Menachos 104

Today's and we are seven lines from the bottom of today's being learned as so we're moving along in the 12th per of this is the home stretch Benel home stretch. The Mishna on days had mentioned a discussion that the great had with the with regards to the maximum size that a carbon is able to be said that a min can't be made up of more than 60. And the reason he said is because up to 60 if you want to do the you could do it. However, if it's going to be more than that, you're not going to be able to do it. So the says that the told that it just seems that what 60 Yeah. 61. How could the be able to slice and dice and be malik literally splitting here? So he told them back isn't this always the way it is that has 40 a person could become but if you have 40 missing literally a this tiny amount in the we had the longer version of response in the ribbon says if you have food That's the size of a it's if it's a minus literally a sesame seed if you have a beggress the bottom line is said that although I hear but this is the way the laid down the law and that is we work within and if you're off by a cimeter you might as well be off by a mile that's going to be an issue as it relates to there's an idea that up to 60 he could do the bilah hence it would be a more than 60 he can't do the bah and as a result it wouldn't be a as a postcript to this discussion asked what unbeknownst to us is one of the most famous kashas and shas the terret is really what's famous and that is who cares if You can't do if it's more than 60 is at the end of the day it's a is not one of so if the is how could the she of it being and to answer this said it's true the but for it to be that in itself is this is a principle that and the apply to many different way beyond the scope of this discussion right here. Way beyond the scope that the London might have thought you could apply it to. And this is very often a general rule that when sometimes say that something's not doesn't necessarily mean that it doesn't have to be not being sometimes means that you don't physically have to do it but at the same time it has to be meaning as long as it's then it won't be but if it's not then it could be it would be what those applications are learn but the bottom line is this is the source I'll upon him for this very wellknown cl and policy there is either way the way Rashi learns the segue of the end of yesterday's daf into the beginning of today's daf we'll see the way tyus learns it later but the way rashi learns it we just had a little bit of discussion related to shim the shear of a mka we mentioned the shear of a mikvah and the brace we mentioned the Shir of Tomas. We mentioned the Shir of Tomas. So, we're going to tell a nice story now that relates to the idea of says the name. There was a story with one mule that was in the house of Rebi. Reb's house probably had more than one mule. Rebi was ofd in the words of the Gar Rebi was an but amongst his big of different animals that he had he had one shea that died as dama and the went and they measured they literally assessed how much blood had spilled on the floor from this dead mule and they wanted to see bivas did it have a raas or did it not have a raves Why did it matter? Because the were of the opinion that to the extent that there was a that would be so we know that a wears two hats. An aa is something that's also an AA is also anatom it's also a a source of the were of the opinion that the dam of this praa like the praa itself was however there has to be a certain sh what's the re went and they were messiah is there reas or is there not a reas to determine whether or not there was tum or not says the gamar sobb in the neighborh says over this and heard it. He says literally hate for this is Mishna says that and both said that the is and by the way we have a to support this said was a story where the king's men were killing they were These are certain types of donkeys and the reason they were doing it was to feed this is good lunch. The lions that were part of the military. Now it just so happens that this was taking place at the same time that the yidden were making their pilgrimage. They were being to the md and they had to pass through these roads and as a result they got very dirty. They were emerged in the dam of these. It was when they came to the mikdash, nobody said anything to them. What would you have expected them to say? You're to you literally are submerged in blood. Can't walk into the ba mikdash. Can't go to the harabas. But nobody said a word. And the reason nobody said a word was is because big deal. It's the dam of these dead donkeys. Dam of an avail. Either way says in the name of there is a re why because they want to know whether there's a over here mentions and from both things what emerges is that re even any of is not going to be so when Rabibi heard this says Ishtik he was quiet he didn't say anything only was there and turned to and he told why were you quiet meaning it's a good kasha but it's not there's a to this kasha my time and you don't even know what the answer is I think why didn't you give him the answer he didn't say what the answer is yet but he says why do you answer he told him there's an answer really I I don't know I I can't think of the answer and then he said, he says, "You expect me to be able to come up with a terrorists to a good you know said three things and explained the three things as follows. He said when it says that in the world of the there'll be people that are going to have to buy. What does this mean? Rashi says this person doesn't have any ka. As a result, he can't produce his own tu. Okay. But he has money and he uses his money to go ahead and buy tu from his neighbor. That's a farmer. That's a cla. The reason it's a cla is because what happens if next he doesn't have any money. So