Zevachim 86

Today's is and we are at the Mishna eight lines from the bottom of the today's being learned as today's also being learned. So we're moving along in peradesh dealing with the ofadu. Another classic doc says the imu the following is a list of things where the is that rashi says these are all things that are and the reason is because they have no to them. What is that? Is eaten is eaten to anybody. But the point is they're both eaten and not put on the leftover part of the carbon. So the carbon was a and like there was a of it that went on the but there was a of it that was eaten. The that's the leftovers. That's the part that didn't go on the misb. It has no to the if it goes on the dinner is gonna be never went on the was on the it was eaten by the there was that went on that was not the but the itself was not supposed to be on the the says was supposed to go on the but not so all of these things are But they have no to the and it's for that reason if they go on the another list the wolf that's on the head of sheep theorisant or the here that's on the beard of male goats the bones the senus the horns and the hooves of the animals all these things to the extent that they're attached to the animal. They're attached to the boss. They're included in the bosser and they have a says even these things. If however they get detached from the says and from that it's we'll see it better in the that it's only the buser and the dumb of the carbon that's supposed to go on the as opposed to all those things. So on the one hand you have a that says which is everything even but then again you have a that says not those things in the event that it's in that instance it's going to be rashi says that as it relates to the and were for sure talking about where the underlying carbon was a carbon. How do you know that? Because it's only the carbon where the ro of the animal went on the misb. Ordinarily, it was only the certain aspects of the carbon would go on the mb. The head was not part of it. it's which is everything goes on the it's going to be only there but if that's the case isn't there a mitzvah of he when it comes to the carbon so if there's a mitzvah of hesh that means you're anyways removing the skin of the head if you're removing the skin then you're removing the wool that comes along with it or the beard that comes along with it so why are we even having this conversation what happened the mitzvah of het The answer is says it's a says that as much as there's a mitzvah of a but the head is excluded from the mitzvah of thing that the ro is excluded from the mitzvah of so it's included now in the that's where it would be the and the so we're talking about a carbon because only by the carbon are you And the understanding of it is based on a that says that as much as there's a mitzvah of but the head the entire face is excluded from the mitzvah of he that's why it's very mustab that the is going to be attached to the ro and the k has to make a quick decision do I put it on the mb or do I not put on the mb the beard does it go on the m does it not go on the mb says the depends if it's yeah if it's not says So the fact that it says even those things you would think that those things should go even if they're detached there's another that says which would suggest that only now if we only had that you would think there's a mitzvah to go ahead and remove the and the because it says so we're going back and forth. Okay. So, bottom line is I have two that seem to contradict each other in the event that these things are attached. You're going to put on if they're detached even if that you are supposed to remove it. Now, just segueing that we're going to speak at in a minute by highlighting one word and that is the bis sounds like it's the Mishna, right? Sounds like it. But if you look carefully, it's not because the Bryce had said a bigger than the Mishna. The Mishna said the Bryson said now the Bryce is asking the same it's reconciling it the same way. But in terms of the mas in terms of the punchline in terms of the it's a little bit different because the says the says that is going to be even we'll see in one minute that this will manifest itself in says the who is the tan of the we just mentioned that says that piru that in the event that the not only do you not put it into the fire, but you have to remove it. Says Bryce is clearly not what we've seen until now that the fact that it says it's even if it's what do you do with the Pik that would seem to suggest that it's only the bus or only the D of a carbon that goes on it's coming to tell me something else that that in the event that the process started already and now after it started So a little bit of it was removed from the fire. So the is if we're dealing with the actual then you put it back on. But if we're dealing with then not meaning that's the where's when it's already in middle of the and now it's spring out of the fire. The question is should I be should I not be if it's already not you're not now this is a different than we've seen up until this point had a different formulation and that seems to be everything it sounds like only okay it's not how do you reconcile But if they were even if it's who was the of the said it's going to be now if you look at it's the second on the top of the rashi says when the said The gumar wants to know who's the town of the that said this pu of yeru and the garra answered it's rebi says rashi oh but that's pit that once we have a name to the town of the it's