Menachos 4

Today's we are nine lines from the top of the two dots today's being learned as a forkl also being learned as a for that you find today's also being learned nishmas of hillsef alter and benra. So we're in the beginning of learning the very first of which is the suga of in fact as we saw the beginning of very much mirrors the beginning of begins begins. Now the topic of today's is going to be the so according to the where one of the critical is there are two notable exceptions there are two times with is it's going to be possible what are those two times and obviously The question is why are those two different obviously the answer is going to have something to do with now really the longer hak to today's daf would be the first several daffod goes through all the dras with regards to all the different carbon is what the is that is an Indian of how do you know how do you know by how do you know that despite the fact that there's It's still how do you know that it's still what's the is different? What's the is different? It's literally the first 10 do or so. But at the end of the day, we know that according to the by the way, we keep on saying because there are other opinions. But as it relates to all are it's all based ones. Those drushes are the basis really for what we're going to learn today and that is that in the world of you have the same idea that with the exception of two those two are the and one other piece of introduction stating what we should already know after learning and that is just two definitions. What exactly was the min and what exactly was the was a min that a person brought because he was a right it's uh dead giveaway. It's a min that's being brought by a what brought a a carbon meaning usually if somebody was and he had to bring a carbon say he brought either a that's if he did an or he brought an asham which was in certain situations when did a bring a so the answer is in the event that somebody did a that the says you're bringas however it's the unique pirate is known as the we are depending on the financial situation. We determine what type of carbon he's going to bring in the event that that person was in a situation where he couldn't afford to bring a he couldn't even afford to bring an so the says then you bring a carbonal you're going to bring a carbon so where is the ever bringing a carbon it's really the par of is a in that very intimidating that comes up in so many areas and right first 20 of let alone comes up in very very prominently but the bottom line is that's where the is what's the brought by the or more accurately the suffix this is a woman that had and there's a concern that maybe she was b and the tyra gives a very mystical mahalik of how we're supposed to go about figuring out whether she's innocent or whether she's guilty. One of the things that had to be done was that this woman had to bring a carbon. That carbon was a ma. It was known as the in fact that carbon was so critical that in the event that she didn't bring the carbon. So there was no way to be the way to know for sure whether she was innocent or guilty. Meaning the punchline of the suffix was she was going to drink from the Mayham and obviously in the event that she was guilty that May was going to turn out to be very potent and she was literally going to blow up in a blaze of glory. The may however got its its energy to be able to do its thing only if this was brought. That's what's known as the regardless the and the come together they band together over here. They have something in common. They're the two types of we're with regards to one of the four critical be it the but be it putting the into the be it being or be it the actual is not only is it's even going to be what does it mean you can't eat means you can't be the right now those two have this in common what the is that is today's not such hard I understand why is going to be possible because because the refers to the as where does the refer to the as the says is unique it didn't involve oil even though most involved oil it didn't involve Even though most involve and the reason the says that's the case is because it's so to be clear the sounds a little like but it's not it's a stating that the referred to the as and if is going to be ple as well by the way what's a precedent after learning for such an idea where you have something that's not a and as a result it gets That's the paradum was the wasn't even brought in the it had to be done outside of but it has a lot of for example and the reason is because also gives us we refer to it as is it no but so even though you want to know what it is it's DNA says But being that the first word is but the says I understand that's posh to me it's possible it's based on but is to me sounds like a good oldfashioned and if that's the case what is the puzzle and just to clarify this a little bit better also even though it feels a little bit like the is related to we said who brings the who did some sort of a but That doesn't make it a carbon. Even the is only being treated like a because the ter called it a is so to speak. But the bottom line is it's definitely not it's a you don't find that the even refer to it as a carbon that is going to be possible says I'll tell you why there was a that presented the following. He said a if there's any leftover money is it was used as an so what does this mean? It means where somebody was mafish money to bring a mas then they went to the store and they bought the ma not very expensive and it turned out that there was some extra money. So the told of you know what you do with that extra money you use it as an adva what does this mean? It means the money was put into a fund. There were a bunch of and funds that were in the BA Mikdash and the proceeds of those funds were used to purchase carbon that were put on the MB at times when the MSB was idle when there was nothing going on on the MB what's known as but the point is that the TAM that you want to know what you do with the extra money that was set aside from you use it for the carbon that were brought with kids on his back those carbon were carbon and that's why the lion that he used was heard what the said he