Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00

Zevachim 49

0 views
Lakewood Daf Yomi avatar
Lakewood Daf Yomi

Transcript

Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.

Today's DA is and we are six lines from the bottom of today's being learned as a so we're moving along in the beginning of perk which as we saw seven and a half years ago is technical from the standpoint that the relate to the carbon are based on dres and limudin. And as we mentioned so many times, the only way to fully appreciate these gimmar is by understanding the and really having some level of mastery over the terix. But either way, the first of is that and the has to be soften as well. And really the avoid pun intended of was what is the mur to the idea that kadashim and kabalas do specifically the gumar focused on the carbon katas and the reason the gumar focused on the carbon katas is because that's the way the paric begins the first carbon mentioned in mikvahim is the carbon katas In other words, there are three general groups of that were kadashim. You have the you have the and you have the schlman. Now there's a and you have the asham. Now there is a that also was kadashim was kadashim. But if you want to speak in broad strokes you have the kas you have the and the asham. Those are all aim of kach kadashim. When we say and the cabala has to be as well, it means that it's true for the true for the true for the which means in the process of figuring out the we're going to have to find the we're going to have to find the for and we're going to have to find a for the as well. Now focus on the murus for the carbonas and what emerged is that it actually doesn't say anywhere in the murish that the carbon is or has to be done. In fact the only one of the carbon that are the had to been is the carbon the says. So how do you know it by the so the said because as much as it doesn't say the foolish suffering regarding the but the does say regarding the okay so and the is so if the is that means the is going to be as well The Gamarra said, "How do you know that the cababola of the had a be bit of soften as well?" So the Gammorra said that the immediately after again it's talking about says right after the says the means. So not only but also that should be biten as well. The Garra said, "Okay, so whenever you see that, what you're waiting for is to find a place with the that was really the whole said all the different have some sort of mention of doing and at the end of the day there's a so we know now the suff for the and the we even know that it's where today's is going to pick up is how do we know that the is that the and the has to be by and it's and then we're going to go to the carbon which is the third category of how do we know that the and the is something that has to by a carbon and again not only as it says we have a that of a carbon has to be in soften what's the that's the easiest in this whole world referring to the carbon by the way if you remember from yesterday's daf theor said that really it only says it by the carbon that's being brought. How do you know the carbon that's brought? So the Gmorra says it says the para to the par on top of it refers to it as a heckish. But the bottom line is I know for sure I know as well that the of bits of how do I know that the and the as it relates to the carbon is now this line of is actually a very very tricky line of mascul And says the reason it's tricky is because in yesterday's d we had no anywhere that the of the carbon has to be buten. It's also not a pos anywhere in the so it's not like if your major parishes and all the other tucked away in the you're going to find it. It's not mentioned anywhere in the Tyra. So the question is after yesterday's said it's not true. we didn't have a mar I think the easiest is the of the makubat says and that is that although it's true it doesn't say anywhere in the cabala of the carbon had to be biten but the did say that the of the carbonus had to be biten and how did the say that the of the carbonas has to be biten the said And the next words were so we say that just like so it's mashma then that the would have to be where the of the has to be and that is bits of either way if you look at even suggest maybe there's a different gear because really just piphat usually and ashkan segways and flows very beautifully from everything we saw up until that point and in this case really we didn't have anywhere that mitzvah by would have to be but the bottom line is what's the now of the how do you know when it comes to the both going to be some we know it with the whole D soften. I only know from the what does it mean I know from the says you should check the and you should do the of the and still you see it's the it's the place where the soft then certainly it should be meaning we're looking at the almost as and the which is is so itself certainly should have to be but the says I don't think it's because maybe at the end of the day is more than and the reason it's more than because and it's not only it's as opposed to which is not so maybe which is it has that so and soften is going to be as opposed to the soor said you didn't understand right he wasn't saying in the traditional sense so now you can go and you could ask meaning the traditional sense would mean that I could say no maybe because what the meant to say was a little bit differently Where do you find anywhere? Where is there a precedent that a tuffle should be more than meaning where something is learned out from something else or where something is considered on some level subsidiary to something else something's a to of something else that the should be more than that's not something you find. So it's not so much the of so that you can ask a on it. The point is at the end of the day is learned from Katus is the proverbial is the proverbial and if that's the case if you find by anah or you find by a that's often as then certainly in the sense but proverbially speaking certainly without question then should have to be is that so and this is going to really take us to the first third of in other words the saying that the is based on the fact that if the which is to it requires certainly the as well and it's based on this assumption so on this the says is that so I'll bring you three rias and we're going to jump all over shas Now to find these rias and try to dig up precedent for the idea that maybe could be let's take the case is something that you could be right everybody knows that stating that if you buy something with you can't be it's a if somebody buys something became you want to be ped go ahead and be said you can't be something that's both with but rather what you have to do with is you have to go ahead and bury it but what do you see from here that in the laws of it's more like