Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
What Macklemore Was ACTUALLY Advocating For
1,700 views
It sounds like something nobody could argue with, until you ask what ideology is actually behind it. I broke down what the encampments were really celebrating starting October 8th, what "intifada" actually means, and why words like "liberation" and "resistance" are being used to sanitize something violent and very specific. You have to examine what's behind the slogan, not just the slogan itself. Don't be fooled by nice phrases. Join Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/c/amikozak Shop Merch - https://thekozakstore.com Socials: https://www.instagram.com/amikozak_official/ https://www.tiktok.com/@aj_comedy?source=h5_m #FreePalestine #Macklemore #Israel
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Now, let's dive a little deeper. A a a
little deeper. Let's get a little deeper
into the controversy because I think
it's easy to be tricked. It's easy to
fall for this presentation of um
you know what exactly did MLmore say? I
don't get it. What was so offensive?
He's up there talking about freedom for
all people. He's saying free Palestine.
What could be wrong with that? This
isn't hate speech. This isn't
anti-semitism.
Why would he be canceled for this? It's
not the uh idea of cancelling somebody
for something. I mean, I think if he got
up there and advocated for pedophilia or
rape and was canceled from the tour, no
one would say, "Hey, free speech.
Free speech." I mean, how could we kick
somebody off of a stage on a platform?
It's free speech. Everyone would would,
you know, coales and agree. there be
consensus around, oh well those ideas
are obviously repugnant and he should be
kicked off for saying such things. But
the thing with the left, especially the
woke left and the anti-Israel uh mob
and in general on the left is a lot of
their most dangerous ideologies are
coded in sanitized language meant to
deceive you. Manny McLemore,
the whole leftwing platform is all about
progress.
you you know so who could be against
such messages and ideas? Who could be
against affordability? Who could be
against universal health care? Who could
be against bodily autonomy? These are
all words and phrases and language
designed to deceive, designed to
actually evade the actual core moral and
ideological issues underpinning them.
Well, who could be up against
affordability? But behind that is a
political agenda that's coercive.
that punishes productive people, that
steals their wealth,
that perverts economic incentives,
that's incredibly destructive, that
gives power,
you know, increasingly to bureaucrats
and rulers to rule over you, to make
decisions for you. But they're not going
to pitch that. That's not a good sales
pitch. Instead, it's under
affordability. The same thing here. What
is it's not just saying freedom for all
people. That's a that's a great idea.
Sure. What's the ideology that's
animating such statements? What does
McLemore actually believe? What did the
protest movement, the encampment
movement that he celebrated, what do
they believe?
That's what matters.
And for all you people wondering, it's
like, remember during COVID when they're
like, "Hey, don't you want to save
grandma?
Don't you want to save grandma and the
elderly and the vulnerable and the
immuno compromised from certain death?
Save the children. Lock them down."
Well, who doesn't want to save the
elderly, save the vulnerable? Who
doesn't want to do that? How could you
be against such a thing? But we all knew
that was linguistic trickery to get you
to comply, to conform. And that's how
you can convince good people to get
behind dangerous, poisonous, toxic
ideologies that are destructive and evil
because you convince them that you put
it on the banner of a phrase of, you
know, a great society. Uh, you know, the
all these movements, especially on the
left-wing revolutionary side, are under
the guise of phrases and slogans that
seem amazing, meant to deceive you,
meant to get you to buy into it. By the
same token here, free Palestine,
the encampments calling for justice.
Who's against justice? Well, what's the
ideology that animates it? Who are they
supporting? on October 8th. Mind you,
these encampments began immediately
after the slaughter and massacre of men,
women, children, and babies targeted
because they were Jews, because they
were Yahood, the Hamas resistance
fighters, framed as resistance fighters
as opposed to murderers, targeting
intentionally men, women, children,
babies, elderly, Holocaust survivors,
taking them hostage, going into homes
and mowing them down, intentionally
burning them, setting them on fire.
Sexual violence, rape
is framed as resistance is justified
when people are occupied. That's how
it's framed and that's what they're all
supporting.
Liberation is actually violent, bloody
massacre,
intentionally targeting civilians,
which is very different than the IDF
targeting those people who committed
these massacres and civilians die
unintentionally in the process. That's
collateral damage and war. It's icky.
It's gross. It's yucky. Nobody likes
this as a state of humanity.
But that's what justice is. It's going
after murderers, not being accused of
being a murderer just because you're
pursuing one and bringing them to
justice. But that's what these people
are celebrating. Make no mistake. They
don't want to even build Palestine. Why?
How do I know that? They simply want to
destroy Israel from the river to the
sea. Inifat revolution. What does inifat
revolution mean? The inifada was a
series of suicide bombs
on buses, malls, and cafes in Israel.
That's you sitting in a restaurant, in a
cafe, having a latte, some matcha tea,
and a suicide bomber comes in and blows
himself up and kills you and all your
friends. That's what inifat means. And
they want to globalize it.
You go to the encampments, that's what
they stand for. That's what
and and they have no love for the West
in general or the United States. They
want to burn it all down.
And Mcleammore praises their bravery,
the bravery of upper middle class kids
who have no orientation towards anything
virtuous or good. So they want to
project it.
They need to project it and find some
sort of cause. And yeah, there's no cost
to them for supporting such a cause
because it's not at their doorstep. They
can support kamas all day. There's no
rockets flying over their head.
Nothing's easier than doing that from a
an encampment protest in which you have
an actual nice home to go home to to
parents who are paying your tuition to
be indoctrinated into this
nonsense blabble.
Your parents are funding your education
to be taught to hate them and the
country that they raised you in.
