Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00

Menachos 108

1 views
Lakewood Daf Yomi avatar
Lakewood Daf Yomi

Transcript

Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.

Today's and we are nine lines from the bottom of today's being and so we're moving along at the very very end of Believe it or not this is already the third to last stop for those keeping score another very minis deodaf So as an introduction to today's d if you notice the first words are tan which means that we learned in a mishna over there it's to go there and learn that mishna and berm hopefully that will allow the first part of the daf to go a little bit more smoothly. So the ver that uh tan hass is referring to is perk mishna the over there discusses that there were 13 in the bas mikdash these cha were kois like bank accounts that were just shaped in the form of a shyer the purpose was to deposit money there but there wasn't just one where all the deposits were made this was a diversified portfolio of uh there were 13 different accounts and the Mishna delineates what the purpose of the 13 were says the Mishna because of and on these 13 it said as follows the first one said the first said the new so means new and the purpose of that was came to the Bikto to give his so you had to put it somewhere you put it into that. The second one said tickliken that was for a person that was for whatever reason lacks with giving the during the year that he was supposed to have. So right now he's so he comes he has to give last fiscal year. So you don't put it in with the because it's not it's means old in Aramaic. So he would put it in the said ticklikim. The third one was kenim. [snorts] So if somebody had an obligation to buy kenim, so he would take the money for the kenim and he would put it into the said. The fourth one was that one put if he was going to buy. Now what exactly is the between that's actually that the mission discuss is not something that we need far enough. The next one said, so if somebody had to purchase, the money that went for the atom was put into that chaer. The next one was lava. The seventh one was so in the event that somebody was donating gold or money to buy gold to use for the notapy but which were the in the B mikdash. So the money was deposited over there and then the gizbar would take the money from there and go buy whatever had to be bought. Either way, that's the first seven. The next six those we use. So the Mishna said there was the first seven as it relates to the latter six. Those latter six were all used says I'm skipping a little bit. What was that all about? So the first seven we actually explained in a pretty descriptive way. The last six were the word is a very open-ended word in so what exactly was the use of proceeds of those six that were so the Mishna says what they would use with that money was they would buy where the ber of the like baser of every went but the of that would go to the like the of all the carbon the point is that the wasidas what we know in the vernacular as so we know that the misb always had to have activity there always had to be carbonus that were being brought what is the supposed to do what are the kan supposed to do in the event that there are no being brought right now so there was a special fund that was an adva fund that in the event that they knew from 2:00 to 3:00 in the afternoon there's going to be nothing happening. You take money out of the fund. You buy a carbon. You buy a and you bring it. It's a carbon. It's thus like the Mishna says the bus and the actually goes to the so all six of those were used for the same purpose. They were used continues and says the following was a that was said and this is the end of clearly we're talking about the carbon but this we don't have to go into the whole of and this is what he said this is the outcome Anytime you have money with the origin of this money was either a or an asham. What does that mean? It means that you have a situation where you have a a moer kas or you have a moer asham. Anytime you have a situation like this where there's a moer katus or a moser asham again the origin of this carbon was a katas or an asham but right now you're not bringing a a katas or asham. So what are you supposed to do with it? He's supposed to buy with item the goes and goes. But after the Mishna mentions a little bit and what was the Mishna then mentions that there's an Indian of sometimes you have and you have an are not going to be brought but rather they're going to be brought. When would that happen? in the event they have a quote unquote. Now what's an example of a katas? So we know there are many examples of it, right? Learn say the kum and you'll be more familiar with it. But for example, in the event that somebody was mafish or carbon and then the katas or the asham got lost and as a result you went and you were mafish another one and then you found the original one now you left over with an extra one or if somebody went and he set aside money to buy a katas and an ash and you didn't need all the money so you end up at katas or asham that's leftovers. These are different examples of a based on a said that there's an Indian of what do you do with the of you buy these so all that money that came from all those ma in the event it was leftover money you just put the money in if it was leftover animals you sold the animals right you wait until it gets and then you sell it because otherwise you can't be paid [snorts] and then you take the money you put it in these funds and ultimately that's what the money was used for. So the bottom line is if you learn the Mishna there were 13 in the first seven the Mishna spells out exactly what it was for the last six of where did all that money come from it came from the and it came from the just to explain this a little bit about it what's unique about the is you can have a situation where you have an animal that I can't just bring but I'm going to have to have a sell it and figure out what I'm going to do with