Menachos 14

Today's daf is and we are at the Mishna on the bottom of the last two days we spoke out a little bit of intro as it relates to the idea of pigle. The first day we spoke about the basic concept of what pigle is the different types of pigle by etc etc. Yesterday we spoke a little bit about some of the peripheral some of the ancillary that relate to the laws of pigle malus according to raud that holds that you get malus on the end that says that pigle was very the idea that was also a m that's why it comes up in and the sug of nicker regardless before we start today's d we need to mention one other idea as it relates ates to div intro but this one a little bit more lumpish that is if you ask a man on the street how exactly does pickle go he's going to say it's bringing a carb in this during any one of those is it's going to be pigle now the truth is the man on the street is right but from a lund this perspective he's not 100% accurate This man of migle would be but the reason you could be while you're doing the is not because of the fact that those dollar are the avoid the reason you can be during those is because of the second hat that the wear and that is that the are also maternal serve two functions. Number one, that somebody's carbon, he has to bring a carbon. What does it mean to quote unquote bring a carbon? It means there's other things, other mitzvah, but that's all. What it really means is at the same time are also m certain parts of the carbon specifically the bos that was eaten by the were they were off limits. They were in the until you did the additionally there was that happened on the went on the depending on what carbon was being brought that would determine what exactly was going on the but is referred to throughout as and that too required a it was so to speak and what was moderate again was the really served two functions Number one that the two theap the whatever the purpose of this carbon is additionally they're also the reason pigle happens during is because pigle is related to and being that those are the and we'll see even more accurately from a perspective if we get there towards the end of what it means when we say but for now Just speaking loosely those are also the and piggle is related to m more specifically just to dig one level deeper and then we'll start to d is that what is piggle so we said in the context of he had one of four to what are those four things have in common that used to eat or the bum used to eat is also so you're doing an so piggle in the world of and it impacts the of the carbon but really the punchline from a lund perspective is where piggle is taking place and where piggle is is really causing issues is because you're thinking about at a time that you're doing an avoid that's not and you're having a very bad as it relates to all this regardless the pickle happening during the is not because of the significance of the of being but rather it's related to the fact that these are also the two to the boser and it's for that reason as we're going to see already in this morning's stuff that whenever you talk about pickle you're talking about a m can I be mad while I'm doing this aid so what's the question the question is is it a m is it not a m is it an avoid or is it not a no because the emphasis when you talk about piggle is is you need it to be an avid m and that's why the terminology that's used throughout the are m or not m on that note we begin a very very begins with a very specific type of carbon and that was the kayer. Every year on in the basikdash there was a carbon sour that was brought that was very different than all other carbon. It was a schlman. The only [ __ ] that was ever brought was the together with the schlan. There was also anas but there was a schlman a and the schlman was made up of two cross there was together with that there was also a that was brought what's known as so there was a that was born in the beginning of that was the carbon that was from and you count 49 days and then at the end of the burn another this wasn't from this was already from it says What's playing out is is that ones when they brought the carbon we just left and then we go through the madus the spir of the and at the end we're ready to be and now we're already on the level not of anymore now we're on the level of and that's why we bring it's known as the so says the if brought to the and he had a mind to eat one of the in other words he had piggle. He thought to eat but only one of the was that was brought together and he had in mind not to eat all the he had in mind only to eat one of the he says of cars it's piggle on the it's on the bread that you ol of cars but at the same time the hasheni as it relates to the other bread or the other sed of the it's only going to be ple but a car says now both breads and all the are going to be olive what's the isle while he's bringing the or had piggle while he's being the for the upon him and he was the on one of the breads, not on all the breads. So that's part the whole carbon is possible. No one's debating that. The debate is whether the special that's on the pigle so that if somebody eats it he's now going to be is it only on the bread that was the subject of the pigle where's and everything says but no smile of that the Mishna mentions is really the starting point of rais but if you know the rest of the story I'll tell you what used to say a much bigger if a is bringing regular carbon and he has a mind to eat the but he had a mind to eat the he didn't think about the it's not on the whole carbon's poser that he thought about even a bigger What the said the Mishna said there's two those are two independent breads says if you had a pickle on one bread it's not on the other bread I heard from even one carbon it's one unit it's all attached even over there if the thought about the it's not going to be on the same held that the can't be worse than something physical that makes a carbon possible. If one a of a carbon would become to would the entire