דבר חדש וחריף בענין סומא פטור מן המצוות

One of the many Allah's that we had in the Mishnah was that an Isha is excluded from Smicha. Now, in our Sugya, the Gemara said, "What's the makor that an Isha is excluded from Smicha?" Because it says yada yada yada. And one of the yada's is coming to be memayet the loyad ishta. The truth is that Tosfos asks a kasha that what's the hava mina that a Isha should be able to do Smicha? Smicha had to be done before Shchita. Shchita had to be done during the day. Take if with Smicha shmit. In fact, the Smicha had to be done literally right around the same time that the Shchita was done. If Smicha had to be done during the day, what emerges is that Smicha is a mitzvah she's mangarama. And we know nashim are patur from all mitzvahs she's mangarama. As I picked this up, I said, "Kasha. Why do I need a pasuk to tell me that an Isha is excluded from Smicha? Typically, it's a mitzvah she's mangarama and nashim are patur from all mitzvahs she's mangarama. As I picked this up, I said, "Kasha." Truth is, Tosfos in Maseches Kiddushin daf lamed vov amud alef asks this kasha as well. And over there, Tosfos asks an expanded version of the kasha. The Mishnah over there discusses a whole bunch of halachas that an Isha is excluded from in the world of kashrut. HaSmicha is, HaTnuva is, HaGasha is, HaKmiza is, HaKtora is, HaMelika is, HaKabala is, HaHazaa is. Nohegin ba nashim v'lo ba nashim. All these things are nohegin ba nashim v'lo ba nashim. And the Gemara brings for every single one of these halachas, "Take this up, I said, 'Kasha.' V'im tomar, "Amay itzrich pasukim Gemara l'mayet?" Why do I need pasukim in the Gemara to memayet all these halachas? Typically, be emtza avoda l'haktir korbanos. We know avoda had to be done during the day. And if avoda has to be done during the day, that means you could do it only BY DAY, NOT BY NIGHT. It's a mitzvah she's mangarama. And we know nashim are patur from all mitzvahs she's mangarama. We once mentioned a teretz nifla to this kasha that the Malbim writes in his safer as the crime. The Malbim says, "How do we know that no Shima Potter from Mitzvah Sasecha's Mangurama?" So, it's a Sugya in the first paragraph of Maseches Kiddushin and it goes something like this. We know that no Shima are Potter from Tfillin. How do we know no Shima Potter from Talmud Tfillin? Because from Tfillin. Because Tfillin is Iskesha Talmud Torah and we know no Shima Potter from Talmud Torah. So, no Shima Potter from Talmud Torah through a Hekesh I know no Shima Potter from Tfillin. Tfillin is Iskesha Kol Ha'Torah Kulah because the Posuk says, "V'lo Isah Yotrah U'l'zikaron Einechem Torah She'bifcha." So, if no Shima are Potter from Tfillin, that means no Shima are going to be Potter in Kol Ha'Torah Kulah? They're Potter from all Mitzvos? No. Any Mitzvah that's Domeh to Tfillin. Tfillin is something that you do by day. It's not something you do by night. It's a Mitzvah Sasecha's Mangurama. That's how I know no Shima Potter from all Mitzvah Sasecha's Mangurama. So, how do I know no Shima Potter from Mitzvah Sasecha's Mangurama? If you take it from the top, no Shima Potter from Talmud Torah. Talmud Torah is Iskesha Tfillin. That means no Shima are going to be Potter from Tfillin. If Tfillin is Iskesha Kol Ha'Torah Kulah, which means that no Shima are going to be Potter from any Mitzvah that's similar to Tfillin. Tfillin is only night by Yom. It's Mitzvah Sasecha's Mangurama. So, no Shima are going to be Potter from all Mitzvah Sasecha's Mangurama. So, look at the Malbim Adava Cholev. He says that we know that when it comes to Kotchin, Dover Al Lomde B'hekesh is only Choser U'melamed B'hekesh. This is one of the Klalim that underpins the entirety of Kotchin. If that's the case, a Mitzvah Sasecha's Mangurama is a Dover Al Lomde B'hekesh that Choser U'melamed B'hekesh. It's learned from Tfillin. Tfillin is Lomde B'hekesh from Talmud Torah and it's Choser U'melamed B'hekesh to Kol Ha'Torah Kulah where it's Domeh to Tfillin. That works in Kol Ha'Torah Kulah with the exception of one area. With the exception of cotton. Being that by cotton there's a rule of Well, if that's THE CASE, THERE'S NO SUCH AS when it comes to cotton. The give me a castle in WHICH IS ALSO WHY is it that there's so many places that you find a myth of when it comes to different Typically had to be done during the day and if that's the case such as a rule. The truth is DOESN'T APPLY TO COTTON. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? I THOUGHT IT'S A REGULAR RULE. THE TRUTH IS BECAUSE the whole car of my rule is which is that rule works in it's not something that works when it comes to cotton. I think this is I found in the this is it's from the great Sinai and the same Peter of this is a double cotton in his own words but it's also a double of he said this methodology of the Malbim which by the way he brings also from the my is a safer that was written on safer of this the my was very known to the same safer back in the in there's a that gave on the my but either way the same Peter of said that this of the Malbim which is also in the safer of the my could be me as if a double cotton that the brings in his my cotton same he says he says one of the London right that's an expression so but one of the big one asked me the following question and this question needs a tiny bit of an introduction one random. The random in the beginning of this is all of Allah Allah. Call him a man like her. If a person violates tomorrow was one of the topics of today's daf gets Marcus. Not just that for every single behavior that he does tomorrow he gets a separate Marcus. Says the random. Even though when someone does tomorrow he violates tomorrow all he did was talk say something he wasn't supposed to say. But he didn't do a nice and the rule is that love shame by my say and like in a lot but. And being that this is one of the three exceptions to the rule. You get Marcus if somebody violates the love of tomorrow. But the random says I have another cash on the Marcus of tomorrow the Marcus cash it says love shame and my son the says. This is the small. That this is one of the three exceptions to the rule. The love of tomorrow is also a love in the class say. The six says we have. In the event that you violate the tomorrow. The condition is going to be held. And in the world of the random that makes it a love and it the class. But wait the random tomorrow is also a love and it the class say. And if it's a love and it the class say then based on that there should be no Marcus. The random I'm going to tell you that's not a cash you know why. With me. in love with Allah say. It's because although this love is in the class say but the love and that say are not sure. What does that mean. Shout about should be in tomorrow at sea board. Or even a carbon that's owned just by two people Ruben and Shimon they don't have the ability to make tomorrow. The alpha p shame but at the same time if they went ahead and did the mice of tomorrow they would be over the love. As it relates to tomorrow says the Rambam that saying the not show the say is more inclusive than that say. The is everybody the but the Yuma for you WHO TOMORROW THAT'S NOT NEGATED and the show it says the Rambam still tired. The only time there's a rule of the class saying love is if the love that say but if the love say a notch over the love is more inclusive than that say then you never say love that say even when you're over the love in a way where you would have the essay it doesn't matter it's a tight love the class say it's a tight the love and the essay if the love and that say a show but you have the rule of love the class say if the love and that say a notch over you're not going to have the rule of love the class say this is a very rare still tired from the Rambam usually the Rambam lays out the rule of the land without giving much explanation to you do it. See that introduction to the safer Yasha of the my but over here the Rambam actually gives us a little bit of insight into how he went about his Rambam passing that you get Marcus for the love of tomorrow and the Rambam said there's really two cashes on the Marcus one the Gamora asks isn't it a love by my son maybe I should but that we have a Messiah Kabbalah even a couple but there's another cash you said the Rambam it's a love the class say and to be me out of this the Rambam said a still tired from the ages the only time you say love the class say is if the love and that say a show. But if the love is more inclusive it includes more people than the essay behind you're not going to say love the class say so the show Martins and the great guy said that one of the loyal asked him the following cash. He said we know that has a sheet in shots that a show is put them in a this stating that it's you do it that the remy in his came you bring this by talks about this throughout the safer said that even that holds that it means he's from us I say but he's going to be included in if that's the case as this one the show it comes out that in the world of every single is more inclusive than in a set because the love include the and the don't include THE AND IF THAT'S THE CASE HOW COULD THERE BE A LOVE THIS WAS THE THIS WAS THE THAT THIS ONE ASKED THE SHOW and the one invite he says don't tell me the public maybe who said has to hold the because hold that and it's only for not for love and as in the maybe it's going to come out there's no but the one told him it can't be you know why because there's a that's mentioned in many places in we all know this I'm just going to quote it from it says regarding the but like there's no on the love of you know why BECAUSE IT'S BECAUSE IF SOMEBODY VIOLATES THIS but the bottom LINE is is that we know is that there is a love I say if there's a love I say and the is right in this cloud that that the only time you say love is if the love and I say in world that FOR BUT IT'S IT'S NOT AND IF THAT'S THE CASE HOW COULD THERE EVER BE SUCH a thing as so listen to a hard and I go in the same he said that the I want to say something I found anywhere in the safer, which means it doesn't exist. So, he said I'm going to tell you a double gosh. And that is based on the rate of the Melbourne and based on the rate of the minor home. He says take a look in the second of the matter of the same. This is also a classic