the money. What I do with the money is I use it for the right if somebody would have an let's say that you can't bring. So it wouldn't be and take the money and figure out what to do with it. You just bring the oil. If you would have a schlam in a situation like this you have a schlam bring it but it's leftover. So just bring it up. So as a result if you have a I don't know what to do with it. I don't have and it's not so over there it's have to come up with an was that's what was used to fund the kids again the didn't fund the kids I just was m it's the take and go ahead and start funding the again this is all you're doing when you're learning but it's also very much as we're going to see the introduction to today's Just now to set it up in a more acute way. The daff is going to begin and ask an obvious question when you're learning the Mishna. There were 13 chaas. The first seven all had a very unique purpose. The last six were why do I need six? I had one and one. So why do I need six lad? There should be one six. Is there any magic to that number? The answer is yes. As a matter of fact, in the first part of today's da, we're going to see six pun intended opinions in the each one coming to explain in a very different way what the in of having six. As a matter of fact, there's going to be so many different that the begins with a sim. So, we learned the mission over there connected me. What was the purpose of having sex? [snorts] This is interesting because if you take a look at the makubet says the says but either way is the first he said the reason there were six is because there were six of so what does that mean? We know that all the divided into mish each mish was divided into a b. So if you're a member of a Mishma and your job is to work in the B mikd this week doesn't mean you get to work Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday depending on what day you fall into that's the day you're going to work into now it was divided into six days either seven days of the week cuz on the used to work together but being that there was six they were six what's the made because they wanted that there should be and of between they don't want any fights they don't want any fights to break out amongst the so there's a long rash that explains this rashi [snorts] basically says that as we saw from the Mishna the benefited from because the bus was and being that they benefited from it so they wanted there should be a lot of that are being brought on on their day if there's one fund that all the are coming from Then it's very possible that a coin who's bringing his carbonus who is doing the on a Monday because that's his b might not have so much on his because maybe it's going to be a busy day in the B mikdash whereas the clay that's doing it on Tuesday will and they're going to start saying I don't understand you made this huge profit off of this fund because I'm the same member I'm part of the same mish so why should you be making all this money and me not so it's very it's possible that a fight's going to break out. So like this what they did was they said, "No, you have your sche. You have your schifer, right? You mind your own business. You keep your eyes and your head in your shifer. He's going to keep his mind and his head in his shifer and you have nothing to do with him. He has nothing to do with you." By you creating that kind of mat like this, you'd be able to delineate be able to differentiate. The point is it was done that there should be said different. He said because believe it or not this Indian of having the you know you think of it as like a fluke. It actually wasn't. It was something that was very and it was constantly being used. So he said that what would be if you had one that was used right or twoers that were used. You take all the money and you would put into the now you're constantly using the B. This is like a ongoing uh system. So what would happen is you would always be using the money from the top and the money that's on the bottom would just sit there literally and rot. So that money shouldn't rot. Therefore they said you'll have you'll spread it out a little more evenly and the going to know take from this take from that. They're going to have a mahal of how they go about it. But the point is like this the money is not going to go bad. The olden days money went bad not just because of inflation. Money went bad because the the actual coins went bad. So to prevent this is sounds like this went and he said I think this is a practical situation third said and I'm going to tell you why we had six it's can get the [snorts] reason there was six is there was one to the extent that the money is being used for a par to buy a bull ago the other one is being used for a calf what's the relationship between a bull and a calf. So the pyro is the older one and the eagle is the baby. Same with regards to an isle and a those are two sheep, one being a little older, the other one being a little younger. And finally, and it's going to that if somebody takes upon himself and he says that I'm going to bring a a big animal, I can't bring a smaller one. And the same thing goes in the reverse as well. If somebody says I'm going to bring a koton the heavy, it's not going to be good either. It's for that reason they had to have separate chifas for the different animals because if the nava was meant for one and you end up using it for another it's not going to be okay. Now if you take a look at Rashi Rashi seems to say that according to Zeri the paragelar is in the event that somebody made somebody said to bring so depending on whether he said or you have to know which to put it into why can't you just intermingle them no going to go either way it's not going to be okay the problem is the Mishna seemed to say that the which seemed implied that the so what's going on over here? So the ask say that it's from he's the only who's going to hold this way really but it's from that when the mentions was like a we just mentioned you should know