Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00

בענין פסול יוצא ובשר שיצא חוץ ממחיצתו

0 views
Lakewood Daf Yomi avatar
Lakewood Daf Yomi

Transcript

Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.

So as it relates to raid just one foundational maramakim which is really more but very very very much related to the first staff over here. So the P of is a P that two months plus into we're all very familiar with this is the P that teaches us the to these are the ideas that underpin the to the of is that of but in today's we saw a another completely unrelated to that learned from this as well and that is that at that point it's going to be and we saw really two very distinct applications to this one is in the sugasha the other is in the world of kachch as it relates to makasha there's a kesh that's learned out from the latter part of parishi that if you the mother that has an ubber inside the of the mother is going to work for the as well stating that being that the of the mother is the for the because as long as it's there at the time of the mother it's going to be there's a concept that if the was going to be why because it left it and ONCE IT LEAVES IT at that point it's going to be Another application for this is bas has to be eaten but it has to be eaten has that once leaves it at that point there's this lab in the of okay the means that that's a tra eight tra 70 all the numbers of is going to be but there's another that really has nothing to do with and that is that has a at that point why is it together with a very important part of this that's once The tra always a traa. So too as it relates to something that left its makita once it leaves the it's as if it always left the in this is says that left becomes And it's something that you're never allowed to eat. And even if it came back in, you're still not allowed to eat it. And if somebody eats a gonna get maltus says the how do I know that says once leaves it's becomes like we explained already. So the Rambamar of the most in the world and the Rambam's telling me about which IS LIKE THE MOST BASIC IN HE SAYS YOU WANT to know why Ber of whether it be that goes outside of it even if it comes it's going to be IT'S what does it say over there you know what IT SAYS SO BASED ON THAT says that's going to be true in as well. What's the mart? If you want another take a look at these to this truth is if you think about this for a second it's a it sounds like it's aesh right is somehow related to right does that ring a bell from could be not right so uh what's over there so let's take a step backwards what's the shy right somebody asked what's the gonna who saw the better a little bit before you say that the is believe it or not these are the but this really is the Mishna says outside says I understand why if a carbon becomes or the carbon would become it would require it's a how do I know that this but it's really all that requires so says it's learned that from the following This is in the beginning of parish. It's the we mentioned earlier and the explains the whole turn and he said why didn't you eat this? Did it have Maybe it's because it was maybe the D LEFT AND BECAUSE it left that's the problem says what do you see from this had it left or had it been it would have been so verses you want to know the is something called say the is the beginning of the beginning of in other words the basic elementary answer to the what's the is learned out from by the way take a look what the is in terms of that happens to be but it's for sure learned out from is in this talked away stating that it's and brings it in that there's another and this is it's learned out from in other words there's two there's a there's a from the par of the in the beginning of parishes And then also from just to say this a drop better carries with it a malus. It's a just like if someone eats a trade he gets malus if somebody would eat that was in this instance you would get malcus as well. fact that Ram says that Ram says so it's clear it's a lie really without if somebody would eat from a based on the he would also get malas because it's a general that if somebody eats he also gets malas so really there's two that are almost telling me the same thing I I have and then I have which is the par of but both tell me the same concept and that is that leaves it is that it's and if somebody's going to eat from it he's even going to get malus just to bring out the point if you take a look says what would be if And it was right. It was jumping around. This is breathing its last breath. And it was when it came back is it's going to be possible says Rashley because which for a lot of people that learn Kachchum this is an introduction right because you do if you learn Kachchum you start second regardless of what's being learned first this is The second learning already has tot this concept of the stating that the briskerv in his first piece and safer on the rail miktosh says that as much as it's mour from the suggest that this and starts with this gave us these two right here. But at the same time the two that we have over here the place what exactly the from where we learned from the between from that we learn that there's a gabul called meaning we know there's a whole regime of kachum the gabs you learn kachum your lina and the pigle and all the different that you have are you holding. So you're just going to give you know about that. So all the different but that's not a when he brings he says sends you outside the bounds OF HE SENDS YOU TO HE SAYS THIS IS VERY MUCH it's and the iss clearly says that this IT'S TRUE BY JUST LIKE IT'S true by that these two that we have over here whereas is like from and if that if it has its and it goes from you wouldn't be allowed to eat it. So why because it's and if you should have the same but agrees that as it relates to that's and that follows the as it relates to this is very much NOT THIS IS VERY much it's the first that said you have to see when you go through this in the second which is just as obvious and that is as it relates to the so that's true for the buser it's true for theim it's true for the right that's the big but on the fats that went on the dam if it was subject this says It's that's only true by like the where the says this is a in that has a where the is in the event that it goes outside of the so is true for et That's and that's something