Zevachim 22

Today's is and we are five lines from the bottom of the two dots. Today's being learned as today's also being learned as and so the topic of today's is going to be uh continuation of the previous den which is a further discussion of the kar says the gamar gfa you said in order for to be able to be mad from the you would have to have enough water in the form to be able to do what they need to do. What's the mart to that? Mosha the Aaron and of the and the understanding is Mosha is one Aaron is two Aaron's two sons are three and four and that's how we come to this number of so this is an idea that we've seen already and the gar now is going to expound on it again so in short what is teaching us is that the shear of May that was required ired for was enough to be able to bead their hands and their feet from any can be used by a toad meaning it's not necessary for the ken to use the kar for his but if he wanted to use a different kay that would be fine in fact Additionally, the Ber says it doesn't matter whether there's a re of mayam inside the scaly or there's no re of inside the scaly. The only thing that does matter is that the kay has to have it should be aiches as opposed to a but what we mean is that you see that it doesn't matter if the that's going to be used in li of the k has a reas or doesn't have a ree either way it's going to be fine meaning it sounds like it doesn't even have to have a reas yet said that there's Forget about you need that there should be enough this would seem to contradict what said and to answer this theor makes a super the better known you want to know what this price is talking about this price is talking about where somebody took a kali and he then stuck that kali into the k. So he grooved a hole in the wall of the k took this smaller kayali put it into the k. The way rashi describes it is mixas of this smaller kali was inside the perimeter of the k mixes of it was outside. The point is that this kayali now is attached to the actual k being that this kayali is attached to the actual k. It's for that reason the Bryer says I don't care if that kay has raas or doesn't have raas and the reason is because it's being y that's lush and rashi it's being y from the larger gear and being that the larger k has the requisite cheer so this is going to be fine as well meaning of the says it sounds like the terret is we're making a bigger when we say you You can use a kali even if it doesn't have a reas. It's talking about where you would the kali into the perimeter of the k. It becomes part of the k. The k itself has the shear. You're now meaning you the ken are being mad. Your hands and your feet from the kali that's attached to the gear, not the actual gear. That's fine. And really it doesn't matter. Reas, not reve. There's no shar that matters because really it's attached to the larger k. As long as the larger k has the sh that in it of itself is going to be oh okay either way. So we just mentioned the bryera machinimach. Why did we mention the bryer? Just to be mindful of the paper trail. It's because we thought that it was at odds with me that we've seen already reconciled and said that really there is no steer but we mentioned the Bryer and the Gumar is going to do what it often does when it mentions a Bryce and that is digress a little bit. It's not a digression because it's a bryer related to the gear which is the sugour but the gamarra is going to do a little bit of a deep dive into this bryer. So okay what did Bri say that you would think had to happen from the only thing that is that had to be the says the describes the says referring to the of but it says mu. What does mu sound like? That's an exclusionary word. Sounds like from the as from some other but the says as much as it's true it says the word but it also says in the next the word and as much as exclusionary is inclusionary. It's very inclusive. It's a word that's if you have a word then why not why does the price say why we said you can't say that it's okay for the you know why based on the which one number one if you're keeping score based on the first of based on a what's the from the so the says had to sit on a stand and from the as we'll see in a second I know that the co could not be from what's where the says that you had a beh with together with which in English just means it was a race right it had like did and still it's not you can't be from the never had with not with the not without the wasn't it's a by definition and certainly you shouldn't be able to you want to know why if the is not something that you can be from. Certainly the now what's the is associated with the with the it's a certainly which is not how do you know that the itself is not meaning that's the premise that we're making of this. So the garra says how do you know the you would think that just like the itself was for the maybe the should do the same thing says and we learn from here that the only thing that the and the ker have in common is they both had to be made of copper. They both had to be made of but as opposed to everything else. Now what's the makart to this rashi explains very what is because if you're going to tell me that the areab other then why would the terra have to say just say I'll know that the k and the being that dimension next to each other close proximity are and whatever is true for the gear is going to be true for the K as well. But the fact that the Torah has to go out of its way to tell me that just like the gear is made out of the K is also made out of you know what the Torah is telling me the Torah is telling me that without a word regarding the I would not know the K has to be made out of I the iskish. So from the fact that the said and they didn't rely on the heish that's how I know that there really is no heish to be had. And in fact, the only thing that's similar about them is now is it sounds like I know by the but of course I know by