going to be the same name to the town of the mishna because the misha and the b essentially are saying the same thing the said based on the reconciliation of the Bryson said based on the same reconciliation. We just said the T of the Bryer is the time of the Mish is also going to be I disagree because to me the Mishna and the Bryce are actually they're saying two different things. The Mishna just says the Bryce takes it a step further and says so the that's going to be but the could be is true I but either way this dick that the Mishna just says the Bryson says that plays itself out according to Rashi it's one and the same and just like Reb is the T of the Bryer Reb is also the T of the Mishna according No, the Mishna and the Bryce don't agree with each other and Rebi is the town of the Bryson. Reb's not the town of the Mishna because if Rebi was the town of the Mishna, the Mishna wouldn't have just said Yalu. The Mishna would have said and the Mishna doesn't say and if we're learning one thing we know there's a big difference between it's not all the same and is a different bottom line is so the Mishna said so we're going back to the Mishna said it says and it says it sounds like you're supposed to to get into the fact that sounds like how do you reconcile it is going to be so came and he qualified of the he said this that it says in the that's only true if it was it was but it further ed itself from the from the fire on the clop. But let's say it was on the misbeh if it's not furthering itself from the it's actuallying itself right it's getting a little bit closer and there the is going to be there the is going to be that even if it's pu still it's going to be y so the only time we see it as a pu is if it's pu clapp If however it's so then already we don't see it as a to the contrary sounds like you're learning we look at it as now says that in terms of the right for this next line we don't really have it says but Rashi says I'm going to make the best of the gear the we have it and try to make this work. And the way Rashi learns the Gumar, these next two words, which you could have very easily mistakenly included in the previous of the Gar is really the next part of the Gmorra and it's aasha and the Gmorra is saying reper is that true? You're telling me that if it's the dinner is gonna be au period now something's missing, right? goes what's the yeah why not so rash says again something is clearly missing in the words of the but I'll tell you what the says is the from the fact that the Mishna said that it sounds like if it's pu it's always going to be and you can't go ahead and say sometimes yeah sometimes not because if pu sometimes yeah sometimes not that when the mishna wants to tell me yo why the sayar yal tell me pu the sometimes yeah so from The fact that it says that's a always cash is you're telling me there's a time where it's going to be what's the only said because it is cash I'm going to come and I'm going to defend my bal right and I'm going to come to his defense and I'm going to tell you a whole different this is a completely different understanding. ending of what meant. So sometimes when the gum tries to answer a kasha like this, the garra will do a tweak. This is not a tweak. This is not what we call a kaz here. We're going to make a whole new shot in whatever said. So rabbis said I'll tell you where he learned the Mishna said and on that his comment was this and here too we need help from Rashi. However, however was being madic that the isalu sounds like it's kachum. It has kadusha right it's subject to the basic that kum is subject to mean you can collect the from the goat right or the the wool of the the sheep I don't know maybe it's nothing right it has kadusha right does it have kadusha does not have kadusha from the fact that the mishna says it sounds like it just is you can't bear is going to have it's on that came and he gave you his fine print and he said the only time we say that these parts of the carbon where was but it has a beam where you won't be able to have enough from it etc etc that's only true If it was at first it was and then afterwards it was but if it was you'd be able to do whatever you want with it. You'd even be able to make a a handle for it doesn't have any. It's not subject to any No, it's not subject to any law. You could do whatever you want with it. What's the is like this. Zika we know is the m right? does two things in a carpet. It wears two hats. It's the mirata. It's also the matter as it relates to being matter. So what is a matter? It's murim on the and really any part of a carbon that anyone's allowed to have enough from is what's to the extent that all these things the gum is the were attached to the boser at the time of that means when the was mate it was mate for what for because it was in a state of is so it got a D that it has a head that to go. Once it has a D that has a head that to go, you'll never be able to use it for your personal use because now it was that it is in Londisha terms it's right. But the point is now it has a D that it's going to go on the if however it was Pu the means when the Z came and was m this garban it wasn't being m to the cuz now it didn't have a D to go on the MB. So what was a m for whatever you want that's the underlying lumbus but said that's where meant he meant a whole different comment not that original comment no way this is what he meant now the says that this and just to say this a little bit better specifically as it relates to the carbon why