Zevachim 105

Today's and we are 30 lines from the bottom of today's being learned as and so at the end of yesterday's d we began a new Mishna the last Mishna of perf which discussed is related to the paranisraim and the manus. So the paranisraim and the manusenim are a very interesting and subcategory within the world of kacha. These were carbonos where the den was to take all the boser of the carbon and instead of eating it or being murided on the it was taken and it was burnt. Which pim and which were the ones that were? So it's the whose dam was sprinkled not on the but rather on the which is why the and are often synonymous with the so the which are the whose dam their boser also was burnt as a result. When we talk about these carbon sometimes they get the name that's true they're down sometimes they get the name that's true as well because their baser was burnt rather than being eaten and rather than having a traditional on the mb what usually complicates the suga of the paranistim and the sman even more is that when you make a of which carbonos they were meaning which carbon is down and which carbon's bas was burnt. These are not the easiest carbon in the world. These are the carbon. So you had the parhelm. You had this also the par that was brought on. So these are some of the more intricate some of the more which again just adds an extra layer of complication. It's much easier when you're learning aim and you're talking about a good old-fashioned or even a orim or an ash. These are carbonos whose deviate from the more standard kachuma rules. These are carbono that in general are a little bit more intricate. As a result, again, it adds a little bit of a layer of intimidation. The bottom line is today's is going to talk more about is related to the and now it's interesting today's begins with an and the truth is when we see the of the it's going to feel like the it feels very much like an you would expect to come from the mouth of stating that most have the gear not rather And it's not because they felt that this question is not matim for just the opposite. It's more related to the fact that this is going to usher in really a series of and the ensuing are all going to be razar. So it sounds a little bit like this was just a collection of that rabelazar had and if all the latter are railar it's you're talking that this is also either way whether it's rabar we lock in now to a fully loaded that we literally have to do at one and a half times speed just to make it which is the go says the Is there a with regards to the buser of the so we're familiar with Lena? Lena means if the khan were not ma the imamim at the time they were supposed to be makurim or if they didn't eat the baser at the time they were supposed to eat the baser once it's l once it sleeps over past its time when you were supposed to have done whatever you're supposed to do with it at that point it becomes ple it's what's known as leno when baser is l it has a very specific name it's known as it carries with it but the bottom line is here's the question is there when it comes to the of the and or not. Meaning you're supposed to burn the boss within a certain period of time. What happens if you didn't? Does it become possible? No. No. What's the do? We say when is there by that's a And by the way, what does mean? So that's going to be eaten by the or the or that's going to be eaten by the what we know is it could be over there. There's but these whose buster is being burnt maybe there's no maybe no means that you didn't do with it what you were supposed to do at the appropriate time and as a result this is going to be absol by the way we know there's absol becomes possible so it's not even unique to could be if you have a that you're supposed to do something with this and you didn't the time passed now this is going to be absol said you should know this question had and I was and I'll tell you where I was from from the following and it's really aishn that we saw already earlier in the was discussing whether or not if a has a piggle regarding the which remember are the same as the would it be ava's piggle or would it pickle says the agree that if the kayak is but the was to eat the that's supposed to be burnt that's nothing meaning the sh is where you had a pickle to do something that is to this carbon so you had in mind to do this. But if you had in mind to do the wrong to eat the BA that was supposed to be burnt that for sure is so after had the same sh doesn't it make sense to say that being that is not when it comes to then it makes sense that if the buser itself would be long then it also wouldn't be subject to now what's First of all, the is I don't know just like it's that wouldn't be subject to but really the is a little bit deeper than that. It's a little bit more cute. And the reason is because really what is a it's a to make the so if a to make the is not a it's because it's because even if it was physically long it wouldn't be a problem but the says not it could be if it was long it would be stating that for it to be that already would be says the maybe we could be ped from somewhere else. And this is a too it's a as relates to as soon as they become if somebody would have from it he would be once the happens remember the right. So once there was a at this point the is now it becomes susable susceptible to so if would touch it or would touch it it would become problematic. Traditionally ubelina once there's a at that point now all of a sudden it's subject to soar says my love when we say lena doesn't mean the ber that's being burnt and it's that by the says it means the im of the is a very important point the man and the ber was burnt but theim is like a regular carbon theim of course went on the So when we say that it's means of course was with regards to the for that you have no but the says natural because look at the of the as it relates to everything that we just said the of the the stays on the even when it's in the when it's being burnt. This is already as we're going to see later until the baser is completely decayed. It's completely decomposed. Now, this part of the