Zevachim 106

We've all learned Kish, maybe even thought we understood. But now with his trademark depth and clarity and his signature uptempo daffomi style, Repsuri Bournestein uncovers the layers beneath the words, revealing a world of meaning, relevance, and beauty in every line. Where the deraim of the bass medish meets pushup shot. Discover the shear that's redefining how people learn Kumish. Reprly Bournestein's Kishar. Find it on the Lakewood Dafyomi app or wherever this shear is being heard. And we are at the beginning of a new per the 13th per. So is one of the important. So when you think of the lumbish parts of of what comes to mind is the madesh and is right up there. Either way really is the of the that's mentioned in so begins and the beginning of par is of course so the para that discusses and the the it's all mentioned mentioned in in right in the beginning it's the very next par the mentions that's also but completely unrelated to completely unrelated to and that is the and the is of let's just very quickly go through the together and then we'll get right into the der begins So this is aid that took a carbon and instead of bringing the carbon what he did was is heed it. It's important or it's a very bad thing. He was supposed to bring it into the Bik. So what happens to this person says the this person is going to be and the reason is because it's important for you to know there's only one place to bring a carbon. You don't do not in your backyard not but it has to be and when you bring it to the says like this will you be able to do you'll be able to do and only then will there be a then the says that you know why this is so important which although we'll see in today's d the gar is gonna have several draws how to learn this Pik but in the PK is is you know why it's so critical to make sure that you don't bring a carbon outside of the B mikdash because we're all familiar with the slippery slope and one thing leads to another. If you're going to take a carbon and you're going to bring a what may happen is you may bring another sacrifice to another deity as well. This may lead to so says the you know why it's so important not to ever bring a carving outside of the Bikto because like this. You're not going to bring any carbon to the you bring a carbon to the goat. I thought the goat is the carbon. No says and once upon a time people used to worship the devil. They used to worship demons. So by having this in essence, it's a protection. It's a to make sure that you're not going to be if you remember we spoke out from David made a that learns from a that is not at first glance it makes no sense. Why would there be a that the guy should be? It's not one of the if it's not one of the why would there be a you don't need the to say that a guy doesn't fill in. So why would you need an apostic in the to tell me a that a guy is excluded from the par of so we suggested that if the whole is of being that has one of the and is like so that you shouldn't come maybe you think the guy would have say as well either says the I want to tell you something else. that just like I said that it's awesome for a person to the carbon it's also awesome for a person to be a carbon meaning someone's going to take a carbon and he's going to bring it whether it's same story and instead of bringing it to the he decided to make a barbecue somewhere outside this person is also going to be and then the continues Either way, so you have two par that are right after the para of the par that deal with someone bringing a carbon outside of the oil. The first one is someone that the second one is someone that was. Today's going to be # no raid but just one har and man it is onear is the pik begins ish is bas is it sounds like we're talking about any as a matter of fact we just mentioned the terrorist that was that brought a riot that it doesn't apply to a guy but aid for sure why is it because you could argue that so if a is going to go and he's going to sh the carbon it's It's a scotch and he did it in the wrong place. As a result, he's going to be But if goes and he's so extent that he was why should that be for which he should be because is always possible to do. I understand why it applies to is as long as you're you don't have to be a it's not being told to the per se but any even a woman incidentally why because also to do that that's the first mission the third par so based on that it makes sense why it would apply to but which is an that's plear why is it that aar that does the is going to be either There's a lot to talk about maybe tomorrow night and that's when we learn Sunday we'll get into it but for now if someone and he's so he did both he did the first part of the para and the second part of the parita and it says he's both for the and for the now he can't be twice so what does it mean twice it means if he did he did the and he did the bash we look at them as two separate aas If you do two for each as a result you'll be for each one meaning you'll be two is that we look at them as two separate aas you could have thought it's one there's a doing and within that there's two of the is that they're two independent and as a result there's going to be for each one independently if someone meaning was done and then afterwards the imam were brought outside the was done it's over you're going to be say if you take the same carving and you do and then you do but you're going to be from the why apostle because what were you my you apostle so mean that what you brought was a d apostle it's not a if it's not so the mission says says it sounds like even if it's the same carbon you shed it and then you took those you put them and you went ahead and you were you both really in that case you're not going to be because once you did has to be if it's if it's at the very least it has to be within the was so at that point you're not going to be when then are you when it was when the was you took the outside that is a good problem is it's as a result you're going to be but it's not true even a case and as soon as you take it outside if you're telling me you're meaning the only time is when you were then there's a problem because every single by definition that Allah took place out of the and the moment you take the out of the at that point it's and the mission goes but the reason the mission is doing it because the mission is going to bring now another from the logic perspective mirrors this previous we'll say if eats So Tommy that eats if he has he is if he eats whether the was tom or the kum was if the ate kchum that's if the tom ate that's he's going to be why do because you have to eat a do you can't eat a dom. really how's it possible for a tot therefore how could you have a that says that a that eats is not for the fact that he ate every single time a eats kachin because he's always being mama of the kachch similar to this argument that how could you tell me there's a that the only time is every because the moment you take the out of it automatically becomes possible either way that eats just as a FYI he's like so even though whenever you