there's a comes through it's something that the town of wanted to tell me didn't have a good place to fit it in so he threw it in over there but in terms of what the was a good oldfashioned array of and depending on whether You said that's how it's going to play itself. Is the fourth shot. He said it's so what does this mean? So first of all learned the he learned the way learned the means and really it's referring to the and to the why do you need sex I'm going to tell you why the one is to the extent that you have a or that's a par when would you ever have that theor so the par is a carbon That's a that's a par. In the event that you have its moisture, it goes into its own bucket. Goes into the par bucket. What would be if you have a par or a that's going to have moist? I'm sorry. You're going to have a or an asham that's going to be a moer. That's going to be an aisle. When would you have that? You would have that by the ash. The asham could be brought as an aisle. The asham gaz and the el was an aisle. It's moist goes into the bucket. If you have a that comes from a cat, when would that be? So Rashi says the both were the when you have a moat that's a that's easy, right? So that was a that was a that went into the sear bucket. Rashi says is referring to the extent that you never even bought the animal. You just set aside money for and it was leftover money. So then that money didn't go into the paras because it was never a paras. So it goes into the money bucket. And finally the what is the so the is interesting that is referring to rashi says the so the issum fame. So the background to that is every year every year had to give but because the the skullum used to erode a little bit. So you always had to be mice of a little something. You had to be mice of this m right. You had to be m of a little bit good and that m is considered to be making hectage hole like this. You know you're actually giving the full shackle but there was another tak that was made. What would be if two come and together they give a shackle each one contributing his shackle? We accept that. Okay. You have to be of a m. You always have to be of a m of another. Why? Because we're not concerned that you need more than a m to be. But the reason they want you to be of another m is because if you're not for it's going to come out that the fact that you chipped in the fact that you came is going to end up being mish. And the reason is because hectish relies in their projections on getting that extra m. But if you're going to go be mash, it's going to be one m instead of two mice. Now truth is the m really goes per coin. So if which beat if we would figure out a way to give two shackles in one coin really it should only be that's true but at the same time hectic is losing out. So it's for that reason you had to be mo of what was known as the kbine and that kbine went to be matched from that extra and that was what the sixer ultimately was used for. So according to barada the six chaers are related to the but that's really only true for five of them. The sixth one was actually related to so let's just break this down a little bit better as it relates to the ones that so I need six right that was the graasha said there shouldn't be worried about inflation right what's this in according to he said that you have to break it down kafi animal so the moer of a ratas that was a par you can't buy an aisle so I have to put it in the par buckets like this I know what to use it for the Same is true for the alim and for theim and for the and even for the money. So based on the type of animal that's what's how it is to be broken down. Okay. So that's the of the five. What's the six? The sixth is the why is this a little bit of aesh because in the original seven we had already we already had two for the comes out there's a third related to the in what would I think you're supposed to do with the if it's this year's put it with the if it's last season put it with the that's why I'm telling you my whole with the here's the regular went into even the regular they had to be went to This M couldn't go there. You know why? Because this M is not really it's just that shouldn't lose out. It's we don't want to be right. [snorts] So being that it's not really that's why he needed its own thing either way. So the Gmorra is going to do something interesting. We just mentioned the first four in terms of why there was six. The Gmorra is going to interrupt a little bit then mention the next two and then again. So we interrupt the program now with doing a little bit of let's just get the said that why were the six it's for the like the six but it's just the six it should be said the same thing but it's related said actually has nothing it's related to someone that's to bring a regular but we're going according to so therefore you said it is related to albeit only five of them. What's the five depending what the original animal was? Was it a Those are the four possibilities as it relates to the animal. And then there's another one for the mistress. There's another one for the money that was left over. And then finally for this comments didn't want to learn like and say that it's related to why am I going to fight each guy does on his day meaning you don't need your own I work on Monday Monday there was no kids on they don't look like they didn't want to look like because the only worked Don't me. They didn't want to be like they didn't like because of two reasons. Number one, moist. You're telling me you need one for moist. Why do you need an extra one for moist? Extra one where there was money. If money was set aside, so what was the money set aside for? It was set aside for a par, put it with the par. Was it set aside for an idle? Put it with the Kev. Kev meaning I I could be Macaba. Why you need to break it down based on animals? But why would the mistress? That doesn't make any sense. The par the also let's explain this a little bit better. If you have a leftover power, what are you doing with the