told him back he's saying very good you know why because it says regarding that it's something that's going to be what does that mean in it means it's going to help determine whether or not this woman did the a didn't do the a so the refers to it however as mascaras Using the magic word oven and regarding it says also uses the word oven just like somebody was money there was leftover money. What do you do with that leftover money? You use it to buy the of when it comes to it's going to be says the well if you're going to tell me that between the and the carbonas with regards to what do you do with the extra money then it makes sense to take this and cut and paste drag it apply it further and just like so is going to be well either way. What's the possible what's the it's learned out? What's the the precedent for that? It's the and that was based on this if you're going to tell me that to be learned from to teach me should also be the we should learn from. So we just mentioned that it says the word of a by the carbon and it says the word by the as well. Now where does it say the word by? So the PIC says this is so it says the word right but it says says we should say that based on the because to teach possible that you could do because it's the same exact word it says It says but even though the is the same the word is not the same because it says but it says who cares everybody knows this they famously between two words that are not even the same words they're not spelled the same they don't rhyme it was simply because they mean the same thing and in the I don't know zoo and based on that they went ahead and made certainly you should be able to make says besides I can make not but because by the of it says Now that's a carbonas. It's one of the carbonus but that's a carbon and it says and we just said it says by the carbon. So why do we learn what's going to say? Because we learn then you should also make to teach me that is possible. Everybody knows it's that is not possible. Now what's the precedent mean? So you have two options. Either you could learn from the parish of the carbon and even though it's not the same word but it's or if you prefer you could learn from one of the specific and that is the of but the bottom line is it's a to be had should also be possible and it's not. So says you're right. You have to say you have to say that even though the told that it's based on between you have to say that was only said regarding it wasn't said regarding you'll tell me you're going to say that what do you mean how could I have regarding one not with regards to another one of the principles that govern is the answer is you have a that teaches me and we learn from there it's right where is going to be possible but all if it was brought if it was brought it's going to be in other words the reason that an asham is even though there's to be had from is because it says and for that matter you would have to say that you can't learn to teach me that because again it says is going to be everything else is not going to be apostle if that's the case so where are we in the if that's the case I just lost my that is going to be possible. I thought I had shava of and we know this is a real because that's the is stating that I now know it says that's the reason that is also if that's the case I don't have a that is and it's for that reason the continues What then is the are so we purposely recap the right before we saw these next words to walk right in to a very obvious that mask and that is one second we had a we had a wasn't the The wasp was the wasp was based on the disproved from and based on that you would think in the flow of the gam the garra would now say apostle because it's only that part of the equation that got debunked but as it relates to why is and that's Because you would think that's but you see from the not that way because now that the knocked out the says we have to go back to the drawing board. We actually have to start today's all over again. Why? But the answer is posh if you think about it for one second. It's because how did we knock out the we knocked out the because it says right here is but as it relates to everything else not just like undermines learning from also undermines equating anything else that's not a to a is not a we made a big deal about this. It's but at the end of the day it's right because it's not the refer to it as on some level it gets the holds didn't have to hold this but the gmorra holds that in the we see that I can't learn anything from and that's just that even if there's a but if you're not you're going to be knocked out only the real is we you have this but something that's not a real that's not either way it's for that reason when the brought the it doesn't only knock out the knocks out the as well it brings us back to the drawing board again says I'll tell you why because if you go back to the first parag you're going to see the following why is it that it says he now the truth is it doesn't say he, it says who. So in the world of right this is an easy one. He who especially if your is he and he can even see more why this would be complicated but who so when it says in the really it says who but the bottom line is that who is going to be possible says here too not he but who it says by who and being that it says who. So it's for that reason I know that is that it's going to be and it says by the the word who so the bottom line is being that it says the word who the same exact word who that I have by the to teach me is possible I have by these as well and that's why these are going to be possible. Mara asks who? It says the word who by the as well. It says so why don't we say that is also going to be possible. So the Garra says who who right that who that it says by the says it right let's read the again it says it after the and being that it says it after the you can't learn that is possible in fact you can't learn anything from that word who and it's based on a where does it say the word who it says it after the and who right if you don't do the at all the so it can't be that if you don't do thear in a certain way let's say then it's going to be possible even though