Menachos 25

Today's d is and we are at the very top of the so the topic of today's daf is the tits specifically the special power that the tits had to make certain avoid that technically should have been invalid valid. So we know that the big day kahuna were like living organisms. They had a ko for themselves. The Gmorra says in the end of is a very bombish one of the most but the last is and one of the things the discusses just like the had an ability to etc. etc. And the Gomorrah went and listed all the big day kahuna and correlated them to a particular a and mentioned that the big day kahuna had an ability in of themselves to be stating that that sits which was one of the big day kahuna had an additional ability. Not only was it like big day kahuna were not only was it the or in the case of the to be able to do the avoid so that he shouldn't be aim but that sits was also specifically as we'll see in the Mishna and that's really the topic of today's if the dam of the carbon of the carbon or the buser of the carbon became where ordinarily now that part of the carbon is t that should pose some serious challenges to this being done in a way that's there's a concept of the tits being and that somehow allows us to look away from the fact that this involved as it relates to the we'll see that during the course of the d but for now this idea of is applied to again that's the theme of the beginning of we're taking that we've already learned some of the more and important fundamentalis and we're applying them If the mates of the became anyway no worries that works. What if the was although the is but it's only it's not the says referring to the that's the mentions this special that that sits has to be the Pik says that by wearing the tits is going to carry he's going to somehow make go away the of what are we discussing it says we're referring to the says regarding which although the we always refer to that it's say that thou shalt not think bad thoughts when you bring your garbage they even get malus for because it's the but that's not the we're not going to consider the carbon in other words the carbon is posit so you see clearly that is not of if it's referring to that of it says regarding so which of is the four. And what would be the reason to say that to should be different than it should be different than because you find a certain in the and that is if certain carbonas were able to be brought thus you see a certain when it comes to so it makes sense if it says it's for certain it's for the of in other words you don't find any when it comes to you don't find any when it comes to you do find when it comes to thus when the says very ambiguously now we don't know what is it makes sense to say that which is it it's the of these the only three that you have in so that if it's not it's not piggle by process of elimination it must be to mit say maybe it's and that too is so the same that you have in that it's not but the says in this same context of the and we learn from there is a that by definition is note where does happen when it's when it's not in the of the thus there's a that says that the that has to be can happen anywhere but it could also happen as opposed to that by definition was not maybe it's talking about the or of with his left hand which is one of the that I mentioned with regards to and maybe that's what it's referring to and that too has the same Because oner the when he carried the and the carried one of them with his left hand and the of the was considered an thus you see you could do with your left hand as the same maybe that's what this was when we say what we're trying to find in this context is we're trying to find we are The exists in another area yet the terror looked away from the such as which is doesn't mean that by a carbon there's no there's no such thing as to of course such a thing as toma certainly according to that there is a of it has implications even we say that despite the fact to and ordinarily tuma creates when it comes to is not going to create soul thus it's I found a place where there's and doesn't impact the carbon so through here that sits will be and say despite the fact that this still that sits is going to be on the to as opposed to smile where although you find you find that smile is mut in another place on your kipper but over there it's not the there's a soul smile but the said despite the fact that it's possible it's okay there's no soul smile at all so although throughout about is that often will refer to smile as but it's not the same as in that there's yet it's still smile is but really there's no smile in the example of where it's and being that we're playing on the word suggests thus doesn't fit the criteria as well as does therefore for it sits on it's not on a different how I know that sits on because the says sounds like there's something wrong with the there's something wrong with the actual it became or piggle in this case as opposed to smile where there's nothing wrong with the what's wrong is with the problem is the mish the ken did the in the wrong It's not maybe it means which is also and there's no when it comes to so it's also so you can check off all the boxes it technically meets all the criteria so maybe when the success regarding the tits Maybe it means that if there was in the carbon that sits as how do you know it's being told back another says yeah the says twice that when it comes to obviously there's nothing being not even the tits because if the tits was the terra wouldn't say bottom line is by process of elimination we went through some we went through piggle, went through noiser, we went through smile, we went through y, we went through, it must be that when the says that now asks some obvious questions maybe it's the if you look in they have other bottom line is the only went through a sampling of other if you want to work