that's going to be true only with regards to the it's not going to be true for anything else said that it's to me this is the which at first glance is a little bit of a we're not going to go through the whole but just the if would eat from before this is one of those fun outside she would get five malus ate it was an it was before this outside malus five times is not allowed to eat an oil no one's allowed to eat you're not allowed to eat and if it was outside you get two malus number one because it was outside of the kach had to be eaten in you get another malus because it was eaten outside you get five and asks kashes if it's five you're saying good say Maybe it's more than five. One of the Mars caches is what about you getus and for the honey you know when you get malus that's only true if you were allowed to eat it inside the now if I ate it out of the I'm going to get malus but over here IT'S AN SO THEREFORE IT'S NOT GOING TO BE A PROBLEM. WHAT WAS THE SHOCK OF IN THE GAR? THE GAR AND THE KASHA THOUGHT THAT if there's a toad it's not let it go outside and now outside of the you is that and it's when there's a and it leaves THOSE there's no bias in proverbally speaking when it comes to an has because it's but that's the second between the general that everybody knows about that comes from versus this and that is number one one is a one is number two number two one is true for all the of the cuz the of it is that something with kadusha that leaves the m of kadusha is now the other is a whole different something that has a if it leaves that it's going to be a problem if that's the case it's only true by buser and even then only that has and that's why the said doesn't make sense shouldn't be subject at all says the brisk this is the second part of the piece I want to say there's a also in parad it's on the over there what would be the if you had a who sat down to eat the carbon p and now the ber of the carbon p left the kabur or left the bias where the kabur is would the bey say would it not And it's a whole very very every single person ever that sat down to learn this learned that the ising we know that there's when it comes to has to be within there's outside if it's going to be the what about the with a concept that it has to be eaten has to be eaten. So if it leaves the B if it leaves the maybe it should be as well says the is a very big because where the area that it's being from is not more than the area that it's going to is more than and is more than you're in this mim of kadusha where you're supposed to eat it if IT WAS IT'S THE BIAS DOESN'T HAVE more than outside the bias. This whole of the should be when it comes to the CARBON IS SAID to that when the declared over here that does when it comes to the carbon ironically the didn't mean to what the meant was because once the says that the has to be eaten with it has to be eaten within a certain area. So it's like FROM it's like any type of THAT HAS if you take a look at the when the brings the general. So we read the says number one it becomes possible and it's forever because it says if you take a look at the carbon and this is empiric Vanessa in his apartment didn't say his only it's LIKE THEIR DOESN'T EVEN TALK over here. says the you know what is BECAUSE THAT'S NOT it's comes from the and if that's the case if that's the case We're benisive to the fact that there's an there's also a but like the intuition of the there really is no leaves but to say this where DO YOU FIND SUCH A GOOD that's over the is the ra doesn't even say ple. Does that mean it's not ple? I'm not sure how far means it. But the bottom line is the ramen didn't say could be the just means it's maybe from the I'm not sure but the bottom line is is that the ra was because when it comes to regular that was it's based on as opposed to when it comes to the carbon that's it's coming over here and if that's the CASE WHAT IT IS that's why the rab saying all the said is that it's the said they have one more one more is not actually the it's pericute the end of he lists all the types of a for which you get malus right so we know there's rain and there's uh sh lavin within the lav The Rama makes a count. He says there's 207 times you can get malus. If you remember, we once spoke at a rabbi with from but there's 207 times that you get malus. And the goes and all 207 times that you get malus. Number 75. If someone is if somebody would eat from the carbon outside of the says you would get malusk brings from the on I think that's the but the brings from the on that he asks that if you go through the entire the does not mention anywhere if somebody eats a that say the only one of the that were that the Ram brings you would get malus for is referring to the carbon and it's a PLEADUM SAID WHY WOULD THE RA only mention carbon now the is like he did in carbon based on his mas of that if somebody eats from a carbon pes that left it some gonna get malus but here the ram counting all the times to get malus. So the Rama wanted to say you get malus for eating of a carbon that was say why would he only bring the carbon that's the most obscure abstract example of this should have brought the basic any carbon that leaves it said the brisk I'm going to tell you the reason is because if you look earlier number 54 in one category any single time you have that's ple that's the ra counts that as what in the ra's of 27 Seven ord count as what? If that's the case of that's push that any of that was included in number 54. It's included in miktosh. SO THE RAH DIDN'T HAVE TO MENTION THEM SEPARATELY JUST LIKE HE DIDN'T MENTION any separately but there's one said that's not you know what that is it's the like it's because not it's not it's not it's NOT if that's not included That means its own number. That's number 75. And you want to know what the tool. So again is there's no question in the world. It has a and that is from the beginning. But at the same time there's a component as well to that is the first over here in perash two between these two rash brings both of them by the way the rubb is in that rash but two both of these are brought down in that but two one is ach the other one is true for all kachum etc. The other one is only with regards to because it's all rooted in a baser. The second half of this briskov is that the leaves that was only it's only the second brings in the two one in and the other one in Sanra