it's true it says the word who just like it says and by those and based on that you would have thought that what you would have thought that should be possible it can't be because the location location of the word who is what teaches me that the short it's coming to tell ME and is not then for sure is not at least a white doesn't say the word who by the carbon it's based on this is also 101 if you have a carbon with the is that you have to give it to the shepherd you have to give it to the and he has to wait until it gets a moment once it gets a m he's going to go ahead and he's going to be ped and he's going to use the money to buy an and the interim he went ahead and heed it. So before it got he went ahead and he is it's automatically as being that once this develops a blemish you're going to be and you're going to buy with the money. So therefore right now it already has and says the only time this is true is if it was given over to the so if it was given over to this shepherd at that point the is that if you as an but if you didn't give it to the shepherd yet and you it's not going to be an what is it going to be it's going to be an asham and you know how we know that cuz it says who who it should remain an ashum until you give it over to the shepherd. wants to give it to the shepherd at that point if you up until that point it's what I learned from the word who bottom line is what's the very very quick recap of the first half of today's said thought that the isle is learned out from the carbon kas the isle is learned out from the carbon kas how do you learn the from the carbon kas How do you learn from the after further review the said you can't learn anything as it relates to from the because and there's ways to learn from and we don't and the reason is because in the parish of you can't learn nothing from the as it relates to if that's the case why then is it that it's going to be possible because the same that you have because it says he or who depending on the depending on your but the bottom line is it says who in the well it says it by the says well those and for that reason those are going to be possible moving along to part two and really part two today's is going to segue very much into tomorrow's it's going to be the topic of today's and tomorrow's the where was done it's going to be possible and the reason is related that the whole of is to be m and if you do it which means it doesn't have the ability to be m so it's not being m by definition it has to be possible continued he said the same is going to be true And even though these are andarily here they're going to be possible being that the whole tact of these is to be and they can't be so it's for that reason over here is going to be possible. So Ra walks into his medish Rav who's a shaskkin Rav even when he says he says and he comes and he says two earthshattering earthshattering at first glance the from as we're about to say one in the world of and the other in the world of as relates to says I want you to know the where the one of the other critical possible why the of the is to between what was even though they're and according to is but being that their whole is to be and they can't be the so it's for that reason in this case they're going to be possible. So let's unpack exactly what it is that is saying and then we'll see the in. So, so first things first, what was the was it was brought on the of it was to be they used to bring the ones then they would count 49 days and then they would bring another known as that came together with and that was brought on. The 49 days that they counted from the is what we know as the sphere of that we count today is a it's not even a real according to some it's a to what once upon a time was a mitzvah that was rooted in we don't have that mitzvah today all we have is a l right like that we do by say there are certain things that we do is according to many the according to others what we're digressing by the way we're other much later in the but the bottom line is that's what the was so what was the of the toad said a very logical thing he said the whole purpose of the is to be m if you bring a carb in even the good ones the ones that are kosher means you got to bring another one. Whatever this carbon was supposed to accomplish, it didn't accomplish. Right? That's what it means. You need you didn't get giving a gift. It's not a gift. Right? Whatever it is that you're trying to do, you didn't accomplish. You didn't satisfy. So, you got to rinse and repeat. It just so happens that itself is a carbon. But as relates to means that this is not going to be the so said the whole of the is to be m if it can't be m then it's nothing you can't even eat the you can't put it on it's going to be 100% possible ra the same would be true just applying the logic to two asham nazer and the ash let's define the asham nazer is one of the carbono that the nazer used to bring. So we know there's a huge kachum component to this. There were two sets of carbonas that the nazer would bring. One was mandatory and that was he would bring the other was not something he had to do unless in the event that became so now he had to be and in order to be able to start counting again he had to become not. One of the things that he needed to do is he had to bring a set of carbonas. One of the carbonas that he brought was a carbon asham. That asham that he brought Rav said in Lumbus was being brought to allow the Tommy to start counting his nazer all over again. Right? Just to go through this a better when became says he loses his nazer. So gets put on hold. But it's even worse than that. He has to literally go all the way back, right? He has to start from scratch. So if he's 93 days into 100 day nazerus, well, you got to start all the way from the beginning. The asham was a carbon that was him that allowed him to go ahead and start counting his all over again, says Raph. So what is the of the nazer? The of the is a carbon that's being brought to allow him to start counting his now if he can't start counting his again. If he can't start counting as a zer. So this asham has noises. If it has nois same logic it's going to be possible. Same is true