Menachos 32

Today's and we are eight lines from the bottom of today's being learned as today's also being learned. So we're moving along in peritza one of the classic procas dealing with a suga that's very long tucked away here in definitely a digression from the core sug of and that is the of specifically we're in the middle of learning related to Als the words have to be written on the last line of the muza. Now we know the muza is made up of two par. It's the first two par of is one is two. What's the last line of the second para of So really the last words of the are he said that has to be written on the last line. Has to be written on the last line. Of course, it's going to be written on the last line. It's the last words. You're not writing anything beneath it. So there's a rashi says the meant to say was that the last line is going to have only two words and the two words that it's going to have are so those last two words are unique that they have to be written on a line by themselves. Obviously the says the it was as it relates to specifically we're on that the words were written some said that it was written at the end of the line meaning the end of the second to last line would be and then the you leave the beginning of it blank and then underneath the words you would write the words. So it's there were those that said that they're not supposed to be written at the end of the but in the beginning of the which makes sense. You finish the second to last line and then immediately in the beginning of the next line you write the words it says that says that it was written. What's the significance of that? It's because you want the words to be written immediately under And the Indian of that is there's a symbolism of the fact that is greater than. So you set up the words and as if they were literally the says it was written in the beginning of the because when we say what we mean is not that one is stacked on top of the other but that there's a very far distance. So what we want is we want the words to be as far away from each other as possible. If they would be lined up very neatly so that it's true one would be on top of the other but they would almost be touching. They would be very close. So one is the other one is like this. You have this you have this distance between the words and which brings out this of we know there's a great distance between arts just to explain this a little bit better what does the mean the is saying that if you're gonna keep the second part of is so if you're gonna keep says you're gonna be and you're gonna have is so Great will be so abundant. It will be literally think of there's a huge quote unquote that's how much I'm going to be to bring out in a physical way at this point. We set up those words in a way that's going to tell this story. The two What do we mean when we say is is the point that oh is so much taller than or is the point that it's just so far away is so then you want to stack them up next to each other and show how one is taller and the other one is lower. If the point is that there's a great distance then don't just put them on different lines. Have one have the other one like this is going to be a great distance between the two just to immediately exhale and come up for breath. And that is so we say and this was in one of his so used to give a every year this was in the year was already at the time. So he said that what's this of? So he quoted the says if somebody sins one day in a year it's as if he sinned the entire year. So it's a cryptic but this is what the Gmorrah says we learned it from the were away for 40 days and they were punish 40 years the ended up being in the midbar. So there's an idea when it comes to We know is how many times is what's the multiple? It's 500 times when it comes to someone that doesn't have says I'm going to remember it. But when it comes to it's for 2,000 years it's 500 times overon says in it's also in the second that what's the distance if somebody tried traveling from to so if you remember talks about who said that I'm going to go I'm going to build a tower and I'm going to go up to and the says Right. A whole there that just to get from to would take 500 years and then to get from one shim to the next shim there's seven heavens would be 500 years and the next heaven would be another 500 years. But what's the distance between? The distance is 500 years. for that shot. If a person's going to keep the second parish the amount of time that it takes to go from what's that distance in a few places it's 500 years and what's the well then if someone doesn't admit for he's going to be as if he did 500 years of mitzvah. So there's some in where he gets this uh balloon payment of 500 years all of a sudden cuz he did a mitzvah. That's the says that's what the means when it says because we know that one day of life is like a thousand years. If you do a mitzvah you become a so that there should be So if somebody keeps technically he's helping the world survive. If you help the world survive you're going to now be my if you're my by me a day is a thousand years. We're partners. We're going to split the thousand years. I'm going to get 500 and you're going to get 500 by you being what's going to end up being 500 years. Again this is a little this is a classic sounds familiar. We got to mention this once before, but the point is that somehow this symbolism of actually plays itself out. I saw I saw when he rolled up the so he would roll it from left to right. So you're writing right to left. And when he would roll it, he would start from the side and he would roll it. Another thing I saw him do was I saw that when he wrote the par of the he wrote them. So observed do two things that to him were a little bit of aesh as it relates. Number one, when he rolled them left to right, not