אם ב״נ מצווין על שיתוף בתורתו של החתם סופר

The Akum Shutfis Maneno, are they considered Oved Avodah Zarah or are they not considered Oved Avodah Zarah? Avodah Zarah. So, really the background to this just uh come to up to speed is the Rama in Orech Chaim Siman Kuf Nun Vav U'vois If Achad. So, the Mechaber over there says that you shouldn't be partners with an Oved Kochavim. And the reason is because in the context of the partnership, the Oved Kochavim may have to swear. And if he's going to swear, he's going to swear in the name of his Avodah Zarah. And you will have caused the name of an Avodah Zarah to be mentioned, which is something that you're not allowed to do as it says in the Torah of Hashem Elokeinu Lo Yisa Shav L'Shav. Lo Yisa Shav L'Shav. Says the Rama, "The Ish Machil B'Seer Shutfis Im Akum B'Zman Hazeh." There are people that are meikel nowadays Mishum She'ein Akum B'Zman Hazeh Nishboin B'Avodah Zarah L'Alilam. Because today the Akum don't swear anymore in the names of Avodah Zarah. V'Af Al Gaf De'Maskirim Kochavim L'Avodah Zarah L'Alilam. And even though they do mention some form of Avodah Zarah L'Alilam, Mekum Akum She'Oim Statein That Kavanasam L'Shem Shamayim V'Lo L'Avodah. Their kavana really is the creator of heaven and earth. El Asher Shutfim Shem Shamayim V'Davar Acher. However, what they do is they're Meshutaf together with the creator of heaven and earth. O'Davar Acher. V'Lo Matzinu She'eish Shutfus Mishum Lifnei Ivil V'Eisei De'Mishul. And you don't find anywhere that there's an Eisei Lifnei Ivil V'Eisei De'Mishul to cause an Oved Kochavim to mention the name of the Borei Shamayim V'Aretz and Avodah Zarah. D'Arei Ein Akum Lo Avodah Zarah Shituph. Because although an Oved Avodah Zarah is not allowed to be an Oved Avodah Zarah, right? A Ben Noach is not allowed to do Avodah Zarah. It's one of the Sheva Mitzvos. But at the same time, they're not Muzar An Shituph. And being that this is being done B'Shituph in this instance, it's not going to be a problem. And at first glance, what it sounds like the Rama is saying is that even though one of the seven mitzvahs of Bnei Noach is Avodah Zarah, but at the same time there is no issur shittuf. In other words, a Yid is not allowed to be over Avodah Zarah, even if it means he's going to be over that Kodesh Baruchu and in Avodah Zarah. Because a Yid is mussar on shittuf. And the Makos of Mussar on Hegech Kamma Amud Aleph, Rav Shimon ben Yochai's memra, it says "Bilti LaShem Levado Yizvach Lo Elohim Yochalun, Bilti LaHavaya Levado." And from Bilti LaHavaya Levado, we learn you're only allowed to serve Hashem, not even bishittuf, are you allowed to serve Avodah Zarah? But it's the Ramah seems to be saying that as it comes to a ben Noach, who also has in this Avodah Zarah, it's only to only worship Avodah Zarah. But if he's going to worship the Borei Shamayim Va'aretz and is going to be meshatef with Avodah Zarah, like the Noitzrim for example, that is not going to be considered Avodah Zarah. Now the Makos of Ramah's place of Simcha Bava Basra Tosfos in Sanhedrin Daf Samech Gimel Amud Beis, stating that we mentioned the Arikhos that there's a Teshuvah from the Noda BiYehudah, which the Vilna Gaon mistakenly refers to as a Teshuvah from the Noda BiYehudah, not true. So one of the 70 Teshuvos in my Yad Eliyahu that was written by Ben Hamachaber, from the great Gaon Rav Shmuel Landau, who said that I believe that the Vilna Gaon is making a Toisfos in this Ramah. The Vilna Gaon is making a Toisfos. And that Toisfos, the Ramah and Toisfos never meant to say that Bnei Noach are not mussar on shittuf. Of course they're mussar on shittuf. But rather, the Ramah and Toisfos were talking specifically about the issur Shem Elohim Acheirim Lo Yizacheru Al Pi Kha, and it's regarding this issur. It's regarding this issur that the Ramah is paskening based on shittas Toisfos, that the only time it's assur