for the was one of the that every asham or every mitz had to bring. And when the mits used to bring his asham the purpose of it was to allow him to come back into the machna. So the had a he wasn't just had to be he had to be as well and the was what was him. It allowed him entry once again. This is his ticket if he can prove he has a voucher that says I brought a proper carbon otherwise you're going to have to stay where you are right now. So again the is what it's to be of something to allow to come back into the says if it's like it's not doing what it's supposed to do. So what is it and it's for that reason says Rav that as it relates to the and the and the right we said earlier what do the and the have in common what does the and the have in common right we're making interesting subcategories of carbonas here but the bottom line is all three of these carbonas are brought is aalis and if you can't accomplish that then it doesn't make sense that the k to be cautioned that's why all three of these cases are going to be possible. Now the Gmorra's analysis of what Ra said begins we learned in our what's the I mean if we're not to this we have to start our B all over again then if you're going to tell me that is also so it's not Right. This is the gara and the gimar says maybe why the even though it seems to be suggesting examples too of when apostle didn't throw into the mix the number one the was only talking about sob was a carbon additionally maybe is a standalone carbon is a standalone carbon came together with animals came together with so for that reason maybe that's why the time didn't mention alternatively is talking about that are not they're not associated with a time however this one the man says what's this man I should have said but either way Benisson And it's for that reason it's not mentioned either way. terrors I guess between and on the one hand and the on the other hand moving along. What was the second part of Rav the we learned in a which this is the first the first words of the first if you're going to tell me that an also apostle listening How come we didn't mention this? Being that there are other that are not coming to be they're coming for example or so therefore therefore we didn't mention it. What's the point? Because the tit doesn't want to get all nuance very granular this n this asham. Yeah. So being that ashamos are kosher right you can't say that they're all possible like by the or like by the pes so therefore it doesn't get a shout out but there you should know that the katas is excluded the pesak is excluded and there are even types of ash that are excluded as well either way. So what was the first part of the gar on Rav both halves of what Rav said seem to be contradicted by Mishnay the first half by the first Mishna the second half by the first Mishna here comes the second part of the also by the way rather intuitive let's focus on the why is it that said is going to be possible he to the because the whole task of it is to be and doesn't have the ability to be. So if it's not being then what way is it? It's for that reason it's going to be possible as relates to the other as it relates to the giz and the eloap they came for. So again they're also not serving their purpose. So if they're not serving their purpose, they should also be possible. Right? When we saw Rav in the beginning, it sounded like such a novel. But if you think about it for a minute, it's actually because the same logic that you have that it's have I don't know. That's so what's the difference that as it relates to the says makes no sense to eat the most makes no sense to go ahead and put it on the for that reason it's going to be possible yet we don't say that came and defended he said he said really the answer to this is is understanding kum a little bit better because you find you find already precedent that there's a between carbonas that are in this case such as the asham and the versus carbon that are merely in this case such as the where do you find this as it relates to there's an idea that sometimes a carbon that's can be brought even after the person that was obligated to bring this carbon already died whereas you don't find anywhere that brought what's the mart is the it's a and this is Hey, it's also the Mishna says so we're talking about a woman that was every and an oil, right? Depending on her financial situation. It's one of the examples of but she's always bringing and she's always bringing an so what would be if there was a woman that was that brought her and then she ended up dying her to go ahead and bring so she was she brought the and amazingly between the good. So right now the go and they bring the bring if it was the other way around. She brought the and then she died. So the ocean are not supposed to bring the and what's the reason for this says Rabia Rashi explains this the reason is and this is a little bit counterintuitive because the used to bring came to be the to be allowed to eat again she asked me in order to be able to eat the again and this is why this is counterintuitive came to be usually you would think the is the and the is the exactly the opposite The was and the wasapp. That's why if she brought the and died before the we can bring the because being that the is a there's a mus that is as opposed to if she brought the and didn't bring the is that should be brought. So you see said that there's a between a and a mapp could be brought sometimes that is as opposed to a a is never brought. Okay. So what does that have to do with Raf? I mean it's a nice distinction between and I hear we're asking aash and ra you're saying it doesn't make sense to put a on the where it doesn't have the ability to be fur say the same thing by it doesn't make sense to put a on the when it doesn't have the ability to be and for there's a between and okay there's a but how does it translate into a but the hes again if you think about it for a minute is very very simple What's Rav's lumbus? Rav's lumbus is if I have a carbon where the of it was to be and right now it can't be because it was brought. So you cannot go and put it on the as opposed to if I have a carbon whose was to be now that it