Unholy Food

just to say over one that connects to Ray that we've spoken about a lot and that is so we're learning the sugis of Traus and the parish of Trafa is one P in the even though there's different Muslim to it but there's one par in the it's one P it's the P says asks. He asks why is it that if a person has a now we know the reason the was to get the is because the kelv didn't bark when the yidden left because of the respect that the dog showed the it was but that's the only reason the is mandating to take the food and give it to the dog is because there's no way for you to eat it. There's no and because there's no at so it's for that reason it's posit that just by process of elimination you have to do something with it from it you can't eat it so what SHOULD YOU DO WHY the kev maybe give it the tiger the reason is because the kev DIDN'T BARK and it's for that reason that the but again it's like a last resort option it's because you can't eat it. So therefore, you need to do something like you know what the is. Why don't you take the and be it with meat. Close your eyes and take a whole bunch of meats. Throw a into the mix. Mix it up so you don't know what's what. You're going to have a we know that like this you'll be able to eat it. Says I know what you're going to tell me. You're going to tell me That's we're going to get to those soon. Everybody knows that of almost every single with the exception of the is that it's not which means that there's a which teaches me a whole bunch of types of included in that. So why does the have to take his and discard it would have been And being that is only I'm allowed to do it. So at least so why should it be? So if the want to come along years later and say I have no issue with that and you know invoke the but why would the say it's predicated on the fact that there is no workaround there is a workaround. The workound is why not be and answer is said he said that I think you see from this learning from a and that is that although it's where the and according to all the with the exception of the all it is is that's only when you're dealing with a of but when you're dealing with a of And there everybody agrees. What's the difference? The difference is when you have a the physical nature, the chemistry of the changes. It becomes with the motor. It becomes ble to the motor. When you have a tar of y, there's nothing changing. Nothing is being altered to the physical and to the chemical nature of the darasa. You just don't know what's and what's mut. And there's which is just like it's but at the end of the day from a perspective you have it you don't have it when it comes to said although it's true only but that's only When the is not going to be ben after but when the is going to remain ben it's going to remain intact after over there everybody holds and you know what the is the is the although this is a and by over The truth is from this that as much as according to it's only that's only true by but it's not true when it comes to of but I was just thinking as it relates to the and that is why does the make it into aid and like this you'll be able to eat him and that is I saw Shiloh the says if you have a last option why do you have to give it to your Why don't you give it to your children? I mean, don't try this at home literally, but why don't you give it to your children? Why don't you take the tra and give it to your children that are kan is not mitzvah? And being that a ken is not mitzvah, so why can't you just give him the tra? WHY HAVE TO GET RID OF IT? Like this, every day my child goes to yeshiva, I'm going to make him a sandwich. This sandwich is going to be a tra. He's not muzzer in mitzvah. So what should be the problem? No, I know it. You're going to say, right, everyone's rolling their eyes now. Why? Because isn't there a right? Let's just preface this a little bit better. That's not a right. So what's the problem? just give it to the couple. The terret is there's a law of what's the says that you're not allowed to feed. How do I know it? Because it says it in the not once, not twice, it says it three times. It says it with regards to the it says it with regards to the and it says it in the beginning of regarding that's not let but the Gmorra says that there's a lot in the calledum and the of teaches me that it's to go ahead and to feed a something that's to aud but it's not so posh You want to know why it's not so because there's a huge huge shim whether the is that true only for the three things that are mentioned in the or is that true for all other as well meaning the says it with regards to two three it says it by it says it by and it says it with regards to but what about WHAT ABOUT is there going to be this This is a major major sh. Now to be fair in the beginning of the maka we spoke out from the truest we made a huge deal about this that the said with regards to the grace of why is it that why don't we say that and so they should be like and when it comes to that cult rights mean that he's not about say he's not about say the same thing it should And it's and we said that learned it that is that although it's true is not by himself to not eat but at the same time but was picking sides in that truth was assuming that not only by the three that mentions but it's true for all and according to that it's not you can never feed a tra But what about all the other who not that way who hold that is only for the three that the mentions what's the is instead of like give it to your what's we take for granted that would never do that but at the end of the day you should be able to do that so if you should be able to do that so why is That not an why is that not an just go and give it to your is what's the terret the is that we spoke so much already about this idea that when it comes to there's the component of the sasur and then there's also an idea based on this that says that if a person eats ele and we learn from there that when a person eats in addition to the there's also there's also a concept of there's also an element of that that is going to come about when a person goes ahead and a person and we mentioned that say that's says when the gar says It's only different because when it comes to there's an element of of we said who spoke out that that's why and they were told that you're going to see whatever you want but then right afterwards it says that be careful. Why do we need an right afterwards? cuz you're going to eat even though it's but there's a there's a a poison a spiritual poison that's going to enter the g of the person and that can be extremely