spoke at the last week where says that was sitting and learning as we all know but regardless he comes from and he brings with him and one of the that he brought was he says as follows this is if somebody continued >> [snorts] >> It's pigle. You're not let it even though we're discussing unless he dabs first. It's going to be pigle. If he's not going to wear clothing while he does the pigle. If he's under the influence, piggle. He wasn't wearing and then he continued. He said once he turns 80 years old and the minimum age for is 80. Now the most famous excerpt of this is that he said that is not let the first place says it sounds like even which is the but the asked to be from a different part of the price a different part of because one of the things he said was is that if somebody would be that the says but even If there's a it's going to be okay now as long as it's possible it should be wrote back he said first of all I don't know why you ask to be on we don't paskin like so why are we going to spend time and get excited over the fact that we have a since when do we ask like but says now that you asked the question let's talk about it a little bit I'll ask you another because we have a we just learned it right now discusses if somebody according to which is so for example if somebody throws a knife against the wall or if somebody throws a knife on the floor and it just so happens It's in that case says did the person make the of course he didn't make the and still you see is going to be according to it's says you have to say and he says what what do you mean the why would say that if you without it's going to be pigled the is going to be possible since when do you find that should be in the says do you know what is of course the is not really in the but we know that someone that's a if somebody is not he's a he's a with regards to anything related it's but if a person is a anything related he becomes if somebody doesn't make the says HE BECOMES A THAT'S WHY IT'S GOING TO BE A PROBLEM SO THAT'S only true says if a person gets up to then HE SAYS HE'S OH A PERSON like that and that's going to be an issue. But he says this person who threw a knife against THE WALL AND IT JUST so happened was he no he he would have made a he wasn't trying to or if a person threw a knife on the being that he's not a it doesn't make him the principle of the is not going to apply. It only applies says if you do it because it's all predicated on the fact that you established a by doing that otherwise it's not going to be an issue but we also spoke out from let's see Frank in his sim and he said a beautiful it's based on it's writing in right in the beginning of perki says as how do you know that every mitzvah every that a person does before he does it he has to make a it says in the says and others make the as well that you see in this year it shall be a very big because And this is something that everybody knows and that is so if somebody has a whether he did a mitzvah or has to do a mitzvah. What do you do? You do the mitzvah but you don't make the because the mitzvah is even for a mitzvah is of course only this it sounds like the says how do you know that mitzvah require from just like require is a mitzvah and by the way so we're learning which is a and learn from a learn from it's one of the so it certainly sounds like from this year it certainly sounds like from this year that voice is the it sounds like Now when we spoke at the heart the first time we spoke at the abridged version we're going to speak out the the more extended version now says if that's the case I want to tell you the over discusses if someone said so he whispered it so quietly that he couldn't even hear what he was says the despite the fact that holds that when you read and if you don't hear the words that you're reciting there's another that is a true over there was discussing so this is not the as in This is he should not be and the comes out that the tone of that mission is and the ask because if holds that when you say you have to hear the words then shouldn't be able to be maf because before you're maf you have to make And this is he's he can make the but he's and as a result he has no way of hearing the braha that he's making. So if he has no way of hearing the braha that he's making then shouldn't he be a problem that you have to hear the words of you have to hear the you make before you talk to not you know why because over there there's a We're dealing with the and the because it's not. So it's true says the gumari who holds that you have to hear the words of holds that any you need to talk you have to hear what you're saying and if you can't hear what you're saying even if it's because you're not going to be but that is only anyways being is only it's for that reason it's for that reason says the it's not a problem and the same who holds that if you say you don't hear the words of holds that if you make and you don't hear the it's going to be okay. I would mean you weren't sure you weren't the but the only Yeshua. It sounds like from the Gmorra that the Gmorra is SAYING THAT IT'S BECAUSE the mitzvah is it's for that reason we don't care about the the as if to say if the to say would be if it would be then we'd have a problem over here why would it be a problem let's say let's say and your person who's he has no way of fulfilling the goes you have to hear what you say and if you don't hear what you say it's okay very nice so you why does the say that the reason is because the anyways only so it doesn't matter that he didn't have the as if to say if the would be would bother me that he doesn't have the bra and the player sure what do you mean even if the so WHAT DOES IT HAVE TO DO WITH THE actual rumor And they bl say that the reason the shagar and the Yeshua blighted was because in the times of the shar the rush wasn't printed yet. But he says if you go to and you take the dice he asks the and he answers the he says he said that you see from this that the only reason is not in the mitzvah is because of would be of it not just the it's because that we always bifurcate THE MITZVAH AND THE YOU COULD DO A MITZVAH without a you miss THAT ON THE BUT IF WOULD BE a you would not be able to do that you wouldn't be able to spout the two so [laughter] you' have they'd be one and the same they'd be attached by the hip and you couldn't do a mitzvah without doing the is only so it comes out the mitzvah it's not of the mitzvah that's why the would be it says it comes out and according to that holds which is it comes out that is if the is going to be the says we can answer and it's what was the came and he said that if somebody and he doesn't make a is going to be possible so much so he says even though it's somehow it becomes piggle. I don't think this of course but it's going to be pigle and ask it doesn't make sense we have from that you don't have to make a says it's true holds you don't have to make because that is only and being that it's but the hill says it came from it was going with the fact it's in the beginning THIS IS oh the shami holds that is if it's which is going to be all the you're right this is from the holds like says in and it's like and the beginning of that is mid But we're just getting started. I found in so it's in so he says as follows. He has it's and he says as follows and he brings the sim almost verbatim which is very to me but either way he brings this whole from the what happened to the and he says he heard a terret from hisb and the terret was terra number one I'm not sure why he doesn't bring the hearts but he's very very in this and at the end he says as follows he says he found in the So this was who once saw his who was giving a glass of water to his mother and before he gave his mother the glass of water. Ready? He made a shameless he said and says how can you make such a now the truth is that as why don't we make a said but it doesn't matter what the terret is you don't make you don't make so what's going over here stating the command that made this is the good right so he says like this he says that we just spoke after learns out from a from a that seems to be truth is if you look up to your shami it's a very long says as follows they once entered a jumped up and he made a good because every single mitzvah needs a bra beer. So the the as in the who was a contemporary and so the wrote a pish under we have it on two we have it on and we have it on. So the and his pish on the shami most have it on this right here says what happened was as follows and went into the store they wanted to check the and the says right you have to make sure when you do business so they were going to check to make sure that it was got up and he made the following >> [laughter] >> Unbelievable. And what did tell him very very good cuz every single mitzvah needs a continues. He says, he says, "I found I saw by and says definitely who was the of the who was the of the so this is the of the deal with he says he used to make a before he gave the is not that was a lot of the roots and why we only different comes from a and he quotes this raja right here and he was says but here's the bottom line that this of the choice who was he said already has the power. He used to make a when he used to give stock when he used to be mal and it really has a [laughter] says that once made says the you know what I think is going on over here I think what's going on over here is the because the holds that and if to make a mitzvah is I don't think you could stop being like mitzvah yes this mitzvah no all these tr that the talk about these are all very nice when you're dealing on a level but when you're dealing on a level it becomes very very so that holds the and by the way what's the mean so you make a and you can make a like did when you give and you can make a like did when he was the bounty hole that it's only being that it's only and that's why we have all these different he concludes this piece. He says of course we don't pass like it's not something you should do. Don't try this at home. that I heard the story from the I felt like I had to find that at the very least even though it's it's a but there's at least a in the a in the shi either way it's more to talk about but >> it's about it's about jabas