talk about it doesn't matter if the person's to and the food is or the person's and the food is to but there is an with regards to meaning it's always going to be but from a a standpoint if someone's that's when there's a if someone's not there's no when it comes to the if somebody if he does it if someone's the same thing if he doesn't he's going to But the point is that there's a for someone that's the mentioned if you the same carbon are you going to be one you going to be two but that's clear there's a and there's a first glance what's the says I'll tell you why it's there's an that the clearly says that if somebody's and not just that the gives an theory warned there's a say in the Torah that says thou shalt not be now we read the together it's clear in the in the it's really the next words it's clear in the says very very clearly that if somebody's now this interestingly is actually not here in par but this is in par and the over there talks about how where the were supposed to be brought they were supposed to be brought in the mikdash and says the if if somebody doesn't bring it in the mikdash it's it's a bad thing and the is clearly discussing and we know and you have two of the three say so you have the and you have the and being that you have the and the it's for that reason there's going to be not only is also going to be but as it relates to the says the clearly says there's going to be cars but you see where did the Tyra say anywhere that thou shalt not So thou shalt not be my but that person clearly says heal we're talking about we're talking about doesn't say anything about so if there's no on then why should it be of in other words there's a a cloud god in the way Rashi learns this right here it's very very clear this rashi is but it's rashi so we're going to go with rashi that applies not to but it applies to the component of of so anytime a person doesn't have that he would have been it's then that he has to bring but there's a rule so just because the says that if you do something doesn't by definition mean that if you do a you're going to be it's only if it was that the says and now you can have the I understand if someone's but that's but there's no say anywhere in the where the Torah says you're not allowed to be as a result you have no question but you don't have the if you don't have the there shouldn't be so the kasha is is how could the mission say that you have so there's no problem of but as it relates to what do you have the says so we mentioned that the gives a why the was like because if you get you know what's gonna happen you're gonna end up bringing up so it says the don't so that you will not to be but those words says the Torah can go backwards as well. It could be going back to the entire par. I just finished telling you a par I just told you that if somebody but I never gave you a take those two words thou shalt not apply it bring it backwards to the previous and now I have a rel that's says even if you want to use meaning aside for the which is again our you want to tell But I have a rebel that already used this love. We borrowed this. It's taken already. You can't use it for this. What was it used for? I mean, we know if somebody an animal mean somebody or how somebody so if you serve the way people used to serve it. If somebody's or or every had its own way that people would worship it. If somebody would worship in the way that people worshiped it, he'd be for what he did. In addition to that, if somebody's over any of the that were used in the B mikdash, if somebody's over any of the to any doesn't matter which it is also going to be it's learned out from apost even a big even if somebody that's just an example of one of the even if somebody where the der is not the marulus because people used to be marulus even then you're going to be what's the even why is that a big I thought the dal No matter which it is, whether it's the reason is because the way they used to worship was they would throw stones in it. People worshiped. So I would have thought that people worship in even though people don't worship this but at least it's it's an that people worship. said I learned from this from this is extra to teach me this that even though that people worship but if somebody being that it's one of the is going to be bottom line is I can't use to tell me that I need this for to teach me that if somebody he does one of the even that people usually worship it's not says let's see it inside said he explains the Gmorra is that if all the wanted to tell me was it would have just said the word would be extra it didn't have to say in being that it says it teaches me to number one going backwards and number two moving forward it's as we just mentioned says the I still need this I for something else for the following who says who is. So what does mean says so the first six of is describing somebody that where the carbon somebody was and was meaning there were times in history where Jews were actually allowed to bring carbon the sh the wholeer of is all predicated on you're not allowed to bring a carbon outside of the mikt I what happened to the parish of isn't that what a bum what was a bum there was a bum which wasn't in the mikdash and then there were kanis that people were able to have different carbonas you could bring you can't different nuances that's the last parag deals with a lot of but the bottom line is there's a concept of abama and the concept of at first glance would seem to be a contradiction to the is of how do you reconcile these two things how do you have a par of which is it's horrible it's But then there's the terret is the only applies when there was an when there was a hat. So it says to that before this I would have thought that the only time there's an issue says again and and Rashi says that really this part of the price it wasn't of anything all the need to say is that those that teach us and I would assume is referring to where everything happened and but from that I know that this is true Because the says that meaning even that I was still Meaning the is coming to tell me it's coming to tell me that this is not only true for someone that was but even if you not but even if you doesn't matter as long as you that's enough to tell me that you're going to either way the price continues and the price says when It says in the I would have thought there should be someone that when he was the end of the and we learned from there say that's the that's the but there's not going to be a of course but bottom line what do you see from a long-winded. The bottom line is the Bryce has said that when it says in the it's a that's coming to teach me that not only is there if somebody's but even if someone was as long as that's enough that this should be bottom line is coming to tell me true in the but not for the classic case of not for the case where you but rather how do I know there's maybe there's only going to be if I was again the the begins with basically one or two clearly implying that if somebody or is he's going to First glance you'd say of course it says in the if you do