to be maskir Shem Elohim Acheirim for a ben Noach is if he's going to only mention the Shem of Avodah Zarah. But if there's going to be a shittuf, then it's not going to be a problem. So Toisfos and the Ramah's psak is discussing the issur of Shem Elohim Acheirim Lo Yizacheru Al Pi Kha. It doesn't mean that a ben Noach that's over Avodah Zarah bishittuf, that in and of itself is not going to be a problem. And we said that even though this is mefursam from the Noda BiYehudah, or more accurately from Teshuvos Noda BiYehudah, but really there was so many Gedolei Acharonim that said this as well. The Yonasan Eibeschutz in the rubber full hamburger in the coin. The rubber band in the two of his son of the prima garden. So many good acronym. One of the acronym that we mentioned that was to this is the the is on this and you can go on love. He says, quote, as relates to those that are the of course he means the the nights room who worship the trinity. Hence, the iron the two of them or the two of them or the two of them or the two of them or the two of them or the two of them or the two of them or the the two of them or the two of them or the two of them or the two of them or the two of them or the two of them or the two of them or the two of the which segues us in to the in base measures and that is that on Shabbos I had the to always to speak by with the from the suite of all of them so far. And he shared with me a double and a lot of this is printed in some of it is in partial page 37 and some of it is in partial page ratio dollar and from there you can refer to the footnotes and the footnotes and and some of the 10 but the kids are the motion is with my lucky from many places in the Torah of the so far. That the seems to say not like what he wrote in his and the shoot of the seems to be so far of that really a ben noach is not musar on shittuf. And again, the nafka mina of a ben noach is musar on shittuf or not musar on shittuf is absolutely flabbergasting. It is not shayach how big the nafka mina is. I'm trying to find an expression that brings out this point. It's an incredible nafka mina because here's the question. Are noitzrim avodah zarah or are they not avodah zarah? I mean, that's a pretty big question. THE WHOLE MESECHES avodah zarah is a nafka mina whether yes or whether or not. So, if ben noach is musar on shittuf, then the answer is they're going to be avodah zarah. If they're not musar on shittuf, avodas hashilush is not considered avodah zarah. Now, by the way, as it relates to the Ishmaelites, that we covered clearly. That's often in Rambam's and Rav Ovadia in his teshuvah says without a question, it's not even A SUGYA. FOR SURE THEY'RE NOT considered avodah zarah. So, if the Ishmaelites are not avodah zarah and the noitzrim are not avodah zarah, well, then you're going to have to travel to the Far East somewhere to find a real avodah zarah. And this is really not going to be so negiah. Certainly not as it relates to the akum she osik b'mitzvah. But, the Chasam Sofer seems to be going with the mahalach of all the gedolei acharonim that learned up in the Rambam and Tosafos that they only met regarding the issur of shemuah l'akum she osik b'mitzvah. But, the answer of ben noach is musar on shittuf stating that said Rav Moshe that if you look around in the Torah of the Chasam Sofer, it's very not poshut. Now, truth is there's so many Chasam Sofer's now that Rav Moshe was malach that we could speak out, but I'm just going to mention two. Only because of specific I did the chabiva way. The first one is the Rambam in Hilchos Melachim and this is perek yud, halacha yud tes and halacha yud yud. These are very, very, very important Rambams. Rambam says as follows. Again, we're learning meseches avodah zarah now. So, really this is only inyan l'inyan b'inyan l'inyan to what we're learning. This is classic ben noach classic. So, the Rambam perek