specifically as it relates to the carbon because actually the mission already said that these cases specifically actually said regarding the se and the are talking about a carbon but this idea that the of a carbon as we'll see in a second specifically the carbon this is really based on the name it says it says the words of it says that the of the carbon should belong to It says and it says those same words as it relates to the carbon. It says just like when it comes to the carbon. So too when it comes to the carbon are going to be. So you see that Ishmal said that the giddon all these parts of a carbon not only by the but by all carbon are going to be. Thus when we say when said that it's going to leave again what Rish says that when it says by the means as a result now makes sense if however these things are then the doesn't make sense because It's a subhan it's law meaning it's a premise. We're not proving comment from but's comment only makes sense after you have to have first in order to have second. Now says as it relates to this that we learn from the just like this has to be so mean has to be based on an extrovert. So we know not created high level this what's known as means where the building blocks one of the building blocks of is extra that's if it's if it's means both of the building blocks are going to be extra means that I need both words in the have two of the same words in two different parishes and that allows me to make to learn one from the other what's the difference the difference is if you have a sha if you have a oner in a m you knock out if we have a mn well it's you can't ask it says this better be and the reason is because if it's not I have a very obvious cash and this is the most obvious cash in the world you're going to tell me that from the fact the is it better bear says it is says Yeah, the the words that it says by the are you say explains because what does it say? It could have just said right. What's that's clearly extra and that's the part of this. But the bottom line is just like by the but here's the bottom line. In the version 2.0 You know of Rabzer's comment on the Mishna. The Mishna said that from the fact that it says it's implied that we treated as at the very least it's going to be only if it was if however was then wasn't m was mate for regular uh consumer use and as a result it's going to be not only mut but it's even mut on this in the first as relates to the bones of a carbon that's there's an after there's not going to be an okay as it relates to the carbon is there's always an so the B says that as it relates to the carbon it always is going to have an what do you see from here not like what said in the name of which is using in our you see clearly that when it comes to that of there's always going to be there's always going to be the says when it comes to the carbon that if it's then it's when it's exactly which is exactly what said so when the says when it comes to a carbon it means only you have to make it then there's not going to be that this hole is said that when it comes to the carbon if it was then you have it there's an is not going to be at all which is from what said according to if it's when there's an Right? What did say if it's then it's not subject to you could do whatever you want with it where it's where it's also right means it's not subject to any laws of this concludes the first part of the d moving along it's up to So what's as it relates to the of to the extent that they were what does means that if you don't want to put it back on you don't have to put it back on. Now the case is talking about where it was not just paka from the misb it was pucker from the fire. It was in the of the and then it jumped out of the fire says the Mishna that if you don't want to put it back in the fire in it's not something that you have to do. Now clearly implied from the Mishna is that if you want to put it back you could. Why are you allowed to put it back? I thought the terrorist says that's the second of yesterday's where said but if it was then the is that even if it's essentially that's what the mission is saying once it's in the fire if it's you don't have to put it back The same is true with regards to a coal that fell off the you don't have to put it back on. What about aim that fell off the regular if it happened before you put it back and it's subject to passes so you don't put it back on additionally it's not subject to another just like the has the ability to bead and just like the had the ability to be mad royal So too there's an idea that have the ability to bead as well. Either way, the mission just gave me a whole bunch of and the is going to do what it does. But first the is going to start with the case of so we had regular that fell off the so they're on right they're middle of being burnt and all of a sudden it falls off the so do you have to put it back on or do you not have to put it back on? So it depends if it's before the clock didn't strike midnight yet. Yeah. Not only that and if someone would have from it he would be once already passes at that point you don't put it back on. So really what it depends on is was a now let's just think this through for a second by ourselves. Somebody would ask you there's a vim that's in the just fell out of the should I put it back or should I not put it back? What would you say? I don't know. Is it burnt or is it not burnt? Did you do the or did you not do should it be subject to should it not be subject to what is if you didn't do the