the really the punch line over here is that there's no hish to be had. The lumbness of it is similar to but the bottom line is says that the K can't be now I know that because I have a that the only thing the K and the K have in common is that they're both made out of but as it relates to anything else they're not either way let's circle back to Abayo Abayio said that why is it that the Bryer said that Kaio if the Marta Ka match is it says that we should be well what was the bias because if the K can't be mad and how do I know the K can't be mad because the only thing the K and the K have in common is as opposed to its ability to be mad that it doesn't have well the K can't and the can't so again what's the short answer noisy the scamar but what's the short answer to the question that if there's your to be not only the but other as well maybe also be the answer is no why from the what's the and not I have a is a stand even if you would come up with a mitas of how you can put water somehow in this tiny receptacle I'm not even how you would do it. But you come up with a and now the wants. It would be an unnatural usage of the that's not what the K is for, right? It's it's not made to put something inside the little receptacle that it may have. But which is maybe that's actually better than the and maybe the should be able to make. But the reason is I have a because yeah the in that it's a it's something that was together with but then again it has no to being okay said I think a different reason why it is that the was not okay to be used for even though you have the of your reason is because it says manu if you remember in the beginning of the asked how could you use a it says mu the answer to that was your now as much as your is a ter why you can use but muo is a real and that is the reason that you can't use a you're telling me you do say mimo so why don't you use mime to says, "Well, the says, what do you mean?" We answered that question already. You have your inso that's exclusionary and we have your that's inclusionary. So from how do you know to be maybe the says come on a taught one needed like the gear was a cliches right the is a so it makes sense that the kay that's like the gear that's the one that's going to be included and the one that's not like the gear that's the one that's going to be excluded. Either way, just to hit the pause button, come up for breath for one second. So, what do we have? We have two things. Number one, we know the how much had to be inside the what's the gave us from means two of a sons as from a so that's number one. We know the sh the second thing we know is that really you don't have to use the you can use any so as long as it's a it's fine and really there's two things that you see in that statement number one any is kosher number two any is not kosher now truth is what we saw in the hemik of the that as much as it's true any is kosher there's one that we know for sure is not the k right the kh we know is excluded okay additionally what is The card that any is kosher because it says how do you know are excluded because it says not related to the mikvah. So said any liquid that could be mashlin the shear of a mikvah. So what's the shear of a mikvah? Arbons could also be mashim for the shear of a what's the shar of a foranim are able to be madaga from it but the reashim but if you ever need a ra for whatever it might be for example kim requires a ra if you're ever going to need a ra these liquids would not have the ability to be mash so is is being very nuanced in what he's saying and which is why we're going to have a home in Suing now. So let's just uh understand at least the framework of what he's trying to say. Is saying there's a certain liquid that has the capacity to be the it has the capacity to be of but does not have the capacity to be wherever is necessary. Now it's mashma that whatever this liquid is is not kosher for a mikvah. Meaning if you would have a mikvah that's made up of 40 soft this it sounds like it wouldn't be okay. If you would have a k that has the shir but only of this it wouldn't be okay. What it has the ability to do is is to be mashim. So it's interesting you have something that's not kosher but if you're only using it to bear then already it's going to be okay. And what we're saying is that this mashkin, whatever it is, I now is going to be to try to figure out what we're talking about. But this mashka, whatever it might be, is a mashka that although it's not kosher, but to be mashim for the mikvah, yes, to be mash for the yes, but to be for that is not okay. It says what exactly is this liquid that is referring to when we say meaning what can't be used to be mashed from the just the words but what is this liquid that was referring to the throws out a few suggestions maybe he was referring to tit is mud is very very liquidy but thear says is it liquidy enough that if a par sees it the parro will bend over old school and drink from it and allow me then it's a regular liquid and it should be kosher even to be meaning then it's regular liquid and if you're going to tell me that it's too thick for the to want to drink from it that it shouldn't be for the it can't be that maybe it's coming to red midgetes so Rashi says these are some sort of creatures insects that grow inside water and even though they're insects so they're not Mayan but being that they're minim that's somehow how they're breeded. So it's for that reason that on some level they have a a din of mind and maybe that's what was referring to that if you want to be in and 40 of these that's not kosher but if you want to use it to be it's good and the same would be true for the would be true for the but it's not true they're actually in treated like water Anything that's created from the water, you have to know scientifically what this means. But anything that's created from the water, meaning even if the whole shear is made of