Menachos 89

Today's stuff is menorah's stuff, pay us, and we are at the sixth wide line of that pay on the base. Rav said in the name of the Rav near the narrows, the lamps of the menorah, so that's the part of the menorah where the fire was was attached to the menorah itself, but at the same time was flexible in the sense that when the coin came to be made of the narrows to clean out the wicks and the oil from the day before, he was able to bend the lamps towards him so that it would be easier for him to clean it. Now, we're all familiar that the menorah was who was made out of one piece of solid gold. Rav was saying that when we say that the menorah was made up of one piece of solid gold, it means the narrows as well. They too were included in what the Torah meant when it said that the menorah had to be but at the same time you were able to bend those parts of the menorah and it was necessary to bend it to be able to properly be made of the narrows. The cuz uh um menorah that when the Torah says when the Torah says when the Torah describes the menorah that it has to be made up of one piece of solid gold that weighs a it doesn't just mean the base of the menorah but it means the entire menorah. It means the narrows as well. And keep it a beam that you have to be able to clean the narrows. If its parts would not have the ability to bend backward and forward, wouldn't be flexible, they have a it'd be very difficult to properly clean it. Thus, Rav said it must be that the narrows of the shall break the base. From a case of how was the coin made of the narrows? He would remove the narrows physically remove the narrows from the menorah. He would leave them in the oil and he would clean them with a and then he would repeat and he would do it all over again. Why is this a because the says before it that the narrows were able to be removed. When it says in the Torah that the menorah had to be it doesn't mean to include the narrows. It means the base of the menorah, but as it relates to the arms of the menorah, what the refers to as the narrows, that's something you would be able to remove. So, how could Rav and a say something that contradicts a so the says can say something that's inconsistent with the is because he has a the there's another that supports Rav so granted there's a not like Rav but there's also a supports Rav that it's not true. They never removed the narrows from the menorah. Now, the says sounds like if they wanted to do they could have removed it. It's just that they did it. Should we infer from the of the they didn't do it as if to say if they wanted to do it, they could have done it. Why not? So, Rav explains because if it would have been possible to remove it, the would have never said they didn't do it. There's no in not removing the narrows from the menorah. To the contrary, the would be to remove the narrows from the menorah so that you should be able to do the narrows properly. say edits the so what it must mean is that you could not remove it. The bottom line is that even though it's true there's a that says how was that done? They would remove the narrows, but at the same time there's also a that says that you couldn't remove it. A whether or not the narrows were included in what the Torah meant when it said the the bottom line is Rav was clearly like one of these the that hold that the narrows had to be part of the that was the menorah. If that's the case, how did they do so that was so it was flexible thus you were able to bend the narrows so that the coin will be able to properly do the that who are the that hold that you couldn't remove the narrows from the menorah. Rav Rav who the small thin golden plate that was on the very top of the menorah where the fire was, where the wick was. would be made of the narrows you would have to push that inward to be able to clean out everything that he needed to clean out. When you put the you would have to lift it a little bit to be able to get the oil in. The bottom line is Rav again is saying that the way that was done was with the narrows attached to the menorah. Clearly, it could not be detached. Thus, it's Rav that's the that hold that the narrows were included in the of mixture. The says by the way I'll find you another so the has many and that seem to have the discussed the whether the narrows was included in the mixture of the menorah or not. What's this final the menorah and its narrows the menorah and its narrows were included in what the Torah means when it says the menorah has to weigh a so However, the tools that were used to clean the menorah, that's not included in the the menorah was included in the so when the Torah says what part of the menorah is it referring to? It's a the Torah says it's referring to the menorah and the narrows. It just is not including the tools, but the menorah itself, even the narrows are included in what the Torah means when it says so what the Torah means when it says says no, it's only the menorah itself not also not so the we don't know the so the says regarding the so that's the in its entirety. How do you know the narrows are included in that? so then it says it's coming to include