to be than something that was bought with money of now that's posit that the micer is to the miser and yet you see a in the over the no such thing that you're going to find the you see it by says it's true this of that you cover that you can't be is a it's a it's a in something that was bought with but that comes and the reason is because in order to The kadusha has to be on a certain you have to have a certain level of kadusha in order for pion to be if something's a little bit kadesh you can't be ped because it's not kadesh enough to facilitate opinion you actually need a higher degree of kadusha in order for it to be now subject to the concept of pion the reason and not is precisely because of the fact that the sheni is moreish because it's the and the is only it's less kesh as a result it's not subject to opinion. You're right. It's manifest as a over the but really it's the opposite. It's it's a that comes but in its foundation what it really is is a as a result it's not a suggest bring you another case. What about again what's is when somebody is makish an animal and then he has sellers remorse. He says you know what why was I makish this animal? I should have been makish the other animal. What's the when he says that not only is the original animal going to remain kadesh but this other animal that he thought that he wanted to be Makdish instead is going to end up becoming as well. Now is that when it comes to even on an animal that has a even if this is a very big because if somebody wants to be an animal that has a now to be clear it's right but we know that once an animal develops its underlying status of hectish changes. It's not just that a pun has a and as a result I can't be mak it it's something that affects the DNA the essence of the actual you can't be something that has however that develops you could be p and the reason is because it actually it's becomes altered and now it's at the point that if you want to be p it's known as and if you want to redeem it now be able to redeem it. The time is we know that is on an animal that has yet that if you want to go ahead and you want to do a on well you're never allowed to do a but if you do a this is the of right if you go ahead and you do a on an animal that has is the is going to be so what's the ta the is that That's posh that of being makish is tough to the oen of being mish. So if I want to be mish something in the traditional sense and I do it to an animal that has a hish is not. So how could it be that if I take an animal like that and I make it that the hish is going to be and the reality is that it is. So he's saying there's an idea that could sometimes be more than the but says it's not a and the reason is because you're making an assumption that is tough to the I could actually make an argument that on some level if someone's something it's a better form of hectish you know why because if somebody goes and he makes something hectish so the hectish is coming from the right you're being the kaduca that right now is going to rest upon the soul of this animal. As opposed to if you make a you're not creating a new form of hectish. What you're doing is you're leveraging an existing hectish. You're just transferring it right. You're taking that hectish and you're moving it over to this other thing. So there's an argument to be made that if I want to be a on a that has a that's something I could do but with a hect already is and all I want to do is I want to transfer it could be it's easier to make a transfer than to go ahead and to something says I don't think this is a to the idea that a tough can't be more than says let's take a third stab at it what about a carbon had to be treated like a carbon but here's some that don't relate to the carbon doesn't require doesn't require and there was no mitzvah of with but let's say you have of a carbon so we know from the first par there's different types of either before or a that was set aside and then you lost it so you another one and then you found it right there's a whole bunch of different examples of what do they all have in common we know is right now if that means the of the but what do you see from here what you see from here is that at the end of the day uh is in ways more than a p because a p doesn't require the p does the p doesn't require p does The pes doesn't require the does. Now what's the and what's the tuffle when it comes to the pes and the this sounds very easy the is the yeah you see that the is the itself says you're going to tell me that is a great example says now we knew that right so what's the beingadesh in the terrace but the that as much as we refer to aer as a really it's a that's what it is and if it's a so has certain dem that doesn't have certain that doesn't have and that's fine the point is if would retain its status of nor so you would say the pes doesn't require these dim of the that does it's impossible because the can't be more than the gather is that it's not anymore of the it's not now it's that it could happen and it happens when it's a but here's the bottom line this second when you're doing and you're bringing you're doing but you're doing it is not on a you're not doing it on a you're doing it on a so the fact that you have that That's neither here nor there. The bottom line is the took three attempts. Strike one, strike two, strike three. At the end of the day, the holds up and that is we have no and if that's the case, this is the first that the brings. What is the that is going to be when it comes to the what's the first of the point is and why not but in this because when it comes to It's so in this world of there's no question is the says it with as opposed to the it's wherever you do the that's the yeah wherever you do that do this oh clearly it's the that's the first the second is a much shorter it's one line says the says where does it say so it's that At the end of the day, why did the just say it's often right? Why did it say you could always ask these cases? But here the asks it and that is why does it say for and again this pos not only for we went with the says as well because the next words after right so the bottom line is I have and the fact that the mention in the par of the if it's a that's how I know It's going to be when it comes to the according to the first I know it from the according to the second I know it from that I have by the so we address yesterday we addressed first 20 minutes of today's and now we're going to shift our attention to the carbon again the carbon is also kadashim and as a result it's included in the of the kados and both have to be biten the question is how do you know it now it's not anywhere in the that take the only time it says that clearly is by the question is how do I know by the how do I know the requires says the says