if he has a field at the very least he'll be able to eat whatever the field produces but if all he has is money if if he has the money but if then right so this is a even if the person has money but if he doesn't have the it's a problem because what happens if at some point he's not going to have the money when the continued and doubles down a little bit. You know that's referring to his shabas. This is a person. He doesn't have a field to produce his own. He doesn't even have enough money to buy for the whole year. So he lives. What's the issue with that? He doesn't even have so much money. He doesn't have an inventory even of and as a result from week to week, paycheck to paycheck, you never know. Maybe he's not going to have what he needs to be able to go and buy the food for Shabas. And then when the concludes and says that's talking about somebody that relies on the baker, which means that every single day he literally lives day by day. He can't even buy enough food for a week. Either way, he said this is the and notice it goes in three madres and it gets worse and worse from the person that doesn't have a field but at least he has money to buy for a year to the person that only has money to buy for a week to the person that's literally living day by day. Soib said as relates to meal I'm in that third category I'm being that I'm he turns to that that there's a good answer to this but please forgive me that I can't think of it because I'm in a a situation where he says and as a result I apologize you're going to have to help me out over here so thear says my what was this terret anticipated that he felt raibish should have been able to come up with but Rabibi just didn't have enough to be able to think said Yehuda was the house of the Rashi says Reb's family had a and the in Reb's house whenever they had They had an in-house attorney, an in-house r and in-house and they used to ask him all the and he was the one that commanded them to do it and this was like we're so it's aishn and this is also said there are six things where was and was so we know ordinarily was say and one of them is the is it Tommy or is it not Tommy and B says it's even when Basil was this by the way is so he's going with that held added to that he said that when was they were only and the reason Because if you take of and you make it into a solid it would turn into a gaz and the baser is the so as a result the dam has to be the kaz equivalent thereof which is a re but the bottom line is you see here was that the dam of is that's the name of a mess a mess that happened with a rebi What do you mean? We know from didn't know an answer said you should have known the answer. What is the answer is the one who taught it to us says you want to know what the answer was. The answer was that that was in base. It happened. Who was that? It was the Tanaud. is of the opinion that is so that's why he went and he passing the way he basking does it with the Mishna in idias no just so happens with another himself is the one that said that according to is and that he passing the way he passing the bottom is it was a big where the dam of an is not a sounds like held one way held another way. When Rhuda said his he actually was attributing it to the house of he was attributing it to Basil. This was one of the but the bottom line is this is a tucked away here in now before we started this we led into by quoting Arashi says why are we talking about this right now it's a nice story little aad but what's have to do with anything that's been going on for the last long while Rashi says not much but at the same time there was a discussion about Shirim and this is an interesting anecdote related to Shirim. We were talking about being mish the ma 60 or a little less than 60 or the mikvah 40 a little bit less than 40 and uh the bead is it a little less than three and the is it a is a little bit less than here too they were mash the dam was it a re or was it a little bit less than a re that's the segue but if you take a look at the bottom says a different says that you want to know why we just brought discussion. It's because we mentioned something very interesting about the great town of Raud said was the of the family of that says is the reason we brought this whole discussion. It's because if you go back to the end of yesterday's d the gar mentioned something that had said as a matter of fact the opening of the garb and the gar said the gar mentioned another interesting fact about who was he was the so we know that once upon a time when the sat together and they would speak so it was done in a very very formal way somebody would ask a question and then there was an answer. We spoke about this in but the bottom line is that there was a a certain surah a certain say there of how it happened and was none other than the great says that the reason we're mentioning this story is because we mention therefore we're going to mention another thing about so what this is just an opportunity to talk about says no it's a little bit more than that because the reason is for the same exact reason that was for one and the same reason and therefore we feel that we mention it's because of X. So I'm going to mention to you now also another thing that was because of X and that is he's so what's this X what is it that was that should become the is also the reason that and that's really it's a very very well-known it's actually a more in a well-known this This is the this is the d that talks about what caused and his son to hide in the first for 12 years and then for a 13th year where he was that all played itself out during that 13-year period. But didn't just decide one day to spend 13 years in a cave. It happened because of and the tells the story in it's a very short I think it's kad to mention it. The garra says actually begins from