something it's coming to be so I would think to be the tools that were used to clean the so so so so although you have that's being you also have that's being the so the Rav Rav was the one that said that it was only the menorah that was not the narrows not the here we have that's the narrows from the the tools from so it's a Rav Rav says it's true you have a between two must be two were saying over what they had heard from each one had heard something else. Regardless, it's not a the menorah was in the menorah he's the other he holds that the narrows were included in the so doesn't it say which said it's coming to be the narrows it's coming to be but not with regards to the of mixture not with regards to the of but rather something else. It's coming to say that the narrows also had to be made out of gold. Says the I don't need to tell me that the narrows have to be made out of gold. There is no debate that the narrows had to be gold. What we're debating in this is whether the narrows are included in whether they're included in but gold it's a so so the even the everything had to be gold. So, why do I need a to tell me that it had to be gold? Hello the referring to the very very top of the where the wick meets the the gold of the so I would have thought being that that part of the menorah is going to get black from the smoke of the menorah so you would think because you're going to have to continuously replace it so maybe that of the menorah that part maybe doesn't have to be meaning maybe just make it even an inferior quality of gold doesn't have to be that best type of gold. The bottom line is what do we take out of this again another with the are arguing whether or not the narrows of the menorah were included in whether the narrows of the menorah were included in mixture. The bottom line is Rav began this morning's with a where Rav said that the narrows of the menorah were attached to the menorah, but at the same time they were flexible so that when the coin did he was able to remove it. said what? The narrows were attached as a that says that the way the coin was made of the narrows, he would physically remove the arms of the menorah and clean it. Not that it was attached, but flexible. What it did was the showed after after after all Rav was really doing was being amongst the either way. So, the was discussing the different as it relates to the that were in the so the had said that one of the was a which we now know means a how long and the purpose of the meter that was Revius Halacha was it was used to measure the water that was needed for the Tyro Hamitzri. And the Shemen that was needed for the Halos Nazir that the Nazir brought together with his Carbon Shlamim when he completed his Nazirus. What was the purpose of the measurement that was the Chatz Halacha? So the Mishna said the purpose of that was for the Mayim Hasoita. Additionally for the Chatz Halacha Shemen Hatorah. The Carbon Toda required a Chatz Halacha of Shemen. Now the truth is that most Minchas, the Mishna itself continued and said required a Halacha of Shemen. So by saying that the Carbon Toda's Halos required a Chatz Halacha it's a little bit of a Chidush because it makes it different than than most Minchas. Most Minchas how much oil it's a Halacha of oil. The Toda required only a Chatz Halacha. And the Gemara's going to elaborate on this. Matam L'Omer Ba'Shemen. Ba'Shemen Shnei Fo'amim. Now Rabbi Akiva was referring to a possuk in Parshas Tzav that discusses the Carbon Toda. The possuk in its entirety. Im Al Toda Yakrivenu. If a person is bringing a Carbon Toda V'Hikriv Alav Chaloys Matzoys Matzoys Beluloys Ba'Shemen U'Rekikei Matzoys Meshuchin Ba'Shemen V'Soles Merubachas Chaloys Beluloys Ba'Shemen. So we know that the Carbon Toda was made up of four types of breads, 10 of each, thus there were 40 Chaloys. 10 were Chametz. 30 were Matza. Meaning one man was Chametz, three meaning were Matza. What were the three meaning? So you had Chaloys, you had Rekikin, and then you had the Revucha. Now when the Torah describes each one of the three meaning of Matzoys that the Ba'al Carbon had to bring when he brought the Carbon Toda, so the Torah says he had to bring Chaloys Matzoys Beluloys Ba'Shemen U'Rekikei Matzoys Meshuchin Ba'Shemen V'Soles Merubachas Chaloys Beluloys Ba'Shemen. The Torah says that each one of these meaning had to come together with oil. And that was where the Akiva's Kashya. Rabbi Akiva said Matam L'Omer Ba'Shemen Ba'Shemen Shnei Fo'amim. Now the truth is it doesn't just say Ba'Shemen twice, it says Ba'Shemen three times. All three of the meaning of Chaloys Toda that were Matza the Torah says Ba'Shemen. And the Gemara's going to address that later. But for now Rabbi Akiva's concern is the first two. Says Rabbi Akiva L'Omer Ba'Shemen Once I see a man with a Toda I would have thought that the amount of oil needed for the Chaloys the same as the amount of oil that's needed for all Minchas which is a Halacha. Actually Because Ba'Shemen Ba'Shemen the Torah says the word Ba'Shemen twice. Have you Reboyacha Riboy? They Reboyacha Riboy Ela L'Mayet. So essentially the Torah is being Marbeh Shemen but not once. The