mitzvah with it yet? You're subject to if you did the mitzvah right at that point there's no way anymore. So you would think what it should be dependent and contingent upon is was the done was the not done. That's not what the Mishna says. The Misha says depends on what time it is. If it's before so then you have to put it back on the it's subject to and if it's after well then you don't have to put it back on. It's not going to be subject to in fact it sounds like from the Mishna I don't even care if the was done was not done. The only thing I care about sigh with regards to do I have to put it back on and s with regards to the laws of is what time it is. Is it beforeh is it after? Who ever heard of such a thing? And the garra jumps on it. And the asks, I don't understand that. If we're talking about where these still have, there's more to burn. Then that even after the should be and should be and the last and if it's talking about where there's nothing left anymore that even if it's before it shouldn't bear says you have to say what does mean the is talking about we were caution I'm reading they were hard really. So, it's like somewhere in between. They're well done. Maybe a little too much, right? But at the same time, it's not to the point where it's literally calls where you can't even treat it as anymore. When it's in that in between stage, that's when we say it's or not. But what's clear from the garra that if it would have a real then even and if it would have no even would be the only time it's of is it when I'm a tweener I'm in this in between stage I'm but I'm not right. So when I'm in that situation over there is says no. So what is the mccart to this idea of again we just limited the scope of where we apply the concept of but the bottom line is we're applicable it's applied right and it obviously has to be based on apostic meaning the fact that it should be totally isbish doesn't need a mar that's common sense but if you're telling me that in this in between stage we work with which is fine I can live with that but at the end of the day it has to have a mar and the gar wants to know what is the mar for sure based on soim what are those so the gar says This it's based on a stereo sub one says and this is the right in the beginning of parad. The bottom line is the says of a carbon this man of the entire night. It says light of actor. Now notice it doesn't say of right doesn't say that. And we just read the puzzle. Read it again. Didn't say but it says that you put the right that's the p of the fire that's the and it should be. So you see clearly the concept of not that there are words in the that say but the idea of the is that goes the whole but there's another that says that the whole night is when you do the true it's when you take the carbon that was already burnt and you remove it from the you don't leave it there you take it off now just like it doesn't say of it also doesn't say light Now what does it say? It says this is the very next gives you the mid of Rashi says the says do and the doesn't say when you should do it just says when so Rashi says understood probably That's mentioned in the previous oh what did the say previously and then that's the but the bottom line is I seem to have a little steerim it's not like the most head-on steer because these are not even but the bottom line is there's an idea of there's an idea of how do you reconcile it so says you know what the answer is you take the knife and you split it up. YOU TAKE the and you divide it into two parts and what you end up with is that half the night is the other half a night is but what do you see from here that you see is a what happens by we pivot we shift we go from it being this man of toma oh if is the cut off when you go from this man of to oh it's very gush it makes a lot a sense that if I have something that's aso in between that I'm not sure is it actar is not aar I could look at it this way I could look at it that way so if you're in this man of then we'll still treat it as aara once you're in this mano at this point we're going to treat now just to be clear even though we're saying that this manara this man switches over by we're only using we're only using with regards to something that's in between if you something and there still an is even if it crossed over already into the second half of the night, we're still going to view it as man. If I care if it's less we're going to say that completed even though there's still more hours to the night as it relates to this man it's going to be that we're going to say that is finished by is only it's only right what the use that word to describe something that's in this in between stage but there's one piece that comes out of this last that we need and that is that it sounds like once happens at that point. We go from if somebody asks you what's so it sounds like it's also it's also when we say that the buser is considered to have been burnt and the is considered to have been of it sounds like this starts by the says I'll ask you from the says every day every day the would do when he would do what's we know it's either it means when uh the veer started making noise or when the rooster started making a gerida But the bottom line is that every single day the started, right? Give or take. They would do it earlier. They would start already. They would do it. They would do it by the end of the first. So we know if there's three misharas, there's four mishas. But the bottom line is it was done either three hours into