out some of the other that I mentioned in the bottom line is it's more oppressive than anything else Because remember the Torah doesn't say anywhere what did S was maratza for. But we know that S was mara that's a pos in the Tory. What was the Matza for? That's the Mishno. It's Miratza on. So if it's a case of a it's going to be on and the and the as we'll see in the course of the death in the context of which is what we're learning right now. Either way, if the dam became and then so dam became and now there was if it happened. If it happened to me, how could it be? That's it. Says that's our Mishna. Our Mishna discusses it in the context of a this Bryce over here is discussing it in the context of a zebra. Now the Bryce is a little bit unclear because the Bry is differentiating between and the question is what happened and what happened with me. I'll present two ways how you could learn this became and was done if it became that's option A. Option B would be Tommy. I don't care how it became if he did. So the truth is we'll see at the end of the is going to be exactly how to learn this. But for now we'll follow Rashi says. So for now, Rashi says it's not important to know necessarily whether are referring to the or the bottom line is we'll leave it for now. The reason it's interesting that it's not important to know that is because the whole topic of the DA is going to be this idea right now. The but for now there's going to be some suspense and foreshadowing. We're going to be left hanging now knowing whether this which is the topic of the entire doubt. We don't even know what the definition is. Does it mean it became or does it mean that Zero was dumb? Either way, the price continues when that's true for it. What happened? We don't know. It worked. when it comes to the carbon of a nonjew. Either way, what we need for this next part of the DA right now is the Bryo is distinguishing between a carbon and a carbon as it relates to the mirata. When it comes to a carbon, the only time that sits as bas is not when it comes to a carbon. It doesn't matter if it was bash. So there's a between a carbon and a carbon specifically as it relates to when it comes to a carbon that sits as it's not when it comes to a carbon that sits for a minute. I'll ask you a This price says clearly that those are the two parts of this that we really need. So you see clearly that it sits as even for so it's a blatant contradiction. So the is going to apply a that's completely unrelated to what we're learning right now. But there's an a principle in that that our thinks is relevant. That is there's a that you're not letting from what happens if a person does it says the true if you did it ain't true says no it's always true doesn't matter if you did doesn't matter if you did it's always going to be true now what's in the tanama says only ain't true presumably he holds that made that they held Even though it's good, which means that it's not meaning it's okay to but don't do and if you do it said then no even though it's not something you're supposed to do but meaning if a person does something that he wasn't supposed to do we give him a and say that it's not going to be Okay. Or do we not give a mass says the gam if the tit is b then the tit is also the only that the tit should be is because we're going to be so we're going to say the maze that you're going and you're taking down that's you're putting it on the I know the tit is but still you're not supposed to do so why do you do since means if it happened but why are you doing so let's go ahead and give a but the question is do we cancel a person for doing something that he wasn't supposed to do. It seems to be in the Tanakama says, "Yeah, we do." Therefore, the Tanakama holds that if someone's says, "We're not." If that's the case, the two bryes that we have with regards to a that did whether or not the should be okay. meaning that sits should be or that sits should not be according to the who hold that we were someone that's so that sits will only be for it's not going to be amazed we never give a even for so there's going to be noas even if the carbon became either me or was amazed whichever one it means we don't know yet rashi says but for right now it doesn't matter The point is ma doesn't have any impact. So me doesn't have any impact. That's the second that says it's always going to be the first therefore is the tanakama of that mish makum and the second is going to be of that one have to do with each other one to do with the one is discussing that sits being the other one is discussing. It's one principle that they have. There's one common denominator and that is you weren't supposed to do it. You did it. We know it's okay. What if you did it? Is there a or not? The t of the first B in our holds is a class of that's why it sits is not it's a class the second B is who holds that when we're not but says you can't say that of this B you know I know that because this second said that it sits in addition to being it's bas that became tommy and it's that became Tommy as And the truth is it's whether the tits was on that became Rashi says everybody agrees that was that's mission nobody argues with this everybody agrees that the tits was on that's the part of the animal the buser that went on the that became the question is what about the baser that was eaten if it became to was the tits miratza or was the tits not miratza now just to be clear everybody holds that if baser becomes Even though that sits as maratza, it doesn't allow the person now to go ahead and eat the basa. The kayan couldn't eat the basa. The bum couldn't eat the baser. You're not let it's very very and it doesn't matter sit not. What does it mean that that is so right here on the say but we'll just speak out one and that is it's going to be the topic of tomorrow's talk by the way. Yes. We had it