is it talking about the or is it talking about the burnt in the um it's pretty say that part is for sure talking about the so doesn't it sound like every part of the is talking about the so when it says it means the right when it comes to say this is talking about the department made up of different components that have different some of the mention the mission Some of the mention the mission others but the bottom line is it could be only despite the fact that that last line and the safer for sure is talking about the another attempt to try to be the ley and this is from Ley's that we saw at the very end of yesterday's earlier on the so that talked about the three bases one of the bases was on the and the purpose of it was if the became ple after they left the in they used to burn it on that now all the said was what kind of doesn't say doesn't it mean maybe it means became which is going to be the topic of the next but the point is Africa were talking about and being that we're talking about we can't be patient. The bottom line is whether it was or it was also had disgraces and that is is there absol had three attempts at the end of the day like all of good shas they remain unresolved. So the last word of the previous mentioned the concept of by paranim and manus by the way took for granted that for sure there is when it comes to paranim really it was and was the one that had the shil he wanted to know is there or is there not so what's even the shil the shil would be in the event that before the buser of the paranim and the manraim was taken outside of the Azar would it now be possible or not? Now not to be clear the imm of course you're not allowed to take out of the Azar. The question is the Ber that's not going on the it's not going to be eaten. It's going to actually be taken outside of the Azor. It's even going to be taken off. It's even going to be taken out of it's going to go. But the question is right now it's not the time yet. Right. That's when all the processes begin to happen. But right now, you're not supposed to be taking it out. Let's say you did take it out. Is it subject or is it not subject? So the says I don't even understand. Now at first glance is right. What we often feel like when we learn some of these is I don't understand because we just don't understand. But if you took a look at rashi says no this is so even if we thought we were we weren't says the only time it should be is something that has to always be in the so if you take it out of it but being that this bus is anyways going to go out there's no way in the world even that it should be subject to I don't even understand what the question said you're forgetting a that we learned not so long ago about a week ago I'm asking is according to the that holds that the time did not arrive yet for it to leave and as a result there could be even for something that's going to be taken out so over here would be would not be so who's that hold and just to refresh our memory what do those words even It's which has a anywhere in but only after the discuss was if somebody would be the boss of outside of the would it be subject to what's the sh on the one hand it's says on the other hand says so that shil Whether or not is that according to the why because even though it's so identical what would be now if it's identical so why you evening so the answer is do we say it could be that holds that it could be that's only because it's never going to have to be taken out. You will be able to take it out. But if you want to eat the column, why not? But as it relates to the of the maybe it's different meaning the sh was according to the man that there is when it comes to does that mean that there's also when it comes to the or no what's the is will never have a to be taken out as opposed to the bus of could be it's a very nice distinction but at the end of the day if there's a dying lawyer says and that begets so maybe there should be here as well says let's get to work over here from ladies so what did ladies say that there was a second base sadession that was on the harab and what was it used for it was used for paranorastrophim and manosphim doesn't mean now this is because what was his is not just I don't know maybe not it it's more actually if it means because it sounds a little bit that actually happened but says no just means it became possible after it left and it could be the wasma could be it was the bottom line is you have no right notice by the way the first was is there a paranimar thought to bring a from you see there's that can happen after already leaves says who said it's maybe the second was is there says oh maybe it's now truth is it could be there's no and really means which is another one of the possibilities. But the bottom line is you see that was the second Shiloh of the Gar Shil number three. So Rashi says this sh is ready different sh this sh was talking about that we spoke about at the end of yesterday's d and that is that the when they were taken out of the ahan that were involved in taking it out of the zor became tom now they become they have that unique to that but the bottom line is they became tom it's understood that the kayana would be tom as soon as roy of the animal leaves the so you don't need the whole animal to leave the azar rub kaka As soon as goes out that would be enough is asking again a very but it's a new shim fact of it went out but it only is because you have to bear the one a so if you take the entire animal you count up the kas of the animal ro of the animal left the azara that's good but in In order to get to your ro you had to use of an a which t had left the problem is ro of that a was still inside. So the shil was right sound like a mia shil. So the sha was a do we say that that we look at it as if it's attached to it and if that's the case it never left and if it never left you don't have as a result nobody's getting tommy here or do you say it left and it's part of the as a result it should be so says I don't even hear the thing being that it left and it's part of of the animal the fact that it's also of an a doesn't have the ability to be