animal become says if the animal's intact then the answer of course is yes we're talking about where the animal has been dismembered. So right now you have the you have the and there's an idea that if the comes to me it doesn't affect the so which is something physical certainly should be in the world of if you thought about the it shouldn't affect the same says in the and we learn from there's a par that says says that it only impacts that's the thing that you thought about it doesn't impact everything else regardless in the if brought and he had in mind is pickled was he was going to eat one of the the carbon's pickled there's nothing to talk about the question is the of does it only impact that that he had ava about or does it impact the other as well same case as if the was bringing which was and he had to eat one sed of the pos. The question is is it only on that he thought about or is it going to be on all the breads according to the it's always on all the breads you think about one it's like he thought about everything according to no say that that's where it's going to be the took and he dialed it up a notch he said this is going to be true even in a carbon where the carbon is attached if the thought to eat but of one side of the animal the he never thought about the it's not piggle of chorus on the and the gar now is going to ask aasha on and really the topic of the next is going to be and this is really a very very long let's leave it at that and this is an excerpt of a brio The Bryer is discussing the like our Mishna is discussing and the Mish the Bryer says that if a had while he's bringing these it's not pickle unless he thought about which at first glance the thinks means both breads. So if you thought about both breads then it's going to be pigle and then the bis says that even though the pigle is as we saw earlier in the week whether you're thinking or whether you're thinking the was always a says to that if a is bringing the kips and he had to eat both breads even if he didn't think to eat a full kaz of each bread. So the kazayas is only together with the two breads. That's going to be enough for to have a mash as pickles. Essentially the br is saying two things. The br saying number one you have to mash in both breads. That's the only way it could be pickle. If you in one bread not the other it's not going to be pickle. That's the first the second is that this is you could bear the two bread says the first deacon the price is that you have to be in both breads. If you want it's not going to be pickle who's the is it have to think of both breads if you the entire carbon becomes olive cards says it's pos who holds that you have to be mash in both and that's why this bry says the only way it's going to be pigle is if you think in bro stating that the bry said another kadesh what was the second kadesh that even though there's a sheer kazayas of the two breads to have a says if holds that is on one side of the carbon it's on the other side of the carbon not like said that if would be not like meaning if it's one goof it's posh even would agree that if on one side it's on the side. I understand why we can now look at the two breads of the as one with regards to being because even though they're not really one and here's the punch line that Rashi says quoting a Gmorra later and that is that the of the has an ability to create some sort of bond some sort of energy that now connects these two breads. That's something that the could do after. So even though the two breads are independent, we're going to look at them as one. What's making them one? The of the is making them one. So now you have one unit. So even though I have a half of his of this, I have half of his eyes of that, but I could look at the two as one. And but the is that only makes sense if holds that if two things are connected that we look at them as one with regards to. But if you're going to tell me that two parts of one ze are viewed independently does the and the as it relates to then goofy. How could the of the be better than two things that are physically together? The best the with regards to is think about both of them together. Thus his somehow bonds them. So now you look at them as they're both part of the same but are very nice they're part of the same but said that even when they're physically part of the same holds the two are not considered the same because so if they're looked at differently in the laws of pigle even when they're physically connected then certainly you have to look at them differently if they're only connected via this energy that was created through your and if they're viewed as differently how could half as this and half of this is the gmorra. This one line in a Bryce which must be raising but the Gmorrah says the cash is only aasha if the town of the B is maybe the town of the B is not it's really tiny. So who's this again talking about the one of the two and he had in mind to eat a half a zas of one of the breads and then he did the other one of the and again he had in mind half of the other bread said it's going to be now why is it going to be because over here during each one of the two you only thought about a half a and really the background is is that we're going to see in in in a moment and it's really going to be the topic of the that holds like most that that anytime you do an avoid and you have a piggle to the extent that the avoid is a or more accurately like we spoke at in the intro it's a matter it's not going to be unless you thought in the entire matter the classic example of the so ordinarily all the first mission but when it comes to all carbon only one So even though there's but really all you have to do is one with the exception of the all four or so what would be if you had avas pickled during one or two or three no it's not going to be pickle because each is only aim you need all of them together another example of m is our this morning the two together were matter after the so each is going to be said that if you