already. That means if there's no or there's no that's you can't go ahead and do this. What happens if the boss became the sits will be and it will say that even though the Tommy which means a bosa which means a no sits is maratza but the tit is not going to be basic to allow you to eat the bosa. What's the lus? What's the methodology since works? So as the bos relates to but since doesn't work for so as it relates to for that it's it's not going to work. But the bottom line is is this price that said it's clearly of the opinion that sits is not just on it's as well. It's what's known as in vernacular sits on the not to allow you to eat it. But to say that this of the problem with saying that the second Bryce is who holds that we're not just like you're not but if you do it even it's so you want to say that if the tumor it's okay it's very nice you're applying a principle in a principle in we'reing over here it's beautiful it's very very the problem is that is of the opinion. And we have information about as it relates to can't be the time of the you know what maybe flip that second. Okay. But theor says you can't switch that last because if you switch that last it's very nice will hold it'll be the second that we began the d with it's all good right the problem is then is going to walk away holding that the tit was not problem is we have a long-winded bryer it's going to take us almost to the bottom of the oven now where the is just going to prove one thing that holds that the tit was also so you can't tell me a that sits holds because I know so what are we going to try to accomplish now with this longwinded because it's going to be very easy to forget what we're going to try to accomplish now is is that cannot hold at that thi must hold eight if he sat he can't be the t of the previous which means we're left with a okay how do you know the rebel holds to not an easy bryer. I would think that if bas became tom before and somebody to went ahead and ate the you would think he should bear. So we know that if somebody that's to some of the harder sis in kachin eats kachchinars. So if someone that's eats kachch that's it's a problem. But if someone is t and eats kachchin that's even a bigger problem. is more than Tomas bos if somebody eats but Tomas he's car this Bryce is discussing if somebody that was Tom atech but the was and in addition to being also so essentially the that's the in the context of that was you would have thought It says that the Torah says and we make a only where you can say the words meaning that's not and being that is not if someone's tummy is not if you're going to make such a hkish and you're going to say that the only time a person's for eating is if it's maybe if it was once but right now it's not that too will be enough to say that he wouldn't be of meaning what we're being from this package that it has to be is something that was never it became before so it was never what if it was and then something happened to it later such as maybe that came about after this maybe that too should be enough of to tell me that being that it's not so you don't have so maybe you shouldn't have the luck of somebody eats meaning very nice hesish but how do you know where to draw the line with the hish why you tell me something that was never mut such as it became t before. So over there the is that a coin that eats it or it's not didn't become before just it's before that is that a coin that eats it is not going to be you're limiting the application of the hish maybe broaden the application of the hish and say that any time right now it's not even if it was once something happened till later such as no there's a boy says You just said you can't bear maybe should be like point is you have so you can't be everything you also can't be everything says we have a we have a meaning sometimes if eats something that's well he's going to be and sometimes if Tommy eats something that's he's not going to be what we say is it makes sense to be and say you'll be if you eat something that was once and that you won't be if you eat something that was never m so if the tummy eats it before was never m because ra's m as a result he's not going to be kar if he eats it when there was a mis piggle let's say he's not going to be karis because it was never m because you never had kosher that's to be m If the ken ate it when he was where it was not but it was because of something that happened after that such as the was it was something that happened after the was done there were full everything was okay over there he's going to be so the bottom line is is that is not allow if he eats but there's a limitation he's only if he eats kchim that was at the very least once royal. But if the kum itself was never you were never able to say on this piece of meat because it was never ever there was no in that case he's not going to be continues the price and this is the part we need is the says that if the boss would become before and then the would eat it after is the tummy for eating this would be why is he if it became before this then it never had a and based on the rule of the he should be and the reason is because I think that is so that says that even though there was a even though physically you can't eat it but that we looked at it as if there was a and it's considered and as a result if the tomy's going to eat He's going to be of course. Okay. What do we want from here? It sounds like from this that only if it was it okay is it considered enough that if Tommy eats it afterwards he's going to be but what if it would have been then it sounds like if Tommy would eat it he wouldn't be. Now the truth is that's a big who is the whole it's all and you see that the is you see that sits works for because in this discussing the it's discussing it in the case where the bos that's the whole over here where a ken tommy ate boser he's