the fact that it's of the animal meaning you want that the rubo of the a should somehow knock out the fact that it's a of the of the animal right because if you look at ro of the animal it's outside it's physically outside right if you look at of the a It's an inside the of the is not going to knock out the of the says this is the says the shil must have been a little bit different. The case was something else. The case was where half of the animal went out and the only reason you have even half. Okay, you have half but the only reason that you have even half is because you have of a certain apher. So you do the math you end up with half. of half is you have of a certain a okay but there's a mute of that a that's really inside so the question is like this do we say that that of the we look at it as being part of the a and if that's the case so now it's going to come out that I don't only have half of the animal that left I actually have roy the animal that left because again without dever I already have half if I'm going to take the I'm going to attach it to the now I'm going to end up with do we say or do we say that I don't know right now it's outside so if it's outside you have a right to look at it if it's inside now with regards to this says this is not something I'm 100% sure I know the answer to the says this remains as a question but the point is what was the between the first the second in the First of the m of the a is part of the of the so if you're going to take that m and look at it as being part of of its a means right a is going to be connected and that the says can't happen in the second of the mi a is not part of the is based on the of the a if I take the mi of the a and I put it together with the of the then I'm going to have of the but over here there's no sha of using a to be this is a ready more of a classic against but this is more of a classic such sh and this is going to be if this wasn't enough fun brings another of the sh this was and he said that Shil that was talking about with regards to and it wasn't with regards to the it was regards to the grey which gave been asking it's talking about with that were in the in taking out the paran and this too is related to the that we saw read in the and that is it was only the physically left the that became when they brought the man out but anyh that was still inside not right The Mishna was like very wordy about it. The ones that went out, the ones inside a right who was almost too wordy. But the bottom line is is that's Clark that it's the physically go out with the ones that become the ones that stay in. So the sh was what would be if there were five of them went out, two of them stayed in. asking us do we say that we look at and this would be a huge kadesh and even the two that are back home they're in they would become because they're somehow or no there's no such if you're out you're out if you're in you're in and the says this too was a this is a little bit more of a to say that as much as the Mishna said it's only the left that but the ones that stayed back onto That's only when you're not going up against a but to the extent that you're going up against a over there the maybe it's different and that is the take of the next shall number four and this is maybe the most of what would be if the and the left a okay so what happens right we're not talking about now we're talking about when they left when they were supposed to have left when the dinner is supposed to leave. But the Mishna says that the take it out become now they were they came back in. What's do we say once they leave? So they become tummy and even though they come back in so what how is that going to make them tummy unbelievable could be once the bring it back in at that point there's not going to be anymore as if to say the only reason that the are because we're engaged in the process now of going and burning it but to the extent that we go backwards and we undo that then maybe there's not going to be tuma, right? The tum is not the mitus that the and the left a tum is the fact that we're on our way. We're doing something that is a very big deal that in the cosmic spiritual world somehow creates tuma. Okay. But to the extent that you undid that the fact that physically the par and the were at one point out of the azor that in itself is not a reason for it to create any this was said I think I could bring from the event that they were carrying the with the people that in front leading the way they had left the but the ones in the back didn't say the ones that left and the ones in the back they don't become until they physically leave that the is that once the parinar leaves even if it comes back in the isma meaning it doesn't get undone then so why Is it that the kahanim that stayed inside that never left are not to say if you're going to tell me just the words of first that the only time the are is if they remain outside but if they come back in they're not going to be so just like if the comes back in it's not going to be so I would reason then I would understand why the kayanim that never left hence they're still inside are not going to be but if you're going to tell me that once the leaves even if it comes back in the is that it remains t so why the never left are they not now those are the words of but it still requires a little bit of soi explains and rashi says that really the explanation is based on the fact and we're going to see this more on bay is that if you look at the P in the Tyra when the Tyra says that the Khanim that were involved in taking the power out became the Tyra toilet not in the Khan leaving the Tyra is really toilet in the power leaving. So really it's that we even say that the Khanim that were involved in taking the out or the Sar but they physically didn't leave yet. That's a reason that they shouldn't be talking. Why not? The Torah says regarding the and if that's the case it's really why the sob said you know something I think I think what's going on over here probably the reason the is because the kayan can't be better than the power itself and if THE POWER ITSELF WOULD COME BACK IN