the night or four hours into the night. by the that's when you're going to tell me that takes out the words and Rashi speaks out we not right sometimes we take out the parenthesis because that's the you skip the parenthesis here actually says but the bottom line If you're going to tell me that the of is the cash is from right is the one that's earlier they did it by that sounds like you have to know why they didn't do but at the very least they did it in this but the regard that they did that seems to be beforehand if it's beforehand said, "I'm going to tell you why." Because as much as we have this of and it sounded a little bit like this Pik is coming to tell me this man of Truma, but really there's another and that other is really the to of based on that other which is the real that I know that if I want to be Mckim, I'm allowed to be MK. What's that other? And he said, "I understand. is why does it have to say it's coming to teach me 10 the is coming to say that there's a new biker biker usually is right 10 biker make a new biker to this bike to the regular biker and that new biker is going to be this man of Truma the way Rashi explains that you read as follows that and then the next which says that you want to know what this man is it's the it's from the time of that new biker that we gave to what the standard biker is okay so the essentially was that the man of is really open for interpretation tame biker I'm not telling you what that biker is you have a right to go and and decide what you want that biker to be. That's exactly what Kazal did in that he felt that the the right man to do it was they thought it's early enough. It's not too late. It's it's the perfect man to do it. You kept it with the had to do all the so he's going to get if you're going to give him too much to do in the morning. So they do it. He's up anyways tonight. So right they keep him up all night. So do it at night and do it by it's a good man to do it on but on where there are so many carbon as you find that yidden used to come to the and they would come sorry right that the yidden used to come very early we do it already and how do I know by the way that the reason they did regardless is because so many used to come save Because the mission actually says that it says I gave him my gas that by the time the veer or the rooster was doing its thing the azar was already but what do you see from there you see that there was so many in there and because there was so many yid in there it's for that reason they would make a little bit earlier now it's interesting that in of itself is a discussion what is just because there was so many yid in there since for that reason they had to do the chum sadashan earlier so some say it's because once were there you couldn't do the chum sadashan right you remember how they used to run up the ramp I mean try doing that if you have a big uh amum in attendance. It could be a little bit tricky. Others say that the nakuda was because the day before so many people were there. So because the day before so many people there was so many carbonas that were brought so there was so much work to do on the so had to get the crew out early to start making things happen. But the bottom line is the bottom line is says that you want to know the to this man of it's which is extra very much opened up this man of interpretation. Hence the three different man that you find in just explain this a drop better the thought that from the fact that you have a that says that that is telling me the of creating an equal but it's also being certainly sounds like it means so of sounds like first starts by how it's possible that they ever did the true before. You can't do something before this is that that of is not of it's what we said it's neo for certain. What then is the pos that tells me this man of trumadash? It's that's a whole different that's open to interpretation and that's why if you want to do that's something that you'd be allowed to do. The reason the thought that is like Rashi spoke out because the didn't tell me. So what is this man of? It's probably which we know is from SAY NO THE DID tell me this that's not it's and means tame biker you have a right to go ahead and do what you want either way we are going to stop here but just to end with one and really it's going back to the raid that we spoke about yesterday and really it's very I think in terms of understanding permiss So again, the objective of this rabb is not going to be to tape the thought to the finish line, but it's just to open up the conversation a little bit. We mentioned yesterday that the very very first is fully loaded. And in that one line, it's not even a full line, it's a half a line of rash. There's tremendous specifically the first words of Rashad. So we said that the was that it sounds like from Rashi that meaning that's a that touches the is going to be is going to be that it gets the of that not only is the royal when it's but the iso even when it's possible and said that it's ra andiml and that the MBadesh even though the suga where the thing that went on the misbeh is ple but it's equally or maybe even more so when the thing that went on the is but said have one from that we learned yesterday was discussing the of the said any animal that goes on the alive is you have to take off in the gar thought that the animal that went on the misbeh if a live animal goes on the said must be the is not what's in the but rather what's implied from the want to bring a riot is but the bottom