the angle. Why was referred to as says the because once upon a time and was with them got up and he said started praising the Romans. They're they're a great great nation. They made uh streets bridges, bathous. What an unbelievable um were living amongst great people. He heard what said he didn't say anything heard what and he did say something. He quoted. He says, "No, everything that they did, they did for themselves. says amazingly went and he told over this story meaning he didn't go and but he says you know you want to hear an incredible story I was once sitting between the three and this is what happened either way and the birds like say sometimes carries things and ultimately the malas heard about what happened. They said who praised us he should be that was quiet. He has to go to Golas. He should go to Shim Shagina Shim who to the contrary he spoke in a very derogatory way about us. He deserves to be killed when he heard that they want to kill him and he's a hunted person. went with his son and they hid and as they say the rest is history but we need the part of this what was the he became the says that you see was very and that's why he's here we'll throw in a little digression a digression it'll also relates to it could be that also. But the bottom line is says this is really the and that is oh that was so that not only did they make him the but he became the he became the person that this says is the and this also a little bit the rest of the story of the rest of the story of the great you know it's interesting we know that rebi was a talmid of Rome Gimmel also a very well-known gimar the garra says that rebi said the reason I was great is because when ram used to give shir I used to see him he said but I only seen saw him from behind and had I seen him from the front I would have seen his face I would have been that much greater rebi is a mogar mayor when rebi sat down to write the mishnay so we know stamishna is raor we've mentioned many times over the years the garis that the avoid of rebi was to be malacit all the different versions of the mess and he had to pick and choose whose version of it he liked most right whose was more katar valan and from all the different that he saw the one that he was the one from raor and the the chain between rebi and ram and that connection is critical and vital in terms of understanding the homos it's in terms of understanding the setup of talmud Bavi in terms of understanding the way the ter was transmitted. Rebi was also a town of Riehuda, right? You see, Rab Yehuda was a big deal. In fact, Raud literally every there's a dead mud. He's the po. It's actually interesting, I think, because when there's audi and that claw of just to appreciate is something that's already in the Mishna. We once spoke out in from Margolas said that we know in whatever this is you always go right that the you go based on the second this is the rule of how it always works right we always pas in like the toughest is the way it is and molas in his epic way figured out that if you go through Mishnayas the second Tana mentioned in the Mishna is always the Tana that we're going to pass like Bisham is always mentioned before B reb is always mentioned before Yeshua and Ra is always mentioned before. We spoke out once that it could be in the sh between mentioned before mayor because there like says in the truth like we talk like but the bottom line is you see rebi put into the as much as much as he's the mayor is legendary again it's critical in terms of understanding what we do but at the same time inudoist was and by the way what do you mean the Romans said that he should be the Romans weren't determining they said he's going to get maybe but at the end of the day if they're asking that means you find that is somehow himself he's telling to that's in terms of the but over there. He's auditory. We now return from our digression back to the suggest the background to the Mishna is as we'll see in the Gumar if a person wants he could be minad wine as a carbon. So usually when you think of a carbon you think of you think of you think of and right the few carbonas that brought or if you want to bring a beginning of par that's something that you're allowed to do as well stating that there's an a person if he wants to be that's also something that he's allowed to do. are and ensuing is going to go through the details of how exactly a person went about being if somebody wanted to bead one lo two or five that's not something he was able to do you want three that's okay four that's also okayish is also okay and once you hit 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 as high as you can out you want to be manadiv that's something that you would be able to to do as well. So the Mishna says that if a person wants to be Mishna doesn't say it explicitly but it's presupposed however there's rules. So one no two no five no three four six and that also is something they'd be able to do. What's the difference? So again we'll see it in the gamar is going to make a bra but the is because in the you find three different as it relates to the amount of wine that was brought together with carbon. So when was wine brought together with carbon with the so there was wine that was brought the wine libation the says that depending on what animal was being brought that determined how much wine was brought. So if it was a sheep, if it was a kev, so then what was brought was a raves. A raves is a rain. A hinn is made up of 12 lugan. This is easy math in contrast to a do we had last week which was hard math but this is easy math. So it's a quarter of 12 which is three. So it's essentially three lugan. If the carbon is an says then it's a then it's a third of a h. A hinn again is 12 lan. A third of 12 is four. Ultimately it's going to be four lugan. And if it's a par, if