yud, halacha tes, Hilchos Melachim. He's talking about ben noach. Says the Rambam, akum she osik b'Torah chaimis, a that learns Torah chaimis, lo ya'asik el mishpat >> that a guy who learns But as it relates to other myths voice a guy that rests even if he doesn't have a weekday not on Shabbos per se and he treats that day like we treat our Shabbos Mesa. without saying if he makes a Yom Tov Shabbos is a problem. We don't allow the to be a Dos. The last myths voice and just to do myths voice. A guy wants to do more than the seven myths voice we give him two choices. BECOME A GOOD GUY. OR DO YOUR SEVEN MYTHS VOICE THIS IS WHAT THE RAM SAYS. SO THE RAM SAYS You can't just make up stuff. You have two choices. Or for loy This might be the most famous Ram I've never heard. I mean it's a very big Ram over here. Now just let's take apart this Ram before we even start. And that is what's the Ram I'm saying? The Ram I'm saying everybody knows the Ram I'm that says a guy that keeps Shabbos is a righteous man." Everybody knows that. Everyone knows the Gemara that says a guy that learns Torah is a bad thing, right? Says the Rambam, "Don't think that when the Torah and Chazal singled out those two inyanim, it's only those two. It's not only those two. It's true for everything. In fact, there's a klal over here." Right? The Rambam klalizes this, right? Turns this into a klal. You learn those Gemaras, it's this, it's that. No. There's a klal. That's what klal she l'davar means. This is not A PRAT. THIS IS A KLAL. GOOD? This is Halacha Test. Ready for Halacha Yud? You sitting or you standing? Says the Rambam, because why not? Let me get rewards. KNOCK YOURSELF OUT. YOU WANT TO DO IT, DO IT ALL DAY, EVERY DAY. HE BRINGS A CARBON OIL. NOT JUST THAT. WHY? BEING THAT HE IS SUPPORTED BY the Yidden, and in fact, there's a mitzvah there to help him. So, if there's a mitzvah TO HELP HIM, BUT A CAN GIVE STOCK AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO GIVE IT TO A NON-JEW. GO HIM. I push it. Don't know how to make heads or tails from these two Rambams. The Rambam in Halacha Test says that if a guy wants to do mitzvahs, he can. But a non-Jew that wants to ask his mitzvah from a non-Jew that Torah, Today we couple star in my noise with glasses like a cool house. And the safer says this is from the most blatant steers of all time BETWEEN TWO RAMAMS. MAMA'S ONE RAMAM after the next. Halacha can't do more mitzvahs. And in halacha yud if he wants to do more mitzvahs GO DO MORE MITZVAHS. WHAT'S OVER HERE? AND THEN THE SAFER goes and he asks another five or six cashes. Cash after cash after cash. By the way, this safer if you want to look it up is al hashass maseches Sanhedrin daf nun tes. And the safer fears this for a line. He says the shaalti picha ramam. So I'll be honest, I was so lost I asked the ramam. For all the plain dark good. Lechelik ben a broken bidvorim in miskabelin. I heard different eitzas but everything I heard is a dovish in miskabel but you can write your minyan. And everything that they were saying all these need riyas and votes. I didn't hear anything that's miskabel so the safer says I couldn't come up with a myself. The shaalti picha ramam and there was no one who was able to tell me anything that to me was a miskabel. This is what the safer is saying. And again, there's so many cashes that the safer asks I'm sure if you want to see it inside but the cashes in your name is this steer. So says the safer that because of everything that's going on over here. The neural state of the ramam. I'm going to tell you what I think in this ramam is. I think in this ramam is that in halacha tes the ramam starts off akum b'toras some have an edited version a censored version that says b'toras. But akum b'toras misha. And in halacha yud the ramam says ben noach sh'rotzeh la'asos mitzvah mitzvos so the safer says I think the difference is one is talking about