line is that the held that it's that if you would have a kosher live animal that would go on would be said why is it why is it so the reason it's because why leave it there it doesn't make any sense if you have a double puzzle it makes sense to leave it there Because if you take it off, you won't be able to put it back on because but if it's for sure you should take it off because I'll be able to put it back on anyways. I mean to leave a live animal on them is very right even though we know let's say even is considered all the but right it's first it's not it's a thing why would you leave it there the only reason says rash to leave it there ever is because I won't be able to put it back on but here being that I'll be able to put it back on there's no reason leave it there but said what do you see from Rashi? You see from Rashi that Rashi seems to hold that it doesn't make sense that should be the reason it doesn't make sense is because predicated on and being that over here there's no reason it should be the problem is we have a serious rash because rashi in the beginning of the par saysle which in brisk is an obvious dick I don't think you have to be a brisket to make this dick that kasher would be subject to the of yet when he was the specifically the kasha one word seemed to say that anything that's being that it doesn't make sense that should have a yesterday we mentioned what they say in that it could be when rashi said he didn't mean has a den of but rather ordinarily only has a to go ahead and to be as it relates to seems to be very clear from that is not subject to the it's not subject to the of just to say when istoer and a puzzle but not a doc. I saw in the safer from says to this which I think is to go through a little bit because it it goes to the gut and the core of understanding a little bit better what we're doing here in paramish. It's very mindopening when he is and that is his father. We mentioned yesterday that Rashi continues and Rashi says the gives this to now become. So what do those words even mean? So the biscob is and it's really based on and it's based on second memor on the bottom of the base where said that even though but that's only true if it was once it's once this dople goes into the fire at that point is that just like that of and now is based on the idea that this two that you have in a carbon the regular classic is you're bringing a carbon so you have to be you eat the bos and you do with some of the rest of the right if it's a different type of carbon it's a different but the bottom line is that there's to take that of the carbon and go ahead and be that to the extent that you have the buster of a carbon that now makes contact with the fire. The minute it goes into the fire, it gets a new that is you have a to be not because it's part of a and the says you have a tob you have to be because it's and you have to be yesterday we spoke a little bit more about what this means. One that's that they say in Brisk is that the regular is the is not it's only a carbon has a to do this with this part of it that with that part of it being it's and when you're it's being in the overall carbon the is not even the carbon it's only it has no nex it's you have no ability to go ahead and bear it's and it's not even it's only but the bottom line is said that when is a new once it makes contact with the with the fire of the it's what's known as the of said that what Rashi means when says not leave it on the is that it's however not the of the regular mitzvah the carbon but rather the so that was that there's a now of which the other hakara now just to be clear that other din happens when it's in the fire like all hakara happens when it's in the fire right obviously And it's called the of when it's in the fire and it was already at that point the is so in that even if it falls off the misb you have to put it back on when the go on the misb it's to go ahead and do the of but the didn't start yet. And because the didn't start yet, it's only going to be where it's on the misbeh. But the bottom line is that what's in is not don't take it off the but rather what's it's of. This is the way the brisk explained the so let's think a little bit now. just gave tremendous additional meaning to I think if you asked the man on the street what does mean he would say that if you have something that touches the gets you can't take it off the I could hear that like you go into the you're stuck you can't leave what are you going to do now right you're stuck once you go on the m at that point you can't get off it You have too much. It's right. You're not let go. That's not the That's not the it's right. That's what the of is. So here's the question. So where does the of the fit into the equation? Meaning I thought before the brisk that is just like a regular it's now let it take this thing that's so very that's always what I thought it turned it into a superus no is so what then is the of the why can't I take it off the let explains a little bit better. If lawyer is a dinar, okay, so let it have a let me take it off the then when I want to put it back on the I'll be where does theu fit in? If the iso that's what fits in that's what it is that is the kesh is but is saying the kdishb is not the kdish is okay so then what is the isoto what is it what is it I think and it could be this is even the but when it's off the it doesn't have the anymore we mentioned the grace of yesterday that it could be once it goes off the misb it doesn't even have kesh anymore