Torah is being Marbeh Shemen twice. Reboyacha Riboy is always a Mayut. Mayut De'I Kasuv L'Chatz Halacha. Freight to Gemara. Riboy Acha Riboy Chad Riboy Hu. Why is this a Riboyacha Riboy? Rach Riboyacha Riboy means the Torah was Marbeh and then the Torah was Marbeh again. Here the Torah wasn't Marbeh twice. The Torah was only Marbeh once. Once the Torah said Shemen he did that. And then the Torah has a second Ba'Shemen which is a Riboy. So Riboyacha Riboy is a Mayut. If there's two Riboyim here only have one Riboy. So how do you make one Riboy a Mayut? It's two Riboyim that are a Mayut. So Akiva explains Ela L'Mayet Ba'Shemen Kol Akur. What would have been said if Rav Shimon had the Torah said Rav Akiva regarding the Shemen not Rav Shimon? Said what would have been the Halacha? O Yish Omer Kol Minchas Halacha. I would have thought that it's like a regular Mincha and requires Ba'Shemen Ba'Shemen. In other words both Ba'Shemens are Riboy. The Torah didn't have to say the word Ba'Shemen at all because without Ba'Shemen I would know it's a Mincha. Every Mincha needs Shemen. How much Shemen? A Halacha. So it comes out that both Ba'Shemens are Riboyeh. Have a Riboyacha Riboy De'In Riboyacha Riboy Ela L'Mayet. Mayut De'I Kasuv L'Chatz Halacha. Says the Gemara Rav Akiva Yochani Chatz Halacha Zeh Mischa L'Shlosha Meaning. I would have thought if there's a Halacha of Chatz Halacha and there's three meaning so take the Chatz Halacha and now divide it equally amongst the three meaning. The Chaloys U'Rekikin U'Revicha. Says the Gemara Kishu Omer Ba'Shemen B'Revicha the Torah says the word Ba'Shemen third time. Shein D'Reiten Fo'am. Shein Tam L'Omer. Why do I need it a third time? Right, the first part of Rabbi Akiva he explained the first two Ba'Shemens. Both Ba'Shemens are extra Riboyacha Riboy L'Mayet that it's not a Halacha like all Minchas it's only a Chatz Halacha. But what do I need the next Ba'Shemen for? Ah, it's coming to teach me Okay Tzad that there's a disproportionate amount of Shemen that was used for that third meaning of Chaloys Toda mentioned in the Gemara. Beis Chatz Halacha Shemen. You take a Chatz Halacha V'Choitzayo. What do you get if you divide a Chatz Halacha? You get two Reviyois. Chetz Oil L'Chaloys U'Rekikin. You're going to use a Revius for the Chaloys and the Rekikin. The Chetz Oil L'Revicha. So the reason the Torah mentioned again Ba'Shemen with regards to the Revicha is to tell me that there's a disproportionate amount of Shemen that's going to be used for that. So Rav Shimon ben Azai heard Rabbi Akiva Shtikel Torah which essentially was the source to the Halacha in the Mishna that says that although all Minchas or most Minchas had a Halacha Shemen but the Chaloys Toda which was also a Mincha had a Chatz Halacha Shemen. It was based on the fact that the Torah wrote the word Ba'Shemen twice extra. It's a Riboyacha Riboy De'I Acha Riboy Ela L'Mayet. Instead of a Halacha Shemen it's a Chatz Halacha Shemen. So Rav Shimon ben Azai told Rabbi Akiva Akiva you're not the Marbeh Kol Hayom Kol Ba'Shemen Ba'Shemen. You could bring Ba'Shemens all day. Ein Shemay L'Chach. This is not the Makor. We have to explain why the Torah wrote Ba'Shemen three times but that's not the Makor. What is the Makor? Al Chatz Halacha Shemen L'Toda. U'Revius Shemen L'Nazir. The Echad Also Yom She Dei Nidah L'Nidah the Halacha of Sheva Yemai Nikiim Yoin which is that 11 day period Halacha L'Moshe Mi'Sinai has nothing to do with the words Ba'Shemen Ba'Shemen Ba'Shemen but rather it's based on a Halacha L'Moshe Mi'Sinai. So the Mishna said continued. And the Mishna said U'B'Halacha Kol Hayom De'I Kol Minchas. All Minchas or almost all Minchas required how much oil? A Halacha. And then the Mishna said a Chidush. So let's say somebody brings a Mincha that has many Isroinois. The Halacha is for each Isroin you have to have a Halacha. But not just that, the way you measure the oil is Halacha by Halacha. So the Mishna's example was if you had a really really big Mincha it was made up of 60 Isroinois of Soles. So you can't take this huge Medida measure 60 Isroinois 60 Lugan of oil and mix it. No. You have to do it Halacha by Halacha by Halacha. The point was U'B'Halacha Kol Hayom De'I Kol Minchas Af Ilu Mincha Shel Samuch Isroin Noisen Samuch Halacha. And then the Mishna brought Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov. This is Mishna Shel Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov which is Kav Naki. So Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov said no. Af Ilu Mincha Shel Samuch Isroin Ein Lo Ela Lugan. That the Halacha is you never had more than one Halacha for a Mincha. So it's not that you have a Halacha of Shemen for every Isroin of Soles that you have but rather the way it works is is that for every Mincha all you have is one Halacha. Says the Gemara Tanna Rabbanan B'Metzora On Iksev. Regarding the Metzora of the Oni the possuk says Isroin Balul V'Halacha. So the Halacha is that a Metzora when he brought his Carbonois when he came to be Metahar himself he was able to elect the type of Carbon to bring based on what his financial status was. So one of the Carbonois Oif V'Yoiri