that's pretty good right the said like this But the bottom line is again just like by the says which means by the says the same exact thing says okay. So the Gamarra says what does it say right after the next words are right and we learn from the even though is talking about the right that the has to be in as well says how do you know that the himself has to be so that's also something that the garra had addressed in the previous staff regarding How do you know regarding the auction that the macabo has to be soften? So the gar says it could have said what does it say instead would being sra and the boy of s is coming to be marba not only the but theo as well. So the bottom line is how do you know the had to be soften it says the next words of how do I know even so I know how do I know that it's so says this is another now this other that we're about to mention now is going to be malava us for the majority of the remainder of So we have to get this P. This P is in it's in Paris and it's talking about so the when he became Tar including in his purification process was a set of carbon one of which was a carbon ash. And the Tyra says regarding the brought an interesting lot going on here. So the Torah says that the should be where it should be. Wow. Till now it was always right. of the okay and then the says do it in a in a very very holy place right we know what that place is that this is like right but either way says the is another that says that the talking about a specific type of but had to be done in the place where you know you had a mitzvah and it had to be soften. So if that's the case, that's why I know the now I already had a for a that was the original that's about the general here to teach me that it's going to be says could I really that the second mention of regarding the from the par of the for the Halloween price and this price that we're all familiar with if there's something that was included in a to me about this you're not allowed to return it to its cloud until the now is going to give an example of it and the example of it is so it's not like we're even telling that talks about something that we think is relevant to this. We're talking to a price that talks about this and that's how we're asking the gospel. Let's just explain the concept. The concept is if you have a and based on that you would assume that oh it's included in a right it's included in the so you would think it should be a regular ash if something now is and it's there's some about this now that doesn't really pertain to the rest of the so for example in our case if I would tell you that there's something unique about that is not something that it shares in common with all the other. Well, now as far as I know, you can't treat it like an asham with regards to anything unless someone says, "No, I want you to treat it like the cloth." Now, as the Bryce is about to demonstrate, this is not only an example, it's the example. It is the example Kazal gave for this rule. And as a result, there's nothing we're going to be able to learn from this says. Let's see. What's an example of what's an example of this? Didn't have to say why did have to tell me. Why does her have to tell me that this is like a like it's it's it's an every is like a just learn the fee I'll tell you why because you find that was singled out and it has a certain that other don't have what is that because they took the dam of the carbon and they put it on the thumb of the hand of the mats on the thumb toe of the mira on his ear, right? So, you would have thought being that the was all these new related to the room. Maybe this is shocking. Maybe there's no I don't know. Maybe that is the maybe the of the mitz is put it on the maybe you don't even put anything on the maybe there's no even on the requires blood to go to but what's the bottom line what you see from this price is that is the classic example In other words, as far as we know, once the said this boy with the dam of the at that point everything you know about a carbon is null and void and the only way I'm going to now know even the most basic as basic as I have to do with all those things I'm only going to know if the is going to tell you before. So what's the gimar timing that you want to know how I know that the and the of the is because the tyra said it once by a and the reason the had it repeated by the m is because had the not repeated it by the I would think it doesn't apply to the what do you mean it's true for all no because the so maybe that's why the but it's not and it's not so if that's the case there is no mart but the says I think I still have a mart you know why once the says that you in the place that you so why does the have to say you're right from the fact that it says I don't know the reason I don't know the is because maybe is different and therefore the has to tell me about but the was just the opposite tell it to me by the ash which you have to tell it to me but once I know by I'll know it by so and you want to know how I know it's from the original one. So the says like this if that is really tall enough that's good. If you are going to tell me that anytime you have uh when we say that you can't assume anything regarding the actually that's true could be only with regards to the pr but what about if I want to learn the cloud from the prat that maybe I could right let's let's take a a step backwards for a second as it relates to this something was it was I can't assume anything of the as it relates to the prat what about in the reverse could I assume something about the cl from the pr I can't assume anything about the to the pr but could I assume something about the pr to the cl I everything about the cl is null and void clapp the pr but let's say there's something unique about this pratt I think I can maybe suit to the cloud. Could I or does this meter get in the way? So says that as much as it's true once something was and I can't learn anything about the cloud to the prat but I could learn from the pr to the cloud then it's very good. What does it mean then it's very good? So then why the have to tell me by you told by the so that's your but if you're going to tell me but if you're going to tell me that this meeting goes both ways that once it's I can't take anything from the over to the and I can't take anything from the over to the clu it's then I need it but says the so again so then we're stuck where is my second for the asham I don't have one. And if that's the case, then the says, "No, I'm not getting past this. This is where the mar is going to be. We're going to find it somehow." What does that mean? What did the say? The said and then it said once the says why does it have to say you're going to tell me it's a and therefore I need to tell you bearish that all that of the are going