right to left. Additionally, he wrote the paras. By the way, Rafuna is one of the menas. We have a rabbi from Margolas who was malakas on this. But Rafuna is one of the menas. So Kazina the Rafuna if you know the rest of the story he's a major sifer that his inonim of saff scatter and army. So what do these two things mean? So to roll a muza from left to right is pretty self-explanatory. What does it mean? He was so we know that there are certain ways that dictates the cipher needs to differentiate between paras and the right when you talk about a par you don't mean when you talk about a par it's based on these that's there has to be gaps between these two paras. So for example, paras mishbatin is one para but if you go through the pario from the cyher's perspective there could be a hundred paras. They have all these different mitzvah and each one or there are these short series of them that have to be written as individual paras. Now there's two ways to write a par or there's two ways to separate between paras. One is through a and the other one is through auma. In other words, there are para it's not surprising. It's a little bit of a what exactly means and what exactly means but to keep things simple to read the in this is so it's actually the conclusion of two long starts talking about the definition of a par and then at the end of he says let me give you this so we'll just read is is when is starting from the beginning of the line is when you're starting the par in the middle of the line. So is is based on where do you start the para if the par starts at the beginning of the line. So if you were going to sit down and write a safer, write a book, you'd probably start at the beginning of the line. If you're doing that, actually there's a little indentation, but if you were going to start it from the beginning of the line, that's what would be known as a a para is when you start it not in the beginning of the line, but rather you started in the middle of the line. Now, it's actually interesting because as it relates to para, we don't care so much what's happened on the line before. We're focusing on this particular par. Is it starting in the beginning of the line? Even if the parish on top ended in the middle of the line or is it starting in the middle of the line, even if the parish on top ended at the end or in the middle line that's neither here nor there. Ramen goes through this. What we care about is simply so the second thing that Rafa did was is he wrote the pario of the muza. Now says it sounds a little bit like Rafuna wrote both paras of the muza stomis. We just explained what does it mean to write it stumois to start in the middle of the line. Does that mean that he started the first para also in the middle of the line? It's a little bit of a kesh, right? Because if this is the beginning of the so why would you start in the middle line? It would make more sense to start it in the beginning of the line. So says when we say the word says a little bit in fact says really it's only the second par that we're saying he started in the middle of the line. That first para that's the beginning that for sure started. But either way says the as it relates to the second thing the said he observed by and that is that he wrote the par of the I'll ask you a on this said mayor who by the way was also aeric right mayor is for sure the most famous cipher in so mayor when he would write a say he would write it on the so we'll see more about the soon but basically The cloth the height of the skin of the animal that's used for was taken by the and was cut into two parts. The outer part was known as the cloth. The inner part was known as theto based on some cloth had to be written on the and other had to be written on the so when he's writing he would write the muza on the that's the inner part of the hideaf. Additionally he would write it like a daf. So rashi says what's a dafmud. Okay. So the d is like an oxymoron but either way the daff is like very long and very narrow. So the way he'd write the is these long narrow columns. Additionally he wouldn't start like at the very very top of the and end all the way on the bottom. He would make sure there was some margins. So he would leave on top he would leave on bottom. The is going to say in a minute how much. Additionally, and he would make the parall said, "I asked my rebi, why specifically are you making the par and the of his question is the way Rashi explains it is because if you look in the Torah, the second para is not it's what's the second para?" The second para is the parish of Shama and in the par of Shamaya is a para. So if you're writing it now in the so why wouldn't you just follow the of the way it's written in the which is it starts in the middle of the line. So if it's a par why you writing he told him he said because the two par that you write in the even though we read them together we put them next to each other in the but so being that these two paras are written far away from each other in the so therefore the laws is a little bit different. It makes more sense to start the second meaning if you were cutting and pasting what you had in the you applying it right now into the see it would follow the way it is in the in the so if relative to the para before it would be a para here too but the paray is not being written with the par that it has before it in the to the contrary it's being written with a parish that's a whole parisher earlier what we refer to as a parisher earlier here the point is being that it's very far from what it's going to be written next to now in the muza. So therefore it makes more sense that it should be either way. So says that my rebi was a great cipher and I observed a few things as it relates to number one he wrote it on the number two he wrote it like a daff what does