amaze it. So doesn't that mean if you do that there's going to be says no because there's a rule and says that that means as it relates to the carbon the only time there's a if there's an I don't have an aar anywhere. So says I found the it says and even though the is involved in the time of the why doesn't but at the end of the day it says that says written all over it. So you have a over here that teaches me that there's going to be anor means that if you give me says one second I need to teach me says true but there's two it didn't have to say so there's two one is regarding the other one is in the laws of says because the truth I found Bryce like what you just said I have a Bryce that says but that Bryce says it's referring to where that I was how do I know if I was so that's where we're stuck how do I know if someone's an animal is and then he is I know this car is because the doesn't distinguish between where the heck was if anything it's more that you but that is already on the part of the parachute that's discussing. Now at first glance you're going to say if I was as long and it's a reason it's such a fest is because that said that those are talking about where Head to said that if you head to and you do the nois all there is is so and you're where there's no still there's an so if I where there's certainly there has to be an this is a par how do I know that I know that from So here with his there certainly has to be a raashi and we'll speak out great about this matabas as well but just those words but either way what's the whatever if you're going to use this logic if you're going to use this logic it shouldn't have said And I should have known if you're going to work with such a logic that I could ask you a bunch of cautious as the is going to ask right now. Why have to say why did have to say that you're not allowed to eat is a part of the animal that's not kosher even if did it still it's off limits you're not allowed to eat the why is to say that I cannot make from if somebody eats if somebody eats it's a regular has an right doesn't have his still there is of also So came to say he told him no you can't learn from the why because even though is more than because has cars doesn't have cars but I can tell you there's something called we learn those together but we know is mama is not mama so mean that is not even of is not mama so if is not mama and is mama So maybe because you find this in the parish of the that this in that vein that you have this as well maybe not but the says okay I could learn it from the from the why can I learn from the that there's no still what's the if you eat it there's an certainly there should be says the word is is really an extra word. The point is same same and by definition are to and bring that to it's for that reason that maybe you have this that there's an azar as well as opposed to which even though there's a there's a but that there's no maybe there's no azar now there is an azar but that's why the had to write the azar I wouldn't necessarily know it what about from there maybe learn it from there but also have maybe learn from also there's no why have to write why can I learn it and so you don't have the previously said that's what learn it from says has a that once something has if you sell it the money that you get in exchange for the now has the you sell the money doesn't become right how about truma truma is not you don't find anywhere that should be as opposed to you do find should be because of is only if it's once that's the but once you find this has so I can already say that all these are you don't find anywhere that they should ever be you find of that's the bottom line is it's not a meaning we wanted to say that once I know once I know that there's a for you where there's no carus certainly there should be an if you where there is an issue Meaning if this is certainly there should be an it means it's more if that's the case why you need learn it out from all it's only true it's not true from but it doesn't necessarily mean that the logic of the is not a good logic but I'll tell you what does boarily But the mission says even if someone doesn't bring the carbon but at the same time there's no why because there's no even though the didn't mention why can't I learn from which is interesting if somebody eats So we mean if somebody performs the act of being he left over from a garbage there's an at the same time there's no you do have it now why we're bringing from there's no other that you could have picked the bottom place on the oven because you would have thought ordinarily You would say maybe you can't learn from a regular voice say because doesn't involve a right how you by not doing how you by not bringing the garba. So you would have thought that being that it doesn't involve a mess. Maybe that's why there's there's no you can't bring a raya from a a regular even though that has a cooler that there's no cars because it has a it involves a so we're just picking the that's right over it by not eating it. Point is is so that bothers me. Again, if you're going to tell me you can learn up an from and that's how you want to have the then should always be because even though there's no why can't I learn the from the t there's no way to undo it now there's a ton you can burn it which makes it a but there's no tak in terms of how to make it that you are also you could always do so you can't learn it even from that you can't learn from therefore you have no limit so what's the bottom line the digress but the bottom line is we started off which begins it's two parts to the para the first part is somebody the second part of it is somebody is we're going to see it's the next that The Gmorrah has where we learn if somebody does and it's not just it's going to be later but the bottom line is is that for now if somebody that's the first par that's second par the gives a time of the which we'll have to speak about it's somehow related to the Mishna said that these that are examples should bear didn't understand why because there's a rule of just like there's no so there's no there shouldn't be a go through the par there's no even though there's no inac but there's no parac said that no that even though it's not an that's the and that's an that's the missing piece and that's how knew you're going to be but dad I need that to teach me that if someone even though it's like even though that people used to worship so there's two so it's a that really is not an azor but we took two out of it one backwards one forward bottom line is one is coming to teach me but thear said that says it's only now and where we left off right now is that even though you tell me for someone that which we saw in that same B so there's no for then certainly if somebody's that definitely only mean that there's a that there's an azor but the garra proved after a whole lot of you can't make a from because if that's the case maybe bottom line is that's where that's where we're stuck now there do we could we learn from kabr could we not learn from kabr is going to pick up net hashem on the Next star.