to apply to this as well. But guess what? The told it to me. The said what is meaning are going to apply to this. If that's the case, why the have to say you'll tell me because I can't learn that from don't have to learn it from you can learn it from the end of the concludes and says no in this itself in this itself the told me twice the told me twice that the has to be said And then the time is even if you're going to tell me that this is and therefore you can't assume anything from this. But once the says well at that point I know the was just to the cloud. So now that me is off the table. Why does it have to say if it would say it once that's I need to say but the said it twice the one time the general one that's to be but in terms of now why do have to say in other words once the now it's already back in the cloud of why have to mention still you could always argue even though it says but isn't there mock to say that that's not referring to every last regarding the carbon that should always be treated like the maybe it means the mean the things that require but as relates to that doesn't require by itself and require soften. So maybe that's why the had no choice but the are over and say to teach me that not only is the treated like a regular ash regarding things that require kahuna but it's treated like a regular ash even regarding things that don't require kahuna such as but the bottom line is the pk is v not extra if the pusk is vit not extra How do I know? So the says I'll tell you because if when it says it's only being things that require not then we're talking about we're talking about that is a very very inclusive word. It's coming to say that it should be like is regarding every last not only the require even the don't require such as the bottom line is once it says so I know already that even though is we treat it like a regular and a regular I know needs soften so why is the same by the you should go ahead and you should check it bit soften that's the bottom line is what's the regarding the carbon that has to been regarding that's as well. Next words are the rabb also has to be. Okay, that's only how do you know that it's going to be is because the tells me a second time that the had to be where does it say it? It says about the what does it say about the a second time that's how could that be a second extra source to teach me that's talking about the and the is the prototypical example it's literally of with the rulers and being that you find that is so unique, right? So maybe you think there's no and that's why the had to tell me that you should. It's not necessarily extra. It is that it's true what you're saying. This is the prototypical example. But believe it or not, as it relates to the terrorist did it twice because this same P it goes and says and in words I know that this asham is treated like a regarding everything not even only regarding the things that require but even regarding the things that don't require kahuna the extra emphasis on but the bottom line is is I know from there already that it's treated like a regular asham So if that's the case I already was have to say it's extra if it's extra it's so now from here until the two dots the next uh 10 to 15 lines the garra is going to pivot a little bit and really this pivot is going to take us into tomorrow's daff and even into the following daff and the gumar is going to discuss a that we've encountered already several times and that is when it comes to there's a dinish anything that you know only as a result of does not have the ability to go now and teach something else. So if this is something I know, you can't take another hesish and pay it forward apply this even further. Now what about if something's could I now use it to learn? We're going to see this all in tomorrow's. What if something was could it be? We're going to see that in tomorrow's as well. Right now we're going to be very very focused. We know the rulershar is going to pivot to this right now. Now why the pivot? Because what we're going to see is two to this big cloud of the first of the two is this of the and not only this the words of the everything that we've been talking about for this last segment of the says the right jumped off the page when it comes to the why is to tell me do In the place that you shacked the katas and you shuck the oil. We do shack the katas and soften. Where do you shake the oil and soften? Why is the ter to tell me in the place that you shack the kas and the place you shack the oil? just to make the the cash a little bit stronger. Says in the place where you says that in multiple places where should you the place that you but when it comes to the it's not to just say in the place you should in the place and in the place and asks the obvious question again. said it's tell you why. And just a little bit of a disclaimer, this next is tricky. It's tricky. The first time you learn it, it's tricky. The second time you learn it, it's tricky. The third time you learn it, it's tricky because it's a hard gim. It's just it's not hard hard. But as we'll see, but either way, I'll tell you why. had the only said that the should be like the meaning in the place as opposed to the place meaning had that been what it said I mean I would have thought how do I where do I know that needs often I learn it from the okay if that's the case it's and if it's a how could it go now and beam so I wouldn't have even known that the has to be its I know but what am I supposed to do and can't be so it's for that reason said ra right away that you want to know why the had to be because had the only been and not I wouldn't have even known the didn't soften when it comes to cuz I would have said but told you answered half the question. What about the other half the question? Why you mention so you explain why you can't just say okay but just says I'll tell you why. Because had it said and not said I would have thought I would have thought that is you'll tell me we'll explain this in a minute or at least we'll try that if so why did have to could have said in the place that you'll tell me I wouldn't note. No, I would know it's often because you're telling me is so from that is right the let's just say that so the fact that the would say that I would know already that just by virtue of the fact that we're mentioning as opposed to so why do you have to mention and so that I should just say because otherwise why even mention just mention the but says it's not a because I will always say because it's not you want to know why the say because what's the right coming full circle to the beginning of the is the and the is it makes more sense to make the reason The went out of it was again what does this mean was a very straightforward theory says in the place and in the place now and both and