Interesting. That's the ideology
animating somebody on stage like
McLemore advocating for a free
Palestine. And I know that they don't
care to create one because the people
that they're supporting
don't hold any of those values of
freedom, rights,
human life. No, it's a totally different
culture they're advocating for that
supports death. It's a cult of death,
martyrdom. They have different values.
Martyrdom, death.
um killing the Yahood,
spreading Islam around the world to have
everybody submit to it. That's the
ideology. That's the values that they
support uh in Gaza and the West Bank.
I'm I'm sorry to say it's people don't
want to accept that, but you know, I've
spoken to IDF soldiers who've gone from
house to house in the West Bank and find
copies of mine comp
in home after home. Kamas support
everywhere all over the West Bank. Kamas
cells and operatives in the West Bank.
For those of you who don't think, oh,
there's no kamas in the West Bank,
that's a different thing. When you look
at the images and footage from October
7th, you don't just see militants,
armed
attacking Israeli soldiers as if it's
some sort of armed conflict, one against
the other, guerilla warfare. No, no, no,
no, no. You see mobs and mobs of
cheering crowds elated,
thrilled to be dragging Jewish bodies
through the streets,
spitting on their bodies as they do it.
You hear accounts of hostages held in
civilian homes,
in the homes of teachers who work for
the UN. The people responsible for
educating children in the Gaza Strip are
holding hostages in their attic or their
basement. home after home after home in
Gaza with access points to tunnels. Not
to protect Gazan children from
bombardments, from aerial bombardments.
No, no, no, no. To protect terrorists so
that they can continue to operate and
attack Israel.
I got news for you.
When you commit acts of aggression
against other people, yeah, you lose
autonomy and rights. That's what
happens. Everybody understand that? It's
the basis of criminality.
That's the basis of justice. You lose
rights on behalf of yourselves and your
citizens when you continually
attack your neighbors.
Every gesture that Israel's offer for
peace over decade after decade after
decade has only been met with more
bloodshed, seen as a sign of weakness.
Because there's an ideological belief
that this land must become Islamic land.
It must be restored and the Yahood must
be killed and fought.
The end of days will not come until the
Muslims fight the Jews. Behold, behold,
oh Muslim, behind a rock, there is a
Jew. Behind a tree, there's a Jew. Come
kill him. That's in the kamas founding
charter. And that's
the culture, the ideology that McLemore
is advocating for when he talks about
free Palestine on stage. That is what it
is. And if it's not, let's have him
clarify it.
I'm all for freedom. I'm all for rights
for everyone, universally, for sure. But
if you have large swats of people that
don't accept that value system and it's
a choice between your own security, well
then it just becomes suicidal empathy
because if you grant people political
power over you that seek your
destruction.
You're not only supporting the homicide
of the Jews by their neighbors, you're
supporting the suicide of the Jews by
themselves.
So that's what uh that's what's meant by
these sugarcoated sanitized phrases and
slogans. How could I not get behind such
phrases and slogans? Well, because it's
the same tactic every single time. It's
the same sloganering to disguise a very
violent, bloody, and evil agenda. the
free Palestine movement, the
encampments, the people that simp for
Hamas or the IRGCbalah,
they don't want to create a free,
prosperous Palestine.
They want to destroy a free, prosperous
Israel. And they're offended by Israel's
success
and Israel's virtue.
The the place in the Middle East that
upholds those progressive values these
people claim to stand for the most is
Israel without question.
Women's rights, gay rights, minority
rights, civil rights,
education,
art, music, culture,
go to Israel. It'll be very familiar to
you because it's all there.
You want to have this experiment of
providing more autonomy to people who
seek your destruction? Let's try it,
right? Uh oh, it did happen. It was
called Gaza 2005. Every last Jew was
removed from the Gaza Strip and what was
it meant with just like in every other
case? More bloodshed,
more attacks on Israel. Hamas comes to
power and they always take the they
always look at the uh effect and not the
cause. They go blockade siege of Gaza.
They they control the air, the land and
the sea. Why? Why does Israel have to
monitor for security measures the air
land and sea? What what happened? Oh
yeah, they're smuggling rockets and
weapons into the Gaza Strip to attack
Israel as opposed to building schools
and infrastructure and roads to take
care of their citizenry and build a
prosperous society with beachfront
property. Could have been a really nice
place, a nice neighbor alongside Israel.
But they didn't do that. They made
choices. Those choices have
consequences. And then Israel has to put
into effect monitoring for security
purposes. And guess what? They were
right. I would say if Hamas didn't
smuggle weapons in and keep firing them
at Israel over these many many years and
you wouldn't have that response. I don't
like seeing a security fence along the
Jude and Samaria and along the West
Bank. I don't Nobody likes to see that.
Why did that happen? You know what only
happened in 2002? Why? Oh yes, there was
a surge of terrorism against Israelis.
The antifada suicide bombs in malls and
cafes and buses.
And so they look at the effect. Ooh,
that's an unsightly sight to have to see
a security fence.
But what's the cause? It's not Israel,
it's the attacks against it time and
time again.
And so I hope for a peaceful future. I
would like that. But it's always been to
me clearly demonstrated that when Israel
has the opportunity to seek peace, they
take it since its inception as a modern
state in 1948.
But in Palestinianism, there's a
rejection of such a state.
They don't want a state provided there's
a Jewish one next to it. That's
unacceptable. And that's not a place to
compromise from. That's not a place
where you can dialogue from where how
about we split it? How about we
compromise? How about and they say how
about you all die?
You have no place here in your
ancestral, spiritual, biblical homeland.
I mean, you can't deny the historical
ties of the Jews to the land. You can't.
But anyway, that's uh there's no room
for compromise and conversation there if
uh there's no partner for peace if the
so-called partner is elimination
eliminationist to you and seeks your
absolute total destruction.