it's a benbuk or if you're bringing cattle, that's a much bigger animal. It requires more wine. And then it's going to be a and then it's going to be half of 12, which is six lugan. Here's the point. In the you find the number three, four, and six as relates to lugan. When the wases that if a person wants to bring wine, he can't. The idea was you can bring but you have to conform with the priest subscribed of y that the already mentions mentions of three by the kev three works four by the aisle that works six by the bambucker that's going to work as well now why does more than six work you don't find anywhere more than six you find three four and six so you can do more than six so again we'll see it in the gimar but rashi speaks to that right away the reason more than six works is because if a person's Not of seven you find seven. Where do you find seven? Three and four. You have three for the Kev and you have four for the aisle. Eight you find eight as well. Two alum would be eight. Nine I have nine as well. I have three and six. 10 I have uh you know do the math. The bottom line is six and four, right? 11 I have four, four and three. Either way, just take this formula and spread it across your sheet and you'll see for every single number you'll be able to come up with a that was being done in that way. But one was never brought, two was never brought, five were never brought. As a result, one, two, and five are out. Three, four, and six, and everything above six is going to work. This is the Mishna with a little bit of uh spoiler alert from what we're about to learn in the Gar says the by the way is really the backdrop of the entire Gar is going to say a bunch of things but there's always a context and a backdrop. This is the backdrop. It's this. So what does that even mean? Kev means that if somebody is of a certain amount of he would have to bring it in one shot that's what ke means you would have to bring it in one shot in means that if somebody is for certain of whatever that might be so you don't have to bring it in one shot you can bring a little bit and then you're going to go and do another libation ultimately you'll have to fulfill your but you don't have to do it in one shot so this was the shim told me what's the give me a practical I'll tell you the person said that I want to bring five as an adult now the said you can't put five in one shot right if you're going to tell me so even though you can't bring five but there's an eight right now to do what you could do is you could bring four because that's something that was brought for an aisle that's something that's okay and as it relates to The fifth one having that will be and you'll deal with it whenever you have to deal with it. Meaning the five is going to be right now I'll bring I'll bring four and the fifth one will be what does it mean it'll be in says two options and the one option is you could just put it with all the stuff that's usually what ends up happening or you could bear it later with other you could end up bring it but the point is you could bring the four even though I can't bring the five I could still bring the four But if you can tell me well that means when I said five I have to bring five together. Now I can't bring five together. So what am I going to have to do? I'll have to add another one. That's fine. But the bottom line is I'll have to bring a six or more than a six and then afterwards I'll be able to bring what's this is the again where a person was five. You can't bring five. That's a Mishna. But at the same time, maybe I could bring four of the five and deal with the fifth later. Or no, I can't bring five. I have an obligation to bring five. So I have no choice. I have to be six. You can't say by the way I was to bring five. You can't bring five. So okay, it's all cool. I'm good to go. No, for sure the five is right now. You were but you can't be mak this way. Okay, so do what you need to do in order to be able to be makaya took the first stab at trying to be the sh by the way. Fabaya takes the first stab. Who's going to take the second right again the sign of I'll bring you from and this Mishna is coming up there was six that were in the B mikdash that were meant to have money in it and the purpose of it was it was me. What were these six chifers for? Canadas. One was from the second one was for a fourth one was these six things. Sometimes there was leftover money, right? There was mistress. So what they did with the mistress was they left it in a koopa. What was the purpose of the koopa? It ended up being used for the that was used for kids. very often, not always, but very often when there's leftover money, so they would use it to fund these that were always being brought so that the the shouldn't be left idly. But either way, here's the cash. Then if you're going to tell me that if somebody goes and he's minad five lugan of yan is you could bring four right now and you can take the fifth and leave it. Well if that's the case so how come there wasn't another for those misters? You would think it would have happened. So if it would have happened there should be a aer for it. There's aer for the the each got their own categories. So what this is any le and the you would think if you might need it so you have it right again this could be an account that's needed for a rainy day. But why didn't they have this that's soar says I'll tell you why because used for all the right all the reason is is because are always being brought and because were always being brought so in the event that you found yourself in a situation where you had a leftover lug of yin there's always going to be what to do with it. You don't have to put it into a fun and wait until like a rash. There's always going to be a need for it. 10 minutes they're going to need a no problem. You have an extra