this is the way of saying that you the question is why did the have to say and either says or say someone says I'm going to tell you why cuz had it said and not said let's have thought that even though the said but I can't learn a toughen from there why because how do I know I know because is learned out from it's so I wouldn't know what the ter is trying to tell me so to just say is immediately completely off the table. Let's hit the pause button right here. First of all, why we talk about hkish? Who say anything about where's the heck? The say so it's interesting that refers to this as a heckish. What the is how could it be that if the Tory would tell you in the place that I would say no I can't learn anything from here because how do I know is and you want to now learn from a second that's very nice if you have a generalish right I don't know this part should be like that part you have this general heish so you want to Now learn a a from a bag that's the but so how could it be that I wouldn't know of I don't know figure out what to do with the but what's that option that if we would have only said I wouldn't have known this are very bothered with this which means we can go right and just say iron but it's But that's why the couldn't just say because again had the just said believe it or not I wouldn't even know that requires okay but was let it just say if it would say not say how we know everything is not how we know everything you're right but you want to know why the terror said I'm going to tell you why the reason the said is because the wants to teach you the of That's why the because the because the wants you to know this that's good for what the is objective is there's a very important critical that permeates the is trying to find a place to fit it in this is where the decided that is the appropriate place to teach us this where do you see this in in this because what Tyra is doing is the Tyra is telling you in the place that you and in the place that you can just tell me the place why do you also have to tell me the place that I'll know everything that there is to know is true you would you would not soften if it only said but wants you to wants you to realize you if I would have just said and I would have said you wouldn't have known the why because it would have been a package. That's why Moses are telling you that's how you know the package. Couldn't you just have said for that price? That was the follow just say because if you could learn from the backage. So why say so why do I need and to like see it as in blaring lights just tell me and why you say oh that's not a argument because you said because that's the that's the right it makes more sense to focus on the than to focus on the says the if I tell you and I tell you to tell me that you don't have to tell me so must be there's something else I want you to know yeah I want you to knows you can't learn from. That's what I want you to know. I want you to know you can't learn from. How do I know you can't learn from Katus? By telling me and either ways says from here. What does it mean from here? I have a different says we just said that the is the parish of the fact that the says that the should be in the place that you and the place says I have a different the says and this is talking about the of the so we know that there were a lot of different types of right there was the good old fashioned you're a regular person doesn't have that amaz then you have the who is he brings a right you have the par of a mistake that made you have the that's when the makes his mistake what if the a was so that's a special in terms of if the does it what animal he brings and if the zebra does it they have to bring the par and the right there's a lot of nuance when it comes to the different that's why the are exceptionally tricky from the perspective going back to the disclaimer in the beginning of the d because of all the different types of you have all these talking about and they could all be talking about different types of so you always have to know what kas am I talking about that's like the first thing that you always have to figure out when you go through a gar like The says this is talking about the it says that you should take the of this and you should lift from it. You should remove there goes to all the different body parts of this animal that are going to end up going on the and these are all the same parts that you took from the when you're bringing and you should go ahead and you should bring it is that the Tyra went and the Tyra tuk long went through different of this animal that are included in the of the and then the Tyra says that this is going to mirror the says the words of why write it if it's to tell me that mirrors is of the is what the terror said laid it out already had not told you what the just says do the way you do the I got it but the tells you exactly what you're supposed to do why does the have to mention the furish that it should be like says the ra talking this is it's because the wants that you should know that just like the we're jumping now from the so the should be the same way. The reason the told me by the is because we need to learn the having this from the therefore the wrote in an extra time by the okay what's the point there the point is and the is as it relates to the it's not something that's mentioned how do I know it from the power which poses a problem and the reason it poses a problem is because if it doesn't say anywhere by the pariah that the way you do the is including the then I have no way of being malam to the because the itself I only know from somewhere else that somewhere else is the by the way if you remember from Right? It's burnt down from have no ability to go ahead and to teach it. You ready? That's why the road by the command so that it should be as if the wrote not by the Mia because it says it there but by the now the Tyra wrote an extra sentence by the Mia. beh but the bottom line is if it's now so now you're not stuck with and that's why the went ahead and the wrote it but says but what's the bottom line what's the bottom line you know what I see from here what I see from here is a why write these words regarding the it's an extra phrase the terror says it must be let's do this again it must be the reason the wrote that extra phrase by the I have already a heckish that is always treated like the par that's a general heish that underpins all these the is because I want to learn from and if I didn't have an extra mention by the to make it I wouldn't be able to learn from you know why cuz how you learning How do I know from that to circumvent this issue? What the went ahead is the wrote these words of to make not merely but to make it if it's so now it's not anymore as a result but the bottom line is from