that, it's going to be okay. You can even be in the eye of a fish. So this would have to be a very big fish that has very big eyes. But the bottom line is if you had such a mess, it would be okay because being that it's treated like limes. It can't be that is just talking about is it's just good oldfashioned. It's not only it's something that's regular. I'll tell you what was referring to. The case was long grashy here where you had a mikvah and the mikvah had a perfect shear of our bums and then somebody went and he started adding liquids to the mikvah that are not caution for a mikvah says or different types of liquids and these are liquids that are not okay. So he goes and he starts adding now for every saw that he placed he was not he took a a saw out. So at the end of the day he's going to end up with the perfect forisa but he has a whole taru a whole gamish already because he had a perfect kosher mikvah but now as he's adding all of this non-coosher liquid he's taking an equal amount out. So for every s that he's placing he's taking out a s that is the mitsus that's going on's case. Now what's the background to this and what does this even mean? It's avo something that's not kosher and then he takes it out. It remains kosher. And the reason is all right, let's just think about the lumbus for a second without getting too digressy. But just to think about it for a second, you're putting in a little bit of non-cooser, but um it's bful right now. as long as you take out then it maintains its but either way the name of send the name of the great that this is going to be okay as long as it's meaning as long as of the mikvah we can say has the original kosher water inside of it then if you do this game where you put and you took out and you put and you took out it's it's going to be okay. So for example, if you had perfect 40 saw and now you added 20 saw and removed 20 saw, so you don't have roy of the kosher anymore. If you added 19, so you maintain the of the original kosher. So that in of itself is going to be okay. Either ways, this is the case that was referring to. Okay? So we need a little bit of help. So this is what's going on as it relates to a mikvah. This works. It's a it's a mikvah. As long as it's meaning of it is the original kosher word, it's going to be fine. Just like it works for the mikvah works for the k as well. The k has a for as long as you're going to maintain of that. Even though you added and subtracted water that was not kosher, but as long as the of it was okay, this is going to be okay. Where is this not okay? The re when it comes to the ra that's not okay. And she says the reason it's not good for the ra is cuz the ra is a very small share. And because it's a very small shar even if you're going to have from the original water to be able to be this little bit of foreign substance and it's for that reason this of works for mikvah it's a big share for it works for kia which is also a a bigger share of doesn't work for the re because Reus is a very small says to stating all this meaning who just explained the way we just described it. So he added a caveat now to he said in the event that you would have a mikvah and this mikvah was so it's okay and then you would go and you would make a hole in the mikvah right this word is the same word that we had on top of the here you're making a hole in the mikvah and you would slap out a re you'd be able to be in this different little medals different being that it came from a mikvah meaning as much as said I'm explaining that the doesn't work for that just means if in totality you had a nonsense of it's not going to be okay but let's say you had a mikvah and you nense of and now you want to take some of the water from the mikvah and create a a small ka mik Right. So a regular mikvah that has to be 40. But you're going to take from there a little bit of water. You create a ka mikvah which is only a that's going to be fine. I didn't say that doesn't work when it comes to ra. Yeah that's if all you had is the ra but here the re is coming from a bigger mikvah which is already dishempled that it's kosher. I think that we know that this mikvah is already kosher. any little thing that you create from it this offshoot that is going to be okay and by the way the lumbness of it is because how did Rashi explain why by re does the not work because the BL can't happen because the amount of water that you're dealing with the mat is just too small in right quantitatively it's not big enough well over here the BL happened from the grass or mikvah it was big enough it's not that when you're dealing with a mikvah that has a she can't leverage the on It's just that that amount of water is not enough for you to be able to. Well, here the reve came from a proper mikvah that did have the share to be able to. It's for that reason that this is going to be okay. So what's the recap of I guess the second part of today's took a few stabs at what is referring to and really the mascara was said this true when it comes to it's true for the K which has a It's not true when you're dealing with stating that if you had a mikvah and you used the and now you want to create a little mikvah form for that is going to be okay next part of the again continuing to discuss laws related to the send if the wanted to take water from the mikvah and now put it into the k and use it for the m that's something that would be okay what's that which often is not if its water is going to be for the itself did not have to have in it right so we know there are times where the said that you couldn't just use water but the may had to be right it had to be from a natural spring and otherwise the water is not going to be kosher could have had a havamina benial that maybe the had to have water. That was in other words, you know, it says in theory the word. Now the context over here is now this is the 13th in parishes. It's talking about the