Menachos 35

Today's is and we are six lines from the bottom of today's being learned and today's also being learned and so we're moving along in pero discussing of specifically the of specifically related to the four pars that are in the so we know that there are four paro in the why four parios because the mitzvah of fillin is mentioned four times and every time the tyra mentions fill in that entire para gets inserted into the fillin. What are the four parios? two of the parios that are tucked away at the end of paras what's known as the para of kadeshar and of very but within those paras mentions the mitzvah of additionally the two par of the par of and the par of either way there are four paras in the fillin that correspond to the four times that the mitzvah of fillin is mentioned in the tra thea that we are going to learn right now is going to discuss the seder of exactly how those four par are supposed to be lined up and unbeknownsted perhaps this bry is the subject of one of the greatest hakic controversies of all time says the garanon kit sidan So how are you supposed to be the four in the specifically we're talking about the parish of should be to the right side of the and should be to the left side of the weed that it's supposed to be just the opposite that's not Is it my right or is it your right from the standpoint of the meaning if I'm looking at you who's wearing fillin? So I'm going to read right to left then it's and it's smile. But if from my perspective looking at you that was right to left then from your perspective the wearer then what's my right is actually your left so that it's going to be in the reverse. So the Bryce that said it was talking about from the perspective the one that's reading the par so to speak looking at the one wearing fillain the said that seemed to say that it's that was talking from the standpoint of the either way. Then the Bryce cryptically concludes meaning being that from the perspective it's what would emerge then is is that the one that's reading if he were to read those paras he would read them he would read them in the order of there's a major how to understand specifically if you want to put names to the faces it's rashi says that what the bryer means when it says from the standpoint of the what it's saying is that if I'm the k so I'm looking at you who's wearing fillin so the parish that's going to be on the far right is going to be kadeshi The one immediately next to it is going to be the one immediately next to that is going to be and then the one on the far left is going to be. So the order is going to be in fact when the concludes and says what the BRC is saying is that being that that's the order it's in the order of the way that it's mentioned in the Tyra because Kadesh is the first of the four parishes mentioned in the Tyra V is second both in the end of paras is number three in paran and volume is number four in parv So that's the order and that's exactly the way it's written in the that's what the means when it fears. Now if that's what it means so how does that retrofit into the bright sashi says meaning if you're going from right to left so is the far right and is going to be second if you take the two left part and again you go in order from right to left it's going to be shama is going to be the one to the right and then is going be the one to the left. So that if you're going completely from right to left, it's says that if this is what the Bryson means, then why would the Bryson not just say it's what's this? The two right side parios and then the two left side parios. We're somehow splitting the four parachutes in half and we're making the right side and the left side and as it relates to the right side it's as it relates to the left side because of that says I think that what the B is saying is something else. What the B is saying is if you're going right to left I agree with what Rashi said it's first it's second when we say what we mean is the far left and is to its right so that the order is going to be then you're going to have and then you're going to have in the words of what you're going to have is the two paras that begin with the word they're going to be the two middle par whereas according to it's according to it's then you have and then you have this is what's known as the fill in and fill in respectively it's exactly how you're supposed to be mad the parish is one of the things that struggles with is to explain the last words of the of according to Rashi what it means is that from the standpoint of the it goes in order the seder of the way they're mentioned in the according to what exactly does that mean so for that already I said as a matter of fact some say that it's that there were old and old manuscripts that didn't even have those words so we're not even supposed to be said either way this is the we are going to revisit this in a major way in the raid. So again, a lot more to come as it relates to these two shittas, but I didn't think it was possible malpractice level to go through this gam without acknowledging that there are two ways to learn it and respectively. Either way we have a whole block of art something said in the name of his and this is really to this that we just said that in the event that a person switches the order of the par it's going to be possible this that we say that if you the order of the parish it's possible this is only true for so if you took one