the fact that the said these words I see what I need to see and that is but continues used for a few more lines again is the one that said this, right? So and he asked him the big why the just tell me the of the why have to tell me some terror is being okay being the terror is being terror doesn't want to say it I'll tell but write to this to that. But here the said it a whole sentence. So for the same price instead of saying just tell me that there's a by the and if the would tell me there's a by the so I'll know what I need to know. says, "No, what do you mean?" Ra said, "Had the said it and never told it to me through this roundabout way, I would have thought I would have thought that is really meaning you're right. If my whole goal over here is to know by the and the wants me to like really know it even in a way. Yeah. The would have just told it to you. But the whole objective of the is to learn the of and the only way I know that is by the not telling it to me and having to come on to that says what do you mean? will tell me you'll tell me that what do you mean why did the have to save the of requiring this I can know it anyways from and if I'd be able to be mamitted forward now to in other words even if the would have by the fact that it requires this I would still and the reason I would still it is is because I would argue to myself why the to tell me by why is it necessary to be told by I know by the m and anything that's true by the power of is true by the through the so why is the telling it to me you know why the is telling it to me because the wants you to be able to pass it forward to And that's why I have to tell you. So what's the difference? If I tell to be if I tell you and it makes more sense to say by the so tell to me by the you're going to tell me because I needed to know and know it because why does have to tell me anything? It's when you wake up in the morning without an extra P. So says it's not true because I would argue that if all the Tyra would have done is the T would have said don't know where to put the commas here. If all the right try to say that a h 100 times but if all the terra would have wanted was to if all the terra would have done is told me that there's a special when it comes to you can't make any what's the deal why do you have to tell it to me by by learn it out from the wants to tell to me wants to tell me it's not a you're going to buy a den that's going to alter 50 Because why that's not going to work. Therefore, that's why the did this whole the went ahead and the told it to me again, but didn't tell it to me. Pun intended. But rather the terror told it to me where the terra told it to me in the par of the that's not like a situation where didn't say the said the words I know it anyways the is if all I have is a I can't pass it forward to see that's why The Tyra has to tell it to me again to make it as if it's now that it's if it's now I could be but what's the bottom line you see from here. So we're going to obviously stop here. But in terms of what the is the what's the short answer 50 into either it's learned out from the or it's learned out from the more specifically either it's learned out from the of the or it's learned out from the of the and even more specifically either it's learned out from the fact that the said that of the of the has to be in the place that the was the could have just said why the terra say and to teach me that had it only said I went to because that requires that's how I know that's the or it's learned out more specifically from the words in the par of the parsiah where after the tar details exactly how you're supposed to do and all the body parts that are included specifically the and it says the same exact way that the already told me what you're supposed to do and if I mirror it with what you do with the I know that that's what you do with the why tell me that'll I anyways know the there's a general heish from ago. So why do I need this again the terrace because has a double fate. You have to know it's but it also was put in this world for a purpose to be the how that is going to be done and it teaches it via had I only known I would never be able to pass it forward to that's what had to tell me a second time now it's like it's oh if it's like it's now it has the ability to O and again we're stopping here exhale. So as it relates to raid so two weeks ago parasyak we went through in the raid bites some of the crim says that when emerged from the table the very first thing that he did was And we went through different that discuss as it relates to the carbon the in general the this week's parish is par and I think it's to continue on that theme very much and focus on the para uh that's mentioned in vira and that is of course the aa so the story of the aada which is a a story that literally is blighting us through the has so many components to it but there's a very component to it and I think to go through different we'll start tonight and we'll try to be with a part two and a part three during the course of the Raisetic in his shir mala asked a bombasha on a med in Paris. The med says that when told and I want you to go and you should bring him as a carbon says the magic and he said is it possible to bring a carbon without a I'm not a how am I supposed to go now and take my son and bring him as to bring a carbon you have to be a told him I already took care of that I preempted your question I already appointed you as a that's what the means when it says in you are a forever it's in this medish that Abrao's first reaction to was how could I bring my son as a carbon I'm not a in order to bring a carbon you have to be a and said you're saying good however truth is this idea is expressed in other as well it's an it's that had to be established as a co in order for him to be able to execute his mitzvah of the and ali asked that I don't understand. We know the Mishna says then that as much as it's true that in order to bring a carbon on the MSB you'd have to be a coen but that's only true on the misbay. However, bishas had their balm. When carbon were brought on balm, there was no requirement for the person bringing the carbon to be a in fact the Mishna says who used to do the used to do the it was it was that moving forward now the is going to be done by a coin. So may he said what was Abrau's Tina and was mim to the Tina that how could I do the I'm not a a why do you have to be a this is not in the mdash this is not the isk is being brought on a b if is being brought on a bummer you don't have to be a now if anything what should have asked was am I am I not a you have to know but this is not to write what's the right and to the extent that this was not something that requires a and said that the emphasis is the catch is even sharer because that's