carbon which we know was which means all the bos had to be burnt on the but before the was burnt on the it had to be washed it was washed in water and from that word we learn a few things says the you couldn't wash it in wine you couldn't even use it in water that was diluted together with wine from the word we learn that you can use even what does that mean? He says even if you have like a body of water and you want to pull the water out of that that's going to be okay. And here's the punch line that we need the and if this is true meaning if you can use all these different types of orders then certainly certainly you'd be able to use the make say what is this meaning if you can use let's say so you can use the make probably the reason it's the meaning you can use you can use and if you could use certainly you can use Oh, probably because the make is better than regular water. regular water says you can use that then certainly when it comes to right washing the inards of the carbon you'd be able to use make you' be able to use just says one that according to's understanding now that when we say it means it would mean then that when we say because really the is not as in literally taking the water out of the k the which is water that's to be used to make. If you look at says but the point says my love is that probably what the what else is the meaning you can use what does it mean here oh because meaning you can use that's right for the what do you see from here you see that says you want to know what the is the can use water that doesn't have kadusha certainly if you can go to the faucet and take out water certainly you can go to the k and take out water and go why is that a because you're handling kum right now so certainly if you can use regular water you can use water that came from the k but the says one second you're assuming which I think everybody would have assumed the you see it's a miler to use holy water and you would think of course it's a miler to use holy water right over here so certainly if you can use regular water you continues but the says I tell you a just we learned in a taught in the so usually it's this is that when the Torah says that is it's that doesn't have any additional name to mean it's just water as opposed to make which That's a shame of right here is not just cold water. What's it called? It's called It's called May. Right. But what do you see from here? You see that if you have Mayan that has a shame, it's actually a negative. It's not a positive. So you're going to tell me that when it says it means literally make and what's the because it has kadusha. That's not a milo. That's actually a we know that from a Bryce that was taught in the but that can't be right. So what must mean when the Bryce says it doesn't mean literally because that wouldn't be the fact that it's means it has that would actually be. So what would be the And what does that mean? Why would that water be better than other water? probably because the water that was used for the make was that it's just uh do this for well understood if you can use for that means the did not have to have right that's what it sounds like because have a that talks about the m that was used to rinse the car and the of the carbon oil before it was put on the to and it says you can use even take from anywhere and you can use the what's the probably is not but that's to be used for the which is you see clearly the had to be made from so the initially thought that no maybe that's not true maybe has nothing to do with because really the k didn't have to be So what's literally holy water? It's not true because I know holy water is actually not okay because what it says may means what may means without a shame and once the water is holy now it has a shame and is actually telling me it has to be regular not make so real false. So what must be that's really to be used for the mak what must that be onish because I see over here that the needed to be you couldn't just take it from a mikvah. So the gar says you're 100% right. You have a from this not like so what's the is you have to say it's true as much as there is a contradicts but you should know there's a that supports fact as it relates to the said that the had to come from a Mayan. It had to be said no they're able to come from anywhere. In other words, it's really a between and a factory is going with the of the it doesn't with that price. That's okay. That price will be the which is right the is going to be but the bottom line is that's fine. That's the of the doesn't with the that's fine. He doesn't just have a tan of the messiah. He has the messiah way because really that is the majority opinion of the and it's for that reason everything is going to be oh okay. Either way, moving along back to the Mishna. So again the Mishna in the beginning of the peric discussed all the different as it relates to doing and the said that all these if they would do it's not okay number one and number two there would be says the next mention is anal what's an oral someone that's not circumcised one what's the how do you know that an oral is not let do the and if he does the it's said if this sounds familiar it's because we just had it a few days ago. This is not something that we know furish from the but we know it from bamboozi otherwise known as the where do we know this from said and this is empiric test either way an oral of the is theer you see somebody's He obviously can't do the know that if he does the because there's another also this earlier the says it says but if you look at the inside it says either way it's that if the lea the baser are going to do the it's going to be you see clearly that is not going to be a good turn up on it on this said when he said you would think it means right a nonjew that's why he explained the call that's an if that's True. So if it doesn't mean he just means someone that has a heart he's an So why