Rashi say like an meaning long column. Number three, he was number four, he made the parame we began with the famous okay. So Rahuna used to write the paras of the stom and here we have ra who's rauni that's important who's rabbi who's pasing that you like what said mayor and that is that he was what's the how could rahuna argue with no it's not a kasha but how could ravuna be with his and besides We have here who's a Tana and if the Tana held that the way you're supposed to write the so why is the going ahead and writing it this is the but answers that although it's true that the name of he said if that's the case we have this when he said that the was like in the name of could be he didn't mean it with regards to the part of what he said. Remember he said four things when he was saying that was with regards to with regards to that he passing that way but he never pass with regards to that he didn't ask with regards to so is not going and therefore rafuna was able to go and write despite the fact that there was this mur used to write obviously he held that not everybody holds that way I is rebi I his rebi never said what his said was okay as it relates to being which said he saw and we just said this is what you're supposed to do margin is it supposed to be so the is says some clip or some pin that was used by the to try to keep the cloth in place as he's writing So whatever the size of that is that's what the and the has to be told. Do you not hold that when said that is like that he meant with regards to and he didn't mean with regards again said over that he observed by a whole bunch of different you write make it like you make and rav cryptically commented seems like there was some amongst what he meant initial reaction was my love he probably meant it with regards to with his great who used to write them as so the says you know maybe only meant with regards to but what being discussed now right so what is the in this when said that doesn't mean with regards to what does he mean with regards tells he says do you not agree that when said he met with regards to it has to be you know why because I know that Rav holds the is like the mic in Rav's world the is a very very big deal as a matter of fact we always pass like a and take a look at what the do they do they all write how do I know that ra is like a mimic because in the name kind of in the name of that's the punch line. was about to say this would come and he would say as in the mitzvah of he would say do with a with a leather shoe we would listen to him if would come and say you can't do with a sandal we wouldn't listen to him the sandal because the meaning is to do a sandal so apparently the meaning was to do khalita with a sandal it's a sad ravi would come and say you know what it doesn't have to be a sandal you could use a min we would listen to him why not but if he would say you can't use a sandal he's trying to be that's not something we would listen to and had a different name of very similar similar as it relates to the punch line we need but a little difference and that is would come and he would say you can't do with we would listen to him but if you would say you can't do with we wouldn't listen to him because the is to do it with a a sandal. So let's just uh tease apart what we just said. We have two Msus and Rav with regards to Ni would come and he would tell us someh related to Khalita how we would handle it as it relates to ifi would come and say you can't do with a sandal in the first the second says there was what was with regards to in the first version in The second version, right? That's what the says never. We all agree with that. The question is is it or is it so let's just fear what's between those two things is right now are you allowed to use a or you not allowed to use a middle sounds like today thus you need to say would come and say according to the second it sounds like the yes to use a or not the mic but the is yes to do use a and thus the way you express this idea that would come and change it would be fine is if would come and say that's where it's neg but we don't need the middle part of this we need the sandal part of this according to the first and according to the second of if would come and he would say that despite the fact that the minute is right now to do with I'm telling you that he can't do with he would not listen to alo Ali is going to tell us all the it doesn't matter if we wouldn't listen to it. It's an fascinating idea. It's because Ra is of the opinion that you go and being that role is to do this way and it would even trump and saying to the contrary. So said, "I'm hearing this whole schmoo. Do you for sure not agree with what I'm about to say? It has to be that when Ra said like that you have to write the in the way that he presented he wasn't referring to the you know why because the min is to write it and ra was always so if that's what the for sure that's what he would what then did he mean when he said that he probably meant right on top of that meaning has to be There's no question in the world. This must be exactly what he meant. Either way, so there seemed to have been some discussion over here when said did he mean regarding the or did he not the initially thought yeah ask but then the came out said not the way seemed to have even proved it that is for sure holds that you can write a he said one of the things said was that he's supposed to write a he meant it with regards to the stating that said no could be when said he meant with regards to everything that he said not just he meant it also with regards to the fact that has to be written I if that's the case how could Rafa his go not like him how could he have written his muza says to you know what you know what mayor meant When it was he was you know what meant when he said that say this