an akum and the other one is talking about a ben noach. What's the difference? They're the same thing, right? No, it's not the same thing. An akum means an any yehudi but what is the literal ta'am of an akum? Oved kochavim umazalos. He's an oved avodah zarah. A ben noach is a yehudi. but what's the literal type of a he's an HE'S FROM THE NOAH IS HE WASN'T BUT ALL THE WAY THAT YOU SAW starts from BUT SEVEN MINUTES THAT FOR SURE YEAH guy that any is an over the desire The says the that's talking about somebody that keeps the seven minutes what's the difference what's the difference so if someone's an and he wants to do more minutes we're not going to allow him to do more minutes but if someone is keeping the seven minutes HE'S A LIKE NOAH AND HE WANTS TO DO MORE MINUTES THAT PERSON we're going to allow to be my friend and minutes says the I'm going to tell you what the you ready to manage He says because an when he's over the what does he have in mind he has in mind is being that he has in mind IS SO IF YOU'RE GOING TO TELL HIM YEAH PUT ON NOW YOU WANT TO PUT ON PUT ON you want to learn WHO'S HE LEARNING FOR HE'S LEARNING FOR HIS SO YOU'RE BEING IN HIS BUT SAYS THE ONE second one second that's not fair if he's putting on probably because he wants TO SERVE GOD OF THE Jews the why else is he putting on him So he wants to serve a God of says the true but if he's an he also has his in his over the ONE SECOND THAT'S EVERYBODY KNOWS IT'S AN SO HE COULD DO ALL DAY WHAT'S THE PROBLEM SO CUZ HE'S ALSO AN HE HAS A MIND TO BE WHO CARES HE'S NOT SAYS THE THE WAY NOT it's true but but the Torah this is the punchline of the rabble. This is such fire. THE TORAH SAID WHAT IT'S motor for to do it off. THE TORAH SAID SEVEN MINUTES and if you do these seven minutes because this is what you're supposed to do and you have in mind that only the but you also have in mind you have a desire that's fine because of and we understand that that's okay. That's what we do that's fine. You have you're allowed to be a he's not but at the same time only what we know he's allowed TO DO BUT AND IF WE HE WANTS TO GO AND BE IN his that's already crossing the line and that you can't do. So if he wants to keep being that we know he's going to be so comes out with FACILITATING AND AND THAT'S NOT what I mean that's true copy with the Torah with THAT IS NOT COPY DESIGN THAT'S HIS HE'S NOT ALLOWED TO BUT HE WANTS TO GO NOW and he wants to be so that already can't do cuz now he's violating I agree he's not he's not for what we know he's not but you're going to go ahead and you're going TO BE NEW WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO BE IF THERE'S ALREADY A PROBLEM BEING AND THAT'S NOT SOMETHING HE'S ALLOWED to do. THAT'S A LOT OF OPEN HE'S NOT ALLOWED TO HE'S NOT ALLOWED TO THAT'S PERFECT. YOU WANT to do more other do anyway he's not being but I think it doubles down on that he says I prove to you I'm right. Because the rabble says that in the event that the and gives stock of a year should nice and nice and what do you do with the stock give it to the cuz being that this person is supported by Israel and you didn't have a where do you find that he has a to be and any you would do it. Where do you find it? It's a passing in the Torah. You find it by the Gittin 20a. It says "V'chai imach." In other words, says the Chasam Sofer, it's mefurash in the Rambam that the Rambam's talking about someone that's not over the avodah zarah. The truth is, it's mefurash even more than that in the Rambam. It's mefurash in the Rambam that we're dealing here with a ger toshav. It's mefurash. Cuz the Rambam says "Ho'il u'hu nisa b'Yisrael, mitzvah alav l'kayem." That's the nekudah. The nekudah is The nekudah is that in Halacha it says the Rambam's talking about an akum. An akum isn't over the avodah zarah. And if he's going to be mosif mitzvos, it's going to start to serve the avodah zarah. Ah, he