did he say meaning he's not a but he behaves as if he is. He's not an but he acts as if he's an either way. That's what an er is. And is like the ben meaning he's somebody that behaves like the bener. So had it only said I would know. How would I know? That's why right? So really is saying two things. He's saying number one someone that's an oral is somebody that behaves like that person he's a can't do in the B if he does it's going to be and an is going to be the same thing says the and I need both now just to clarify one point you mentioned this already but just to clarify one point isn't an or by definition ano meaning he's he's not doing so obviously he's not behaving like a Jew so the short answer is Because an is someone who is could be he's somebody that's mitzvah in the nicest way and he wishes he could do the problem is not allowed to do because he had two brothers that died and as a result is established right when something happens twice one of the big of is related to this but it's because of that reason he can't do so one person's an yeah he doesn't behave the other person is just an orber he's doing everything right He can't do the said both of these types of do and if they do it's says mention only I would have thought right because right is always treated as a so this person who has this foreskin which is disgusting in the eyes of so he can't do the most might be very handsome and as a result there's nothing about him. So maybe he could do the only because his heart is in the wrong place even though he has this stubborn on his but and his is in the right place. So I would have thought maybe he's different it's for that reason that we need both. We are going to stop here. In fact, this next is if you know, you know, the of the ziknim, which is really a whole another that goes through the entirety of tomorrow's. So we're gonna pause over here and just speak out a few short light related to the kar which was very much the topic of today's in a classic in the beginning of he makes a very subtle dick the p that introduces the k says Why does the say grammatically what the Pik should have said was right? You should make a K. And what should you put in the gear? You should put water in the gear. Sh means the You should put the water there. I mean, that's like more slang. You should put it in it, right? You're making the gear and in the says that we learned that the Gmorra said what the is from the word. But from the word that it says in the par of the we learn that it's not that the from the itself but really stating that says there's this is in the fourth in the end of that says that even though the itself was not whatever cliches the going to use to bead that's fine but the of where exactly the had to be that says the was the was not you have to have a clich but the itself was not but the of the was You should put the water cuz that's what's because it actually didn't have to be in the gear. If it's the K, it's the K. But it could be any what's that that's there. The geographic location of the k is what's the k of itself is not that's why the use this of an of that's the first the second is we mentioned recently in that uh I recently got a hold of a safer it's called it's five volumes it's a leot but it's a little than mostly and it's very shotentric either way this right here brings from who we mentioned recently in here asked a few beautiful on this p the first order that he asked was the pik says bosis Rothberg. Why does the POS have to say that the purpose of the K and the was of course it's the next P says so obviously it's meaning if the reason the is saying the word is to tell me the use of proceeds right what is the purpose of the well it says it in the next that's It seems to be redundant meaning that's the tells us what's going to be the purpose of the why does the have to mention again or the first time the second that he asked is that if you go back and you look at all the the ca of the mishk when the mentions of the ka right the it doesn't say who what when and where this ki is supposed to be used for for example after tells me all about it then at the very end the last last. But when the mentions go ahead and build a same is true by the says, etc., etc., etc. And the Tyra just goes on to describe how exactly it's supposed to be with no mention of what the purpose of the isber that if you look at every single one of the Mishkan it follows the same thing make a I'm going to tell you later don't worry about it there's going to be plenty of time if you'll see it like 50 times you'll know exactly what all these are supposed to be used for but right now THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. And I'm giving you the I'm telling you. There's no reason to tell you right now. Doesn't say make and then light it and put oil inside of it. Make a put bread on it and then on Shabas you should go and do the from the and then eat the and split it between the that's all the that's going to to come about. But when it comes to the Whoa. Why do you have to know right now? Just say and even more by none of the in the introduces the for and to go ahead and build the kali. Does the Tyra tell you what the purpose of the kali is or what should be placed inside the kali? There's one and only kali where that's true when it comes to the really three. Number one, why does the even have to say in this? That's the next. Additionally, why in the of are we even talking about what the function of the kal is going to be? It's going to be and why are we talking about what you're supposed to put inside of it by none of the kum that were mentioned do you find this he said a beautiful based on a soperno and the soperno he's on this in paris the says as follows this such a glaring observation that everybody's made in their life at some point either consciously or subconsciously and that is where does the talk about the gear which para it's in paris