in the name what he meant was to do it that if you want to go out and do it's going to be okay was not it was something that was in factcept What he meant to say was that even is going to be okay. Meaning when said was he didn't mean as opposed to he meant even that he was okay doing but for sure for sure was okay and as a result is no because yeah rakin like even with regards to that you can write them but not that it has to be that it could be but could it be of course it could And that's went and he did it. So it sounds like you could do the accord and it even sounds like which is why did it that way and just used to say if you want to do it you can do it as well. What would be again why you should do it and it's going to be okay. It's probably based on the said on the top of the in the is written. So if it's written in the makes sense the should be this way also challenge he says why you doing it this way but the way he's supposed to do it is you're supposed to do it bottom line is we have two had to reconcile the fact that used to write his despite the fact that his great pas who had said that was either it's when he said he didn't mean regarding he meant with regards to or he meant it also regarding but what meant when he said was if you want to do it is going to be oh okay at first glance do it seem to be a from a tok's understanding in Allah says about and that is doesn't mean it has to be but it could also be and this is going to bring now in a way is going to be through the majority of the rest of the this for which the is going to bring the is going to be fleeting but the is going to do what it does so well and so often and that is bring a price and then digress on it a little bit so let's get this price similarly If somebody has a that was it can't be used anymore as a safety but fill in that right they decay they decompose on some level but you have certain paras that you know can be used so you have a you can't use it as a safety so I want to take now I want to take and I want to incorporate it and use it as a or same as with my fillin the parish of the as well so I want to take the and the of the and I want to use it for my says the Bri said you can't do this. It's because more than the is also more than the th that's not something you could do says the let's be it sounds like if there was no problem with if there was no issue of well if that's the case you'd be able to take and you'd be able to use it I don't understand how you could do it how can you use you ready for this of it's the same words, right? But there's a big difference. One is and the other one is we said that the para of the in the telling me that said so how would you be able to do this? So what you going to tell me didn't hold it as it's not that that's the case must be what when was he hence if you want to take from the and apply now to the it's going to be okay it's going to be it could be it's only sounds like a good but says no there is no right because could be when we say that without the problem of you'd be able to take a take the bolo and use it as a muza. It doesn't mean you'd be able to take the entire para. The entire par wouldn't be able to take because the entire para is a para and in the muza it has to be a means you're going to take certain parts of it maybe certain words certain lines certain shuro but you're not taking the whole not taking the whole thing okay you're going to have to make it and then if there's a few lines that you need that's what you're going to be able to do either way so we just mentioned this and and the made a great it sounds like and what was the problem? problem was that these parishes in the in the so how could you mix and match deflected it but the is now going to try to prove or ask away from different nuances that there are between the versus the muza and ask the same kasha meaning what was the ham in the world that you should be able to use a satyra or a that went bad all of a sudden for a muza they're not the same you say what do you They're not the same. They're both written on on a parchment with black ink by a by. It's the same words. Yeah. But when you learn the you find out they're very very different. And as a result, this was a very perplexing bryer. Like what is this is ignoring so many that seem to differentiate the parish of the from the muza and the parish of from the muzza. The first one was got him. But now the iss going to continue right all these cautions are going to begin with those same words. Tell me if there was no problem there would be no issue to go ahead and to mix and match the fillin has to be written on the cloth portion of what we know as the cloth and the has to be written on the portion. So again the cloth is the hide of the animal. They would take the hide off and then they would slice it in half. The outer part is the cloth. The inner part is the filler has to be written on the cl and the not just that the meaning when you write the fill on the writing iter meaning that's the side that's facing the flesh of the animal and is and when you're writing the it's it's the one that's facing the here that's on the outside which by the way basically means that if you're going to open up the cloth so you're going to be writing the fill in and the muza on the inner parts of what you opened up respectively. play, right? The two parts that were attached to each other, those are the sides that you're going to be writing it. The outer sides is not what you're writing it. It's on the inner sides that you're writing it. But what's the bottom line? How could you mix and match fill in? They're not even written on the same parchment. They're both parchment. Yeah, high level. But one is cloth and the other one is you have to say this whole is only being that it's only mitzvah. So it's not it's not it's not going