that the Torah talks about is the Carbonois of the Metzora. The Torah says that if the Metzora could afford it he would bring three Beheimos. If the Metzora couldn't afford it then all he would bring was one Beheima. The Torah says V'Im Dal Hu Ein Lo Massegas V'Lacha Keves Echad Oshom. He brought one animal supposed to three. That animal was an Oshom L'Chaper Alav. V'Isroin Soles Echad Balul Ba'Shemen. And together with his one animal he had to bring an Isroin of Soles that was mixed together with oil L'Mincha. That was the Mincha. V'Halacha Shemen. And there was a Halacha Shemen. Now Posuk Shemen in this possuk is very straightforward. The Metzora is bringing one Keves. Together with his one Keves he's bringing one Isroin of Soles that's Balul Ba'Shemen. It's going to be a Halacha of Shemen like all Minchas. That's going to be the Mincha that's going to come along together with his Keves. Then he's going to bring a Halacha Shemen because we know that the Shemen and specifically a Halacha Shemen was a very important part of the Tyro Hamitzri. Stating that the Gemara feels that there's a lot of extra words in this possuk. Although at first glance there isn't but the Gemara's going to Darshan based on Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai that the Torah addresses them some very important fundamental Mincha Halachas from what at first glance seems to be a very innocent possuk. Says the Gemara Tanna Rabbanan B'Metzora On Iksev Isroin Balul V'Halacha. L'Mayet we learn from here Al Isroin Shel Totel Halacha. That every single Isroin that a person brought together with his Mincha required a Halacha. Isroin Balul B'Halacha teaches me that every Isroin needs a Halacha. Again, it's not Posuk Shemen in the possuk. Posuk Shemen in the possuk is V'Isroin Soles Echad Balul Ba'Shemen L'Mincha. Kama? Or period. V'Halacha Shemen. The Halacha Shemen is is a whole separate thing. It's not even part of the Mincha. That's the Halacha Shemen that's going to go on the Beheima of the Metzora. It's a completely independent part of the Tyro Hamitzri. But we're somehow marrying the word Isroin we're skipping five words to the word Halacha to teach me every Isroin needs a Halacha. Divrei Chachamim. Chami Rabbi Eliezer ben Akiva Isroin Balul V'Halacha. They learned no, just the opposite. That if you're bringing a a Mincha it doesn't matter how big the Mincha is all you have is one Halacha. And how do you know that? From the same possuk. She Ne'emar L'Mincha V'Halacha Shemen. Every Mincha has only one Halacha Shemen. Again, in the possuk Mincha and Halacha Shemen don't come together. It's the Mincha period V'Halacha Shemen. Somehow the Tanna'im put it together and that's how they had this Halacha. Says the Gemara Rabbi Eliezer ben Akiva Isroin Balul V'Halacha May Akiva What did they do with the Chachamim's Drasha? Hu L'Gufay. That's coming to teach me Posuk that the Metzora had to bring a Mincha that had in it Shemen. D'Chamar Rachmana L'Aisi Chadi Isroin. D'Idoch D'Guf Lo Itzrich. of the and the home say no, you don't need a a positive to tell me that the had to bring a minute that was made up of one inside. Why I mean because we need that brings carbon noise and together with this the Torah says he brings Australia noise three Australia noise hot carbon. You have that this quite material only is bringing only one carbon and so makes sense that you should only bring one so what do I need a positive to tell me that he brings and he's sorry must be extra to teach me not a regarding the mincha that the material only bought but rather a that teaches me more generally regarding all in the so I would have thought but the and the say that it's not natural because being that you find that the Torah altered the Torah changed the nature of the carbon that the material brings when he's an only versus what he brings when he's an usher so I would have thought maybe it doesn't have a minute either so that's why the Torah had to tell me he brings you can't anything from there. The what do they say you find in that the amount could change but to tell me that the usher has to bring a mincha and the only doesn't have to bring a mincha at all that you don't find but I have a minute my what do the do with the rush of and all the like shaman all of them is not if mincha if you don't know it's coming to teach you that somebody mincha you can't bring less than the amount of that would normally require my what does the and the how did they know this that the minimum size mincha has to be that they learn it also from that positive somehow in those words of the mincha you don't just learn one but you learn two regardless we have a positive here talking about the material only which at first glance is just telling me what the material only is supposed to bring instead of bringing three carbons he brings one carbon the carbon that he brings is going to be a a carbon his carbon is going to have one meaning the material usher had three with his three animals the material only is going to have one and the you sorry is going to be followed by shaman that's going to be the mincha and additionally there's a like shaman that's part of the