power? You're actually and then what you're going to take the money. Oh, so you're going to end up with the money anyways. You just cut out the middleman. You cut out all the fees. At the end of the day, you're going to end up in the same exact place. So, it's going to end up being what's the difference if it started money or if it didn't start off money. I don't understand that. And also that we mentioned earlier that is part of and if that's the case it should go together and how do I know so and I don't understand what's going on now what would maybe tell you he would tell you maybe is going according to what's the simple answer it's not that would be going that's a very highly unlikely uh probability and it's for that reason for those two reasons all the didn't want to learn like the fourth but we have two more said [snorts] and I'll tell you a different reason why there were six again it's for the but the way the are broken down is a little bit differently it's regular all the different asham which is referring to. So you want to know what the six are? It's one. Now does mean all of them? No. Because three is four is then you have the of the [snorts] what's the that's the of the and finally have the of the of the let's unwrap this for a second according to all the get put into one bucket get divided into three and a why do you divide it into three because they came for different the regular asham came to be The Asham Nazer who brought the Asher the Naz allowed him to resume his and the Ashra came to be the give him for whatever he needed it's a different and as a result being that the coming for something else it's for that reason it gets divided differently so in as much as all the goes together but you know what we forgot about we forgot about the that's a that's for sure different and because it's different that gets put into its own bucket. And then finally the sixth one is the the now that one is extremely interesting. Why? Because the is even right. So why would that even be an issue? So the truth is that the is based on a says and that is referring to the serious of it's referring to you see the refers to the as being that's already for that reason you would end up having an issue. Now another interesting thing that's worth mentioning is similar to meaning he's saying that and had to be divvied up a little bit. You can't just lump them all together, right? If you think about it, according to you can lump them all together. I don't want to fight to break out lump them all together, but I'm worried about [snorts] was the one that was not all these were created equally is going with that also. But whereas is dividing it based on the of the animal, right? The [snorts] way is dividing it is based on what the what the what this carbon is actually coming to is the six we'll see is almost identical to just one tweak says so far it's identical that's different which was also the same. So what's the between according to you have and according to you have the so doesn't have and doesn't have the why did not learn like right we're going to have to figure out why didn't learnish and then we're going to have to figure out why didn't learn like so first things first why does not learn like meaning why didn't he mention kenan so what's the answer. If you remember the introduction to the top, it was mentioned already in the ratio. Why do I need another? What about is it because it's a little tongue twister is the reason did have kenm it because didn't have kingdom in the ratio. By the way, Rabisha we know had a lot of bryes, right? [snorts] Very often he's or has you know nuances of differences between the Mishna, right? What's the most famous example? But obviously has 13 right. So the bottom line is is Raboshi's prices are very different. See is the reason in the safer because does not have in the ratio in the because he did mention it had and he had talking about where a person's coming to the kingdom says. So we know why because he had kingdom already in the but why did not learn like that. It's not something that's and the money goes like it's on his back. There's a different what you're supposed to do with this. You just let it rot. That's what you do with the leftover money. What's the to say the obvious question? The question everyone's asking. What does this even mean? Let me tell you what the price means. So the way the price is meaning that's the word you have to add is referring to the of the but you have a over here you have a this is where is getting this from that the of thean wasn't lin it was and that's why he didn't have it as one of his says actually had a different shot in this no of so what then does the Bryce this cryptic bry mean when it says what it means is this is really an older so this was a major Shila. You want to know what's going on here? The between That's what's going on over here. I'll ask you a leftovers of any leftover. What about if there was what we're going to need? Now we just need one part of this forward. When we say don't we mean the of the and what do you see from here that the of the was that it was like who like not like not like this is a little bit of a problem. This is a lie. All it says is what is just a share. So it could be in a different that had the Yeah. But the other you know it's referring to it means it's actually that the is and this is referring to the said what does it mean? she is called but there's no other it sounds like we're coming to something you know we're coming to serious why would it have been right what about why would there have been so always says so there was already some sort of that the on levels But I would have thought that maybe it's no it's not called does require but the bottom line is you see it's not called with regards to it's going to be as well but the bottom line is you wonder why didn't learn like how come he didn't have one of his six being the A it's not L doesn't refer to it as true but there's a bottom line is this very much concludes the first part of today's