can't be because still put it on the say what's because you see can be brought let me ask you a question when is it being no inap the person's not alive anymore is it that a carbon that's has an opinion sometimes to do with it even though it's not accomplishing what it's supposed to accomplish even though it's not being but when it comes to a you see that you can't bring the because of the fact that it's a and you can never bring a but here's the point you find that there's an in that sometimes we put a on even though really it doesn't have the ability to be so if you have an asham and an asham we it's even though right now it doesn't have the ability to that in of itself wouldn't be a reason not to put it on the despite the fact despite the fact that when it comes to the is we would say that you can't put it on the either way that's the it's not just oh I found a it's he it's the same exact I'm finding a that you could take a that's not being and put it on the that's the case and that's not being even though it's was to be still maybe there's a that it should be as opposed to with you don't find any to this but says he says that you never put a on we learned and this is a mo Lizo if somebody was mafish money for ner somebody somebody's a nazer and he has to bring his carbon nazer so he went and he was mafish money what's the purpose of this money he's going to go and he's going to buy the carbonus that he needs to bring so from this money because this money is hectish however there's no and the reason is because one of the carbonas that the brought was a carbon there's no being that he technically could have used all the money to buy. So it's not that the money is maybe it's so because he can't have even from a but there is no because maybe all the money over here is what would be if after the person this was ended up dying so says the if the money was meaning he was never mish whether the money is going to go for the or which dollar is going to go for what so all the money ends up blowing. What does it mean? It goes to that fund that was used to buy that was used for the Marta. This by the way is what would be if the money wasn't but it was designated this is going to go for this carbon that for that carbon. Okay. And then each dollar needs to be differently to make the money that was set aside for the that you throw into the and the reason is is because it's way we look at it even though it never became it was only but that's one of the and the is you can't do nothing with it. So in the form of animal what would you do? you would let it die and the form of money is now stating that he can't have enough from it because it's still but there's no because there's noises and the reason there's noises because comes from the fact that it has a purpose that you're supposed to give it to and being that there's nothing to do with this is not subject to the laws of what about the money so that you can bring a carbon right why could You bring a carbon. The reason you can bring a carbon is very simple because and as a result even though the person died but you can go bring an and not just that the money is going to have a bringing it as a carbon and as a result it's subject to what about the money so is that you again you can bring a carbon schlam with it because also an edam stating that this you're going to bring is going to have a dinner to be eaten for a day and a night. This is because usually eaten for two days and a night. But we know the sham nazer was unique just like the shi the sham nazer was eaten only for a day and a night. And being that this money is money that was initially set aside for a nazer. So it retains a little bit of in it and therefore it's only stating that the aim to but at the same time it doesn't require that's also because the did require and you're telling me we treat it a little bit like a it's only I would have thought either way based on a lot of here's the is Here's the punch. And of the way, right? Because what's the whole purpose of the carbonus that the Nazi used to bring? The what was the purpose of his carbonus? The purpose of his carbonus was so that he could come to the next kadesh and have a glass of wine. Right? That's the whole and you find that it's being brought being brought the guy died and we're taking the money and we're bringing carbon bring. You're telling me and that's the way you entering. Is that true? You never bring a have a perfect example of the you see clearly was brought said I'll tell you what meant to say. You have to tweak a little bit. What he meant to say was you don't find anywhere that should be brought and as it relates to the of the how do I know that? Because said that if you bring even one of the three could he could drink and that makes it a and knows is going to be different. So what what does the ta mean? What's a and what's avo is where you're the only you're Let me say it better. You're critical for the AA is where you're when you're brought, but I can get the without you. means I need you in order to get as opposed to means I don't need you in order to get the and that's what Rab was talking about are that you can't live without a Tommy who doesn't bring an asham will never be able to start counting as again a that doesn't bring his ash will never be allowed to enter the another who doesn't bring is as long as he brings this he can do whatever he wants because what's the point the point is that knew that there's a but only a you don't find it by and was saying by so was saying by over you don't find as opposed to you do find That is that's what he was coming to say in other words. In other words, Rav who said that there's a between the versus the and it's because one is a and the other one is a said that if you doesn't make sense that you should even put it on what do you mean if you keep it doesn't make sense either. What's not true? is an idea of putting a on the even though it's not being whereas you see from you don't put a maka on the muzz when it's not coming to be now does that mean you never ever ever will bring a not will never ever bring a no it doesn't mean that but as it relates to a as a that yeah and said that's why distinction