this is not the first time ever brought a carbon the beginning of par the says that built rightem now says what does that he was being but that was meant for so it's this is not the first time is bringing a carbon and never seemed to have an issue about the fact that is not a pump now it's a bombash so a male lady had shot based on something that he heard from a great gagyan who was a muik of the brisker ravel chatekch is incidentally featured very prominently in this forum of the mishier he always refers to his uncle the great [ __ ] ravelik and in fact in mishar alvi inv this is a madur kamo it's at the very very end of the cafer It's not the last tickle. He brings this as well that he heard from his great [ __ ] his uncle. So revel was once a mismed and it was and he went over to the grizz and he asked the grizz everyone knows the says after the told so looks up he sees an Why does the have to say that he brought obviously it was right just say why have to say that that was brought says the reason is because every one of the avoid that did with this ay he said a he did an avoid and he recited a he did an avoid and he recited He would say, I really was so ready. I was so prepared to be my son. No, I'm going to instead bring this but I'm going to do the right. He asked me that's what he said when he did the and then he did this. He said and then he did and he said and then he did the and is a borious it's also a sovel as he said that I don't understand one of the things it's that did with the was he See he said that what's why did Abrau do he [ __ ] with this the reason is because it was an one of the unique related to a carbon is that it required and then after that the was no din he on a carbon that was brought on Obama and being that this carbon was being brought on Obama right there was no Mishkan there was no Bikto so if that's the case if that's the case the chic asked the briskov why is there a he going on over here what's this is that not only did he but he took the skin and a gau was made from it and years years later generations later centur Later, Elio Yoani would get a hold of that gar and this would be his magical gar that the novi talks about. It came from the skin of this aisle. But the bottom line is that was his kasha. Where is the hid over here? So the brisker told him so the briskar told him that if you take a look at the infernom a few times right the is very very precise and you're never allowed to make the in a place that's not in that very precise placeto says is then continues there's a that everybody has that that the place that built when he bought the from that's the place that that's the place built his when he emerged from That's the brought their carbon that's brought his carbon when he was born. That's the place he was born from. So the said that if you take a look at the says twice that the took place in the Why does have to say it twice? The first time the Rambam says it, what's histogram saying that as much as took place and as much as you would think in that the of the was on a bomb and if that's the case of the was that really the together of the was it took place in mik it didn't take place in mikdash it took place in mikt of then it took place in mikdash and if that's the case it's governed by all of mik if in the mikdash would go and he would bring a carbon there be a mitzvah of if there'd be a mitzvah of there had to be a mitzvah of as one of the I saw in May doesn't bring this but this of it's a unbelievable in the world of that said over he said that take a look at this is so good the Mishna over there is discussing the of so how do you make so one way to do it is you say that I want this to be another way to do it a mundish way to do it is that I want this to be like that right the whole word which is the way of referring to an is a kino for the word carbon what does carbon have to do with somebody says I don't want any fruit what does it have to do with a carbon the ter you say I want the fruit to be like that thing that's I want this to be aer as well so the mishnas and the furs and second parad talk about different phrases. If somebody would say this, would it be a would it not be a right there's a whole bunch of actually if you say right there's a whole bunch of different says if somebody says I want this to be like it's going to be considered a what does it mean sheep I want to be like sheep what does sheep mean says If somebody says like the sheep with the you know what that is it's the it's that is that if a is if you have a carbon it's not there's no so how could it be that if somebody says I want this to be like it's not even there's Call me evil. So said that from that talked away that it had a den of regular and that's this Indian said that I've always said that this went with if that's the case it's when the were being brought on what was the was at the was done by the Frank if that's the case. So what's going on here? How comeing he's saying he says I'm not a says you're right. I preempted I already made you a coin. It's because this one being that went with a miktosh. So it's for that reason miktosh you have to have a ken he would have to have a coin as well. But I just want to say two before we go there. Number one, this vert sounds eerily similar to what we spoke about the other week from the as it relates to the carbonus of right very very very similar right based on the same here in it comes from we said it's a mural that the Being that was done in the mik for that reason the governed it was not the governs but rather was the governs saying remember we mentioned it many times all was able to prove from all those was that was built on the mikdash I'm going to now take a leap of faith. If it was onto as far as I know didn't say it by this is talking about the by the screams at you that's a you have the notion that you have as it relates to as it relates to so really the iser has to be true by the but is not necessarily as it relates to that's the first the second is that the said this was asking on the of the wasn't discussing he was discussing the Right? That means that this vert that we're saying over that it went with is not just true with regards to the component meaning how could I bring the on the I'm not a that's right now maybe the minute he knew he was an at that point he didn't have to be a but it'sn't just true That's that's and it's because really we're coming to that's talking about the of the and if you see that it's true even regarding the of the so it's that it's true not only regarding the component but it's true with regards to it's true with regards to the component as well the truth is I hear from and really this and The kachum of the aada is something that permeated and underpinned it underpinned the entirety of the sh of shabas. I went through