of the parish that was supposed to be gaviosa in the inside and instead you put it at one of the ends or vice versa then it's going to be a problem. But if you switch the order of two that are supposed to be on the inside or two that are supposed to be on the outside then already lea there's no issues that's going to be okay. So if you go with what are the two outer ones the two outer ones are kadeshi and shama what are the two inner ones it's and it's what is saying is that if you would switch for example which is a and which is a that would be a problem if however you would switch Israel both of which are gavios or you would switches with both of which areas that would already would be a less lumb that would not be initial but commented on what said and he said I don't understand your methodology why is it that if you switch an outer with an inner and inner with an outer it's a Because one is supposed to see meaning one is supposed to have an end unit, right? One's supposed to be at the end that it actually has a a way to see outside it has windows and the other one is supposed to be in the inside. Well, if that's the case, even if you swapped out two iners and two outers, it should be a problem because if I switch with soades is supposed to be on the right and is supposed to be on the left. And I flipped it. Allah said to me if it's meaning it's always in all situations going to be possible. Now this postcript to the that we began with is really a very important in the because really what it does is it raises the ante in a very very big way because the said that when it comes to sed you have to get it right and if you deviate and you get it wrong then the filled. So when you ask yourself is the right way to set up the film like or is the right way to set up the film like this is not a question of this is a question of you have to make sure you get it right because if you get it right the said it's what the definition of is but you would think that we like so the point is according to it's always going to be possible if you get it wrong here's the bottom Whether or not to say the paras is like rashi or like is huge huge huge it's not just semantics. It's not just yeah this is the preferable way of doing it. No. Again, we're going to get back to this later. Talk to another of his grace and that is the of So, what exactly is the So, we're all familiar with the right. So just think of your fillin and on the bottom of the fillin there's a platform that's wider than the actual bias what's known as the so underneath it you have this platform the fact that that's there it's not there for practical reasons maybe that also but the reason we have it is said is also said what's the so that's the little part of the platform that's behind the which is where The cash fill in is which is what the run through. So that area that is also said fill in the shin that's embedded in the is also additionally so the is made up of four individual they're separated by a wall as we'll see soon in the bay said that you need that the to be all the way to the mat so you have to make sure that The wall goes from the top and it's going to go all the way to the bottom literally to the makar the place where the tur is stitched and attached to the said you don't need it to go all the way down but as long as it's nicker right that's why you have these grooves looking outside from the so as long as it's nicker that you have those uh there that in of itself would be enough you don't need it to actually go all the way to the ground for that's right in fillin, he has to do a on the before he writes the fill. So there are times that sometimes before you do a mitzvah, you have to be to make sure you're going to do it right. So a good example is he has to do a to make sure that it's perfect that he's not going to render the animal that he's about to. So said that when it comes to the fill in you have to be what are you worried about the because you're concerned that maybe there's a hole inside the and if there's a hole then when the writes the on top of the hole the itself is going to have a hole in it. It won't be and one of the is in is that the has to be how do you know that it says right? So we learn from the has to be complete if there's a hole in it's not going to be okay. Right? So in the event that there's a and it won't be and you need that's why you have to make sure you do you don't need to do it's not necessary because the kumas itself is going to be because if there's a hole then when you write on top of it you're going to see the hole. So why do I have to do a a separate action of aika before I sit down to write it? you would have to do if you're not going to it while you're being but over here I'm going to know as I'm doing it as a result there's no reason to do the fact that the have to be black that's also when it comes to the fill in so you have to use so whatever the men that fill in is made of that's what the minus have to be made of but this is what we need you're right guys bane bane it doesn't matter if they're green, black, or white. Stating that you shouldn't make it red because of what are these two things. She says is if the are going to be red, it's going to look like this person has wounds and he's bleeding and it's a gay that he's wearing the fillin in such a state. The doar is were concerned that maybe it looks like this person was mishid during the time that he was wearing