The Inaugural Torch

The very end of the mission that we learned on that test of a love. So the mission of pivoted. The mission began to meet the main and the mission and the mission etc. etc. And then the mission said which involves which is the beginning of tomorrow's but all of this is for the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the whole of the how the had had to be the camera in the base of another words you couldn't just go ahead and start using a camera in the base of it required a right come ask me there's some process that required the camera to go through before the camera were able to be used and the mission that goes and delineates how exactly they were each one of the camera in the base of truth is this is very much the topic of tomorrow's but we're preempting a little bit of this bridges today's and tomorrow's you know over the years we mentioned many times that he Frank in his heart wrote a true related to the Hirsch Kalisher movement in the 19th century about bringing a carbon in and his his in that he brought to the was this right here says I don't understand how in the world it's going to be possible to bring a carbon because in order to bring a carbon you're going to have to have a bear and in order to have a you have to be the and the mission that says the only way you can be the only way you can be the is with the the was a carbon which had to be paid for by the the so basically you're suggesting that we're going to have it's going to be impossible to have and it's for that reason he said he said he said he said he said he said he said he said he said he said said that it's going to be impossible to go ahead and bring the carbon really the background to this is that even knew that it was only the carbon he was able to bring but I'll come back and bring the carbon right because everything had issues but the carbon he thought he could bring but he said that you can't bring only the carbon because you have to first be and the is the is something that has to be done you did the and as a result he held the whole movement was was dead on arrival again this is a that we spoken about several times over the years nothing I just want to mention one and that is that the in the Yuma discusses the summer night and the says and that is love of you would thought for sure that accounts as an so we know love of had the love of in fact the says I would have to have a there's four that if would do them you would be high of so what are they is actor and the and and the goes through every other in the world and tries to figure out why would do them he wouldn't be high of and then the comes to the and the says it's not even because it's possible that if would do he wouldn't be high of now the truth is is whether means that the is allowed to go ahead and do or means that the if he did it he won't be high of like the says holds he's allowed to do the says not allowed to do right he tells the you're taking way too much out of this all the said was in response to why is not high of for doing the but to go be all and to say that could do that that that this is has a and on it something we spoke about in the past but the income of the is if you take a look on the side of the in the in the says to him it's a player how could it be that the says the love of the of the of the that the holds that the of the of is allowed to do the there's no in the when it comes to the of the this cash is most obvious cash in the world cash is the of right who's supposed to do the of the is the one that's supposed to be the of so that I don't understand how's it possible how's it possible that the says and she does is that even allowed to as long as there's no for a to do it well if that's the case about the of it's a it's a how could anyone hold that there's no at the very least it should even be but for sure for a to be the what happened to the of the in a classic right in the beginning of the he says a double says I would say that when the says about you know what the was referring to that was not that every single time the was going to be lit that it would have to be lit by a that says I think it's talking about a that's tucked away in a in the in the that the mission talks about how they were the different in the base of in in this of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of that the way the of the took place it happened the it happened with the of so this of about that's talking about the of being and in of so that required a it's the that would happen afterwards had love of share the of I feel about this about is talking about how they were the and that was something that had to be done and I think that I think that's the in the that everybody knows that in the beginning of says that why did right here in about immediately following the of the tell about the so the says because was very sad because the because the was are you who is because he wasn't involved because he wasn't involved in the who not him who is not a I'm like so told him you have nothing to worry about yours is going to be bigger than theirs automatically you made you're going to be the of this is a he wasn't involved in the of and he tells him you're going to light the of but it's a what his issue was that he wasn't involved in the so you're giving him a you're telling him that he's going to be the of very very you can do what the says that what he was referring to was the that was going to happen the but it's because the problem with this obvious question stares you in the face he has that he wasn't engaged in the so what's the over here that you're going to be the of the was that you're going to have a of of that's going to have to be done you did you and it won't be able to be done because that's and if that's the case just like the of could be done the of could also be done but the was he told him you feel bad that you missed out on the I'm going to give you a of only is allowed to be done you this mission in the in the that says it's this is the of that was the that got and that's the was why because he missed out on the what was the that you're going to be involved in the that the of the that really happened it's but it's the that's what this was that's that's so the that I think you can say in something that if you think about it a little bit it's something we've heard a thousand times but he's asking a very question and that is what is the conclusion of this of the of the of the right this was the of the famous of Cutler right we all know the right the of the of the how could the be made the of the of the it's being stated in real time right now about the what's the I don't know it sounds like Aaron's going to have to Always light the menorah. So if Aaron's going to always have to light the menorah for the next 39 years in the midbar, Aaron's going to be lighting the menorah. Stating that right this second in Parshas Beha'aloscha, you go ahead and you tell Aaron that what? You tell Aaron that you should do it. Aaron lights the menorah. If I ask him Aaron if the tzeevi was to light the menorah always, then where's the because right how we did it? Okay, let me explain. 39 years from now we'll revisit this and we'll figure out. Was Aaron shina was he lo shina? How could the Torah be made right now like the lo shina? So Remes Simcha, it must be it must be that really the Beha'aloscha is was not that Aaron was always going to be the one that was going to light the menorah. But the Beha'aloscha was was that he was going to be the menorah. By asking Aaron like he was the one that went and he lit the menorah for the first time. He was the menorah. The words of Remes Simcha. The gain. By asking Aaron should the lo shina also be like I will allow you to also do it myself. The call of this is the this has to be the Remes Simcha the answer to the question is shina. He said that even though she said that it's even as shina. But there was a that had to be done by Aaron. And that was Beha'aloscha it was the it's this that's tucked away here in the Mishnah at the very end of Menachos daf mem tes I also saw a nice there's a sefer it's called Parshas Chodesh on Menachos. Incidentally, if you're of Remes Simcha's Torah and who isn't and you're learning Menachos now it's good idea to track down the sefer. But either way right here in Menachos daf mem tes so the on this sefer he's different pieces from Remes Simcha on Menachos. Then he wrote a whole sefer on the bottom divrei every that I went through. But either way so there's a little called Torah. And in the Torah it claims a nice it comes out that Remes Simcha's at the first time that the was lit the of the that had to be done by he said that of that first is that the because that is meaning in as much as it that's only every after the first but the has to be done by so he said it's Torah. If it's not if it's not I but Aaron the Torah says that told Aaron this is going to be done by you day you and if it's going to be done by you day you this is going to be a but just because there's a doesn't mean that there has to be a what's the example of we need a but it's not an example of it has to be done by you day you but at the same time it's not necessarily he claims this is that the first of the of the first this was that was together that it had a that was an or it wasn't an required but on number one if it's an so obviously has to be otherwise he's if it's not an he wouldn't need to be another maybe it would be because really the said that should be when he's the menorah. What was the but for Remes Simcha's at the first is an so maybe he would even say that it would be I mean said it would be very if that was the case but nice in terms of understanding the of this Remes Simcha the bottom line is this Remes Simcha his that there were two there was one of the and then there was the that initial of the truth is this is really in Parshas Tetzaveh I know but this is really Torah in in Parshas Tetzaveh because really the whole end of Parshas Tetzaveh the Parshas of Miluim it talks about different that were done that seem to be part and parcel of the Mishkan and this Torah from we're going to get to the space where the said that those that are being discussed in Parshas Tetzaveh it's not but the of those are it's the and that's the safe of this Mishnah over here in Menachos daf mem tes either way we're going to stop here.