had in mind on a half a of one of the two breads of the when you brought one and then you had in mind a half a zas of another one of the breads but while you brought the other it's not going to bear you know why because what you have at the end of the day is on each m which was each all you had was a zas but says the implied from rebias. It sounds like the whole issue over here is because you thought only on each katim. So you don't have anything. But let's say during each m you would think a full kaz but the full kazayas would be a halfas of this kala half of that sounds like is it would bear which is essentially that one line in the bryer that the gumar just brought. What was explicit in the bryer that the gummor brought three lines from the bottom of daf is implicit in what what rebi is saying is the gammorra maybe the tana of that affformentioned bryce is not the raon it's not it's so what if it's so look at rashi the let's the on top it's not if it's not you can't ask kashes on something raun said about from a so that's rabi but the gummor says it's very ice. You change the name maybe of who exactly the Tana is. But at the end of the day, Rebi has a what does Rebi hold? Who does he hold like in terms of our between if he holds like then you don't have to think in both even one because that's if you thought one of the on the other one of as well and if he held like so you're right said it in he didn't say it in rebi but is so at the end of the day it's it's still going to be aasha says the garra here I'm going back to the original again what was the said when says in the if you one bread it's notig on the other if you one side of the upon him it's not on the other side of the upon him it's true not only for two breads that physically are separate of each other it's true even in a ze you have a carbon and a carbon is made up of two parts you have the and you have the even over there that same exact is going to be true. The was that we have a Bryce over here where the Bry says the Bryce seems to say that if a doing with the and he's thinking piggle in the he has to be in both of the two breads. However, if he's a half his eyes of each bread that's going to be enough can't be the raon. Why not? Because you have to think both breads and you see in could bear of the two breads. Why? probably because the makes it one. But the problem is even when it's physically one, it's not one because are considered two. Then how could your make it better than being physically together? Says the really the what was the according to the why do you have to think in both breads? The Bryce says not with a tough with a not you have to switch it from tohan. What's the difference? The difference is not talking about being in the two breaths are not talking about being in both. And the punchline of what are trying to say is both sheep because each sheep is a matter and they're coming to say they weren't saying you have to think of both breads because that's in our think in one bread it's on everything. What is saying is you have to think in both sheep because of as it relates to the breads. But you could think only in what is not says if that's the case. What's the word? And if you look at Rashi says the word sounds like there's more than one. So if you say a vert and you preface it with the word you can't just say one it's there's a lot going on over here there's a lot of lus there's a lot of rain there has to be a lot of or at the very least in the statement that's being said and this line in the was prefaced by the magic word it says like this the way you're supposed to read it And really what it means is and the Tana then of the Bryce would be because essentially then what the B is saying is number one you have to be during both and number two you have to be in both breads. So it comes out saying it's that holds that you have to think both and it's also that whole you only have to be in one bread but so it's very nice the word number one both You have to think about both just think of one bread. No, that's you have to think of both. But if you're going to tell me that the tan is going of that bread says and the gear says only because you don't have to think in two breads. You only have to think in one bread. So what's the one? You're telling me you have to think both. Awesome as opposed to one meaning what's the coming to be that's the first so the how could say that smile I have a where is for sure the town of the how do I know that from the word this whole that we just learned but I know the town is and says that even though you have to be in both breads of the but the two for the which is that the two breads are considered connected they're all part of a if two limbs of an animal are not considered the same then how could two parts of a that are only connected via be considered one that's the first the second is next part of the dus The context over there is we know that it says the parish of the twice both times it says it is by a carbon and it's because of that holds that the only time this pigle is a carbon that was born that was born meaning that it's not similar to the schlam was born there's no piggle stating that there's a rabi says this pigle by carbonas that brought them were subject to the laws of pigle stating that only if you meet two criteria you have to check off two boxes number one the being done has to be avoid that's being done in the as opposed to being done in the additionally the had to be about that's going to be done in theor again as opposed to a that's going to be done in the now what part of the of the was done in the the was known as and part of the obviously by definition but it was only the of course was done in the we spoke about the the was done in a the was done in the azar the was done in the same was done in the azar was done in the aar it was the primarily that was not done in the azor but rather was done in the that's this was standing in he had in mind to while heing to do the why isn't it's true happened while he was but it