d the longest part of today's d what's the Mishna says in the six there were 13 that were [snorts] used in the BTS the Mishna explains what seven of them were four and fighters the other six says that it mean it's not I don't know what to do with it you're going to take the money and you're going to buy that money was put in these and the obvious question is why do I need six one would be enough I don't know logistically however many money you should need but where does this number six come from and what emerged was The way the mubet says has it is referring to the six that said six different the first was that's the kof of the peskia said it's the shisha about the obvious that there shouldn't be the non of is the non of he said it's the zion is the that's easy he said that as a matter of fact has nothing to do with but it's related to someone that says and going who holds is going to be an issue the pay of amazingly is referring to the pay of who said I know it's for the but we break it down based on animals money and the sixth one is for the for the shin of is referring to and said it's also for And we're breaking it down. We can't just lump it into one. But rather you break it down based on what the purpose was. So it's connected regular gets its own. And by the way, he holds based on the also considered that has the same exact in that it's it's been. And then finally the is the of not the of right special with an it's the of who was very similar to there was only one that he had. The one that he had was that instead of he instead had he instead had the by the way just one thing that's we're not going to talk about now but in case it's bothering the that I think is worth mentioning and that is we keep on talking about how the is going to be brought in isn't the right the money what's going on over here But why says it's only that's really what predicates this entire either way. So the Mishna really returns to the regular program and it's talking about somebody that took upon himself to bring a certain type of carbon and either he was very cryptic he doesn't remember what he said or he just wants to change it right he wants to do some sort of switcheroo so this has been the theme of these last so the says what would be if somebody said somebody took upon himself to bring a carbon and he said I want this right here to be my ven and then the developed Right? What does nistive literally mean in Aramaic? Nive means that it became right. It's disgusting. It's usually a word that you find in the context of why would we refer to as a as we just learned a whole recently because the refers to as being but either way and it developed. So because it developed a m obviously you can't bring it right now as carbon. So what do you need to do once it develops you ordinarily can't be like but once it develops at that point you can be so now I have the money the question right not now he has you know he has to figure out what to do with it if he wants if he wants he can bring just replace the or I'll tell you better you want to bring two isn't that you could do that as well would be if somebody had two as they both developed the and again he was now he has the money if he wants he can replace the two or if he also wants he can bring one says no rebi says that's not an option we're going to see in the whether only on the latter of the two or on both of the two I mean according to you can't do the switch idol if somebody said I want this to be an isol and it developed a moment of you don't have to bring an if you want and say you can bring av what if somebody said I want to bring avas if he wants to replace toile again what exactly that means to the said if somebody was and then it developed a you had to sell it and now you have the money and the question is if you want you can replace it exactly the way it was or you can switch it right if you originally were mak and Now you want to bring two, you could bring two. If originally you were two and now you want to bring one, you can bring one. That's not a ratio. We learned in the ratio. What does the ratio mean? Right? We just started the Mishna means we learned in the previous that if somebody said to bring a for and then instead of bringing one you decided instead to bring two you're not going to be why you're not going to be because and if you said and you're going to bring two obviously that's smaller and if they're smaller then you're downgrading the of the even though you're making up for it in comments but this is you're downgrading and because you're downgrading so based on that that's not something you're allowed to do what's the difference very what's the is very in the previous Mishna You said you took upon yourself right see the first how this works where I am obligated right now with right I'm signing a personal guarantee that I am going to go and I'm going to bring a fora you have a responsibility to bring a for if you're going to bring it's not going to fulfill what that obligation was if somebody said he's already passed that he said I want this to be the over here you're not saying you're not being you're being I want this to be a what's somebody says there's no now what happened over here what happened over here was this developed okay so when I was now I have the money okay I could do whatever I want with the money so it's for that reason at that point I can do whatever I want and therefore if you want to switch it this way you want to switch it that way it's going to be okay where a person has a to bring you can't fulfill that which but this person doesn't have a to bring a shaman what this person really has is $100 worth of money that originated with a okay so right I just have to replace it with an but if I want to replace it with two that in of itself is going to be okay. Okay. The mish continued and said right the same is true in the reverse. If a person started off and now he wants with the money bring only one that's okay says it's not going to be okay. Why is it that holds it's not