the fill in and as a result that's certainly very very inappropriate. The price continues and says he used to tie his fill and he would use heard this filling and didn't say anything. Is it possible that saw this and didn't say anything? They told him didn't see him. Had he seen it, he wouldn't have allowed it. Another was story within he used to tie his fill in with he is made of purple. He didn't say anything again. If he telling me that it has to be black is it possible that sadic saw him doing something wrong and didn't say anything didn't see it from because had he seen it he wouldn't have allowed it. Bottom line is what do you see from here? You see from here? You see from here it's red. You're supposed to stay away from but as it relates to the other colors at that point it's already going to be okay. That is a to what the just said and that is that's the now notice the like did a little digression. brought this to ask this kasha but then also threw in there were two stories with a big whose wore rits of different colors and they weren't that also at first glance seem to be a kasha but the deflected that because that knew but the for sure I mean it could be didn't see his town and it could be didn't see his son but for sure the says And if that's the case, how does the say like it's not it's the outside part that has to be that's when the says that if you want to make a different colors, you can make a different colors. It's the inside part. It's the part that you don't see. The part that you see has to be black. The inside part that we don't really care and as a result you want to make it another color just don't make it. If this Bryce is talking about the part that you don't see, we said don't make it red. Why don't make it red? Because of it looks like the person has wounds. Why these issues? You're not going to see it anyway. So if you're not going to see it, you're not going to see it. If you're going to see it, it has to be black. The ter says you're not going to see it. So why is it an issue? So the says because sometimes it flips around and if it flips around then you will see it. So If you want to make it blue or green or purple, one of these other color, it's not the end of the world. But to make it red because of the that's already something that's not okay more that govern the laws of the fact that a fillain has to be square. The bottom have to be a perfect square. That's also something that we know said that when we say that it has to be square what it means is when you sew it. So what do these two things mean? Says means that you have to be sh you have to make sure watch that it should be a perfect square even in the place where you tie you sew the bias the kita to the platform the tur that's underneath it. Where specifically do you need to be sure? So Rashi says because sometimes when you tie something, so you're going to pull the thread a little bit, if you're going to pull it a little too tight. So then you're going to ruin the perfect symmetry and as a result, it's not going to be a perfect square. So make sure when you sew it, you maintain the square. There's a here the is that it's not enough that it's a square on top, but you need that it should be a perfect square from top to bottom and all four sides. So even that area where you're sewing the kit to the tur needs to be perfect that's what it means what does it mean this is already geometry but there's a ratio that the diagonal of a square has to the sides of the square 1.4 for something and you have to make sure that you're going to keep that perfect ratio meaning it has to be a perfect script something at first glance there would seem to be that supports this idea that is philosin round number one he's putting himself into a simit and besides he's not the mitzvah oh sounds like a source right again so these two seem could be saying the same thing is not talking about where it wasn't a perfect square was shaped like a nut specifically it has a pointy bottom says and because it has a pointy bottom if you're going to put something on your head and on the bottom it points so like every time you breathe it's going to poke you that's tako and over there it's going to be inb mitzvah but lav davka lav davka if it's not a perfect square is it going to be a problem that's a much bigger over here we're saying that it has to be a perfect square that's not something you see from that as it relates to in the event that the of the are intact it's going to be as opposed to what as opposed to in the event that you have some of the inner being puzzled then or being torn that doesn't bother me. In other words, as long as the that you see of the bim is intact, it's going to be I don't care what's going on with regards to the inside that I can't see. So, just visualize the that has all these barriers, these in between the different paras. If something would be punctured over there, that's what Rafoon is coming to say doesn't bother me. As long as the As long as the outer looks fine, that's okay. What's going on inside, that's fine. It's not so simple. If two of those walls have an issue with it, it's still But if three of them, it's this that was saying that if two of them have an issue, it's going to be that's only true if the two are not facing each other. If the two holes are literally right next to each other, then they're going to be possible. And even if it's the only time we say it's a problem, that's