one, I have two, I need a third and like this will be able to use it. Being that it was so often being used, it's for that reason you didn't need a fund for it. And that's why even though there is a mus says a of a but to have a for it that's really not necessary I'll bring you right from somewhere else a so the background of the bra is a says this is if you remember that's the term mentions the whole understood was extra what Exactly. This is poss remember all the different that talk about the all the right that was that para so we dish in every syllable of that entire par this seems to be completely superflous as follows is coming to be something is not only something that could be brought when there's an obligation to bring it but if you want to bring in that's also okay how much could a person three How do you know that if you want to be teaches me that you want to be you can go ahead and be you would think if you want to bring less you could bring less as well. No says so I learned from here that if you want more than three you could bring more than three less that's not something you'd be able to say let's understand this price a little bit better. What does mean when we say ye has come to be and if you want to bring more than three you could bring three you could bring more than three and what does more than three mean four or six I need a to tell me not only three also four and six doesn't make any sense if I know three I know four and six why the of three what's the of three it's because you find three in the there's a precedent FOR THREE there's a precedent for that as What do you have to say? What does the mean when it says that from we more than three? By the way, the word is not mentioned in this if you notice doesn't say the word. Where does it say the word? It says it in later. Take a look at uh No, as a matter of fact, it says it in the part. Interesting, right? But the bottom line is it does say the word year in the context of the not in this if you're looking up the P in but the bottom line is he can't tell me year is coming to tell me four or six because for the same price that I know three I know four and six must be coming to tell me something I wouldn't know what's that something that I wouldn't know probably five and what's the then saying that there's a being five must be why because I can't for sure I can't bring the five ele must be I'm going to bring four of the five three of the five but the bottom line is you see there's a mus of bringing part in the five which would mean at the very least a ke if there's no five you just have to add another one if then at least there's a a five which gives it as if I'm being the five either way says the was to the heard this whole again always gets the last word in these discussions and said you can't bring one not two and not five doesn't it sound like five is the same as two just like two you can't bring at all so two five you also can't bring at all why can't you bring two at all because there's no mix of two that you'd be able to bring so it's going to mash with at five is the same thing. I think actually it's not no it's not the same there's no there's no way to be you can at the very least bring four out of the five says the if you're going to assume I mean just said But that's it's not a what I'm about to ask now is is not a shot. However, I have a shot. My sh is as follows. In the event that somebody is up until 10, I know exactly what you're supposed to do. What are you supposed to do? So we mentioned one loan nothing. Two lugan nothing. Three lugan that's the four that's the five lak right you have to be six lugan that's the bambakar seven that's four and three eight that's four and four nine is six and three 10 is 6 and four right so up until 10 I know what to do however 11 I'm not sure what's the somebody's 11 What what are the to do? We assume that this person was to bring two pumm now a power six. So two par 6 plus 6 is 12. No. So why do you say 11? His math is not so good. But the bottom line is I mean good luck learning last week's stuff this guy. But the bottom line is his math is not great. He thought uh how do you get to you know 6 plus 6 is 11. So the bottom line is and if that's the case, but the bottom line is really which is really 12. So therefore, he's going to have to ring a 12. So unless you have the 12, it's not going to be okay. Or maybe this guy's an actuary, not this person said 11 because it's right multiplied by this divided by that the square root of this. So maybe this person is holding in the and then that's how he did this. Either the guy push doesn't know back of the envelope arithmetic or this person is working with algorithms. Right? This is the Shiloh over here. It says the what's now what's the crux of the question? The crux of the question is do we assume the guy knows math? No, that's not the crux of the question. The crux of the question actually is something else. The question is do we say could be just like a weird way for a person to bear I'm going to bring the wine of two and a right. Is that really what he's Is that like a normal way of doing it? Maybe not. to pin is normal to az way of you know ordering takeout. So this that's not usually the way people do it and it could be as a result we assume that the person probably meant to parh if he meant to pim so why did he say 11 because math was never his strong point in school. SO IT COULD BE THAT'S the reason as a result what he really meant TO SAY WAS 12 he said 11 he knows his math he knows that it's 11 and it's not so crazy to say the amount of wine they used to cover and what's the for this well is gonna come he's going to be and so many he's also going to be either way is going to tell us exactly how we're supposed to go ahead and be the truth is there's two things that need to be understood here. The