AFTER it left it wouldn't be a problem so the kayan that were involved in taking it out to the extent that they're still inside it can't be worse but if you're going to tell me even So were involved in taking it out even though they physically didn't leave. Why is that a reason that they shouldn't be said right? I don't know what yava mean is to even bring a riot from here because the is way more simple is because the says clearly that the cen that was involved in taking the power out becomes he has to go through his tire and afterwards he can come back in said that's the reason those are not the reason those not is is because they're in already is clearly saying they had to leave you're making it sound ter doesn't say that they have TO LEAVE A SO what's no the does say they have to leave you know where the said it not in so that's for sure not so says so what exactly was now the truth is this line is a very very line what do you mean we explained what was that to the extent that you take the And then you bring it back in. Does it undo the toma? Does it not undo the to? We even set over a little bit of a say in the sh right. Is it physically taking it out that makes the or is it being to the makes the now that you brought it back in? You technically undid. We thought we had a from the Mishna Rain fragged up the from the Mishna. Okay. So then we're back to Shila. Sounds like a good shar says no. What's the Now to be even more clear if the Gumar is not sure is then I hear it's a fear question. We fetched in a little bit of but then the Gumar should have right away said I don't understand. Also the word would be improper. It sounds very much like I tried being posit I knocked it out. Once I knock out that from the Mishna, now I'm all of a sudden stuck with this conundrum, it's the how did the shack of and whether we have a don't have a somehow undermine that all of a sudden now we're left with this sh of if you look at Rashi Rashi is very very if you look at and because it is a whole different but the bottom line is just for the is like not really sure what is and just with one the thinks that of course it should be what kind of business is this that now because I brought it back in all of a sudden it's not going to be and the garra gives a rather complicated answer the says The case is talking about where the par and the Sar had been taken out of the Azar and then it was brought back into the Azar. So to be clear that's push to the gum now that's pa to the gar now now that the khanim that were involved in taking it out those khanim are they were to when they took it out they didn't become when they came back in coming back into the is a mik and as a result they didn't become number one number two that's also posit if another kayan would go and take it out some that ken for sure would become as well right now you might see it took it out Just because the first guys are Tommy doesn't mean that the next set are not going to be Tommy also going to be Tommy. The question over here was is when you had that were outside and they started schleing they started shleing the and the using poles. This is a pole and they started shleing it from outside just in the Azar. Now they didn't take it physically out of the azaria cuz if they physically took it out of the aar then there's nothing to talk about. They're like they had them that took it out of the aar stating that still has it sad that maybe they're going to be and the reason is because once you take the and the out of the ahanim that engage in it become right the ones that took it out the ones that are involved in the straa. We're going to see more about this in the course of the dah. But all these the now that are bringing it out since even if they didn't physically take it out but they're engaging right now in a par that had once gone out and being that the had once gone out. So now that from a person that would engage with it on where it didn't come back in and just like those would be because they're involved in the so these could be would be as well for being in the despite the fact that right now it's in the that's not that maybe when the par goes back in it undoes the rebel is something else that it could be when the power goes back in we still see it as if it's outside my namino namino is if there's a co that's metap with it that co would be Tommy what do you mean if that copple with it see he's taking it out anyways the terret says no it's talking about where he's outside and he's metic while it's inside that's where the now why wouldn't the sh even a more simple case where the k is inside he's inside and he's being metap with the par and the sire while it's inside but the power and the sire had once been outside same shil do you say being that it was once outside now even if it's inside so any kind that's metabolis is going to be or not right what essentially is the shil we're saying the shil is not that when the power comes back inside it undo everything that happened the shil is that it could be even when the power comes back inside we look at it as if it's still outside okay so would be where the kayan are outside and the top. Why don't you just keep it simple with the Kan took it out? If they took it out, it's possible they're going to be telling me the sh with her anyways outside. Maybe the sh with her anyways inside, which is a more normal case. You know why? Cuz you don't need this uh bakuli, this uh Greek pole or whatever this is. So, you don't even need this. So, wouldn't that be a more simple case? What's the answer? The answer is if you're holding the answer is because if the co doesn't leave, you can't be we just said a minute ago. That's part of the kay has to be outside. And that's why this k has to be outside. It's not ne if he's not outside. If he's not outside, it's not nea. So the sh is where he's outside. But the parasar is inside. You didn't physically take it out cuz that's easy. But it had once been outside. So it's the chemclaren. We look at it as a was already outside. So that's going to be or maybe not. Either way, that was the Shiloh of Rabalazar. And again, the Gomorrah has