to be a problem. to the Ble says that if you're going to be fill when it comes to fillin you got to get right but over here we're using it for the muza we're taking fill so if you wanted to take muza use for fillin no way they don't arrive but fillin for muza is okay because there it's only the mitzvah there it's going to be fine the was talking the same minion and it says what does it sound like? So you see it's actually the bane and the both are referring to the when we say means it's the two types of again it's supposed to be written on so meaning you wrote it. So you got the part right but you got the bus part wrong because you wrote it on the say it's gonna be puzzled. And the second china is if you wrote it on the duster, what do you get wrong over there? The dustto part. By the way, says it could be say also the point is it's the so the baz is the first b is you did it on the cloth. That's correct. But the second is you did it on the whether it's like say like either way that's what the issue is going to be. So the bottom line is what was the cash? has to be on the cloth has to be on the not just that the is written on the cloth is written on the so it's a whole different type of parchment and for the that's true that's that's only one mitzvah I we have a says it's fillin the two types of shin or you could say that when the second means oh if that's the case and now we have a little bit of an issue the issue is the meaning to use for the one is written on the cloth the other is written on the one is the other one's and you see it's says true there's a brace that says it's however it's really meaning not everybody holds market but the bottom line is there was another that held that when it comes to it's going to be so it comes to it's going to be so this says would be going according to that holds when it comes to is going to be oh okay another it's not for the problem of You could take a safety or you could take and you can go ahead and you can use it for a muzza. What happened to the of So what exactly is so certify has to engrave as he's writing his stan. Now a muzza requires circa is that's the case. How could you take a and fill in don't you need so what's the sounds like and fill in don't need because if they also need so what's the problem need they also need so if you take a look at Rashi Rashi says but you don't find you need so how could you use doesn't need it sounds like from that doesn't need stating that from getting and it's really or not. We're going to get to that in the portion of today's talk. But for now, the cautious how could you use let's learn the way. How could you use for doesn't require and muza requires? How do you know that requires? So names matter. said in the name of who said in the name of that doesn't have to walked in and he said let me tell you what I heard from the name of let me tell you what I I heard my own what I think and that is but really according to both versions you have to have when it comes to either just if you don't have it or it's so It's really meaning whether or not requires it is not so in the name of so when you write you don't have to be looking inside similar while you're writing it. So when you write has to be looking in can't write it write it by heart. Additionally, they don't require stating that true does require both of them can be written about can't be written about. Why could be written about because everybody knows it. The only reason you can't write we're afraid you're gonna make a mistake. But over here it's not something you have to be worried about and it's for that reason it's going to be okay. But what's the bottom line? You see there is a meaning be able to use the fill in for doesn't have doesn't have like this the is not going to get in the way. So the bottom line is just to make a little bit of a recap because we digressed in the middle from this last and the was like very taken back by this like extremely taken back as if to say there would have been a when you learn the you could take the parish of from the or the and apply it now to as much as that the same parishes and they were written by and then they're on claps and black inks disciple wanted to make in but at the same time there's so many differences and the says I'll name three number one as it relates to the said maybe this is a that said that when was he meant or said maybe it's only and we're not going to use the whole par It's only second question the garam said was what happened to the fact that the fillin is written on the and the mus is written on theus right. So how could you use it? It seems to be then on arrival. So the garra said it's only the mitzvah. It's true there is such a but it's not that so at least you'd be able to use it were not for the fact that third was about but Rashi explains fillin doesn't have and does have so what's the hobby you should be able to use it this holds that also doesn't have as a result they both don't have there's no problem a little bit more he was sitting on a bed that had a safe that had a safety on it. And when he that there was a on the bed, he took a he took like a big barrel, a jug, he put it upside down on the ground and he put the there and it was then that he sat down on the bed of the opinion. Seems pretty intuitive to us. They not let us sit on a bed that has a on it. And this is not like something have a minute to say, "Wasn't there a story with who was sitting on a bed and that there was a on it?" And he slid off and he sat on the ground and he was so disturbed by what he did that he sat on a bed that had a on it and he was like physically acting as if he was bitten by a snake. Someone's bitten by a snake, he's going to be like doubled over in pain. That's the way reacted. says the name say not like you're going to say what do you mean how could it be with