has a mind of a ba'al seichel, a mind of a ba'al seichel. It's true he has a mind of a ba'al seichel, but he also has a mind of his kishke. And because he also has a mind of his kishke, IT'S A PROBLEM. AH, YOU HAVE to know the sheetah of that's only for the sheva mitzvos in THE HALACHA GEDOLAH. BUT IF HE WANTS TO BE MOSIF IN HIS AVODAH SHEETAH, that's already something that's going to be a problem. Halacha Yiddin, I'M TALKING ABOUT A GER TOSHAV. OH, GER TOSHAV I GET. BUT IF HE'S A GER TOSHAV, it's going to be fine. The Chasam Sofer throws in one more chiddush here that's worth mentioning. So much here that's not right. But there's one more chiddush that we have to mention. And that is when the Chasam Sofer says that in Halacha here we're talking about a ger toshav. So what's a ger toshav? Someone that keeps sheva mitzvos, right? Wrong. What's a ger toshav? The Rambam says so many times, that's the miktav of Moreh Nevuchim in the end of the Sefer HaMitzvos where the Brisker Rov isn't makes all the diyukim that a ger toshav is someone that's also mekabel. So the Chasam Sofer says something again. You have to be a Chasam Sofer to say all these chiddushim. And that is a ger toshav is not only someone that's mekabel to keep sheva mitzvos. A ger toshav is not only someone that's mekabel not to be over the avodah zarah. A ger toshav has to be mekabel not to be over the avodah zarah a few beshituf. It's the ma'aseh. Even though the Chasam Sofer says "I hold that the Noachide is not muzhar al shituf k'pshuto." BUT A GER TOSHAV THAT MAKES A KABALAH, HE HAS TO BE MEKABEL NOT TO BE over it a few beshituf. I think this Chasam Sofer maybe We have to think this through a little bit better. But I think maybe this answers the Sho'el's kasha, who we know it Reb Chatzkel Abramsky. In that last michtov in the Brisker Rav, where the shoyel asked the Brisker Rav that what's the kabbalah of a ger toshav? A ger toshav is anyways chayiv in sheva mitzvos bnei Noach. Every ben Noach is chayiv in sheva mitzvos. So, if a ben Noach is chayiv in sheva mitzvos, so what's THE KABBALAH? YOU CAN'T BE MEKABEL SOMETHING YOU'RE ALREADY MECHUYAV. SO, THE BRISKER RAV SAID, BASED on the dikduk of the gemara in that base on the base, "Rov Yaakov Goyin is chayiv in kedushas Yisroel." Which is told in the tshuvas Pnei Yeshua and the Bamah Ginish But, this Ksam Sofer was a little bit of a giluy because a ben Noach is chayiv in sheva mitzvos, but he could BE OVED BESHITUF. BUT, A GER TOSHAV CAN'T BE OVED BESHITUF. YOU KNOW WHAT THE KABBALAH IS? "I'M ONLY GOING TO SERVE THE creator of the world." And it doesn't only affect avodah zarah, IT AFFECTS ALL SEVEN. ALL SEVEN MITZVOS, I'M NOT DOING IT FOR a gashka ANYMORE. I CAN'T BE OVED KOCHAVIM U'MAZALOS ANYMORE. I feel beshituf I can't be oved KOCHAVIM U'MAZALOS. MY GANZ AVODAH HAS TO BE FOR KUDSHA Brichu alone. But, the bottom line is But, the bottom line is What do you see from this Ksam Sofer? This Ksam Sofer screams from the rooftops, "Ben Noach is not muzhar al shituf." It's a full shiyur of Ksam Sofer anyway. The whole shtickel, the shtickel is marvelous, fire. But, the whole shtickel is ben Noach is not muzhar al shituf. Mention one more Ksam Sofer. And this is in Pirus Moshe, it's in Parshas Zav. It's also again, about this inyan many times. This is a dvar gadol. And that is the Medrash says, it's a Shmuel Rabbah mem gimmel alef, that when Moshe Rabbeinu, we know when he came down, he saw that the Yidden had worshipped the eigel. What did he do? He broke the luchos. And shviras haluchos is a very, very big deal, right? Like in the kol Yisroel, the last Rashi in Chumash, last words in the Torah is related to shviras haluchos. That's like the final uh analysis. Like we said, the last thing we mention about Moshe Rabbeinu is shviras haluchos, which was not by any kol Yisroel. But, the bottom line is what was the greatest zach, this big