first thing is prefaced his question is and after learning the what's have to do with the sh if a person says 11 did he mean 11 did he mean 12 what's the crux of the shil did he mean but his math is off or did he mean two and a math is really okay is it a normal thing to make an adv based on two different meaning or no we assume he meant the same This this was that's already now she's not it's not so clear has to be it's the sh itself really makes sense if you hold as well but the way presented the sh that's only if you hold why because readaya's words then you can bring it right now. The Shil that he had was can I bring the 11 or can I not bring the 11? If you hold and you can bring the 11 then there's no sh the only time there's a shil could you bring the 11 is if you hold ke and there's a that you didn't mean 11 you really meant 12 h would be a sh but the shil of this guy does no math doesn't know math does he mean the same could he mean two different meaning that would make sense if you hold I think that's pos that's the first the second is a shil he's not sure if If when a person says 11, does he mean 11 or does he mean 12? The said includes 11, right? I mean, what's the holy means different types of animals? No other way you're gonna make this work. So it's it's right. I mean again I didn't do all the math but at some point you're going to end up having to be mitar of different animals think to make this work. So if that's the case so so what's really what's really the sha right and by the way even seven what was seven seven was made up of a four and a three right so you'd be mary the kev so you have to say as follows you have to say that's pit if if the guy is clear that I want 11 because I want two and a or I'm seven and the only way you can come if we know for sure what the person means there's no shila this is going to work The shil is with there's a little ambiguity where maybe his math is off and really he meant two part it could be it's more that the person would do two partition is not a steer the mission is saying it works it works there's no sh it works that's enough in a two of this and one of that there's no suffic in the world that's something that's possible the question is where there's two ways to bear is that like a way to bear no maybe THAT'S A WAY TO be but you want to know if it works it's right that's There's no sh in the world that would work either way. So the discussion of this last Mishna was the idea that a person could be not only but even what's the it's a talked away from that we learn this concept that a person is able to bead our Mishna now the last Mishna of the 12th of Messiah is going to discuss a person that wants to be menad she oil so oil is also something that went on the misb when did oil go on the misb with the almost all had oil could a person say I want to bring a carbon an oil libation is that okay not okay I just want to bring oil that's what I'm going to do I'm going to come with a tablespoon of olive oil is that something I'm allowed to do or is that not something I'm allowed to do said you can bead of you can't bead of said No is not so rept. So it makes a lot of sense which is also should also be brought keep to bring how do you bring the you bring it by itself you take the wine and you pour the meaning by any time wine was brought on the you took a fleshan and you poured it on the m that's the way the wine was brought so there's a mus if you want to go now and do this potato you do it. But is that when the she is being brought as a it's not being brought it's together with a and if that's the case maybe it wouldn't be able to be brought meaning if you had a way to bring the shea the way you bring the I hear what you're saying but your example of being would be bringing she on itself and the precedent on doing it is when it's and it's not to because they're being brought. Either way, this was the case. You can't have two people one. In other words, you can't have two in a now a little bit from the it sounds like you could have two in a you just can't have two and one is but let's say it's two is yeah and by the way would make a lot of sense in it be very logical one which is the minimum share of you can't have two but maybe if it's two is so I get my half you get your half maybe it would work stating that we know and this is the So can bring a carpet even a one little bird even that could be brought. So the Mishna was made up of and the ratio was could be the now is going to discuss both halves. But so the we had the affformentioned said no. So I think from the two we can learn that if a person wants to be he could do it and he could do it all day every day is in fact in their whether the gear is even supposed to be there but it's not the point if you could do it one day you could do it every day that a person can bead We do see this. So Rashi says it's false because Rashi says it sounds like the is why not because why? Because you see it's should be brought up just like why not because so you can bring up is together with and so here too you want to bring the oh but it sounds like if I would bring the she with the other things then I could do it meaning it sounds like we're drawing a parallel that when I'm able to bring if I'm going to bring it in the same way then I'd be allowed to do it the whole book is because it's not it's not parallel you're bringing it in a different way than it was brought but let's say it would be brought in the same way then it sounds like it would be it sounds like he wouldn't have what to say that from from I think that if a person wants to bring that's something you'd be able to do now look at it's interesting the would be part of the equation right was so you would have the carbon without A CARBON EVERY SINGLE DAY THAT WOULD be okay it's like why is that even I mean yeah for