the great are not that way awesome the story over there was different the reason I'm learning this says because I know that this is a misqued story right m sometimes take on a life of their own this one did also even back in the day they used to that's not what happened I'm going to tell you what happened over there there was to say and that's what the issue was. So there's a whole there's a whole sh in the right it's not so clear what exactly happened. What does it mean there was a safety gaba? But it seems that was maybe sitting on the bed and he saw alabi ka. See he quickly got down and he picked up but over there the issue wasn't was sitting on bed next to and was somehow involved in that story and that's what caused him so much pain. That's where he was a little more. So see we know the muza has to be affixed to the doorpost right hence it's called the muza. It's on the muz of the house. So the name of what would be if it was suspended with a m. So the way that explained this is that somebody took a mac like a stick and inside the stick he put the cloth and then he hung the did I skip a line? Yeah. In the event that the muza would be written like an it would be possible. So what does it mean that it was written like says number one it was written without number two. Additionally the person wasn't so he sat down and he wrote it like you write a brief right you ever write somebody a letter types an email. So this is the way he wrote the name. It's learned that from and it says in the parish of and we learn from there we learn from there that there has to be a proper and a proper means that it has to be with additionally a proper means that there can't be any issues with regards to via asks it sounds like you're telling me a new that muza requires if you go earlier on the so the gar said it's right or now all of a sudden we're throwing in like a third it's funny that we would just throw in this third cheetah 10 lines lower from when the already had a discussion about what the requires says because of that I think doesn't mean it has nothing to do with but rather means the second part of what Rashi says that's what means it's not the first part of what Rashi says again one last the name In the event that somebody took the cloth and he put it inside a stick and then he hung the stick on the side of the house on the on the doorpost my time and what's the reason it's not enough that it's has to be has to be a fix to the if it's hanging it's not going to be okay that supports this in the event that again the person put the muza in this and he hung it on the doorpost or if he put it not on the doorpost, but he put it on the wall behind the door. Saka, he's living in a mat of Sakba mitzvah and he doesn't get a mitzvah. Rashi says mitzvah is self-explanatory. That's not the way he's supposed to put the muza on the house. Why is he in a sak? Because a muza is a and this person doesn't have now. So if he doesn't have in so the family of the pund when they used to travel and they stayed in their pundics. So this was the royal family. They were always traveling. They never stayed in a house long enough for them to be, but they wanted to make a So what they would do was is they would put it either or they didn't want to do it in the way that you're supposed to do it. But to make they had some form of I'm read there's a mitzvah to take the muzza and put it within the of the so it's not enough that it's on the doorpost but it has to be underneath where the actual is says isn't that what means it's like the place where the door closes so it's where it Someone says not so I would have thought that let's let you have a very wide doorpost. So you put it in the that's closest to the farther out that it is it's good. And even if it's outside of where the door actually is as long as you can consider it muza maybe that should be okay then no it has to be not just by the not just on the but it has to be and if it's not in that instance you won't be able to be ex so as it relates to raid lot happened in today's d but specifically the garra had a discussion with regards to the of the primary topic of today's d is muza what emerged is three different of muza Aita that holds that muzo is additionally was that fill in for sure. In fact, the Gmorra said the hill. Additionally, we very very fleetingly mention that whether a requires or whether a does not require the inactus and this is in addition to being very very pertinent to today's also says that it says in the as in migillas Esther. So the Esther is referred to as you know we learn from those words that requires says what does it mean? Just like I say requires so too the migillas requires literally on today's ask from another it's five lines from the Bible as in we find that It's referred to as a safer and we refine that it's referred to as anaras again one of the last we just learned this nuance between said in the name of the great that it's you find referred to as that if you would sew together the different of the cloth with threads of flax it would be possible because a safer requires it to be sewn with right with senus it's referred to as anaras that if you have three of it's going to be you have to make sure that it's going to be so in the name of that with regards to certain is treated like a cafer with regards to other is treated like anger is treated like a cafer just like a safer requires that you should be the with gen not with so to migill is the same way but says you see from this that we have already that migiller and because it's safer has to be treated like a safer if that's the case why do I need a to tell me that migilla requires which explained means like to the extent that a requires I don't needs to teach me that migill would require I know it from the says from where I learned other as well. So why do I