inyan, this avodah of shviras haluchos? Somehow it seems like it saved the nation. Why was that so critical? So, the Medrash says, "Mashal l'mad l'dayma." There was a melech that sent a shliach to be mekadesh an ishah. And he was mekadesh the ishah. On the way to meet the melech this isha was not FS, right? She was mizana and everyone knew that she's dead because the king is going to kill her. I mean, she's the wife of the king and she goes ahead and she is mizana. Aluva kalash is in like what's going on over here? It's going to be a big problem. So there was a serosa, there was a broker, right? The shatkin, the person that made this deal happen. So what did he do? He took the shuba and he tore it up. I'm not saying should be done in the new year. The like this the very least it won't be treated like an says the madras give me when the did they go? So much of a realized that you didn't want to be punished like a fish that was since they took there's no hope for so he broke the he tore the proverbial and by doing that he was able to save the past we mentioned the in the beginning of Lee Lee Lee Lee destroyed the Lee and if you don't have that relationship of Lee so this the between and is not on the same level like this is not going to be such a big problem. But brings this madras and he says I think I want to say a little bit of a different and that is what was the it was right? But the says that in love bring me back to my days in love should have a lot of her. This is how you throw your name is client. When the worship the ego so they said right? They mentioned that taking them out of but they also mentioned the they said we're not for the fact that they said I just would have been wiped out. Why? Because when they worship the they worship the but it was because they were worshiping and they were also worshiping the ego. They were doing both, both. But were not for the above, had it not been below Robin, we'd be wiped out. We wouldn't stand a chance. The only reason we have a chance is because it was done by Shinto. So I'm sorry for the ego that the more it says was the Zara by Shinto. A year is not allowed to be over by the Zara by Shinto. Built in Russia the robbery. BUT A EVERYONE KNOWS THE RAMA BASED ON BASE on the base on the given up a base. I'VE BEEN A SHINTO. YOU KNOW WHAT THE motion of the day was? He went ahead and he broke the tour the if he tour the and now you are not you still alien. You know what they are? They're playing you have to worry about the ego. It's not a problem. WHAT DO YOU MEAN? IT'S A GOOD ALSO CUZ IT WAS SHINTO LIKE THE SAYS IN SO FOR THAT REASON BUT WHAT DO YOU SEE FROM THIS so far? What do you mean? Everybody knows the Rama. Everyone knows but I was a Shinto. In fact, I must have in purchase and footnote perfect. He says it follows. He says I'm going to be minor to you a little bit. Of the with says this in you that I was it's in some say for these in the old that I am to get more. It's in some say for a gamble on the coffee and it's some say for purchase for a moment it's a good for a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment for a moment Torah of the flood. In safer Maggid Mesharim and Panim Yafos in the end of Parshas Noach and Panim Yafos in the Parshas Vayeitzei and Panim Yafos in Parshas Shmini and in Parshas Pinchas and I just said if you have the Nuksav Yad Madura Madura Tanyana Parshas Bereishis there to the Panim Yafos and the flood said it come with a come up on the also. So it's in the Sofer and it comes from the Sofer of the flood that Noach is not allowed to all that It kind of been joyless. What's going on over here? It's a big problem. The Sofer and his guys, he brings the Makom and it sounds like he went like to the Akedah all hell that only meant it clap you this one Zach. But as it relates to the bottom is the nice is my NAME THEY ACTUALLY LIVE BEFORE THE SOFER. AND here the motion