okay? Right. It's probably because it's a cotton and it's for that reason like we mentioned earlier if somebody goes and he brings that that's not fine says the well if that's the reason and even though right now it has a and we just spoke out of lumis that once it has a mum at that point it's not an issue anymore. We'll explain this in a minute that still doesn't want you to do meaning understands the lumbus that we mentioned earlier but at the same time still holds being that if you said it wouldn't be okay. So even when you said still it's not okay but if that's the case why is only arguing in the rebi should have argued in the as well and the reason is asking rebi should argue in the raashi is because held in the previous mishn that just like cotton is not okay is also not okay and being that is also not okay so it's for that reason tinus the just like rebi was in the should have been in the as well. So there's a very tricky aspect to this and as a matter of fact if you look in the gay is flying all over the place that's how tricky it is. [snorts] The Gmorra said on the last case one line earlier we said that the first case of the that's a case of right that was the was on the first line of the that didn't even say and it made sense that that should a case of god of every because you're obviously getting a bigger one you're obviously getting two smaller ones so it makes a lot of sense in the in the seder that that's the way it should be stating that the very next line of rebi ostensibly on the second of the two cases where a person said two he ends up bringing one why the garra says oh probably god of heavy cotton now what be the what let's just touch the words how would it even be god of heavy cotton it would be god of heavy cotton because in cameos it's god of heavy cotton cuz you made up I'm going to bring two and now you're only bringing one. So even though that one in a is bigger right but the [laughter] problem is in the first part of the gamar the gamar is neming on ros and in the second part of the gar the gar ising on right the gar is trying to understand what's going on over here initially taking on the assumption [snorts] thatos that and you brought two smaller ones that's god of a heavy cotton and the second when the tries to understand rebi the takes the reverse attack assumes that two and you brought one that's a case of God caught why because of and you downgraded the amount of so how do you even make sense of it so I think the pup and the garra is the garra looked at the and the gmorra saw rebi rebi o the second case and they want to try to understand why would rebi bear on the second case so the gammor said you know something maybe it's because rebi holds that the second case is god of kata Meaning the initial gisha of the gamar was the first case is god of baby cotton because we go ba that makes sense bigger animal small animal that's what defines godle and cotton but then they want to rebi and rebi on the second case not on the first case why obviously because the first case must be cotton godle that's fine the second case is god of a cotton and that's not fine meaning must be rebi is only when it's god of a cotton That's the first area where he argues. Additionally, Rebi must hold not like we assumed and that is you don't go but rather you go. So the Gar says that's the case again. It's a major switch that you don't notice unless you are a little bit but the is saying it doesn't help me because I still don't understand why wouldn't be because a problem is a problem however you learn however you learn at the end of the day should have been on both cases meaning my time was see it again inside why would on the second case because he's going to say not like we assumed two lines ago. He's on this because we define based on not based on and therefore he holds even therefore what you don't have that mentioned on top of I still don't want you to do but if that's the case Why? Because he just was very he waited for the to finish doing their thing. Right? We know Rebi was just shask. We know Rab was a shask once spoke at a rabbi from who had a from the that ra's came from and he learned so also a sobi waited and then he went and he was which by the way if this is the case in both cases you don't have to say that according to rebi god and continent based on we can on what we assumed for sure that it's based on and the is not only on the second case cuz that's he's really arguing on all the cases then says t I'll prove to you that this is true that is not only on the case of cotton whichever that case is but he's also why would you need a just explain this a little bit better if rebi holds cotton baby god is a problem so it's a problem because it could be as much as rebi holds in the cotton baby god is a problem but when it comes to over here in this where it's maybe there he's only where it's now meaning maybe is also masking this between the here it's a problem right in the case of over here it's even the right it's only by the So it for sure is only a so being that it's only a maybe the is only not that's why we still need a little bit of a but the says I'll prove it to you anyways because look at the last part of the what if a person said and it developed if someone said and then it developed and he wants them said bring an isol he could now to an isle is the is going You seem foolish was even so for sure is going on the whole first part of the you see is going to be true even in this case what would be with regards to somebody said and now he wants to bring a different men says he wants to bring two right one is won't be enough money right you're going to have moist still so you're going to bring two alum can I switch me min or can I not switch In the Mishna, we had all the same men. We had one two one or we had island and Kev that's all the same men. So the question is what would be what would be in the event that it was two different mean you can't bring an So what do you see from here? You could switch me. Now you can't