was it was about something that he's doing if he was standing in the he said here he's standing physically in the and he has in mind to do such as or to do again it's not because now so again in each case there's a when is it standing because over there both are he's standing And it's and he's thinking about doing something he's thinking about doing that happens in the he's thinking about doing that happens in the very nice who said this in the name of that's what we need. So this is talking. So essentially is saying that if that's all we wanted from this that had to do which we know is but we need to know it's why we need this. So it's says what became when he had what became pickle did the dam become pickle meanly? Everyone knows dam doesn't become pickle. It's a pickle. Mean these are the following things that don't become pickle. Meaning if you eat them of course what became the boss became pigle. Whoa. What's going on over here? You're thinking about the dam and the boss is becoming pigle says the garb creates piggle chest on the certainly smile says the says this is from yesterday stopped right at the beginning of the par. So what was the right at the beginning of the par was if was doing and he had a mind to be the according to it's not going to be but if he had a mind to be the was over there that it's going to be so says the we have another in the walls of pigle let's see what said the in the case where the piggle was to be what's becoming pickle is the becoming pickle meaning he's saying it's pickle so if somebody eats the it's the same rice we just mentioned we just said that doesn't become pickle it's the becomes pickle says the over there where you weren't So if the thinking in the can make the big then how could you tell me that if you thought about the smell is not going to be big says the checkmate three on's understanding in meaning it's posit that held that only said regarding the only said with regards to the upon why why is unique enters and he says I'm going to tell you because is something that on the one hand even they're two breads but they're also one they're one in the sense of each other you couldn't just have one you had to have each other called later in there's a certain between one and the other, but they're also because physically they're two. Therefore, sometimes you look at them as one, sometimes you look at them as two, they become one. We look at them as and therefore holds that if you had a on both a half his eyes of this and half his eyes of that. You look at them as one cuz the two could bear to give me the stating that but if you were of them then we look at them as separate and the reason is that because the at the end of the day made them into two simply because physically they're and that's where holds that if you one the other one's not going to be because you want to know time it's not because he looks at every of the carbon as being independent no a carbon is one. There's nothing to talk about holds on two because in fact even could be one. But the bottom line is that is said with regards to breads. He said it regarding the and regarding the upon him that if he one it's not on the other the other breads that were brought as carbon but if he was to eat some of the what would hold on the others are not that was that came with many breads as well. So one of the ideas that we had on Alf was the of the matter. Rashi asks two kashas. Rashi asks two very important kashes. If you look at is a very long rashi and rashi over there asks two very important kashas. Rashi asks is that it sounds like from the there's one mayor who holds maki. Everybody else holds if that's the case throughout we've already seen this theor talks about how if the did and he had it'sn't because there were two tracks that took place while the was being brought in order for the to be considered to have been brought properly. You had to do a with the you had to do a with the so the was done with the had a counterpart which was take the out of the same exact and put it on the now it's not called it's called but why isn't always considered and being that the most is that matter why is the throughout At the beginning of referring to someone having this as pigle at the time that he did as a good you should have to be while you did the and then again while you did the says Rashid you have to say that even though it's true that the or the both together created the and they both created together the but at the end of the day you know why kit is not considered matter because there was no kit that was done with the lev At the end of the day, one was and one was so being the Mtor that would be a classic case of because they're both doing the of the two as we saw this morning that would be they're both doing the each because it's all the same. But over here, even though they're very similar and they mirror each other and they parallel each other, but one is and one is good, it's not the same thing. I mean that it's not the same thing. You look at an next week, but for now that is that's the first part of Rashi. The second part of Rashi Rashi says that the is that it's only that holds. Let's review a gumar that we learned together yesterday. So the first begins with a was doing which just established is a is a m it's a matter. So the was doing and he had if his was to be is it's going to be pickle. Everybody agrees it's going to be pickle. If the was to be over there the is that it's not going to be there say it's going to be pickle says it's not going to be pickle. The garra says that it would have been very easy to make a mistake in this meaning there would have been to think that the reason holds that if he's doing is because he holds meaning you could have very easily thought that that's being only being to do and is only so maybe that's but says the that's not I know that's because that if you do the matter it is just like a matter is also matter they're the two sides of the same coin they're the twois that make the complete matter so if you're