eating boser of a carbon where the boser itself became We're saying so you see number one you also see that at the time that this holds because the bry seems to hold that if the bus would become the would work to tell me that but if it would be in other words so you see that there's a here that holds the one that holds Now it's very nice. It's in the mentioned on top. But that's all true. If you're not apric you can have a stero and you can't make an apocry a must be then you have to leave the previous the way it was which means holds eight it's that holds its hold if you keep that means we started off with two bry and we wanted the first bry to be the the of the and we wanted the second to be in the it's very nice you want to apply that when we don't make a so we can still say the problem is that also and based on that we just knocked out the first terret so the first ter was that doesn't said, "Stret just changed their names." The second you just said, "Holds." But theorist asks a very obvious question. is not where do you find anywhere that holds that is going to be the says yeah in fact the same exact way that we know holds that the same that we're applying to our to make us think that would that sits with I have the same exact information about the time before what was the we had it was in I have the same exact rebel in the continues and says and this would have been a on the first maybe by which is not so over there we're not when it comes to amaze it but maybe which is more we are the says I hear the you want to make a between I'm buying I have no problem with that but who is the t it has to be somebody who's going to be the time of the it has to be either we know it can't be because of an issue and the bride sits so bezer it has to be one of those two and even though you can make a I got it the London can go crazy here and tell me you're not the fact I'm sure there's a you could say and throws out a very obvious one. One is Truman and one is Kachchum. That's pretty obvious and is always but at the same time who is it? It has to be somebody. there is and the best we can come up with is that it's initially alternatively either way those are the first two of the but there's another two and ra says it's not because the truth is when we saw the bryce originally we saw that the bryer left us hanging right it wasn't clear in the bryer when the bryer said me what was so you have two bryers one bryer says on the you We have another Bryson that says sits on it's a stero really before you ask the stero you have to ask yourself what does mean maybe what means in one and what means in the other is not the same thing we pose two possibilities one possibility was it was the second possibility was the was being dig the is going to say two additional to roots and to answer this both are going to be alone this theme that what means in one B is not what means in which what does mean in the first B what does it mean in the second B those are the two says to when it comes to the second B is discussing how did it become did it become or did it become if it became tom it's going to be when it comes to so the first price is discussing this the second price is discussing the tum there's no steer this if this happens that's what the second price is saying that's what the first price is saying the second price is not about the second price about the tuma if it became even it doesn't matter it's still going to be same but just the opposite as it relates to this as it relates to the law again's ter was that the Second Bryce is discussing the first B is discussing to so as it relates to it doesn't matter if it happen it's going to be for as it relates to there you have the idea of doesn't it sound like in this one other again who is where you have you can play with the words so it can work with exhale. So the topic of today's was really one topic it's the of we saw a few in today's da number one we saw the idea of is only even though the seems to speak in more general terms what's so the by process of elimination said that it's referring to the what does it mean that is on it means that if the carbon was which part of the carbon the dam the if it means the baser as well but if a part of the carbon was and now the was done there was a special for the tits to bea that said that even though technically based on the ordinary laws of kachum because this to this carbon the carbon shouldn't be maratza that sits is meatza it allows s us somehow to have a a carbon that's cautious despite the fact that really this carbon should be possible. So just before we get into the real raid just two things that are important really in terms of understanding and that is when we talk about the being an so what it means is that if the go the cenle cuz he's the one that wore the tits was wearing the tets at the time that the was done with this carbon that's tame although the zika really shouldn't be miratza that sits allows that that's the he asked the man in the street that's what he's going to tell you stating that and rash in other places in says a tremendous he says that when we talk about the what matters is whether the was wearing the tits at the time it became or not meaning what matters is not what was going on at the time of the z but rather what matters is what was going on at the time of the toma. So if the kangala was wearing the sits when the toma happened then you're going to have the sits maratza. If the kangala was not wearing the sits at the time of the to not going to have tits maratza but here's the punch line. If the kod was not wearing the sits at the time that the toma happened, but he was wearing it at the time of the even though the what'sa it doesn't matter. Sits miratza means that the sits is working at the time of the that's what matters. It does not matter whether he's wearing it at the time of his in his asks. He