nitos to the Shiloh. Moving along, so the now is going to bring a Brio, which is going to talk more about the paranorm. And it's actually going to marry the paranorm with some of the other complex types of uh carbonus specifically the and the the specifically the and specifically the and the so what do the paranim the and the paradum have in common, right? So, if somebody asks you this question, what do they have in common? Besides for the fact they're allis and but uh what do these things have in common? What they have in common is they're all of they're all but they're only mama in very very unique situations. So, the circumstances have to be very specific. The stars have to be perfectly aligned in order for them to be mama. How so? the paran and the on the does that mean if somebody touches the paran becomes no you have to be one of the that's engaged in this taking it out of the who we saw the end of the we'll see more at the end of the you actually have to be involved in burning it but the bottom line is is that if you're engaged in the that's where it's neg that this is going to be same is true for the paradum the tyra says that the kay that burnt the he was he Tom is the god that became tame. The was the same thing. The co that was involved in the of taking the he also became to. So these are three situations where you have anat but at the same time the is only in certain circumstances somebody simply goes over to it and touches it he's not going to be stating that we're about to see now. uh remain just to give it away spoiler alert we're going to learn this price in one minute but spoiler alert nonetheless and that is that the held that although these three things the says are only mama in certain circumstances what that means is they only have the status of an avat in certain circumstances they can be a ka right they have the of anat but at the same time they do have a in all situations where they could be that they for sure are going to have very doesn't say it anywhere in the specifically that there are certain situations where they are going to be matama in other situations you don't find that they're going to be mama these things have the ability to be mama albeit and even the way they are by the way Another category that goes into this conversation, right? We mentioned the we mentioned and we mentioned what's another one of right is also something that's but it's only if somebody touches it he's not going to be but there's a now that we're about to learn by the way it's going to take us through the majority of the rest of the this right now these things that are inat which But only in certain circumstances stating that as it relates to being that already they're going to have the ability to always do a whole bunch of followup similar to the beginning of the that is the next part of today's Right. Regarding the regarding the right, the person himself becomes and has begotten the but the things themselves are not right meaning if somebody would touch it not burn it not be not be but somebody would simply touch it wouldn't But these things could be again we gave it away already. We know what this means. I agree with regards to and I agree with regards to the however but as it relates to and the reason is because the is alive and can't be now by the way this should not be taken out of context because it's not 100% true a human could be right a person could become and he could be but it's a behavior that's that can to be. So again agreed to this concept that these that are only mat in certain situations that limitation that they have that situation only qualifies its ability to be as anat but as it relates to be to treat it like a source of that it's going to what's the is yeah it's the and whereas according to It's not neglim and I know it's based on that was it says in theory of so what's this talking out. This is a well-known PK. The PK is talking about a falls on top of something that's growing or something that a person has and the person is about the fact and the thing was wet. It was the person was happy about the fact that it became wet. So then is that that thing is going to be tommy. Right? And this is where we learn the of we learned the concept that the only time something can become to is if it was first. So we learn from zer that there's an idea that just because a sheritz falls on top of zer doesn't necessarily mean it's going to be it has to first be through one of the mashkin and then there has to be a from the standpoint of the bim afterwards. If one of the would fall on it, it would be Tommy either way. So in the following will never be an they'll never have the ability to be. It's a tricky draw. Z will never be in a situation where it's where it's av it's a right. I will never be in a position where it's anat now and convey to then and only then do you need in order for it now to be it could be if there was a what's the you need the has to be that would create so everything can't just become you have to bear So Bryce was talking about a veil of anaram which will be right how could it be of in the event it's in a then it becomes a and then it's right now it becomes already a situation like that it does not require what does it mean it does not require it means it doesn't need any preparation in in order for it to now become tommy in the event that one of the fallen it you know why because it's Tommy right now that's the point that it's not just it becomes through the whole but that's because it's never going to be anat but anything that at some point is going to become an example of was it's automatically right now and it has the ability That's what said in this. So the Quran says like this mayor in his coming from this again but that's obviously where he's coming from said regarding the with regards to but it's right it's the same exact thing. These are all things that are in certain situations. The if it's in the if someone's all these things do not need any in order for them to be. So there's a new that anything that's automatically right now has the ability to be. So the mayor I understand because this mayor is identical to