holds true so we're going to end with one last measha on and this is aasha that's almost going to end the conversation So again, this is the main part of the R's done, right? That's what was done. Oh, you didn't do the we don't need now. You put it on the It even requires but you need to bring another What did this just say in English? The part of it that we need that is what did say that and that are going to be and says if that's the case is knocked out. Right. We don't learn all the but these we might as well. So it's the second on the top of really those words is almost a misnomer right because what do you mean is you can't checkmate because he found a says the could have said that but the bottom line is what was again we're going to start with Rav tomorrow but what was that even though in the There's actually a third that's going to be possible and that is the however the why are they because it says who the why is that that's based on by the way said he said the same exact as said the what's the is in the first par of the short answer is right short answer to every question in but short answer is what's the H it's the exhale. So just to end with one short and that is so in the last three days we started a new mak which immediately followed the previous that we learned and that is so the first two of and a lot of other makas that are coming up but the first two are the primary topic of are all all the carbon that were live animals, the all the types of all the types of etc etc. What's the topic of? It's the other carbon that's not about and that is the carbon. It's called because there are many different types of carbon. So deals with all the carbon deals with the carbon that came from carbs, right? It deals with the carbon dram of carbon. So from on starts in a very systematic clear way delineates all the different types of carbon there's an there's a there's an asham there's a schlam goes through every single carbon and then he comes to he says says all these carbonas that I just mentioned which is the entire litany of carbono the exception of the all of these are what we know as the Rambam says this as well almost verbatim in histo. So the Rambam wrote a hakama to say and towards the end of the Rambam says as follows. So here too he lists all the carbon goes into great detail mentioning every single carbon that you could possibly bring and he says I just gave you the entirety of all the that were ever brought from the shame and they're all referred to by one shame. And what is that for who? So you want to know what is? It's all the carbon that were brought from IS THE ONE THAT'S not brought from the bal and that is the carbon the in his says as follows. He says the says that all these are called that this that the said that all these are called he meant that when used the terms it means all the additionally and then we list out all the different says says them. He says the words always is referring specifically to the carbon in his first comment on he also quotes the Rambam. Now doesn't quote the quotes in his wrote a so when he's making his comment he's making it on the ra's comment which is a he was learning and he saw what wrote in his and that is quote shame that what does mean shame says the even though the Rambam said that the words all the carbon however you should know that the when you find it in the it's means only and this is a very similar comment to what the said the said that I'm skipping makes almost the identical comment again but it's almost the identical comment because and says the that you want to know the or says that that you want to know the that you find only with regards to the and the take a look at the Evanzra at the very very end of paras. So what's this Evanzra in the end of paranzra brings as follows he brings that he had a conversation with a min so we know min is code for so had this conversation with he says I saw one minus said and it's that according to the word is all the Carbonas he said he said that he didn't find the words referenced in the with the exception of the right you only find it by the and if that's the case he said how could the you only find it by the just to bring out what this min was ting and really just go through you'll see that the terms is always mentioned in reference to the carbon but exhibit a for This is right in the beginning of parish the says and then it says so right out of the gate right when the introduces the refers to it as but either way so the got it wrong he was mocking the that they understood that the word means you see clearly THAT IT'S ALWAYS THE READ SCRIPTURE and you're going to know it's only REFERRING TO THE SAYS the evanzra that this man is a fool. You know why? Because with all his he forgot a posing in the it says in the end of it says and being that it says so it's clear it's clear that you can find the words even regarding a carbon not only regarding a so says that the said that the words says that that's only true when it comes to but when it comes to when it comes to over there it's only the and the it's only the and says that that even though the himself in that told the man that you're making of the that treats as a shame in the only he said what do you mean it's a you find by the as well but even was only able to find for the he wasn't able to find it for the and he wasn't able to find it for the and it's for that reason to say that and that is the comment on the so again the end of right before the first mission made the same comment that when you find of you should know it means all the carbonas that were brought from the ineron made a comment. What was his comment? It's true only in it's not true because whenever you find the words what it means is the made a very similar comment. He made it inn his comment was that it's true only it's not true when it comes to because it's only the end of now the truth is the mid is you can't even give us with this mab the mid is mish making the argument that the min made to the eanzero so the mab because just like the min forgot that I mean abd is right. It sounds a little bit like the the is almost making the same talk. So obviously you have to be this but the and the both