only if it's a new filling. If it's already an old period filling less at that point, it's not going to be an issue. What's the So the is the way Rashi explains it is we don't care so much that there's a hole inside those. What we care is that it looks like you're using some inferior art. So if the hole is there because of wear and tear, okay? So it happens. It's not a big deal. So if it's a tikto, if this is an old piece of leather, it's an old pit fill and less slumber, then what's going on inside doesn't bother me. If however it's it's new. If it's new, why would it have a hole? It must be it's some zeus type of it's an inferior type of that already is going to be an issue. So what's the definition of new and old means literally mean did I buy it today? Did I buy it yesterday? It's not. So how do you define new and old like this? In the event that you would pull one side of this and when you pull it it would automatically revert back to the way it was. That's considered old. If however if you stretched it out it would have some it would be stretched that means it's new. Another way to know about in the event that you have two people like tugging on the fillain. So one person is holding on to the rits and the other person is holding on to the base of the fillin the bias of the fillain. So in the event that you're able to pull it and it's not going to tear. So that's already considered. If however it's if you pull it I don't know might fall off. I think that that's a sign that it's already old was one sitting in front of and his he asked his said and my letter is back together told him it says and from the word we learn it has to be a perfect ritual and now your ritual is torn and you're sewing it back together you can't retie the the ritual told so I understand he said that Ra had already passed that you can't take that to and tie it back together what would be however if you're going to tie it but you're not going to see where you tied it meaning from the outsider's perspective it's going to look like a perfect ritzua it's just from behind an area that you wouldn't be able to see. That's where you would see the fear. Would that be a problem or not? He told him go take a look at what people do. Right? Sometimes this how is he take a look at what people do. And what he meant to say was nobody does this and because nobody does this. So really in all instances this is going to be an issue. So this just discussed the idea that you have to have. So we've been talking a little bit about a tama. This is a tama that if there is here the garra says you wouldn't be able to sew it back together and it doesn't matter if you could see it you can't see it either way this is going to be an issue rashi is mupic a little bit what this issue is with the not being like what's the problem with taking the rits and putting it back to just tying it together. That's what I'm says is is because it's not going to be it's not going to be there's like some says it's it's a in the for that reason this is going to be an issue the other says just means one perfect and the minute you're patching things together that in of itself self is but either way it seems like Rash himself was struggling to understand what this is and what exactly would be the concern said that in the event somebody has just fill in with let's think of the ritualist that come hanging down right and now you have the ritual in the event that you have stumps of it that means they got cut and you have very little left it's going to be but the says it's not true from the fact that the sons of said, they said that when it comes to the gardum of the of the gardum of so was used in different and tyrus settings for the tyrra for the paradum. So there said that if you have the gardum it's going to be kosher it's that there and only there and you can't even say that maybe just like the so maybe elsewhere there should be as well because you can make the argument there it's over here it's going to be different. So we don't fill in even though it's a mitzvah, right? It's a mitzvah to put on fillin, but it's referred to as tashmish kadusha as opposed to mitzvah because of the kadusha that the fillain has. So it gets upgraded in terms of the way we view fillin, right? You have to treat your with more sanctity than you have to treat your tits either both mitzvah and the one is mitzvah, the other one etc. So it has kadush is the fact that said that the of it's not I maybe just like no because you can't say that because those are so to say that maybe it's going to be but when it comes to therefore even though but says one thing you see from and that is you see there's a meaning from this whole discussion what do you There must be a shear of how long the rsuit have to be. Why do you see that? Because if there's no shear, how long do have to be? Then what does it mean? Gardumi. Gardumi means you're supposed to have a shear and it got cut off and now I'm left with a little stub. Okay. So the question is, is that enough or is that not enough? But if there's no share to begin with, then we shouldn't even be having this conversation. So from the fact that we're talking about how long these ritsu hanging down need to be. So you say mezz there's obviously a share. So the Gmorra says, "Well, if there's a I'd like to know the very obvious follow-up question, and that is what exactly is the soar says, not surprisingly, it was he said very