tomorrow. The tomorrow said time of the what is the of the matter of the holes that assume is part of the matter of this. He said I'm not possible of the matter of the matter of the matter. We learn from here say yes the matter of the matter. Any person that's included in the matter of this. Like if his show damages is higher. He's if he's somebody has to pay to make yes the matter of this someone that's included in the matter of this is included in the matter of the matter of the matter. Any person that's included in the matter of the matter of the matter. He's not included in the matter of the matter of the matter. He's not included in the matter of the matter of the matter. He's not included in the matter of the matter of the matter. He's not included in the matter of the matter of the matter. He's not included in the matter of the matter of the matter. He's not included in the matter of the matter of the matter. He's not included in the matter of the matter of the matter. He's not included in the matter of the matter of the matter. He's not included in the matter of the matter of the matter. He's not included in the from the matter of the matter of the matter. Said the same page of the roof. How does the matter of the matter of the matter know that the matter of the matter of the matter is not the matter of the matter of the matter. It's the matter of the matter of the matter. The matter of the matter of the matter is not the matter of the matter of the matter. does the matter of the matter of the matter know that the matter of the matter of the matter is not the matter of the matter of the matter. The matter of the matter of the matter is not the matter of the matter of the matter. The matter of the matter of the matter is not the matter of the matter of the matter. The matter of the matter of the matter is not the matter of the matter OF THE MATTER. ANYONE THAT'S INCLUDED IN THE MATTER OF THE MATTER of the matter is not the matter of the matter of the the matter. The matter of the matter of the matter is not the matter of the matter of the matter. The matter of the matter of the matter is not the matter of the matter of the matter. But any person that's not included in the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter. Such as the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter. SUCH AS THE MATTER OF THE MATTER of the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter. Such as the matter OF THE MATTER OF THE MATTER of the matter of the matter of the matter. Such as the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the MATTER OF THE MATTER. SUCH AS THE MATTER OF THE MATTER OF THE MATTER OF THE matter of the matter of the matter. Such as the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the MATTER OF THE MATTER. SUCH AS THE MATTER OF THE MATTER OF THE MATTER of the matter of the matter of the matter. Such as the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter. Such as the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter of the matter. Such as the matter of the MATTER OF THE MATTER of the matter of the matter of the matter. SUCH AS >> AND THERE'S ANOTHER POSSIBLE to say some who come up with when the partial of mishpatim to the partial of mitsvos for who come and based on the Rabbi who formulated his position that is going to be put on the mitsvos. I'll be the feed this that the Malbim the gave us THAT ANY OF SHOTS THAT'S ALL OF THE CAN APPLY TO KOSHER MALBIM SAID IN THE WELL IT COME OUT that although Rabbi who said this that put them in the mitsvos but not when it comes to kosher. When it comes to kosher over there can't be put them in the mitsvos. The reason he can't be put them in the mitsvos cuz it's all learned from the Malbim said this which is not true for kosher. Just like the there's no mitsvos Malbim said by kosher. Because Malbim SAID THIS MALBIM SAID IT CAN'T BE SAID BY KOSHER. So to Rabbi who SAID THIS MALBIM SAID THIS MALBIM SAID THIS RABBI WHO SAID this Malbim said this Malbim said this also can't apply to kosher. Cuz Malbim said this Malbim can't be Malbim said this. Rabbi who said this you're right. Malbim said this Malbim said this a big problem. You know why Malbim said this Malbim said this a big problem? Because the Malbim said it's not a big they not a because the Malbim said it's not a big problem even the Malbim and Malbim said it's not a big problem even the Rabbi who said this Malbim said this Malbim said this Malbim said this Malbim said this it's only Malbim said this it's not the Malbim said this Malbim SAID THIS. WHAT WAS THE MALBIM SAID THIS THAT THE MALBIM SAID THIS his grace the Malbim said this what DO YOU MEAN RABBI WHO SAID THIS said Malbim said this Malbim SAID THIS WHEN DID HE SAY IT? BY THE MALBIM SAID THIS MALBIM SAID THIS MALBIM SAID THIS Malbim said this Malbim SAID THIS KOSHER. BY KOSHER THERE'S NO MALBIM SAID THIS MALBIM SAID THIS MALBIM SAID THIS MALBIM said this if that's the case the MALBIM SAID THIS MALBIM SAID THIS MALBIM SAID THIS MALBIM SAID THIS KOSHER. KOSHER SHINY. Kosher is a big going to be different. My kotzim is going to be different. This is a dover hadash. It's a dover horif. The ruyan hadvarim l'mishanem.