need a of to tell me that it's like a safer that requires the fact that it's a says you see from here that when the says does not mean like you know why it doesn't mean like because does not need says and that's why despite the fact that we know that McGill's nikra is safer and we learn how So many different of you could never learn from there that it requires doesn't require. Okay. And what does the mean when it says you know what is referring to it's referring to the says the is referred to as and that does require and by the way why is referred to as because what does it say in the muza you have the first parish which is the parish of which talks about the of where a takes a vow to believe that's why the gets this unique it's referred to as but the bottom line is the le of by migill is not from it's from what was the kasha why do I need to learn it from typically it's al doesn't need that's why you can't learn it from the what then is the mar the is not like says in Rather is in the same exact way that is in other words what emerges is and this is that we referenced during the hold and that's why said so what does it it means like the but if that's the case as so why do I need the words of asill it's safer and we see there's a lot of that are learned out from the fact that it's safer why can't I learn from there too that a migill require Why do I need that brisk and this is in beautiful and this is in the says you now write a migill with black ink. So when the writes to he has to follow the it's going to be it's going to be possible. The Ram says that the requires like doesn't have to be processed etc. I'm skipping the migill requires fear. You have to sew the ureas together. All the should be one long and it has to be like etc etc etc. over here in this is nothing the first people learn when they sit down and they want to learn some right exactly the details of how you write a mig but for us these are literally the beholding it in the middle of this is on today's but the bottom line is so the ra gives me a whole of how exactly the has to go about writing a migill and one of the themes is that it has to be written like a a safer Right. Just reading a few excerpts. So again because it has to be written like said there's a whole bunch of that flow from there said the brisk one thing is clear from the learn because the says that it requires right he keeps on comparing to and he says he says So that's clear said the brisker that the way learned in is the the way the rama learn is the way learned in the migill and not the way learned the brisk one that jumps off the page and that is let's read those three lines in the again very very carefully the says safer Emphasis on safer doesn't say why is it when it comes to and the ra safer when it comes to and when it comes to the rais but when it comes to the said the brisk one line I think that we have to deduce from this that requires which is the require it's not one of the it's the requires is certain fell said to Briskov. The fact that has to be written on cloth, the fact that it has to be written, the fact that it has to be written, the fact that the need to be sewed together and they have to be sewed together with gon these are in the there's a of when you're going to write a safety, what is that safer? What does that safer need to look like? What sura does it have to be? What does it have to be made out of? What does it have to feel like? What color should the letters be? Those are that govern the safer of the safer of the does not have a said that it requires. There's no that if you look at the there should be lines underneath all the words. The safer is not of you know what's of the is the WHEN YOU WRITE FORGET ABOUT SAFER WHEN YOU WRITE YOU HAVE to make sure that all the lines of that you're writing are going to be underlined but the is the fact that this written it's not the fact that this is a safer so it's not the safer that requires a s even though you would think it is the safer because it's part of the safer right the binding is part of the safer, right? No, the binding is a that's what we're saying, right? The is not a in the actual but the is a in the when you sit down and you write so there's a that the way you write the is you have to write the certain said that's the in the says that regards to it's when it comes to it's but when it comes to it's because it's the requires that the are the words of that the words of the migill are words of these are words of they're the the words the words of oh the words of require no mention of the word safer requires this is going to require as well to Why do I need a tell me that I have learned the terret says migill and safer would teach me that all the of would be but I wouldn't know that the words of the migill are the words of I would know that a migill whatever those words are need to be written on the same safer that say needs to be written on convoling but that the words of the So I wouldn't know yet that the words the words are words of and because the words are words of so that's how I know that the migill is going to require said that the issra Ms. Just like the requires this is so haffling. Just like you could and then you could this is also it's not referring to the it's the gay of the words that the words in THE MIGILL ARE BECAUSE PUT together with this idea that you COULD This is what the grass Safer safer that it's called safer. But either way said to Briskov that the Der is not a Den safer. The is the requires. So even though I had the already that would teach me all the of would apply to migill as well as that's not in that's THESE WORDS ARE THEY OF they not of the words of msimar oh now I know that the words are words of if the words are words of shalom the words of require these words require as well and that's why the also in the same