doesn't understand what caused to learn this way. He says that's you would think that the way since Mirata works is if the kanga was wearing it since at the time of the then it's going to be Moratza. Who cares what was going on at the time of the to the takes place when the takes place. So tits mirata you would think works in tandem with this somehow it gives it kayak. So you would think the needs to be wearing the tits at the time of this why were how and did Rashi think that since the and the leaves it and we're going to leave it at that note as well but the truth is that really this and this and and the way that we're going to speak about right now is really in one mand because the truth is there is a mand that holds that sits was bid also So Rash is coming to explain the mandar that holds that the had to be wearing the tits in order to have tits. When did he have to be wearing it? Says Rash you would have thought he had to be wearing it at the time of this. No, he had to be wearing it at the time of the but the truth is that that in itself is whether the had to be wearing the tits at all. There's a that says even if he wasn't wearing it. So according to that says the kang be wearing the tits. It's simple. The tits was even if he's not wearing it. We're going according to the ma that holds that had to be wearing the tits. When did he have to be wearing it? You would have thought the shasar says that's the Rashi says not that way. Rash says it's not to in the sh but rather it is to in the sh of now for the hash topple the raam in the end of and we've spoken about this many many times saysam says it's the big even if it was in the they get mouthless. And the reason is because one of the big was the was made up of and even though it's okay to wear the but it's only when the doing the he has the of the and as a result it's okay for him to wear the big but if a is wearing the big even if it's in the B mikdash it doesn't matter he's still going to get malus and the Reason is because he's wearing he's being and as a result he's going to get malus for what for the silver then why isn't it always a problem because ordinarily says the when he's doing the he's being what's the mitzvah the mitzvah of we spoke out that's not saying where the ra holds that wearing the big day is in of itself a mitzvah That's the immagaris the income but that you do is the rabbit asks two kashas the first the rabbit says is wrong made a mistake first of all the rabbit says the was allowed to wear his big there's a discussion If he can wear it out the says that's the first the second that this said that the reason the will get mouthless if he wears big is because of the le why is the ram only mentioning the what about the and the aphoid the and the aphoid also had collide and The truth is is the whether the abn had collide. So really the cash is a very strong why is the saying that the is based on the which is questionable whether it had shness say the everybody agrees it's that it was made up of. So if the and the were made up of why did the ra what happened to the and what happened to the and the another the intto the ra brings the same over there so this ram is in where the ra's discussing the other is in hikto where the ra's discussing says the ra big kun says from the big and it's for that reason it's okay for the to wear his big says the with the exception of the says the ram over here went out of his way to tell me this with regards to again it's for that reason says the why is it only the why not the says that it was only the had to be worried about the mitzvah but as it relates to the there was no such issue. Why not says the based on the gumar that we learned today? We learned at Gmorra today that the tits was maratza. What does it mean the tits was marata? If the carbon became tommy, whether it was the dam, whether it was the and according to one mand, even if the basa became tommy, ordinarily that would disqualify the carbon. But there's a special of sits and there's a ch that says when was it sits if it was if the was wearing the sit it says the bas that's posh although it's not posh but if it says the bi that's posh that when we did say that tits was it means that the was wearing all his big he was wearing the then there was a power for the tits to be says the if that's the case there's no such thing as when it comes to the god Because if the is wearing the even if he's not doing he's not being the he's not bringing the he's not doing but at the end of the day if the is wearing if WOULD HAPPEN AT THAT MOMENT THE way and that is that sits with that means weary that sits in and of itself always has a so it's ALWAYS IF IT'S THERE'S NO SUCH THING as that's why the brought SAYS WHY NOT BECAUSE IT'S not possible when it comes to the only is there a concept of but by the sites it's always going to be that's the says Goliath bit me. I don't understand why is the Rama talking about why it talk about the a cuz who wore the ag and the a being that it was only the worsh and the a it wasn't the and the ra that the whole is only the it's not the you can't talk about it's not it's of that's why it's only the it's not Why mention the not mention and the tells a fascinating and a well-known stories. Yesterday we had the about and this is another story that's a classic tucked away in the middle of a super lish place there in that's the there's major lumpus over there but tucked in middle of a tells a story there's a story with melik he went to a certain city when he came back. He was really really pumped. And he called the he made a for and he tells the I think now would be a good time to remember once upon a time our humble beginnings. We are our ancestors were building the second and they would eat. They didn't have anything. They would eat salty food. Let's sit down on the floor and let's eat. And this is an amazing event. This