cryptically, it's until the your index finger." Okay, what exactly does that mean? He didn't just say, but he demonstrated and what he was cough. So Rashi says that what he did was is he took his second and third finger and he spread them out like a V and he said the distance between the two that's what the shear is raid I'm sorry skipped like four lines went ahead he also demonstrated and the way that he demonstrated was the way Rashi explains it is he showed the distance between his thumb and a second finger and Rashi says that's much wider The two are not the same, right? Is it the distance between your second and third finger or your first and second finger? Either way, so we know that second finger is playing a role over here. The question is from which side? It's from the middle finger side or it's from the thumb side. That was a sha either way. These are the two as it relates to those rits that hang down from. So what exactly are you supposed to do with them? So we know what we do, right? But this kamar might be a little surprising. What would do is he would take those two and he would put them behind him. So they would be swinging like a cape. They would be behind his back. That was his cut. He would braid them. So he would make some whole fancy uh knot or braid with it of as it relates to raon. He did what we doing. This is Gishmak because if you're sitting down and you're learning a mar you should know what that means right so he would do it the way we do it that's the way he went about even have to explain it meaning he just left it the way we do it and that is hanging from the front either way these are the three shittas that the gimmar says as it relates to with the rits of the again today's daf was very bullet point style like some of these garas here in par we are going to come up for breath and exhale and end the daf portion of today's So as it relates to raid as promised going back to just going to get comfortable for a second going back to the very first gimra of today's daf and that is the bryer that discussed the seder of the parachutes of the throne. So the tunn exactly how are you supposed to be the four in the should be to the right and should be to the left. said we learned in it's just the opposite and said, "Is it my right or is it your right from the standpoint of the it's from the standpoint of the it's going to be just the opposite. It's going to be and it's going to be we mentioned that there's a big time and had to understand in this very cryptic bry what the means when it says is that from the perspective if you're looking at it from right going left is going to be the parish on the far Right is going to be immediately to its left. What does the bry mean when it says what it means is that as it relates to the next two paras what you would consider the left half of the is going to be the one to the right and is going to be to the left. In other words, the way the paras are lined up are going right to left from the standpoint of the k meaning from the standpoint of the person who's looking at the said it's not that way from the because if that's what the means then the bry should have just told me that the way you do this is is why are we talking about the and the smile. Why are we bifurcating the four parach into two halves? It almost has no havana says I think what the price is saying is something else that are from right to left exactly the way Rashi said. But when the says smile is the far left which means that volume is going to be to its right. And the reason the brace has divided it into a min and smile is because we're looking at it from the barsa to the gavasa we're looking at it from the outer to the inner. So on the right side outer to inner is on the left side if you're going outer to inner it's but said that if you're looking at the fill and going right to left the way you're going to see it is and in the immortal words of what you're going to be left with is you're going to have the the two par that begin with the word vaha those are the words that are going to go in between in other words according to rashi if you want to summarize the it's the way it's set up and in the in the itself the four parishes are according to the way to summarize it is for sure on the far right is on the far left and it's the two voyas first and then that are that is the twoas of respectively. If you take a look at the and this is in the says as follows as it relates to the seder of how you're supposed to put the parachutes inside the according to we'll see the ra in a minute. So Rashi is looking at it from the standpoint of the again what's to the right in our is to the left that was the either way I'm sorry the brings the sheet of Rashi and the Rama It's a little different than the way we've been discussing it in the BCA because the Bryer was talking about it from the standpoint of the and the is looking at it from the standpoint of the which the Bryer just alluded to and in that but the bottom line is the presents the sheet of Rashi which he refers to also as the as it relates to either brings again in his language and then he says as it relates to the it's both and he should make two pairs of fillin and he should put them both on and when he puts both pairs of fillin on what the should is the one that is The right one I'll leave that's the one I'm being filling with and the other one is they're just leather straps says you want to know how you