stating that the time we're bothered with some nuances in this positive and it's from this positive regarding the material only that the common and the and the it's also and in our mission to learn their positions respectively when somebody brought a carbon mincha if it was one there was one like shaman that everybody agrees with what if there were 10 or no noise how much shaman was it and say for every sorry there was a like shaman it's learned out from this positive and the and the common and it's from the common here in the price as well that no every mincha didn't matter how many of the war all there was was like seven another that's learned out from this positive is that the minimum sheer mincha had to be and sorry either way the said she shall upon and so the amount of oil that had to be brought together with a power as part of its mincha was meaning six which is a and a is made up of 12 so one of the was the it was used for the mincha that came together with the power our boys full which is a third of a that's the and the that's three which is the like we all know the positive right so that's the the those are three again of the seven that that the mission mentions says the me how do you know all this the positive says when the so the power has a and trace trace we know that the is 12 how do you know that the is 12 because the positive says it says so the measured a and regarding the it says it's the that we should have used to anoint the common and the and the etc. It Torah refers to it as mission and the trace have you the bottom line is if the common is there and there's 12 and we know that it was a so it's 12 something into the must be 12 that's how you know it's 12 in the so the mission said that power had how much oil it had six you know what it's based on it's based on the positive that says the and the a is 12 thus must be six looking so this is one of many in not that many but there are in the more learns that from the just one and that is that perhaps one of the better known that the learns from the is the that the zeros is so the zeros is and how do you know that so the brings between and the master said on my common regarding the another and the tells the says it's connected to 30 times that it says in the Torah the word is really only 29 times and that's a classic right in the beginning of the so the master said how do you know the is because it says and the word is 30 if you take a look at the rush in its on the so the says the rush the 1000 year the I must have been a that the just they were on this and the reason is because is you can't learn from the it must be there was a mission that that the zeros is the just said you want to find a in the Torah have a the word 30 plus everything is in the Torah but it's not really much more than that says the rush you can't tell me it's a master sat down and he said year is 30 thus we have a the zeros so so that in this as well you can't tell me that there's a that 12 is somehow in the it's it's an I thought it was interesting because I think that the person more than anyone else that really introduced into the mainstream was the the has many many every page of there's different that are based on the was the rush right the Torah always brings a rush so it's interesting that the rush writes that you know is called all it is is a but all you can't really learn much from the so I said with the rush the Torah that probably mainstream more than anyone else either way so the mission so the mission had said that the every single night required three and a half looking of oil what's the methodology because there was seven and each had a look of it says may so the is that the when you lit so you had to light at we learn from there that isn't just the amount of time that the had to be lit but it's also the sheer of how much oil there had to be came so at the end of the so may there should be enough oil that will allow it to light may that the we'll see that what that means in a moment another that there's no that's a may at other than we'll see what that means in a minute the sheer so going back to the first in the price so says the the first was how much oil came what's the so how much is that it's how much is that it's how much is that it's may it's a explains says we all know this is that the took the longest night of the year which are the and in the how much oil would you need for the oil to be able to burn and not extinguish during the night literally it's a and it's based on that we have a every single night there was a even though really you only needed the during the so the what then happened on a regular night so let's say it's not it's it's one of the shorter nights of the year so what's going to happen on a on a short night you're putting in all this oil the is going to come the next morning to be made of the isn't there going to be left over oil so the says what they would do is they would make the wicks a little bit thicker they use so the so being that the wicks were a little bit thicker or thinner I said depending on the nights they somehow manipulated it to make sure that it would only go to be made of but you couldn't