Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00

Imponderable: Did Korach Believe In Torah Min Hashamayim?

58 views
Rabbi Daniel Glatstein Official avatar
Rabbi Daniel Glatstein Official

Transcript

Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.

Okay friends, I want to share with you the following question that's troubling me on paras. Did Kyak believe in the Tory or did Kyak not believe in the Tyra? I understand Kyak did not accept the prophecy of Mosen. Clearly he obviously was challenging Moshe. But did Kyak believe in and I would have thought so on the says they all heard words from sounds like to me everybody heard words By the way, the says what words? What words are that's why it says in the context over here? We all heard Hashem. We heard the next rash. Why are you being elevated? You took you're not the only one who heard everybody heard. Fine. So I'm assuming believed in he believed in but says like this like we saw earlier from the made of he asked by the Okay. The brisker of points out when says it sounds like double. So says has to uphold the two principles of faith regarding the of so and is by the way the Briskov says that's why when the when put his ear to the like says inal that's why says that's why he has to say both so did believe in the says no the briskar says that's why he's punished and he said But said, "We heard on Shamui." So what was that? He didn't believe in the Tyra Kak said everybody heard on Hari. So is Karak denying what he himself. In other words, what did Karak believe? Did he believe in aim or not? I mean the simple answer would be that here if you look back in uh the perd let me get that up on the screen so you could see his shine. I think one answer one approach would be I he believed that God said he believed in other words maybe it's even from Rashi. Rashi says we all heard things. What are the things we heard? We heard but that's it. But regarding says, "We were never commanded on it." You made it up. You made it up. by the way is perhaps you could say that the reason why kak went after titus is because actually were clus the mitz of titus was given in it was given in response to mcoes aliphat so is it that kak denied the whole or he is or at least he's denying certain mitzvah. So in other words when we say that kayak did not believe in aayim doesn't mean he didn't believe in the whole experience of hari it doesn't believe that he didn't believe in harina he was there along with everybody else but he is kazal do say that when he said he doesn't believe in situs he is saying so Just pointing out that even though said he believes in he believes in he believes we heard but regarding certain mitzvah kak is saying no I don't accept that or if you have a different way to answer that how do you reconcile the that said with you know you you have by the way you have movements like this you have carites You have Sadducees who they believe in the written law. They believe in the or even we find many times in uh the Garra. The Gomorrah says you can't just publicly read the ten commandments. You can't publicly read that because people are going to think that's all there is. There's just the ten commandments. You know where did that come from? That's Kyra. Kyak was the first to acknowledge the Asser. In other words, is Kyak only believing in Assaras? Is he denying the whole Tory? Is it specific to Titus? There are a couple of approaches you could take. But it seems from that didn't just go after he even questioned whether Tory is okay. I want to take you to gateway to >> recording stopped.