bring one aisle. We'll see why in a minute. But if you want to bring two, you could. The bottom line is min in itself is not rebi says you can't. Rebi gives a new reason here. Rebi says the reason is is because there's no what does that mean? It means because when a person brought a carbon so there was a and very often that was brought. If this person said he was going to bring one if he's going to switch it to two he's going to have to bring two. He can't and because of that that's this issue that he has but the bottom line is right what was the question but if you can go why does it have to be one for two why can't it be one for one right it sounds like you have to find almost some big monster aisle that's going to replace the why why can't you have uh right What's the reason that I'm sorry it sounds like you have to find two. Why do you have to find two? One should be I mean just as long as you replace it. That in of itself should be okay. So the says you're right in our don't care is it one for one for two. And this they do care and that's [laughter] apparently that the raon of this are a little less liberal in terms of what they're allowing you to do. Right? In our Mishna allow you to do anything. Why the words of the who cares once you p you just have to make sure it's an I don't care what you do with it in the bracelet it's not so posh we allow you to go that was the that was the original but at the same time what emerged is a that's a little bit more medactic in terms of what he's really allowing you to do [snorts] specifically you can replace it with two you can't replace it with one gave us a reason why it's a problem it's it's because Now remember in our mission you didn't give any reasons we s didn't explain it. Okay it's very good there's a Ber that's doing some explaining over the isn't that what Bryes are supposed to do. Yeah but this is a problem. You know why? Because it sounds like the only reason is because of what does that mean? If you were switching it one for one it would be of sir and there's no problem because it's one not too over here from the price it almost sounds like SAYS oh but the price in the mishna it's one for one and still you see that it was a problem you have to say here too so it's interesting that in the Mishna when the areal because shi they're overwhelmingly make they don't care one two big small they're always and when's he's always in the wen always make and rebi wasn't always right that's the sequ the was sometimes it has to be one for two not one for one and rebi was only when there's a problem with the when there's a name problem but if it's one for one there's no problem with the mka that won't be an issue this next line is the he of the original so we're returning now to that price that we brought earlier as a to the [snorts] continues and says as it relates to if you want to go ahead and you want to switch an able with a parvis that's okay and that is that whole that this something you're allowed to do now what does means where there's no m right is if it was we mentioned literally means that it became It doesn't literally mean it developed. It means literally that it became. So the is the inverse of but again it means not in the but rather it means versus not having a the bottom line is in the event that it's fine is fine. What's the reason? Because these are examples of is okay. Who holds that stomach? Which not of the only said it's only true if he said and like we said earlier when you say so you fulfilled your obligation now you just have to figure out what to do with the money but if you say then already at that point you have a meaning the word Allah is you now it's like you made a regular and now you have to refer back to the in terms of figuring out what exactly you have to maybe a lie means I'm going to bring the money maybe means I'm not being myself more than this on the on the maybe even the money but at the end of the day I it's not an lie on the sh It's a lie on the That's the right mean. You're right. I think you're 100% right. And I don't think between Okay. Okay. So now what did mean in the name of he said if he said like we just said so when [snorts] not if however he says then it's going to be already different because then when he says of lie the way we t it is is that I'm taking myself that I'm going to do with the money exactly what I was going to do with charz. So if shar was going to be this sh well then I have a to take the money and use it for a shar well either way the we're not going to go through the whole thing of this second part of the daf was really it's the sequel to the previous mission the previous mission said if somebody says like baby go baby the grab everybody go baby is a problem that's what the says our mission is being our mission is saying that the only time that's true is if a person just said har I have this uh abstract his to go ahead and bring an animal so you have to bring it. If however you already designated the specific animal and now I'm back to the drawing board because it developed the woman I have the money I have to figure out what to do with it. Well, now I could do whatever I want with it because once I designated this animal at this point, that's what my is and at this point I could stating that is a just like he was a over here. I don't like it because if you say you couldn't do it and this is coming from that origins I'm not but it's only and there's no question this is something you'd be able to do. As a matter of fact in the Bryce Rebi Kubi only had a problem with the such a additionally if the person would say and then he would throw in language where he's making it clear of that already would be different one last part of today's d and this is the shortest of the three segments. So we're in terms of the of the amount of time of the of each part of the if that makes any sense. If somebody says I want one of my sheep to be hectish or I want one of my to be had twoish we assume that it's the bigger one that's going to be hectish. We'll