doing the is because then how could distinguish between is not because of matter What's that's hold SAYS WHAT comes out then of this do the back of the envelope arithmetic means it comes out because the gar is timing that just like you can't be in you shouldn't be able to is not because of in other words holds by the way says it comes and that means everybody holds it doesn't matter if you're doing the and you're thinking about or if you're doing although there is but that's for a whole another reason they the fundamentally that would be an right over here with the says that if you during one of the only mayor holds it's going to be pickled because only holds and the truth is we're going to see on Sunday the whole with so what's going on over here what's going on over here would seem to suggest that would seem to suggest you have to say it's two separate very very posh it's a rash very very posh the is discussing a is doing a m and he has a good mash piggle a during a m is that a mak's piggle or is that not a mash piggle the in the is it's not a mash pigle there's one who holds But and that's that if you had a piggle during the was doing is discussing where the was doing a full m he was doing we just spoke out the first part of a m he was thinking about doing he was to be the he was to be a matter M is in the it's not that he's doing a m and having a he's doing a m he's just thinking about aim over there. When do we say aim? That's when the happened while you were doing. When do you say that's when you were only thinking about being that you were doing that is only in the world of over there that you're going to have a but there's a very very very big problem and the problem is that what's in the a little bit yesterday what's this if you that somehow that should be an issue. We know that you say is you're thinking about and that's why when it comes to a carbon there's four types of which is and which is you're thinking about that's what it is the counterpart as it relates to you're thinking about that's but you say to pickles you what would be the when it comes to the when I'm doing the we of piggle states that is the read the bylaws of pigle that's what it says you need to be doing a m okay I'm doing so you trip up because it's only but as it relates to what the has to be it's a different bylaw there the law states You have to be thinking about a so if I was thinking about it's very nice it's only a world of m this but we're not living in the world of m you're living in the world of at the end of the day why should be worse than it's enough it's in the world you know as briskar asked and said parrots. And if you want to see it inside, you can take a look in the he brings it beautifully. It reads easily once you go through these. It's a little bit of an oxymoron. It reads easily. But the the point is is that we've gone through many of these gar together and regardless it's in that's where he brings this and said based on two from first is the second is first we keep on saying that is you're doing an one of and all four cases they they fall under the purview of either stating that said it's not true said it's a mistake said it's true for three out of the four types of it's true it's true for together the lumbness of that is you're doing an aid of matter and you're thinking But when a does for example and he has a mind to do this said why that's a whole another discussion but not and the reason it's not because why then is because there's a new there's a second there's a that states that if a client is doing and He has a to do an which being that you're doing X and you had a mind to do Y concept and it's for that reason it's going to be said primarily to beginning in the context of so for example is possible that means if you We know that it's going to be possible. What if a was doing and he didn't think but he had in mind that when he does this it's going to be says it's going to be possible says no says how do I know the if and he would have in mind to do the wouldn't it be so what's the difference if a was doing he had a mind to do the it should What's do pickle has nothing to do with has to do with the fact that you're doing and you that's why it's not you can't make while you're doing the ver is I'm doing and the is possible because I was thinking about while I was doing what does that have to do with doing and thinking that when I do this it's going that doesn't work with it works. I was thinking to do the and that renders the carbon pickle. So says if you find the concept of when it comes to pigle you should find the concept of when it comes to then said even a big said that being that we just established very clearly from there's other as well but very clearly from that says that the of when it comes to being I'm going to tell you And it's where that is is that the together of what the definition of is to do is and what the definition of is when we say that if you had the pigle while you were doing that it would be meaning the that's going to govern the you have to think about in order to establish A piggle of is the same of what dictates what's a that says that if you had while you were doing this that the carbon would be possible. It's the same exact says that means if so what's you put the blood in the wrong part but the ber you can't eat the ber you can't be but the ber has issues you can't put the buster anywhere near the ber said says the if a claim was doing this he hadn't mind it doesn't work why like everything we've been saying this morning because what's the lumbness of why you could be while you're doing this not because it's because it's a matter and this is not matter it's so but then the gmorrah says even a bigger you know what the garra says if a was doing listen carefully and he had in mind to do a that's big right but this that he had in mind to was going to be see had a mind to do it's like how do I know that and it's there's a a rashi that explains it a rashi says one buzz word that reverberates within the brisk I know