manipulate the amount of oil that was going to be used the amount of oil that's the the you find the longest you find the longest night of the year and that's how much oil you had to have that's one in the the other in the so may it now it sounds like what the is saying is is that the would light the at night and the only that was the is that is that true is that true historically says the there were two that were done at night that that's my connected that of course we know was that was done first thing in the morning but before it really became morning which means it was done at the end of the night so I have two that were may so the says the dice says the dice says regarding the actors in morning that you have to say that it's true that it was kosher by Lila but it was also kosher by you. As opposed to the lockers on the mirror that had to be done at night. But the bottom line is it sounds it from the dice is one with the coin light them in order you would light by right at the beginning of the night. That's when you would light them in order. Rashi after all of them and all of them is a whole different shot in the mirror. Rashi says that when the mirror says in the Shira may Arab bad boy care Ella Zuba bad means that really that lockers on the mirror was done during the day and there was no avoid that that was allowed to be done during the day. Until the next morning after that lockers on the mirror I actors actors in order is not an avoid that that's an avoid that's light. Had lockers on the mirror which was an avoid that's light was the last avoid that's light that was able to be done at boy care. The fact that you could do actor that's an avoid that's kosher by Lila. We're talking about avoid this that's not kosher by Lila. Such an avoid the last avoid that could be done during the day was a locker so just like there's a locker of Allah and color so tell me what was the last coin that was brought during the day. So to the last avoid that was done during the day was a mirror. But it comes out at first glance it seems to be a very fundamental my when did the coin light the mirror. Did he light the mirror at night? Did he light it during the day? It seems to be based on how to understand this mirror of in the Shira may Arab bad boy care Ella Zuba bad dice in the locker of Allah says that lockers on the mirror was done at night. Rashi in Yuma says that Allah says that Allah was done during the day. If you look at the homish and the mirror of homish already debate this. Regardless it seems to be a little bit unclear. May Arab bad boy care is it before Arab the last avoid that or is it no ready after Shira regardless so the locker is how much oil the amount of oil is a half a light and it's based on the first shot in this bracer may Arab bad boy care came on me dice to take the lockers mirror bad boy care. The mirror says something interesting. Mirror says how did they figure out the amount of oil that's needed. Some say no matter what what they did what they came on me matter what matter Shira. What they says my like is whether the first time they lit the mirror and they had to figure out how long it's going to take for the oil to burn. So that they start off with a little bit of oil and they saw that it only got went to 3:00 in the morning. So they knew for next time they would have to add and then it went to 4:00 and then after finally they were able to figure out how much oil they need. Or maybe it was just the opposite they started off with a very large here and they saw they had left over oil. So the next day they did a little bit less and the next day they little little less. And this is hashtag rest of the story. How did the common figure out how much oil needed to be done? So some said that they started low. They went up to the mile. Some said they went up to the mile. What's the common is matter what mile Shira also in the mission of Israel. It's based on this principle that keeps on repeating itself. How Shira also in the mission of Israel. So we're not going to just go out and throw away oil. So let's start low because we don't want to waste oil. Matter what matter what mile matter what says that they went up to the mile just the opposite. It should be an idea of of how Shira also in the mission of Israel. This is the base of we're going to act as if we're so sensitive over a little bit of oil. That's a news. In the news of my Shira this is the base of so it's interesting. We had so many times just recently how Shira also in the mission of Israel and now all of a sudden the the mirror just introduced an idea that would seem to be the diametric opposite which is in the news of my Shira and you see that they're opposed because the mirror says if you hold how Shira also in the mission of Israel you're going to go up to the mile and if you hold in the news of my Shira you don't want to show sensitivity to a little bit of oil so you go with a break guide then you go up to the mile. So every time you have how Shira also in the mission of Israel why don't you say in the news of my Shira or any time you have in the news of my Shira why don't you say how Shira also in the mission of Israel. So