the again was talking about and was talking about like we said in the introduction and the spoiler it's all one and the same and there's a as a result we know but according to if they hold I And after they hold of this well if that's the case is also if not not where did they come to be just to explain this a little bit better this doesn't seem like it's working with any rationale right like there's a new it's that anything that becomes so what's the saying the NOT SAYING BUT AND IS NOT this is this whole is a ter is there's a becomes right now. So who cares that the is right now? If you hold the it should make no difference they hold the in which case they should all like if they don't hold the wow this was one of the shadows that we needed for came from said I'll tell you what they say and the way Rashi explains this is that even though said this that's something that is considered right now and it doesn't require it doesn't mean that we can negate all right it doesn't mean that something that all the rules and regulations of tum do not apply all it means is is that ordinarily in order for something to become you have to become has to be a it has to come in contact with that's the way it becomes that that which it states in the in the parish that that doesn't apply when it comes to something that if there's a studious reason why this thing can't become because there's a that says for example that can't become I don't see in this not that way all I see in this is that with regards to the requisite steps that are needed ordinarily for something to become the process that's something that you don't need for something that's good. But if there's a reason why this thing can't become and that's because it's a and there's no of a sky that's ever going to be well just because this is not necessarily a reason that that should be an issue. So hold like hold of but they are and they hold that you have to just take this within a certain context. Raor took it with zero context. Anything that's automatically be included according to the according to the ready. We now return to our regular program. So heard this. He heard that and both agree that when it comes to is that their even though they never came in contact with there was no process which it is and as a result it's going to be right. So you want to know is that true even in the or maybe it's only true when it's out of the what's the right now it's so do we view it as being or not view it as being the way explain or is very and that is what's the premise of this it's learned out from that that anything that's doesn't require So as a result, it shouldn't require it shouldn't require any stating that it could be the only time it's considered is when it's not in a state where it requires a order for it to get to the point where it's going to be able to beam. But to the extent that it's I have to do a ma in order to get it to the point where it's going to be able to beam. So it's not considered yet. What's the basis of the to the extent that right now it needs a so it's not oh I'll do a mice okay do the mice and then we'll have have a conversation right but right now you didn't do the yet so do you say that if then I can't see it now so it's not either you like or maybe No. So theor says as a result itself won't have the ability to be another according to mayoras. Could it be or could it not be? This is another fun shil background. is right only becomes or is now when we say does it mean that it could only be when it's or does it mean it only becomes to keep things simple let's go with it means that it doesn't even become to the extent that it's so if you have less than a worth of it could come in contact with from today till tomorrow it's not going to be stating that had the following. If you have the that's a would it be or would it not be? What's the sh it's true ordinarily is but why is of right now because it's really it should only be when it's in the but when it's going to be in the it's going to be it's enough for it to be how much of the has to be in the in order for it to be you don't need a for that for that because is already enough so that may right now a kaz would be enough to have this or maybe no or maybe there's a this is classic and is always so maybe I would need a now notice the shil was late the sh was late now first glance what does this have to do with right was only regarding the son of when it comes to right there's no over here said even hold like so based on maybe it should be it should be a shab as well. So Rashi asks the and he says that the was coming not because it has like a direct reason why this should be a shame versus late but you see that Romeo and have a different standard when it comes to what is able to do. Romeo said even that's alive. We're ordinarily mama but is a new it's a new and it can bypass all the regular rules and regulations when it comes to said no said as it relates to that I'm willing to look away from but as it relates to anything else no way in the world you're not going to say be a live thing all of a sudden now is going to be able to convey to really really this is is a similar sh because there's a general rule that says that is only forget about there's a that you have to have a word so that it wouldn't work for the so it makes sense too that it wouldn't work for this either but that you find that works even for so there's this new that anytime it's well even so just like you can have this that emerges from this new type of called being then maybe should also have the ability to be mama either way This was the Shil stating that the refineses the Shil a little bit the in the event that right now this of is on the floor there wouldn't even be a Shila and the reason that there wouldn't be a Shila is because right now it's on the floor it's so far removed from the Bah which is where it needs to be in order for it to be able to be Matama that it's not even considered and as a result there would be no issue if it's in his mouth that's not even where he was holding in a sense it's not on the floor and it's also not in his mouth do we say the fact that you have to