sure you see it in the why would you think you can't tell I would have because there's a whole par it's in the beginning of I think we all could have been after learning the right because the tells you what could be brought as and if you count this five different right all the five by the way they'll be featured prominently in tomorrow's but again we know what they are see you would think those five are okay but maybe you can't bring a six so even though logically you can come up with a of ba just like in here you don't have but at the same time could be when the terrorist said those five work the begala those five yeah and others noamash that that's not the case I then why the terrorist say five the five are talking about where a person just is but if he says I want to bring then it's already going to be different meaning a regular again even those are not right I mean I mean right they're not but all I said was I want to bring a I want to bring a lays out exactly how you're supposed to do it doesn't involve wine by the way right it's brought the way the TA says you're supposed to bring it but if a person decides one day I want to bring a which is done in a certain way you see the parish of by the way one of the is it has wine if you want to do that you could do that but then you have to I wanted to be like that but again those Five are not an exclusive group. That's what was coming to be. The second part of the two people can't bring a and this next of the per is actually a classic. It's so classic that we spoke about it in the introduction to the talk to my what's the reason that you can't have a is it because the says it sounds like only one person can bring it. So then also shouldn't be able to bring what's the reason you could bring it says so you see you could bring afist well it's the next word in that it says so should also be able to be brought so it can't be because you have the same exact language by the reason must be because it says the way the mentions The carbon is and being that we preface it with the word teaches me teaches me that you can bring there's only one carbon that's an exception to the rule that can't be brought that's because it says like the hence And teaches me that can't be brok now. You're going to tell me I understand. You just told me now the word nephesh teaches me a very important man. You're asking me now the man. Literally what do you mean? It says nef for this reason. No is it could have said ish. Right. It didn't have to say the word. You could have told me the without telling me the word. So the was not the understands. Whatever the word's going to be, it has to say I'm going to tell you why it was when he said the word was saying the following. He said who brings the brings it. When the brings the I consider it as if he brought his in front of me. Why is it that by the five options right doesn't have five options? How come why by the five options I'll explain to you? There was a king his friend made audited him. He knew he was in so he knew how much was he able to be really he doesn't have so much. told him, "Listen, I know you're not going to be making me steaks and lamb chops, but at the same time, the carbs that you're going to prepare for me, the make in five different ways like this will be audi is limited in terms of what he's capable of bringing upon him and make a nice board like this will be able to enjoy the food together. Is also a little bit the reason is because when the was brought it wasn't brought as a sport of five things you got to choose one of the five a little bit but on that note so the peric ended with twoas that we learn from one word not so tucked away it's the very very first word of the par of the sacrif it's a interesting choice of words a b you don't find the word nephesh by any of the other carbon and the question is what is the word nephesh coming to teach me and really the mas we learned two things from number one who gave us ages number Two, the singular form of the word nephesh teaches me that in contrast to all carbonas that are brought that can be brought when it comes to the carbon the carbon is not a carbon that's able to be brought in in this is he says he says that every carbon that was brought involved a right A be is a living uh organism is a living being. It's a and it makes sense based on the way the explained the concept of a carbon that what you're doing is you're saying that really this deserves to give his dam and his butish gave him a mat called and he gave him called and instead of him being the that's going on the it's going to be the it's going to be the which is a carbon IT'S A CARBON THAT WORKS of there's no lessap that the personal gets from bringing the than does the who brings his or does the brings but it's not and part and parcel of a says you need so this is he says Unless you know to look for you might not even find it but it's in says that I believe the also is you know WHAT THE IS IT'S THE PERSON HIMSELF that's the and that's the to the because every single carbon needs inside of it the has the has the carbon that when the man brought his carbon, he brought his own nephesh with it and his iss that I thought was to mention in other places a mesh specifically in the to shab is which is mentioned at the very very end of and it's also in his to which is mentioned at the end of it's very in the other part of this the part of this that says that can't be brought and he says I just want to share one and that is he said in the which we lain said that at the time of the destruction of the first mikdash said I'm not interested anymore in your I'm not interested in your carbonus specifically why is it that picked on the carbon And why is it that he picked on the says classic? He says the reason is because we know that the was not able to be brought. So it says and we