right and then it's like all the ka are the par that talks about the of all the ka was in paras there's a little bit of paras but the k gets pushed all the way to parasis parisel there's a lot happening in parisa but the mitzvah to go ahead and make the k says this faro it's very interesting It's mentioned in paris. Why is it not mentioned in says the again by the way what's gam what's the other ki that he's referring to? So the other kali that is referring to is the inside but that's for another day. But as it relates to the says this because the of the was not to be one of the that was going to now facilitate which was the intention of the other like I already explained earlier you want to know what the purpose of the was one purpose and one purpose only and that is it's a cle to be able to go ahead and do the says the from the location location location location of where the mentions in the you know everything you have to know about the K the is not a k like the other the k was not which was the of the other if it were it would have been mentioned with all the ka that are mentioned in par's this ki the let's just explain this a little bit said for us right above my pay grade and said if you want my to reside with you you're going to have to build me a house and that house is going to have to have certain kum inside of it there has to be a has to be a that has to be a misb right it has to have a what does a house look like okay the house also has to have a sur of a house a beautiful house and that is what is necessary in order to have in order for there to be a Mishk says the of the Bikdash if you think about it had a dual purpose they obviously were part and parcel of that that was done in the B mikdash but even before that these are the kalin the amenities of akades's house this is the way akadesh bar who's the architect of his house that I want my house to look these are the things that I needed for a house. I need this. I need that and I need the other thing. All those that WERE PART OF THE BIAS of that are in terms of being able to have a bias a bias where will be able to be those are the mentioned they're in the parish OF THE what needs in order to facilitate the the says this foreign is that period end the story that's the whole of it and being that that's the whole of it. So for that reason says this morning it's not mentioned in par this is more like the big day right this is can't do the without he can't do the avoid without because then he's someone that doesn't have but being that it's fundamentally different than the other it's not part of says this word that's not mentioned the parish of it's for that reason it's mentioned in parish It's why it's not mentioned in parish. That's the dick. The deal over here is that as it relates to the other the have a without the aim OF THE MIKDASH for mikdash and you should also make it certain kalem and the kali has to be there because it's what's necessary in order to FACILITATE THE NOW RATHER those ka are going to have also another purpose a purpose in that they'll be a muk to do with those. That's fine. We'll get to that. That's perfectly You're right. And then of course you're going to light them in etc etc. But being that they have a so it's for that reason it's for that reason that they're mentioned just as they're mentioned in the but as it relates to the K the whole purpose of the K is what it's being used for CUZ IT'S NOT PART OF THE furniture of the BT. So what's its tas is IT'S NOT PUNK. THAT'S WHAT IT'S BEING USED FOR. THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT IT'S HERE FOR. sole existence is there is no k without a there's no k without that's why when the introduces the mentions when the introduces the mentions it's a fellow and the he was today he said that you see we just learned the gam the gam said that the k itself was really not even right any would be okay your any when you ask any is good the terance is because the gear is not part of the furniture it's not necessary for it's just here to facilitate okay make a you want to make something else you have a right to go ahead and make something else and then he said one more he said he said with this you can answer briskova so what's this from so it's in the briskovin stencils it's in the sugis that learning right now asked the kasha that the had said right he made a for this whole contraption so that every night the k was able to go underground it's like this the wouldn't become possible you know freight the brisk up and he blighted said the brisk up I don't understand the k was part of the bto that means there something called the miktosh has to have a k if the k is underground it's not here and if it's not there then freight the brisk at night every single night they they take the gear and they put it on the ground well right now it's from if it's from the mik then the mik is possible MEANING THERE'S A CERTAIN WANTS THIS MIKT HIS bias to look a certain way if he wants it to look a CERTAIN WAY HOW ARE THEY ABLE TO it's very nice you an issue you were able to take care of the bit but the problem is you opened up a whole another can of issues because now all of a sudden the mach is one of And if it's one of the why should that not be a problem? Now the truth is we're not going to go into this now but we when we learn we said overra from that brisket said that we know according to one man the was right there was no during the second mikdash which is something we need to talk about and there's a whole sh what happened to it but according to one what happened to the it was hidden where was it hidden it was hidden in said that it's not punk that it was hidden he said he said it was necessary for and as as long as it was. So has the arm could be this is a little bit of a this and maybe you can be a little bit we could this is all but the bottom line is that because the is not one of the mikd it's not something that's active