going to put on two pairs of fill in it's not a problem because the says this place on a person's forehead to put on two pairs of on the bicep on the arm also to put on two pairs of says let's say you don't know how to know to put on these two pairs of fill in at the same time. You should put on one of them first. The take it off and then put on the other one. So you'll make a put on one immediately take it off and put on the other one. There are some say that in the event you can't put them both on at the same time you should put on your should you should put on your and you should read meaning you should read the part of with your either way. brings both brings the Rashi and the says like in other words is stating that says and therefore you should put on two peers of how do you put on two fears of fillin says put them both on at the same time because let's say you can't do it that way there's two options one option is put on one immediately take it off and put on the other. Both like the other is for after you put on your fill in and you go ahead and you put on the fill in and say from the it seems pretty clear that the is like Rashi stating that There's an Indian that in addition to putting on should also put on Tom's filling in this isal as that everybody's asked themselves consciously or subconsciously at some point in their life and that is that why is it that when it comes to this said that should be And he should try to not rely on the which is rashi but he should also be mimitt there are so many shittas in shas that we don't pass like we don't pass like there's so many throughout shas that there's tremendous rishim that we would be afraid to be in the same room with but we don't follow their because this greak and We follow whoever th is like when it comes to some became such a that even though the says that we don't pass like but the last asked the with a little bit of a pump also he said in yesterday's sois brings uh shil exactly how you're supposed to put the the parachin themselves. Rashi says that they're supposed to be standing says they're supposed to be it's Rashi and on the page here in blood earlier where the discusses or the talking about exactly how the parish are supposed to be like that's the and he doesn't say the way did it which means by the way just to put into perspective if would see a person who wears fillins He'd be very disappointed. He would say, "This is called Did you not learn? This is not the way it's supposed to be." said he says in filling in we're not even doing it seems that for whatever reason as it relates to this particular in terms of the parishes in terms of over here we're taking on the and he has I have no I'm trying to understand why this is the way it is by the way the name of the sh is he's the one who asked and he said why does this have a masle that even the already says that gave a very very short answer as a matter of fact this whole chuva is like eight lines it's definitely from the easier chuvas but I think in order to appreciate what told the we need a little bit of an introduction and we have to set it up a little bit. So this these two types of fillin is known as the between and of course it comes from the here six lines on the bottom of the truth is that really this is also he discusses in detail even drew a picture how are you supposed to be mad these four paras in the tone and the ra goes ahead and he describes exactly the is and he has a long long long and the says that's not the way he's supposed to do it but rather the way he's supposed to do it is now it's interesting not for now but the rivet actually had like but whereas raenutam has kadesh and he has sham The rivet has it exactly the opposite. But that's not for now. The bottom line is the ram seemingly had rash fill in and the rivet had something very similar to fill in. He had fill that and the truth is we read it a minute ago when brings. So it's not only it's ra as well but when you open up the raam you'll see a long rivet and the riv is as it relates to the way it sounds like that we're bifrocating the right and the left and which was but either way this on some level is also between the ra and the I saw in from the great go and this is he has a long long chva. By the way, if you go through that chuva, you'll know everything you have to know about this topic. But either way, if you go through that chuva, he has a very very big and one of the things he does is like no one was ever able to do is he's lists out the two columns, right? The and the spoil, right? He has the right side and the left side. All the names that follow and all the names that follow. Just give you a synopsis as it relates to and that went and pin like it's the ra the safer the raan the raj the safer and the ramanic these are all the column the rebari the riff the and the how's that for two hall of fame lists. So really if you go through the and the this is between even though that's what it's known as but really you could just as equally say I wear the fill in I wear fill in right are you m and wearing's fillin I don't know some people are some people are not all right so you could name this fill what you want to name it it's known as but we just mentioned 10 on the rashi side and 10 on just trying to bring out one point and that is is that this is Rashen is literally from the grace of all time. This wasn't something that one day decided to argue about, but rather this