harmful and as a result of says if you're going to eat the but at the same time just be careful be realize what it is you're bringing into that says even though but it could be that when it comes to you don't find anywhere that answer Why it is that when the came to that first year, right? How were they allowed to eat from the why didn't you say the B never asked the because the B knew there's no say it was only the we spoke about maybe that's why the because that's the when you have you have right that's where that whole Indian comes about that comes through that thing you know what's interesting even this if you notice every time the talks about the prefaces it with the fact that right the we spoke so much about in the beginning of the was in the end right the terrorist mentions the word kadusha 10 times with regards to the Tyra says here too by the whenever the talks this point all the say it IN THEIR OWN BECAUSE THAT'S WHY we were commanded that's why we were to make sure that we're not going to eat things that we're not supposed to eat. But either way, it's that when it comes to it's this is of but there's also the it could be what the is saying go ahead and give it to a cotton WHY NOT we can whether the is only true for the three that's mentioned the whether it's true for all the as well but there's another element over here the other element over here is is that when a person eats that is going to the of the is believe it or not it's insur and that has nothing to do with whether there's an or there's no brought with it brought with it the tim if a sadic would eat unknowingly it would bring with Tim, yeah, but it's still going to bring with it a certain element, a certain dimension of it's for that reason. You can give it to your child. I the child doesn't have an isser. I understand the child doesn't have an iss between the and the is only whether he has the or he doesn't have the iser. But at the end of the day, the Tim the Tim that the would get it's the get and if you're not sure just over the talks about who even if she's a and she has to eat but let someone else be the child because that little bit of is going to eventually make its way into the lathe of that child and it's going to be some of the mayonos that this child needs in order to be able to pick up what his spiritual antenna all the is that's being poured down to him from Shmay the idea of Tim affects the cotton in the identical way that affects the and that's why the says it's not because if you give it to the you be you're NOT BUT AT THE SAME TIME AT THE SAME TIME YOU'RE TAKING AWAY HIS KADUCA so is that an IT DON'T MAKE ANY SENSE THE KASHA DOESN'T START IT'S IT'S not a kasha it has absolutely no havana nemesis I think in taicha the pic we have a little bit of anime The says the prefaces the with all the say because why can't I eat a I can't eat a why not IT'S KOSHER WHY CAN'T I eat it the but the is it could be explaining the second PART OF THE WHY IS IT LIKE WHY CAN'T I JUST go ahead and and give it to my child. The terror is and that's why you can't eat it. And that's why you can't give it to your child. The MS is the where the Torah mentions this idea. What does the P say here too? This is the P that doesn't just say thou shalt not eat. You shouldn't eat. And what should you do with the don't give it to your child? You want to know why? And the key is a pish on the of the and it's also a pish on the of the in fact by the it says by it says it because this idea That's the explanation for why you can't eat it. IT'S ALSO THE EXPLANATION WHY THERE'S NO OPTION. WHAT DO YOU MEAN I COULD COME UP WITH A I HAVE AN OPTION? THE OPTION LET ME GIVE IT TO MY CHILD. THAT'S TOTALLY IN the ter that's all true from an perspective. But being that what's at stake is that's why it's not even in to give it to the child. That's why it has to be like that's why it has to be like that. I have an why is it regarding the veil as well? Why is there's an take the like this you're not going to have a problem. What was the parents was because of this? Oh, the only time is that's when there's a but when there's a then there's going to be maybe you can say we spoke earlier in the week about the concept of specifically we spoke about this idea of what happens when you have something that's who the name of the said that what if somebody wants to when it comes to clich or somebody has a little bit of that was but he wants to be in the so is he allowed to he said he's not allowed to it's says no you could do it he said that you're not allowed to do it it's actually but we spoke from the that says in that that's only true that you're not allowed to be if you're being in the I don't I don't trust or you're saying that I don't want rely on the fact that a cliche is all the other examples that we spoke about in that instance it's a because now you're undermining the but if a person wants to be A AND HE SAYS I want to be aim to you I want to take upon myself A PRECIOUS OF I DON'T WANT TO HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH EVEN IF IT WAS I WANT TO HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH that then it's all ABOUT THE PERSPECTIVE HOW AM I GOING TO TO Am I approaching it that I'm insecure about THE THAT'S WRONG. BUT IF I'M A bffish that wants to be myself from a well that's something that I actually do have a right to do. And to the contrary, it's an element of if aid would go ahead and he would take and he would be it would be to you for that we have for that we know already that this is an idea that would stay away from it. And by the way for sure that's the first opinion that's brought down in the hold if a person has a situation it's a for person to be we mention that held and we were trying to be of that but the us but even the ones that hold already said that it's only if you're going about it because you're being but if you're doing then already it's going to be okay could It's the same this is an Indian of it's an and being that there's an element of therefore you're right there would have been an there would have been an to give it to a child there would have been an maybe both would work could be THERE'S NO COULD IS only we're dealing over here with dealing over here with of Tim of the Tim. That's why we say don't give it to a which by the way this is just the general of not even the general idea of for a person to distance himself as much as possible from well for that reason that's why it could be the says not only should you not and but don't even come up with and of how to save it. It's all predicated on this idea of This tea only.