see in the because of someone's makish. So we assume that that's what he was nicest most handsome as sheep and his nicest most handsomest. Let's say the person has three. It's the that's going to ask I thought you just said so why is it the [snorts] what if a person says I was one of my one of my father told me that he was before he died one of the animals I I don't know which one we assume always that the god is the one that's going to bearish what do you see from himish If he had threeish now you don't see because that would mean but at the very least it's the nicest one said let me tell you read the mishna when the says it doesn't mean but it means you have to be you have to be concerned that it might have been the ben meaning for sure it could have been the best one but it might have also been the benabu because the benon is alsaf the ISIS one is for sure and the ben on some level is also so it's not for sure the it's [snorts] like he's but maybe the is also therefore you have to be say what do you do that this is the two so what's the so is this like how do you go about right what are you supposed to do yeah you wait until it develops and as soon it develops a be onto the god. Once it develops, it ends up being and now the god ends up being the one. So you ended up satisfying both, right? You ended up satisfying the and you ended up getting whatever you needed to get. And oh, by the way, it didn't cost you both. It only costed you one. was only said. If the person would say not but that was his so is commenting on the case where a person had three and he said what did Mishna say explained meaning you have to be concerned maybe it's the best one maybe it's the middle one as well said that's only true if he said the we have to be very nuanced with his language. But if he said then it's for sure the best one. You know why? Cuz the ax of my accent means it means the thester that's the one that he means and that's the one that it's going to end up. Is that true? And really we're going to see three catches tomorrow's going to ask number one send the name of if somebody tells his friend said this is but he said like the proverbial and he said again he didn't say he said he could show him the attic right the attic you assume is not as the main floor. So you see clearly you can give him anything's law. You know what aliyah means? This is a name second. If somebody says our case next case we don't really need if someone had a got mixed up in a with both of these cases is right the god of them is the one that's going to be. So the god is hectish and there two again it's a terus you don't know what's what now so the god that's the one that's going to be considered hect the all of them are going to be sold for the objective of and after you play it the money is going to go we just need one thing over here is that doesn't sound like a m that supports what said. But here's the problem. The sounds like we don't just say this is for sure the one I have a suffic I really don't know which is one and therefore all of the other ones you can't just use. Wait till it gets able to use it. You're not going to lose it in your pocket at the end of the day. But you can't use it now. If automatically means the if that's for sure what it means then what's going on over here? Why is it says when we say the last part that's not referring to the part of the it's referring to the says it sounds like both are true for both cases the is referring to the fact that he in the case of the god is heish and in the case But for sure as it relates to that one is the one that's going to ultimately be the hackish everything else over here. So you have to wait until develop and then they're going to be one last again. If somebody said and then it fell. So somebody told I'm going to sell you a bias my bias and then the one of the bought them fell and now there's a whole between my house fell your house fell like what's going on over here so the says if he wants this is the one I sold you this is the one it fell good luck hire a contractor but this is the one I sold somebody says I'm selling you and then yeah you want to come invited to the is where it What do you mean? It's not just a half. You should see which one died and which one fell. And if it's not the you should be able to give it to him because it's like that said always means the god. So we didn't mean just give him the maze. You have to see hide and hide the maze. That means which which one died which one fell. So the says like what we're talking about what are you talking to me about is different because what's the when's the last time you said that right after learning a year of being so over there something you would have to bring which one is yours and therefore you could ch the base and unless you could prove otherwise It's going to be different. But as it relates to as it relates to hectish is different. Now that you're telling me that you can go back to the first the said you could show him and told what does it mean? You could show them the attic and we would no not the attic because that's not the best aliyah means the I could tell you really what it means is the aliyah the and the bottom line is the Mishna had said if somebody says so it's always the based on the fact that is stating that if there's more than one good one let's say you have three or four or five or six everything but the one you have to be for right you Like said even for the there's a whole of how you get out of it stating there said if you would say not but so you use that and you meant to say then you never then we know for sure without a question beyond a reasonable doubt that for sure you meant to onear had three kashas on that three kashas one from bay the other one was from the third one was from bay and evad the gar saidim the big that came out is that this whole memory of was only said with regards to hectish based on the idea of based on the idea of but when it comes to when it comes to there's already an of never said in that case.