the whole purpose of the that's the whole purpose The whole purpose is to be it's actually not part of the furniture of the BTO. And if that's the case, if it ends up underground during the night, so it's actually not at all from the And if that's the case, there's not going to be a a problem at all. But just to wrap this up, so he's using the Spurn to answer the sc every night. They would put the K on the ground. What do you mean the the mdash is missing a now? So if it's missing a gear, how is that okay? Says no because the K is different than the it's it's not and as a result it's just there for a purpose. Oh right now we don't need this purpose as a result this is not going to be an issue. Why didn't the say that? So I think it's because really this is right but it's in the beginning it's incidentally if you want to go through just really we're still at the very very beginning right we're still within so if you want to go through it just read the in the beginning of chapter and verse chapter and verse it's so clear it's so systematic is written like only the Rambam was able to write. But either way, this is says the had to have seven. That's number one. That's two. Is three is four. is five is six is seven says the mikt had been made up of seven kum there's a certain surah there's a mik and when the ra lists out this he says SEVEN TWO OF THEM are it's not like this it's not like this was coming from this ram and that's why blight just end with one And that is I saw this in the from he brings from the but he brings from the made another beautiful again along the theme of the first. So then why does it say why twice? Say truth is it came up a little bit in the in today's but this was the of the saddic he said a beautiful says everybody knows that although the k was made of although the k was made of but it came from a separate fund meaning in the beginning of parish truma where mobeno initiates this uh big fundraising initiative for the Mishkon. So the Pik says right away that they collected Z and right and all the different materials The K was made in you would think where was it made from which it was made from that but everyone knows Kazal say that that's really not where it was made from where was it made from it was made from theat these were the mirrors that had used when the and those were part of the donations that the had made and initially They don't got them. He felt uncomfortable. He said, "Well, you're going to take something like this and you're going to use it for the mishk." And said, "Yes, and I want you to use it for the why the because that's where the man CAME FOR THE SHOW." RIGHT? THIS IS THE BUTON. Where was the k made from? The k was made from the marat. It was made from the marat said that that told us with regards to the k but regarding as it relates to the stand that the k was on whoever heard anything about the regarding that. So he said that was made from the regular fund the fund of that's mentioned right they had a WHOLE BUNCH OF COPPER. What are YOU DOING WITH ALL THIS COPPER? SO A CERTAIN KUM that you have to make. So the K itself that came from the but that came from the regular that's what's going on in this why are we saying is not the same there was the and then there was the of the it wasn't the and mean that it wasn't the same. So it's for that reason the are mentioned individually again but said there's one problem the problem is we'll read this the says now the itself almost sounds Doesn't it sound like is describing the can? Okay, maybe you knew knew it, right? But it's okay. They had these mirrors that they used to look at themselves when they were wearing their jewelry. And when they came to donate to the Mishkan, they were so forthcoming. They even brought that was very disgusted by it. It was used to provoke the take it. Believe it or not, these donations are more beloved to me than all the other donations that you receive because it was through them. A whole military, a whole was born in through them. Why? Because when their husbands were very tired, they would take these mirrors. Everybody would see themselves together with their husbands in the in the mirror. for says the was made from them because the purpose of the K is to bring peace between man and wife. This is the of what we mentioned a minute ago. Rashi continues and Rashi says he said I'll prove to you that this is that literally mirrors and it's different than all the other I know that because the says Rashi mean so if you fast forward to those three is referring to this isn't the end of and the is describing all the purposes of all the different materials that was the weight of all what they do Exhale. The goes and tells us all the things that were made from the weight of the and what they were used for. So, what's going on? We're missing two things. We're missing the and we're missing. So I don't know how to give you know what the terret must be must be the kin county didn't come from that it was a separate fund what was the separate FUND IT WAS THE THAT'S to my understanding of how the maras worked out of wise in his maras that it came to k from somewhere else was cuz it's not mentioned in those Because the mention all the things that were made from the it doesn't say you know what else it doesn't say it doesn't say either and if that's the case it's certainly Mashma from the and for sure from that it wasn't just the k that was made from the maras it was koi that was made from the as well. So he says, "Yeah, what the sadic said is why do you have to single out the twoes?" Oh, maybe because they came from two separate at first glance it would seem to be. But either way, here a little bit. He said in this post you see the show in Yuma's that the is fundamentally different than all the other like And the came from the two funds that existed in the time of the Mishkan. Either way, all this raid from all these stroll and we're going to slap