exact of learned that the migill is what do you mean it's you can't darly of the migill is that they're words of truth is from a migill perspective it's a it's a fascinating idea the words of the migill are words of the words of the migill are words of tra and are included in the words of mill and it's tucked away in this obscure which is not obscure if you're holding with right now and that is I just want to end with one last and that is so we have to learn to rash it means like by the way is everybody mches with the brisker up why say this is one of uh more obvious on the brisker of the Ash of course but the bottom line is Rashi learns that it means literally like a toy says that means the muza and it's very sesome it's very sesome why would the muza be referred to as but even more so migilla requires like the muza as if there's some connection between the muza and between the story of Purim, right? It sounds like there's some connection my migillas to quote in one of his drawers. This was actually ironically in the year in Pbar. So the brings that what does it mean? It means like a muzza and his needs a little bit of spice. Why would we compare the migill to this? So the he said that it's we know the says as in he was and the Romans they tried bringing him back because he was a very important person and it was a big biz for them that he crossed over and he became a Jew. So they tried wheeling him back. The problem is every time a Roman would come and he would talk to Uncleis, Uncle would somehow convince him to be a Y and they were just losing people left and right. And finally they said that you're going to go to Unkus you're going to take him but you're not going to say one word to him. Don't even breathe right you literally have to go don't exhale and says you know it didn't work. This is the last part of the story. So they finally sent like the last troops to come get him. So he told them right don't talk to him as they were walking. So was walking out of this door walking him out. He sees a muza. So what does he do when he sees the muza? He kisses the muza. He put his hands on it. Actually didn't kiss it, right? We agreed on that. But he put his hand on the muza. So, so right. He said, "Do you know why I just put my hands on the muza?" And they said, "No, we don't know." He says, "Are you curious?" He said, "A little." He says, "Uh, we're not allowed to talk." Right? Just tell me. Why did you do that? He says, "I'm going to tell you." He says, "Look around the world. Go to any royal uh palace. Say, you're going to find that the king is sitting inside And he's going to have watchmen that are going to be standing outside. They sit in their houses. He watches them from the outside. When the heard this, they were the Romans said, you know, let's just write off. We're not getting it back. And let it be the way it is. But what is the symbolism? What is the significance of the significance of the is that are inside for whom the standing and he's watching guard for us. Imagine we're the we're the nobodies but stands in front and he guards our house. Hashem says we come, we go. Hashem is always protecting us. He's always watching us. And that's what's symbolized with the said like this. He says we know that when it was so and the Mishna says in the beginning there were 24 posts in the would stand guard and they would watch. It's for the that they're watching and they're protecting to show that the and is over there when it's and when there's a so then says the and we're but when doesn't have a mash and when we don't have this and when we find ourselves in a mat of gullus when sometimes we need to hide in our house because what's going on outside is very scary and what's going outside is VERY VERY DANGEROUS. I'M GOING TO WATCH YOU THEN AND I'M GOING TO BE looking out for you. I'M GOING TO BE STANDING guard for you. YOU STOOD GUARD FOR ME ONCE UPON A TIME. NOW I'M GOING TO BE standing guard for you. And that's symbolized with the muz. So the said that really from the time that the came it really wasn't this he says but then they went to gullus and when they went to gull they found themselves already in bl and they found themselves in in during that kufur it was very very very dangerous there was already a final solution an edict that was already passed by hmon and the situation was going to be very very bad and the ether were hiding inside because they knew that there was a date that every single Yehudi had circled on his calendar where their life was going to be a tremendous risk and the truth is he didn't even deserve to say right what did that they deserve there's different reasons whatever but the bottom line is on some level this is actually something that they deserve yet was said I'm going to watch you and I'm going to make sure that nothing's going to happen to you that ultimately you are going to be saved. The ultimate expression said we're the were hiding for their lives. There's a final solution. That's something that played itself out when it played itself out with the story. says that's why that's why migill has to have like the mizuza says you want to know what the kesher but what the kesher is between migillis and the muza they both symbolize this they both symbolize that it doesn't matter how low we fall and it doesn't matter how bleak the situation is but remember we could be hiding in our house but of we should be watching That's the way it's supposed to be and that's the way it is when it's shown in but we don't have that level of we're the ones that need I got you that's symbolized by the like said to the Roman officers that's something that's part and parcel of the story of the migillo that's the talin said the some that we need to add to a little bit of a deeper appreciation and understanding of why it is we would ever compare Esther toes.