there's a true from the native of Yuda with a true may I have a asked the native of Yuda this question and they will be a powerful back and forth with his bonus but that's not for this morning. Regardless just one before we start the next mission and that is so how much oil had to be inside the mirror. Each lamp had to have a half a light. What's it based on? It's based on the person that says mirror bad boy care. Came on me dice to take the lockers mirror bad boy care. You mirror bad boy care. You take the longest night of the year. What's the longest night of the year? The way they came the way they came you need a half a light. Some say for in this mission of the says we're all familiar with the mirror of the mirror of was daily the entire night. Says some say for I think that from this mirror right here in the mirror of and the mirror of which the mirror discussed earlier in the mirror of all of them and all of them is also in Shabbat perhaps we could find them a car what the mirror says about the car that hidden mission is actually so you know the locker is that came in my way we learn from the concept of hidden mission. So let's say you have an acid and then there's an acid that's more hidden. So obviously there's an idea to take the acid that's more hidden. How much more do you have to pay for the acid that's more hidden versus the ordinary acid or any mission. How much is a person supposed to overpay for hidden mission. So when it comes to for example how much how much is all your stuff that's with regards to how much of your net worth are you supposed to spend for missions. You're not to be left with no money because you did a mission. So how much is even this much something else. This is a question of two missions in front of me. One is more hidden than the other. I'm willing to overpay for hidden mission. The question is how much should I overpay. So the locker is hidden mission actually. You go up until a third. A third more that's how much you can pay. Says the some say for I think I have them a car. Because the mirror says how much oil was put into the mirror every night. It was a half a light. The way they came. Says the some say for the longest night of the year is 16 hours. That's the way they came. The mirror of lit for how long? 24 hours. Says the some say for 24 is a third more than 16 if you go up the bar because if you go up the bar one lit for 16 the other lit for 24 the difference is eight. Eight represents one third of the total amount. It's a third up the bar. The mirror of was the hidden mission of the mirror. So how much oil was there for 16 hours? How long did the mirror of light? 24 hours. Says the some say for I think that this is a car mirror to what Allah said about the car that hidden mission is actually says the some say for it only works if you go up the bar. No no it's a problem because the mirror of says clearly you actually actually actually so you have to know because the mirror over there blinds with a take so says the some say for that although the mirror over there wasn't sure but at the end of the day the mirror says take I mean that the mirror says take me something you would have to go with the higher number. The higher number is the middle of the bar. It's not middle of the gap. So says the some say for that at the end of the day works out because the mask on it's a take. Take means that the way we are the locker is is we go and it's a mirror of the bar. Works out very nicely with the mirror of there was oil for 16 hours and ended up burning a third up the bar which is 24 hours. But the truth is that last line in the some say for is really not so partial. So we're not learning the some say for mission we're not learning some say for some say for but really there's a real some say for whether some say for you go some say for with hidden mission or some say for you go and it's based on some say for is it a mission essay or is it only a mission essay. Some say for in the beginning of Allah they say that my ticket ain't coming but here you have a second of hidden mission came in my way is it a essay or is it a essay. If it's a essay then you actually some say for some say for some say for which you're going to go and it's going to have to be but if some say for only mission then it's some say for some say for where you go then it's going to be a some say for just throws in which seems very nicely with the mask on it's not so partial. I am sure it's a big discussion in the whether we we're that is the or that is the my name is foreign but my name is Adam. So we saw that different although the standard had but there were different that had different so for example the power had a which is six the had a which is four the had a which is which is three says the how about in terms of Israel the amount of so the power which had six had three of the which had four had two of the that had three of had one if you look at it from a ratio from a proportion perspective the power had six to three it was a two to one ratio of oil to the which four and two it too was at the same ratio two to one. The which had three and one that was at a three to one ratio and that