bring it to your mouth that's considered a liar Maybe the fact you have to put it in your mouth that already not he told him back all it is not and as a result that's p that who holds that can bypass all the regular of so you would have a of kala on a kaz of even if it's not in his mouth even if it's simply in his hand as a from a there were 13 that was said regarding the is not going to go through all 13 this is one of them it requires a big sh what means it's also a steer in rashi in different places what means we're going to go with the simpler which is not what rashi says over It's what the other say here and it's what Rashi says elsewhere and that is that the person has to have a want to eat the in order for the to have the ability has to have a want to treat it like an why would you want to treat it as an so you have to have that in order for it to be okay it doesn't require any what does that mean it's that we've been talking about that it's automatically And you want to know what the says my life mayor aren't we probably talking about mayor and if we're talking about what do you see from here that even holds that you have to have a oh it's that even though but when it comes to being it requires the is always says it's not going to it's going I has to be because who's the one that holds that it's now if you look at the here on the side of the so say no one knows where this ram is that holds that it's not even that whole line of but either way the we'll read it the way we have it inside who's the one that holds It's so if the is then the safe is also says when it says that's going to when it says that's not that's going to in itself being enough but have another problem if you go there in that 13 things that's a long right if you go in that look towards the safer. This is that we've seen already and that is in the event that somebody shacks an o somebody does malik you find out afterwards it was a tra it's obviously not but the question is do we say that the was not right is that right this brings us back to but the bottom line is it says in the Who's the one that holds that? It's we know it's someone says, "Okay, so let me make sure I'm getting this right." So you're telling me when it says I know it's when it says you're telling me it's so and is the absolutely the bottom line is you have no you have no from this one more before we go v and that is the thought to bring a ray from this mishna that it says presumably it's first and the we know it's also probably so what do you see from here? mayor holds that what's the shear of when it comes to of it's probably so this is an a is a bombash on the affformentioned gar rashi this is rash's kasha what's the I don't know what the kash is if you remember when the gum had it sad to say that would be mamaas the gumar said the shil is only when it's in your hand meaning if it's inside your mouth then it was partial to the garra in the hand that was the but the Gmorra said that if it's if it's on the ground it was to the it would only be it would not be so maybe this Mishna that says that the is talking about where it's on the ground and if it's on the ground it's part even that it's not because again this is an another do not sit down until you answer the following question. We would be standing the rest of our life if someone asked us this question. But either way, don't try this at home. What's going on over here? We got to do this again. Again. What's the sh the is so we have this comes from the that of the way also the paran and also the we're going to so even these things the question is do we say it when it touches the becomes so now the can go v It could be and make a sh or maybe when it touches the it makes it a shy which is which means it won't be able to go and convey additional but to make it a Christian to be able to make it into a sheny that night this was the so this because of the fact that does it make or does it jump all the way to make now here too the shil of the was the shil wasn't according to which again you have to know why agree with the only regarding this so why would this be a shin to so again you have to say that it's not who has his global perspective of this is to make it a more serious to that we have a that it makes a that we to have the ability to make a but according to there was never a shil so regardless told do not sit down until you answer the shil knew what to say. told him anytime you have a that it would be have the ability to be a person by contact that type of but if you have a doesn't have the such as this only it's so now is the one asking the question and he asked this question to say he asked the question to we learned in a some change to reason is because it's not a mishna this that we learned in a price. So this is talking about where somebody has half a and another half a but there's a some body of order that's being the two things. So is it's considered a for this to be able to but not so the question was means if it comes in contact with it's going to convey to wanted to know is it going to be subject to or not do we say that so it's interesting the first sh was regarding it was asked this's answer here was the one asking the question and the answer that was given to him was the same exact answer meaning being that over here it's not so even when it's only going to be but not with the as well we're not finished we're going to the end of the par so in the we saw between and when exactly the ones that were in theim and the serum became according to they became when they left the which was one of the themes that underpinned today's according to it was only the ones that were involved in the actual that became now the talks about this we didn't even find this in the so it's of course the says as follows the brought him should be taken out of the should be burnt. the one that burnt them. has to wash his clothing and he has to go to the mik himself and then and only then we saw this earlier is he able to return to the truth is if you look at the what did the sound like saying that the say that even the one that took the already and took the out of the is going