ונתת שמה מים

The Mayasimcha in a classic Meshech Chochma in the beginning of parshas Ki Sisa, he makes a very subtle dik. The pasuk that introduces the kiyor says, Vayedaber Hashem el Moshe leima, Va'asisah kiyor nechoshes vechano nechoshes lerachtzah, venasata oso bein Ohel Moed uvein hamizbei'ach, venasata shama mayim. Fremier Simcha, why does the pasuk say venasata shama mayim? Grammatically, what the pasuk should have said was venasata bo mayim. Right? Venasata bo, you should make a kiyor and what should you put in the kiyor? You should put water in the kiyor. Shama means there. You should put the water there? I mean, that's like more slang. You should put it in it, right? You're making the kiyor and in the kiyor venasata bo mayim. Says the Mayasimcha, that we learned in Gemara that the Gemara said kol ha'keilim mekadshen uvilvad sheyihyu kesheirim. In the Halacha what the makor is is learned out from the word yerachtzu, but from the word yerachtzu that it says in the parsha of the kiyor we learn that it's not me'akev that the Kohanim be mekadesh yadayim veraglayim from the kiyor itself, but really kol ha'keilim uvilvad sheyihyu kesheirim. Stating that Mayasimcha says, there's a Yerushalmi in perek Torah be'kalpi. This is in the fourth perek of maseches Yoma in the end of Halacha hey, that the Yerushalmi says that even though the kiyor itself was not me'akev, aber mikuyam me'akev. Whatever klishorim the Kohanim are going to use to be mekadesh yadayim veraglayim, that's fine, but the makom of where exactly the kiyor had to be, venasata oso bein Ohel Moed uvein hamizbei'ach, that says the Yerushalmi was me'akev. So says the Mayasimcha, the kiyor was not me'akev. You have to have a klishorim, but the kiyor itself was not me'akev. But the makom of the kiyor was me'akev. That's what the pasuk Va'asisah kiyor nechoshes vechano nechoshes lerachtzah, venasata oso bein Ohel Moed uvein hamizbei'ach, venasata shama. The makom of bein Ohel Moed uvein hamizbei'ach, there you should put the water cuz that's what's me'akev. Venasata bo is not me'akev cuz they actually didn't have to be in the kiyor. If it's the kiyor, it's the kiyor, but it could be any klishorim. Aber vos is ya'am me'akev? What's me'akev is that it should be bein Ohel Moed uvein hamizbei'ach. That's shama, that's there. The geographic location of the kiyor is what's me'akev. The kiyor of itself is not me'akev. Says the Mayasimcha, kedarka bakodesh, that's why the Torah used this loshon of venasata shama mayim and not the loshon of venasata bo mayim.