is literally the best of times. And there was one person who was sitting at the meal who was a ish late. Quite the resume. And turns to Yan Melik and he tells him, you know, the Orthodox Jews, they don't really like you very much. So says, "Really? I mean, how do I know? Maybe you're not telling the truth." He says, "I'll tell you." Put on the tits. So see, he says, "Put on the tits." Rashi says that when you're going to wear the tits, it's going to cause them out of deference to the tits to have to tell the truth. You can ask him anything you want. That's the perfect blind detector and you're going to know 100% what's going on in their minds. So he went ahead put on the tits. There was an he says, "Isn't it enough that you're king? Why don't you let a real be?" It was a very big mistake. And the reason this person said this was because people used to say there was a rumor that although Yanik's father was a Yani came from the but his mother had been avoid and there were rumors that maybe she wasn't a result he's a and he's puzzled to be a let alone a either way people started looking into it at that suda they do their quick due diligence. Lo and behold the found out that with this said was not true and everybody left and the meal ended abruptly. So it started off as this unbelievable celebration with everyone sitting on the floor and they're remembering the Jews ate when they built the mikdash. It had a very bad ending. So this same bad guy turns to the says, you know, when a fight breaks out and and things end uncomfortably, so everybody leaves in a bad mood and then they get together and they make up. He said, "But you're a king and you're the you can't just let this end like this. You have to do something." So again said, "What should I do?" Says, "If you listen to me, kill them." So said, "Kill them. These are the he said, don't worry about the terror will be fine. office is not going anywhere. I tell you to destroy this. I said destroy the courses. So you see that at that moment became an what should he have followed back and said but this is before at that point hadn't been written down yet either way listened to what told him and he killed all the and the world was empty there was no tyrants one of the few times in history where A fascinating story. What part of the story do we need? So goes and he puts on the tits great and it's really rash already asks how is be able to put on sitting at a suda. You could just go ahead and and put on the tits. It's not so simple. Isn't there a big sha if you're just put ON BIG? THIS wasn't a hasn't say being that the Tyra says that sits should be on the so it sounds like he can even wear it but when it comes to and who was putting on even though IT'S A BIG TUM WHETHER YOU'RE ALLOWED TO put on You know why it's not aasha? Because over here you're dealing with the and he only put on the he didn't put on the other all he did was put on the but the truth is with this raid from the bi I don't know if it's maybe put on all the big you're not let why you not let because of this problem of shness but when it comes to the is never a problem of shness. Why is it not a problem of shness? because it's always has always been the bottom line is being that has always been for that reason it's not going to be an issue but just one final and that is that in his asks we've spoken out this kasha in the past very very briefly but we've never gone into it that is where the discusses that has is he a mazik does he now have to pay the orz And there's a that says that he's a and as a result he has to pay right it's a whether or not I think he brings the one of his mash that we know that we is overness it's the end of it's the rato and the reason is because the big had shness and he's wearing it. If a client does the it comes out he never did an because he did it with if he never did the it comes out he wore if he wore big he gets for if he gets he can't be so that he doesn't understand you're to the extent that you had it comes out If you're then if you like you're always GOING TO BE SO WHAT'S WHO'S THIS man you're going to be they bring it's based on that we've learned together and that is that we know that there's a terminology which at first glance sounds like an oxymoron but it's a terminology that's used it's called carbon piggle. What does carbon pigle mean? It means in order for a carbon to be pigle, it actually requires it's one of the intros to pickle that we spoke about last week. In order for to be pig, you actually need to do it needs. That's why if the carbon that was was that was had the mash was for example and a had a during one of the which makes the pos then he had a mashle. It's not pickle cuz it's not a kush or a carbon bigle because the shalishma knocked it out. You need that. The only thing wrong with this carbon should be pickle. But if there's something else wrong with this carbon, it's not going to be. But the point is there something called a carbon piggle and a carbon piggle in order for it to be a kosher carbon pickle. Using those words loosely needs if it needs a comes out what a does a with a pickle cuz if it wasn't a wouldn't be pickle. IT CAN'T BE PICKLE IF IT'S NOT AN. So what was the says was that every time a doesn't get for if that's the case because you're not it's not true. It's not it's either that's more the reason that it was a because requires and if it's not it's not so it was a it's not by definition as a result so you don't have a problem being like but that was brings a few but I was thinking maybe when the mission says we don't mean we meet a who said we meet a maybe you meet It's never because even though the was doing the mash is piggle so clapping the he was doing it was maybe but it's always a because this is always so if it's always a because it's always going to be a it's not thus he's not there's no problem of mish Calling.