the for mayor. I went through the fordavid and it's really different and different based on this idea just want to be Messiah with a few each one is so short. The first one that is told take right bring him as a carbon. So the Pik says that tied up and he brought him on top of him and he takes out the and he's about to go ahead and check him and at the last second incidentally I saw in the briskish room they say what's like why twice because when you want to stop someone from doing something that he shouldn't do you say right you scream it you don't say it once you say it twice it was at the last second the knife Mama had his neck right but the point is the is taking place where it's happening on on top of the right and this is where he's going to go ahead and and and and do the but the was going to be on top of the misbeh and in they asked why did the have to be on top of the misbeh had be on top of the that's will be done on the but why is the being done on top of the so they say over in the name of the briskov that the biscarov said because was an right should bring them as an isen that was today's anah has to be in soften now there was no real right we was soften the md but the says on that If is on it's a and the reason is because is treated it's treated like the so being that and always requires soften so it's for that reason it's for that reason they had to make sure that it was going to be that's one another I saw in the brisket they bring from the brisk that the briskov So one of the things that tells is we're going to go we're going to bow down and after we bow down we're going to come back what's see why he wasn't told to bow down like why is he bowing down he said it's posh because and we know the is that any person that ever left the BT there was a you always had to bow down. But that's what we talk about when because every person that ever left the Bikto had was leaving the BT and being that he was leaving the BTO there was a and because there was a so it's for that reason he said first and after one last they bring in and that is so the Pik says that are now walking right they left and Ali behind and they're walking now and they're walking now to do the Pik says that turns to and he tells him he said where's the where's the right when you read the it sounds like at this point doesn't that he's the one that's the right so he says I see the I see the I don't see the sheep where exactly is this where exactly is this carbon and they ask two cautious number one so obviously doesn't have all the information about what's about to happen right he assumes though this is going to be a cell so two cautious number one any so you could say that according to the mandama that holds that only allowed to bring it's good but there is a mandama that You can only bring right but doesn't have to be a first of all it could be a bucker right it could be a goat and the frat the frat if you're dealing with carbonus of the benoyak if you're dealing carbonus with a benoyak it could be any kosher animal right that's the gamaru we spoke so much about the other day in paratas so they ask in cheer how did ye know to assume that there was going to be a making two big assumptions, right? You're being very presumptuous over here. This is the way this carbon is is going to go down. So they say they say because they understood that was going to have to build a misbehav. The Mishna says if you have the only way you could be you have to be a that's going to be used always had to be a being that it had to be well it was a there must be it must be there's going to be a cell and if that's the case he What's going on over here? Oh, but they say that's only true if you hold this with some that's following. But if this is a bomber, there's no mean that this had to take place in the Bikto. If it had to take place in the Bikto, so it's for that reason, it's for that reason. This was his question with the assumption that this was going to be a lust maybe for one and we're really going to end with this and that is in he asks and by the way on this specifically in the brisk so from Yeshua says over this and does and because has a lot of fun with this kash. So this is a kash that comes from the in the he asked the kash the says right it was already the the third day and leaves and behind and he starts walking together with he starts walking together with so asked that why Didk first ask for they've been traveling already for 3 days, right? This is going on for 3 days already. So if it's going on for 3 days, why did he wait now until day three to ask this question? Some say I saw that at this point wasn't sure that he for sure like he didn't know what was happening. Maybe is going to be the car. I he didn't know exactly what was happening. But now he right it's just me and my father and I don't think it's me. So stops getting a little nervous. you know it was the three of them but you know now it's it's already only him but why did he wait until the third day right this was his why so said that till now for sure he was the carbon he assumed for sure he's the carbon there's no question about it right but what happened after leaves the behind so the puts it with a carbon. So with a carbon at this point said what's going on over here? It's probably uh it can't be me. If it's not me, it must be a he wants to know where the oil is. But he first on day three. This is what said in the but I was thinking that last vert that we said from the from brisk maybe you could say that until this point I don't know if he thought he was the carbon didn't think he was the carbon this is already something that right that's already an Indian that already talk about but in his mind this was going to be a regular carbon it was going to be a carbon of bama like any other car but what happened On the third day, they looked up and they saw the mo and they and now we're going there. Now, you know where this is going to take place? This is going to take place on this is going to take place in Mikto. If this is going to take place in Miktosh, one second. Now we can't just build him as now you have to have a until this point I don't know maybe's going to find the carbon maybe he's the I don't know it's not the point but now it was until this point how's this carving going to play out is this going to be or is it going to be the third Hey all of a sudden the smoke is there now till now he doesn't know where he's going. That's the whole point, right? But now he knows where he's going and now he sees a smoke. And now he that it's gonna be we have to have a I am the carbon. I'm not the carbon. Maybe he thought he was the carbon said he thought he was the carbon. So now when he saw it on the third day, it was But that's why he first asked the kasha on the third day and we are going to stop