it's when you're making physical contact that's when it has the kesh but the minute it's not making physical contact not right let's go with that side which seems to be the more side. So once you're telling me once you're telling me that the only has when it's on the but when it's off the not well if that's the case then has to be in the reason there has to be because if I'm going to take the I'm going to be and that's not something I'm allowed to DO It's the Scottish Indian. So what's this business that we don't stop talking about? IT'S BECAUSE from the fact that THERE'S A THERE HAS TO BE AN BECAUSE IF I'm going to take it off, I won't be able to put it back on cuz I'm going to lose the I can't take a double puzzle and put it on. So I'm going to lose the I'm going to lose the kadush. If I'm going to lose the kadush, there has to be a is the it's because there's a and I only have the because I'm touching them and the minute I'm not touching them, I won't have that anymore. So there has to be an because if I'm going to remove it, I'm going to be so is DON'T GO AHEAD AND ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU can't just go ahead and take a carbon that has to bring that's what the is. So you want to know what is doing? It's giving me a is because to the extent I'm going to be I'm going to lose that and that's not something I could live with. That's not something that's tenable. holds holds that is true even also holds there's no when it comes to the is not said is what it's that it's what and on that it's going to be true even FOR A DOUBLE PLE WHY EVEN FOR A DOUBLE pleos a double BECAUSE A DOUBLE IS TO BECOME WHY NOT IF A DOUBLE ple gets kish why should a dash what's the problem the problem said that when the mission says if the animal go and it's a animal is going to be fake because it's that if you have a freak the brisk how could it be part that it's going to be if you tell me is true even for and is how could it be that it's what's going on OVER HERE NEVER SAID THERE'S NO when it comes to never said that there's no said there's no it's positive there's no because the is from that Why is there because if you're GOING TO TAKE IT OFF THAT'S ONLY TRUE BUT AVAT nothing if I'm not being nothing. If I'm not being nothing, if I'm not being nothing, well then if that's the case, so why should there be a den of Rashi in the beginning of the per when the it's a true for there's no reason a double shouldn't have that comes. Who said anything about a double apostle? It should be true for a double kadesh as well. Like the Ram says it's even more relevant when it comes to a double than it is when I rash wasn't talking about the Rashhe was talking about he was talking about the that's what Rashi was talking about and being that Rashi over there was talking about the well as it relates to there there's a that comes that derivative there's no reason that should BE TRUE CUZ THAT'S ONLY BECAUSE I'M BEING MOVED TO THE TERRACE. Why am I being moved to the terrace? Cuz I have no way to put it back on. Well, over there I do have a way to put it back on. So for that reason, it shouldn't have been a game. I discussed this with my son this morning. And he's told me that the reason they don't learn this way in brisk is posh because the ofadesh from the beginning of the peric to the end of the peric and really from the beginning of kachum to the end of kachum is that's the it's means now you want to reconcile these two tights that come from that madesh gives a dinar like the brisker said and madesh creates an isah said good you can figure it out but to say that the is from where the whole that's the whole per it's very very dark and that's why they don't like to learn this way in fact if you look at the first so why is A there's two of the fact that it says in the okay so laying out the law of land this is Rash's keb he's giving you the over here but if a read is like a summ you only have the kdish when you're on the if take it off. You're going to lose the condition. YOU'RE GOING TO BE SO TELLS ME IN THE NEXT MISHNA. THE MISHNA later is telling it to me anyways. So when you get to it, WE'LL GET TO IT. THAT'S LIKE A PR THAT'S NOT THE CLOUD. THAT'S THE pr the is the is the there's two that come from number one. Number two and each one is a cloud. They're both to say the is only because I'm being it's beautiful. It's half of a it's not the over here and it's he said that's why in they or the very least they very very much with this deashi just to add one there's another rashy and this rash is I think this is a fire isn't there a carbon ple This is the same rash, right? It's the same rash but the same as the beginning of say not carbon. Now first of all says carbon impossible the same that we have in the beginning we have that's the whatever you're going to make out of that you're going to make out of this but here and he didn't say the magic words he didn't say all said was carbon that's means means to be not to stand to give it a terrorist but made such a big deal about this that left out those words. It's the same we have to and it certainly brings out that of color is the either way this is again we will mock them it's just a little bit thoughtprovoking light isn't but so where does fit in like how do you make all this all of a sudden leer is feeling a little left out right I thought I'm the over here it's all about Loyer. Now all of a sudden we don't even know where he fits in. He's the odd man outr. That's part of the avoid. Again, just putting it out there.