to be and also to be clear even though these are in talking about the really true for all the all the so there's a little bit of work to do in terms of figuring out how we take away that don't even sound like and all of a sudden we create the and we apply it broadly to all the different so on that note what's the to this idea this idea that that once the takes part of the he becomes the now the over here is talking about really I should say the over there but the is talking about the mashiach and the that two are examples of and there the says that the of we'll see where the and over here it just says you know why to tell you at that point the is already going to be in effect in other words the ising like this it's understood that all the was done if that's the case what does the mean It says one it's must be that this is not describing the because that I know from the this is talking about when the descends when it's now you have the next That's when all this is playing itself out. But it can't be that this is just telling me the mock of where the was because I know from so it must be this is something else. This is talking about when the is going to this okay how do I know that the which is the basis that the when it says in the it's not referring to the but rather what it's referring to is what it's referring to is when the who's involved in it is going to become says for that we need to learn a price That is talking about the power. It says that's the you had to burn the boss of the when it says it doesn't mean one means all three says. So doesn't it sound like one? It says regarding the power it says. So it says over there you should take the it didn't have to say you know why the next words you should burn. So why the to tell me to tell me two okay so I'm already getting somewhere when it says now this is already talking about the was done every day so when it says over there it didn't have to say why not this is like a whole another idiot tell you It says where should you take the dash? You should do it in the place where the dash is. Which dash? This is Oh, it's there's only five and change to even refer back to. It's where the said you should take the par. It's where the said you should take the mash and burn it. Naturally, when you burn it, you're going to end up with dash. And if the would simply say take it to the which in anyway says I would know that's where it's supposed to be. So why did the say again to tell me that there's supposed to be a third. So the bottom line is it says it says to teach me that the of the was all in the same place. It was if that's the case, what does it mean here in the par of the it's talking about the says and he said it's only the involved in actually burning the beame simply taking so what do you do with this right and by the way it can't be to tell me to take it out of the fourth That's like you don't have a fourth. So that doesn't work. So what does it mean when it says for the following and it says over there? Where's there? This is so tricky. This is by the say and it says just like there okay where was the for the it was to the east of how do you know it was to the east line. So is very simple because we know there were that were done with the dam of the not but the were done and they had to be which means you had to be facing the which means you're facing the western side of the which means that you're to the east which means that you're to the east of the bottom line is obviously it was from this we learn which you could have learned from the and And the power but this you for sure could have learned from there that when it says what is the it means so the say don't seem to have this so if they don't have this acc where exactly was the of the we know what the parad was that's for sure but if you don't have this where was the we know from the following Where were the done? It was in the northern part of said now is not coming to be necessarily that it wasn't. He's just adding another criteria and that is this had to be done which says it first has to have dash and only afterwards be able to burn it. So if there was no dash that was there first then you couldn't do it right the says it has to be so there had been some who said anyone's it sounds like argue with this mean something Doesn't mean there has to be dash there, but it means it has to be a slanty place. So that what if there's dash it's going to be then the dash is going to slip and slide. doesn't have to be dash but has to be a place where if this dash it's going to be a so this was what said I don't know if I necessarily agree with you meaning what say who is the it's why it's a we know from the other has a different type said oh obviously they're arguing does there have to be dash does not have to be dash said said they're arguing maybe everybody agrees that there has to be dash in there has another in addition to there having to be dash there could be also it has to be one last price had begotten became but the person that lit the fire not additionally the one that was right. He just set up the wood and everything. His begott also didn't become who's considered the person that's helping out at the time of the you would think that even once it became meaning he's assisting in the so it's already says so what does it say? This is this here regarding the power and the it has to be like still the power and the but once it's not considered anymore says but even if it's not yet even if the bus are already decay to a certain degree at that point already it's not going to be says what's between that says when it's first said once What would be if it's shard right where it's but it's not right that's according to at that point it's not mama of anymore whereas according to the tanakama at that point it would be so even regarding the we have a is at one point it's not going to be mama anymore and on that note all full I know I probably lost my cases at this But the truth is that the next per and the per after that these are two of the most forget about and lus light and there's even a if you can believe it coming up in the next two weeks either way full