learn from there stating that the was able to be brought right you have that were brought you right. There were many that were brought. If there's a if there's a that says that the has to be brought in the singular and it can't be brought you the ter is the terret is that when two come together and we say we're going to be partners. We're going to bring a carbon. So then there are two different that are bringing the carbon. Nephesh excludes them from being able to bring a carbon. BUT WHEN THE COMES together and they bring a carbon, it's that the are treated as one unit and they're one of and because they're one of so it's for that reason works and this is an Indian that we've spoken about in the name of his where he talks about how is one unit and a mess because the of is much bigger than the sum of its parts. There's a unit called as a matter of fact says that theol of 3,000 years ago and theol today is the same of it. There's different members of that entity, but the entity itself is a 3,000 plus year old entity. You want to know when it was formed, you'd literally have to go back millennia. And something said that's why said talks to I remember when you were we were in the midbar were in the midbar. No, this in Indian I remember when you were in the midbar and says that's the that even though Thomas but there's still something called in the sense of our once did something amazing maybe that's Thomas but from the standpoint that once did something and I'm the so looks at and sees a son and sees A because the entity didn't change the entity didn't change so of but the point is there's one unit one called says that it's true can't bring a carbon that's because it's not nephesh but the there's one called nephesh there's one that's in the singular and the is able to bring a carbon he said that when the so then there was of nephesh of they were one unit and they were able to bring he said but when were androl were not getting along and were not for whatever reason when is not they lose that status of being a nephesh and if they lose that status of being an effesh they're no longer that singular of clustrol says that noi a few earlier in the compared as the what does it mean? So we know what the a of stone was the was it was all they didn't get along with each other they didn't forget each other that was the of and if the noi says that means there was and at the time of the destruction of the first mikdash and just to be clear even though we know the second was the one that was destroyed because but there was a tremendous period at the time of as well we know that the whole malus was divided into two groups. You had muso and then you had the mus of etc etc. There was an incredible pir within. And that's what the meant when he said when is the pirut they're not a nephesh and if they're not a nephesh they can't bring a garb CUZ NOW THE BRINGING IS I KNOW YOU ALL CONTRIBUTED. I know you all chipped in. I know you all gave a it's very nice. Yeah, you have 600,000 Jews that are being but you're not aesh and there's a carbon it's a carbon it's not a carbon and not a carbon because it's not a carbon se therefore it's not going to work says that's why the says why did he said because we know the says that the kyus was made up of all the salmon and one of the salmonicus was the and the ra smells very bad And the says, "How could you bring the and the terret is because as much as the tastes bad, but when you take the and you mix it together with all the to the contrary, it actually enhances the smell better with the without that says true if there's an so there's an so now the is part of it at all. But what happens when there's A PERIOD NOW THE IS STANDING by itself THEN THE YOU KNOW WHY IT'S BECAUSE OF THE BUT YOU MEAN THE IS SUPPOSED TO MERGE THE MERGES WHEN we merge but when we're then as well and that's it's why we're picking that's why we're chapping with the that's why we're chapping with this was all at the time of he said that there's going to be a day when is going to do and there's going to be a day where once again is going to bring back the mash is going to come and then it's going to be he says when is going to do and when the is going to bring back the mikdash then again the is going to be then again the is going to be sweet says You don't see that lion every day. Why says that there's two that you find to describe something that's sweet and what's the difference? Is something that's sweet. Something you taste it's sweet. Sugar is sweet. It's something that's sweet. Is it's something that's sweet, but it's only sweet because of the taras. because of the because of the that's why it's sweet. each individual thing. No, no, maybe you can do better. But when it's when it's where you see the sweetness, the carbon once again will be great again. When it's going to be great again when we're going to be when we're going to be then the carbon is not going to be a carbon. Then the carbon is going to be A CARBON. THEN WE'LL be able to because even though we're at the same time it's gonna be like one by the way I have to mention this one of the says how can you call it 70 is called when it's the punch line it's but the bottom line is that right now we've appeared and when we've appeared looks at us and says this is not a you got together come on are you are you do you respect each other are you being if not then it's a you're bringing school he can't say it out of your mouth but this is what said but when comes together and we're able to look away from our differences. Then we become and you know what happens then? It's because contrary to what we might think that each person is like really the real of the year comes when we come to then even the even the even the has to offer when is going to be when is going to be then our will be and will be to go back to the days of Four.