is minor 10 different places Sofer and the floods all over the place with the Sofer is not that way. Schlemiel said that it could be Rub the Rub of this Sofer in the world of maybe there's a between the of and the of right? There's a in we go like all these very very very it's not clear. But I just want to end with one last beautiful one. And this Schlemiel told me in the of this is not mentioned anywhere in the Sofer and that is there's a safer it's called Keren This safer Keren was written by a great guy whose name was Haas. Haas was the Beis Din of Dreznes. If you know, you know. Previously he had been the Beis Din of Halishav, which if you know, you know. But the bottom line is that Haas, this great guy, he wrote a safer Keren And he sent it to the Sofer to review and the Sam reviewed it and he gave him a haskama on the safer. He gives him a glowing haskama. Now, we mentioned that before he became Rav in the residence, he was Rav in Holleschau. Who was the famous Rav of Holleschau? The Shach, who by the way was also Rav in the residence. The Shach was Rav in the residence, then became Rav in Holleschau. Sam Sofer was Rav in the residence, then became Rav in Holleschau. Rav in the residence, but anyway. So, the Shach was the Rav in Holleschau and he said when he was in Holleschau he came across a Chavya. A Chavya from the Shach. It's a drasha on the Haggadah shel Pesach on the common mylis toyvis u'chulis, right? The dayenus. And the Shach writes this beautiful drasha and he says, "I'm printing the safer now and I found this drasha from the Shach. It's it's never seen the light of day and I want to print it." Like this the world is going to know about this drasha. And at the end of his safer, the last pages of the safer he has this drasha from the Shach. So, the Sam Sofer in his haskama in his haskama to the safer Kerem he writes as follows. He says he went through the safer and it's not shaya. He says, "I don't know how this Yid was able to write as much as he wrote. Must be because he's learning Torah lishmah." And the Mishnah says, "Kol lo limed Torah lishmah zocher l'churban Harbei." This is what he writes in the haskama. And then he says as follows, "V'ayl kideish gefen yichidi, Kerem right? V'ayl kideish gefen yichidi, ki hikra sham yodei drush echad miksivas yodei shel ba'al hashach zichro tzaddik l'vracha, shehaya ba'al habayis b'kilo k'doisha Holleschau." He said he had stumbled upon this drasha. Says the Sam Sofer, "We're going to enjoy this because we just had this in the daf yesterday." Makom sheyibola eitz sham yipara eitzav. And it makes a lot of sense he would have found it. Cuz don't Chazal say Makom sheyibola eitz sham yipara eitzav? We had that with the braysa of Bar Kappara, right? In that city where Bar Kappara lived in Parvod, there was someone that knew a braysa of Bar Kappara cuz Makom sheyibola eitz he's mamesh quoting a Gemara. But anyway, Makom sheyibola eitz sham yipara eitzav pri kodesh she'elulim. What is it? It's a Nachman ben No'im al tes vov toy vois kfulois she be say there Hagada. The Amarity said the Chasam Sofer I went through this drash and I said "Ilu loy bo el abishul zeh, had he written the sefer only for that?" What's the next word? Dayeinu, that would have been enough. This is what the Chasam Sofer writes. So Yaakov said that he went through said he went through the drasha the dark length of drasha a little bit. A drasha that the Chasam Sofer If such a Chasam Sofer drasha from the Shach, go find drasha from the Shach, I challenge you. And by the way, in case you're wondering Shach al ha Torah was not written by the Shach. Shach al ha Torah comes from the Talmidei Ari. So it's not from the Shach. So go find a drasha that's six pages long. So he's going to have to do something about this. But go find a drasha that's six pages long from the Shach. But either way, so if you go through that drasha also, one