coming to the same maso that you have to say and but the truth is that if you take a step back and learn that ebenezar for a second is really a little bit of inzar as well because the was timing that got it wrong they treat to mean it's not it's not that way you always find the word by Debra said he's a fool. He forgot about the he forgot about the okay. So it's but it's still not the it's still not the is still a little bit because said okay then you don't even have to find the bus again then you just knock the men out. But if you're already going into the bl with this men and you're having a a fight over scripture at the end of the day at the end of the day all you found it was by the you still didn't find it by the it's a little bit still I'll tell you that I found in the mish and this is inim it's something that he brings from his uncle Relic He said such a he says that in Ezra the they were all struggling a little bit. Where do you find this that should be referred to all carbonas? You find the mafurish in the countless times by the schlam and the benezra has his one maram that you find it by the as well but you certainly don't find it by the you certainly don't find it by the asham saidvilleik he said I'm going to tell you where you find it such a beautiful no one ever thought of this there were two misbeh and there was the was also known as the MBH and it was also known as the MB and that was the big MB with the ramp where all the carbonas were brought. There was another Msbakus that Msbak was also known as MB because it was made of gold. It was also known as because it was inside the What was brought on that misbay? The kyus was brought on the misbeh. But it was called a misbeh. It's not a So in what way is it? It's because there was a time where there was some carbon that went on the misbeh what makes it a MISBEH which is the and they would put it ON THIS STRUCTURE. HENCE IT GETS known as a misbeh. It's not going to have a good answer. It's checkmate. The name is the that even Okay, so we were just What about the right? We're getting someone. What about the for that revel from the Raman? I don't think we ever mentioned this Ram and this Raman's in two places. It's in we never even mentioned it in. So the Torah goes through all the carbonas that the nim used to bring right we know this right all the whole and we say it again and again and again and again again we could all say it in our sleep right so the whole suite of that used to bring makes an observation says all the different carbonas you can bring every last thing that you would ever bring in They went ahead and brought the fact that they brought a was really a very big because it's not something that's ever been because if you make you're going to see every single carbon that would ever bring they would says there's one problem. There was one carbon that wasn't brought. You know which carbon wasn't brought to asham. There was no asham. Go through the niggan in your head. There was no asham that was brought. So if there was no asham that was brought what about the is not fair because the and the shame who the are literally the same thing. their shame and the it's one the other place says this is by the tells of he says he tells him bring animals and he says that they should be what does it mean they should be misles the rabban brings he brings he brings different what word mislicious is but says raban I'm going to tell you what I think misles is mislesius is three animals. And the reason three says there's three types of animals that were brought as carbon three. You forgot one. What about the is like the the only between the truth is this reminds very I mean today's right just some things that came up in today's so we know the and the really are very very different but this is Ramban says the Ramban says that as it relates to understanding the relationship between the you have to know that the cash is in the doesn't sound like it means only the and even was able to find the but what about the what about the you want to know where you find that the is considered ZEBUS WHAT was brought on it only the must be it's considered a zeb what about the for that you have the ramban says it's and if the word ze passes for the it's based on this it would pass for the as well and if that's the case you don't have to say what the said and you don't have to say what the said and that is and because you have in as well that it could be that the words is not only true for and not only true for but it would be true for carbon as well. Just to end with one lasting says that he found afterwards that really this that why was the called there was no done over there the was brought over there. So in what way was it called? asks it's just read the opening lines talking it says there was that was made this is a that requires his point begin to train because there were two And the one was outside the was inside. Now that the which was inside why was it called A there was no there were no carbonas being brought over there. The word comes from and if that's the case in what way is the called Allah said begin I'm going to tell you the reason is the because the was so potent it was so powerful that when the would bring the he had the ability to be so many and so many of the and being that the got slaughtered. It doesn't have the ability to bear and it doesn't have the ability to be mad. You want to know why it's called? It's true. There's no ze there's no that's being done in the mak but when the brought he was being he was making a in the which the badas and he's slaughtering all these terrible zeras we know the power of the is we if there's a right this is the when he was and the way it works is with it works with a so says it's a you have to be you have to be in this why would the be referred to as the terror is not because of any that's happening but it's because of that's happening in the it's because it's being because of all the schoolers and all the that are coming from the that's aligla it's because of and maybe that's also So this kash is an interesting kasha. Why would the even be referred to as a misb? We have a mahalpig. We have a mahalister. We're going to stop here.