matters for this next the next you want to be the of the with the next of the so that it's really not so partial but at first glance if you're learning for sure what the mission is referring to is if you have a you have the with of the power which is six to three of and then you have silas bull by sherman of an aisle which is four to two. You're allowed to be mar of the two with each other. And the reason is because proportionately the amount of oil and the amount of silas are the same for the par and the aisle. This key possible in this key possible this should be allowed to take one minchas masochim of a cavis with another minchas masochim of a cavis because they're both three to one ratio and you let it be mar. Possible the show tiva that's also not a problem. Show you the show lemanish. Yesterday's is also not a problem you can be mar. I will mar of this key possible in this key possible but you can't be mar of the masochim of the class and together with the masochim of the par and the in bolo and this axman the business axman business axman if however each one was mixed independently and then they got mixed up together that's no worries. I'm actually bottle but if they got mixed up meaning before you were by the silas and the sherman of the par and the silas and sherman of the cavis then they got mixed up that even with the heaven it's going to be possible. Then the mission says a cavis that came together with the other one we'll see about that in tomorrow's class. So regardless of what the mission has said is what happens if two minochas got mixed up that's essentially the question. You have silas bull by sherman you have silas bull by sherman and they got mixed up. Say if the silas wasn't bull by sherman yet then everything got mixed up so that's a little more complicated. That's not what we're going to discuss right now. We discuss when you already had the silas bull by sherman of the par the silas bull by sherman of the aisle the silas bull by sherman of the cavis. So if it's the par and the aisle that got mixed up it's not a problem because even though one has six lugen to three astralinus one has four lugen to two astralinus proportionately it's the same ratio it's both two to one. So the fact that they got mixed up doesn't bother me. If however the par got mixed up with the cavis with the aisle with the cavis then it's going to be a problem cuz one is at a two to one ratio the other one is at a three to one ratio. But regardless as long as the ratio is consistent I don't care. Cavis cavis par par aisle aisle even par aisle is also going to be fine. Love them should be allowed to mar of love them love them. So the coin wasn't allowed to take two love them of different carbonas and put them on the at the same time. It says it could have said and we learn from there that it has to be one at a time. What's the question so how you allowed to take two minochas that got mixed up with each other and put them together on the Rabbi says in this the mission never said you could do it all the mission meant was you could do it the mission says you can't read the mission that way why cuz the mission said in this key possible in this key possible. That feeling is allowed to take seven minutes this one business business that heaven the mission is it doesn't matter what the was it's kosher. We have the ratio so what do you see from there that the ratio is discussing cuz the mission is making is distinguishing between the mission is with the proportion of sherman and silas is the same versus the mission is with the with the proportion of the silas and the sherman is different. When they're different you're not allowed to be mar of it but heaven it's okay. When they're the same obviously it's even the okay cuz if you're going to tell me that when it's the same it's only okay then what's the difference if the ratio is the same as the ratio is different. The mission said clearly that when the ratio is different it's okay. Must be that when the ratio is the same it's even the okay. So how could say in this that you're right you never allowed to put two carbonas on the at the same time. You can't even take the of two animals and put them on the at the same time. You certainly can't take a of different minochas and put them on the at the same time. And when the mission says you could do it it meant to be it's not true cuz the mission is distinguishing between ratios and the mission says everything is kosher must mean when the ratio is the same it's even kosher I'm not buying it you're right you have to say when the mission says it was a it's not what we thought. We thought the was that the minochas got mixed up that's not what got mixed up. The got mixed up. It's the wine that came together with the mission mar of in this salt and the what it means is the wine the wine of the animals that whose have the same ratio you're allowed to be mar of the but to be mar of the itself that you're ever allowed to do. So mar of the mission mar of the mission mar of the mission mar of the mission mar of the mission mar of the mission mar of the mission mar of the mission mar of the mission I will pick it up tomorrow.