was a a shah that really cuts through all the and the and it's almost like half the came out one way and the other half of the came out another way. The truth is it's a little bit deeper than that. in this famous on the bottom of quotes and acknowledges that this I'm about to quote sounds very much like the is at the very very end of par in fact it's the last par on the mitzvah of says the four times that mentions the four as relates to the it's one and as opposed to the that's already four these are the four it's here's the punch line and you have to write it in that order and if you don't write in that order you put it in it's not something you're allowed to use says that It sounds like this says that the seder of the par now the is talking about the way you write them but it sounds like as well is supposed to be in this order and even conceded that this was very very mash already like so we have a that jumps off the page very much like Rashi the in his and this is in it's under that's where it is if you want to look it up inside It's called the discusses that it's that there was once upon a time a sedum. Now if you ask academic right was there a shami on sedum. So everybody knows that about 150 years ago somebody claimed to have found and he went and he pedled it around and he showed it to all the it was so good that the says that when he came to Dinsk I don't remember who was who but either the said it's real and said it's not or said it was real and the said it wasn't. I think it was the ragv who said not based on some but the bottom line is this was marish but this is more 19th century hak the bottom line is that once upon a time for sure was on and he brings a few from that it's very clear that they had it and one of the that says had on kchim was the rivid as a matter of fact he says that the rivid said quoting Zoy, wow that themed Xiaomi says that in terms of the sedav this is the way it has to be and the rabbit brings this as a he's on as a have to be bans but the bottom line is we have a onch quote unquote that seems to say in furish that have to be bansa Which means that this sha of exactly how to say the parishes have to be forget about that. It's and we have the long list of on both sides of the ledger. It's already a it seemed to have already been a between the which is already acknowledged and the albeit in that seems to say that it's supposed to be a visa. So this again this is an old old old old mus but it's even more than that and that is we're familiar with the sh right it was written by one of the who used to have dreams and in his dreams a maggot would come to him and he'd be mal and it got so good that every night before this sadic would go to sleep he would write down a sh on a piece of paper and mish in his dream the maggot would And the mag would reveal to him and he would tell him uh what the answer to this shil is we've quoted from the safer many times over the years specifically from Rabu Margolas's purish and his m to the so one of the that margles published that wasn't his own uh unique safer but rather a commentary on another safer is you can see how this was right up his alley and in the introduction he has like a 75page mvoy in terms of what happened to term Additionally, he wrote a very very detailed commentary on the different chas that are discussed in this. I asked I reached out to heaven and I said that can you please uh shed some light in terms of exactly how you're supposed to be the he says I'm going to tell you exactly what I wrote verbatim. Ready for this? You're sitting or you're standing. We have this big suffic and we know the stakes are high. We learn tomorrow. If you get it wrong, it's possible that say who do you love more? This is the question. Ready for the response. So the response that was given was you think you're going to get a There's lit up in also. Yeah. The same the same are going up up in as a matter of fact says there's nowhere to go after this, right? I mean this is take called taking it all the way to the top and if you're not getting you're not getting anywhere. But what's the bottom? What do you see from all this? We see from here that this is not just a Let's open the rift of not just that it's between not just that it was between said this is not a regular this is a much bigger all All these braces and you FIND arguing said coming full circle and his to the wanted to know over here says that why would this be different than all the other that we have now he doesn't say it as dramatically as we set it up but says You can't compare the two. There's too many people on the other side of the equation. We said there's a whole bunch a whole of We said you have the me of you have literally the other side is too strong the other side is too compelling and because the other side is too strong and the other side is too compelling so it's for that reason when it comes to this mus this mus already has to be treated a little bit differently and that's why when it comes to this mus between rashi and over here this til over here you have on the one hand repos asking like rashi but then again over here we have to give credibility to the as well the truth is there's a whole another approach as relates to this and that is why would it be that we pin like but at the same time punked over here says that and should and this really goes into the world of Cababala and that is Hashem we are going to save for tomorrow.