of the things that the Shach says is like this. Everyone knows that when the Yidden came to the Yam Suf, the Yam Suf didn't want to split. Why? Because the Yam Suf said "Halalu ovdei avodah zarah v'halalu ovdei avodah zarah." Right? What's going on over here? Now the Mitzrim the Yidden ovdei avodah zarah, it's true they ovdei avodah zarah but try and fix says the Shach. But now already they did teshuvah. So they did teshuvah they're not ovdei avodah zarah anymore. But it's not so poshut. Why? Because we know that they had the pesel Micha with them. Pesel Micha went along the Yam Suf with them. Oh but says the Shach, even though they had the pesel Micha, even though they had the pesel Micha, but at the same time at the same time they were also being oved Hashem. So if they were also being oved Hashem, well at this point then l'chayra it shouldn't be a problem because they're being oved Hashem. The answer would be it's true they're being oved Hashem, but they're also being oved the pesel Micha. In other words, shituf. So essentially what was this face off over here? This the Yam Suf doesn't want to split. Halalu ovdei avodah zarah v'halalu ovdei avodah zarah. But ultimately it's going to split. What's the Shach al ha Torah? So he says the Shach al ha Torah was the Yidden at that point, that moment, do they have a din of a Yisrael or do they have a dinner of a Ben Noach? Right, the Mishnah Berurah brings this Do they have a dinner of a Yisrael or do they have a dinner of a Ben Noach? If they have a dinner of a Yisrael, then they're not allowed to be over the Mishnah Berurah. BUT IF THEY HAVE A DINNER OF A BEN NOACH, THEN THEY ARE ALLOWED TO BE OVER the Mishnah Berurah. In other words, THIS IS WHAT'S GOING ON OVER HERE. BUT THE SHACH SAYS MEFURASH, IF THEY have a dinner of a BEN NOACH, THERE'S NO PROBLEM OF AVODAH ZARAH OR AVODAH ZARAH BECAUSE Mitzrayim is not Avodah Zarah. They did Teshuvah already. Otherwise, they have the Pesel Micha. SO, IT'S FINE TO HAVE THE PESEL MICHA, but they're still being over THE MISHNAH BERURAH. SO, IT'S OVER THE MISHNAH BERURAH AND SAYS THE SHACH, AVODAH ZARAH BEN NOACH THERE'S NO PROBLEM. THAT'S THE WHOLE SHACH OF THE TORAH. THAT'S the big Machlokes that's going on in the celestial world. Whether this should be an issue or shouldn't be an issue. In other words, the Shach Shita seems to be The Shach Shita seems to be that what? That it's Mutar for a Ben Noach to be over the Mishnah Berurah. Now, this is gevaldig. You know why? Because if you remember the first rate by that we did on this, after all the rate we spoke out that the Shach says in Siman Kuf Nun Aleph in Hilchos Avodah Zarah, HE BRINGS MEFURASH THE PSAK OF THE RAMAH Hilchos Avodah Zarah not in the laws of a Shem U'Malchus Lo Yisa Shav L'Vatikha. In Hilchos Avodah Zarah, the Shach says Mefurash, couldn't be more Mefurash. The Shach says Mefurash that Ben Noach are Mutar Mishnah Berurah regarding different Halachos of Avodah Zarah. So, it's Mefurash that the Shita of the Shach was that a Ben Noach is not Mutar Mishnah Berurah. And if that's the case, as the Shach Shita says stating that after all this rate, I don't know what Shitasos anymore. Why? Because he sees the Sam Sofer held like the Mordechai and like the Besamim Rosh and he held like the Rebbi Akiva Eiger and he held like the Pri Megadim and he held like Rebbi Shmuel Landau and he held like the Sha'ar Ephraim. Ready, he held like all those Gedolei Acharonim that what? They really Ben Noach is Mutar Mishnah Berurah when it comes to Gerushin and all the Gerushin of the Sam Sofer and the Ben Noach was Mishnah Berurah. So, this is a Mamesh a classic example of of In Mashiv Al Halacha but the bottom line is The bottom line is that the first class this Shach would seem to be the Shita. Again, Rubai the Rubai what we spoke about now. I heard from my great Reb Moshe Schlamowitz. And we're going to stop here.