עולה לשם שלמים

Just to end with one horror because we just finished really the first chelek here of maseches zevachim and that is I was discussing with my son Zalman over yom tov that the first Rashi in the masechta Kol hazvachim shenizbachu shelo lishma ela shelo ola u'vav mincha u'shlamei tzibur is our Rashi. Kol hazvachim shenizbachu shelo lishma shenishchat ola leshem shlamim. So Rashi says what does it mean? A zevach that was brought shelo lishma you brought an ola leshem shlamim. So l'chayim it's only beer ola leshem shlamim meichatasei. There's so many different variables. There's so many different ways that you can concoct a korban shelo lishma. Meichatasei. What does Rashi want? How did he know to say shenishchat ola leshem shlamim? So Zalman pointed out that number one Rashi is coming to teach you rav shalom and nafka mina. That the mina machriva the lav mina loy machriva. Kotchin mechal um kotchin vechulin mechal um kotchin. Meaning the first thing Rashi is telling you is that you know what it means to bring a korban shelo lishma you have to think about another korban. Because if you're not going to think about another korban you're only going to think leshem chulin well that in and of itself is not going to be a machshava shelo lishma. So it's shenishchat ola leshem shlamim as opposed to just not leshem ola. It has to be leshem kotchin because kotchin mechal um kotchin they in chulin mechal um kotchin. Another thing that Rashi is coming to say is that when the Mishnah says kol hazvachim shenizbachu shelo lishma it means shinui kodesh. You say of course it means shinui kodesh. No it's not true because really the laws of shelo lishma are nogeia shinui kodesh and they're also nogeia shinui bayla. I am the first Tosafist in the masechta where Tosafist is not sure how to learn pashut shana Mishnah. Is the Mishnah only talking about shinui kodesh or is it talking about shinui kodesh and shinui bayla? So for sure Rashi is saying that as well. Right so this is too easy low hanging fruit that Rashi is coming to tell me. Number one, it's a shinnui koidesh. And number two, it has to be a machshavah l'shem kodesh. But if it's a machshavah l'shem chulin kodesh mechalel kodesh, the in chulin mechalel kodesh, the min hamachrovah, the lav min hamachrovah, aval adayin tzorich biur. Why would Rashi say oilah l'shem shlamin? So choyeh the pshat hazay. The pshat is because Rashi wants is coming to be mefaresh the shittah of the Tanna Kamma. The shittah of the Tanna Kamma is his unique shittah. It's the loy ke Shimon Achiazeria who holds that l'shem nomuch me'ein it's going to be pasul. If the Tanna Kamma is machloket with Shimon Achiazeria and he holds that when it's l'shem nomuch me'ein it's really going to be kasher, so behooves him to give me a case where it's l'shem nomuch. So it makes perfect sense why Rashi would pick a case of l'shem nomuch. But even in l'shem nomuch, Rashi didn't have to pick oilah, right? He could have picked chatas. He could have picked asham. Right? An amalah case of l'shem nomuch would be kodesh kodashim l'shem kodesh kal. But you have the chatas and the asham. Now, why couldn't Rashi say chatas? He couldn't say chatas cuz chatas sh'lo lishmah is pasul. It's not kasher. Okay, why couldn't Rashi say asham? I'll tell you why. Because when the Mishnah says kol hazvachim sh'nizb'chu sh'lo lishmah ksheirin elah that line of the Mishnah is shittas Tanna Kamma. It's also shittas Rabbi Eliezer. Read the Mishnah. Kol hazvachim sh'nizb'chu sh'lo lishmah ksheirin elah sh'lo odin b'eilim l'shem chovah chutz min haPesach v'haChatas. Rabbi Eliezer omer af asham. He knows Rabbi Eliezer is also leveraging that first line of the Masecta. Kol hazvachim sh'nizb'chu sh'lo lishmah ksheirin has to shteem with the Tanna Kamma who holds chutz min haPesach v'haChatas and with Rabbi Eliezer who holds min and if Rashi wants to tell me a case of because he wants to go from well Rashi only has one example that he can give it has to be the because everybody holds the is possible it's not true that's in the right that's the Rashi can't say because that's in Rebbe Eliezer's so this line of can't be and the talking and she does Rebbe Eliezer so the only one of the that are available is Rebbe Eliezer that's why Rashi said why did Rashi say so but first of all Rashi is coming to teach me that it's not that's number two it has to be because but also what after you learn through the four Rashi the is coming IS COMING WHERE DOES ARGUE WITH THE WITH THE WHERE HE argues with the now by the way does he argue with the same also that's the only thing we know for sure THAT IS IS IS POSSIBLE THE IS GOING TO BE SO YOU WANT TO BRING out of in light of all the the one you have to talk to is right this line is the and Rebbe Eliezer Rebbe Eliezer and is talking about you had a lot of something else that's not Indian. So really you talking to me and you want to bring out that it's going to be true even though what is country the same country and country and country okay so what are my options here? My options are but what's country it could be hot as could be an ocean it could be it could be a minute but we're not talking about a minute that's easy walking It's a minute off the table hot as not what's in a hot as probably as it's talking also and he said in a hot as don't you see it as an hour and that's why he said I will show them and Clark the land there's the here in the second