it because if the is that you can't be while you're doing then if you THINK ABOUT AT THIS PIGGLE UP. WHAT'S GOING ON over here? What does have to do with THE OTHER? I CAN'T be methagle while I'm doing a why not because and I have to be while I'm doing a mish but it's not a m but why can't I beagle in what's the criteria FOR it's certainly said that the together of it's not enough of you and being that your bus is not considered that if you had while you were doing it, it should be big. So it's not that if you thought to do it, it's not going to be big either. upon him says just to summarize and that is that ordinarily the definition of pigle is is that you're doing it's not the way it works by zero's piggle is not because of the of that it's a but rather it works very very differently together is I'm doing an I had in mind to do the but the of the is because I was a and if that's the case has to be an if it's not an is that's when it comes to and that's the beer in why you need but because even though but in the laws of pig it's not considered because the definition of the of is in the definition of what is in terms of if I had a while I was doing that it's going to be that's the First the second is beginning of the week we learned between together and it impacts and it impacts what it means is about to do this weekend there's no boss too flesh you can't find there's no that's going to go there's no bosser Yeshua says if you don't have a kazer you can't do the z rea says what does one have to do with the other zer comes primarily to create kapara all the bos related are there's no reason you shouldn't be able to but that's an impossing as well if there's no at the time that the wants to do the so says you can't do the says no you could do the kit what do the other as long as he going to get the purpose of what the is coming for I don't care is is so doesn't bother me the rahu is always like bless that is always like dusting and and if there's no you can't go ahead and do the stating that there's a steer in the because when the Rambam brings the of says the Rambam that if there is no Ber you can't do this what if a did when there was no says it's not a good when the rabbing says the and I quote come says Don't do the but if you went ahead and you do the then is that it's going to be okay and asked the obvious why when it comes to does the say that even if you go do this it's not going to be good yet when it comes to the says clearly But the if you did do the is going to be we know that the of the mirror the you have you put the in that's you take the that's and then you knock the that's the truth is there were two things that were put on the by every carbon there was the dam There's and then there was there was said I have rias from the ram that the ram held that there was an the equivalent thereof of the also where's the equivalent thereof in other words accomplished two things it wore two hats number one it's there's no dam this is number two it's also the it can accomplish both things I'll just read to you says the that means the does two things. It's the that really never really works when it comes to it's cuz what are you going to tell me the he wants to put the under his back? He looks around he can't find any there's no ber if there's no buser how could I go ahead and do the it's not true there is ber you know what the buser is the is the buser because the same that holds says Isima. What's the definition of bas? You have to HAVE EITHER BASIS. SAID you always have you have the where's the held that although it's true of Yeshua's was said by because you have to have the but at the end OF THE DAY YOU DON'T HAVE THE WHAT you have is the with regards to because for that Yeshua did say you just don't have the what's the difference either you have it or you don't have it so maybe we'll talk about that on Sunday that's a whole different lumbness a whole but that that's already a whole different but as it relates to right now a major lumus that the way is the main impact is not the same the way it impacts a carbon you can have where I have but I don't HAVE ANY IT'S never going to be possible let's take it back to our now we're learning a where was the he did and he had in mind to be m only the or only The is should there be an issue of the SAYS THAT COMES OUT over here that's the but what's why are we talking about is the that if I'm doing could I be or not but over here I'm we're discussing what my was in my all I need is is that so is that so that's true when you're in baser in but when you're in you have to be in a and what's the definition of avoid whatever means in the sense of that if I was while I was doing the big that's the definition of if I had to do that and just like you find your boss therefore if he's not gonna be either so and halo are both connected. The may be the lumbus of pigle ink works like the lumbus of and lundus is basically going to state that you need to be invoid and if that's the case you'd have to be in the entire matter because being that you need it's not going to be so therefore it's not going to be enough. So just like you can't be because it's not considered and when it comes to you need so too if you're in or it's not going to be either because just like you can't be in a m I can't be thinking about either it's true the But it's also I mean that it's also on the imm level there is a concept of that's why this whether it passes to say when you which at first glance is said that based on the two of you number one that the piggle in is piggle in the number two that the really wear two hats and that was the shock of attire the thought maybe you have because maybe piggle in is piggle in just because it's so it's if that's the case if I can't be while I'm doing I can't be in a matter this has nothing to do with m because it's true I'm being I'm thinking in a matter but I don't need that void of the in order to make it I could have and by I don't need aim I just need that it should be and based on that it's going to be