Zevachim 52

Today's daf is n and we are about 20 lines from the top of today's being learned as a so we're in the middle of a the more specifically whether orim is not. So just a few pointers as relates to an introduction. The mentions the mitzvah of five times. All five times regarding the carbon kas all five times regarding the carbon kas that are mentioned in parasikra in pericall. The first time it mentions it is by the mashiach. The second time is by the third time is by thei and the fourth and the fifth times are with regards to the why two times by the because the can be brought either with a kispa or with a. So all the that are mentioned in vayroperic mention that after the after the after the mat that were put on the all synonyms of each other you take the left over and you perform an with it what's known as if you look carefully at the there's nuance amongst the five times that the terra mentions the Indian of three of The five times the Torah says that you should pour the on the of the which is the large that was in the other two times the Tyra simply says you should pour it on the three times that the Tyra says you should pour it on the of the are by the Mashiach thei regarding the of the regular be it the or the simply says you should pour it on the does not emphasize that it should be on the and the that discussed why is it that the Tory had a mention three times that the should be on the and the garra said all three of these mentions are there for a reason they're all coming to teach us something the first of well that's easy that's coming to tell me that the had to be on the as opposed to on the now the first time the term mentions it's talking about the mashiach the of the mashiach were done on the so you definitely could have had a that maybe the should also be on the kamashon it should be on of the second time the mentioned that was by the par is coming to tell me that the only that's going to have the is going to be the there isn't even on the which as we mentioned yesterday once I know that it really makes the first not applicable anymore true but the only reason I know that is because I had the first but the second mention of teaches me that the only that had was the and the third mention of that it says by the is coming to teach me which means that all that the doesn't say a word about well they too should have a they too should have a mitzvah of now one kich that I think is worth mentioning Now that we didn't speak out yesterday that's going to be relevant for the today's and that is this third which that's only that's the that any carbon whose den is to be put on the should now have the that is the but the point is we're being who was on the but notice we weren't whose it was to put it on the what would be an example of that the makipur this right Those who were not the where the says have their dam also doesn't go on the and as a result they're not included in the third of the and as a result just based on the we have we wouldn't have a that there should be a mitzvah of and that the should be on the of the in fact as we're going to see is going to bring a price in today's d that's going to discuss how do you know that there's a mitzvah by the and I what do you mean I thought we addressed it no we only addressed all the that go on the we did not find the for that doesn't go on most of the that don't go on actually mentions that they go on the I hear. But what about the barikum? That wasn't mentioned. So that's something that's going to be addressed a little bit later in the but continued after the dseo. This is going to walk us right into today's dig said maybe the third is not coming to be for Islam to go but rather maybe what it's coming to teach me is now here too there's a understand but the way we were albeit quickly was the way Rashi is and that is the Garra is suggesting that maybe what we should learn from those words is is that the zikas of the carbon had to go on a of the where there was a which by the way is the truth. So the carbon had to be on parts of the hadite. We know not all parts of the had aite the it had to be. says the maybe that's mentioned is coming to teach me not that old that go have but rather what it's coming to teach me is that the not even the of the has to be and the price brought that they both were that suggestion they were both for almost the same reason eerily similar reasons but a different reason nonetheless said that I don't need a to tell me that the has to be on a part of the that's you know why I know it from it requires certainly would require said almost the same thing he said that's what said that's where he veers off a little bit has two so to speak number one it's not number two it's not still it's so certainly and it's certainly it should require you don't need the to tell me that the of would have to be connected if I I don't need a for it. So what is the third coming to teach me discuss what's the between said they're both acknowledging that is not is where they seem to be that holds that is not only not it's also notapish didn't add that kage to his sounds like he holds really is he agrees it's not but he holds it's what's going on over here and the had two suggestions high level the two are the same there's a nuance where they veer off raat holds that as much as the is not a but it's because holds that is holds is not a it's also notap now we said it's a little bit of a mch what's the difference between being a versus being isn't that just semantics but just to keep things simple holds that although the is not a It's holds it's not only not it's not even hence when he said the he said that number one is not number two it's not even it's couldn't say it's meaning it's because he also really isap All was able to say was that is not as opposed to is what would emerge however is is that whether is the way the garra understands the dto of is that is would be that is not didn't like that papa was not that raish should emerge from this ba as being that is so said everybody holds is not for sure that's what he means when he says that is not even and even so why not say that is also notap because there is one type of it's not literally but it's similar to that is kapar and that is the messy of the now the sugis of katas are very much coming up is so we'll be a lot more familiar with what is the seventh par is called but one of the unique avoid that had was is that after the you took the and you stretched out the leftover down it's the equivalent thereof to based on we know that the is and as a result to say that is never is not true because the of the proverbial the of the is that's why he didn't want to say that language but don't be that is that is really going to be in other words the pto of how you understand there's semantics is the hold is hold came along and he that that's natural said that even holds that is not it's only the soap this is going to walk us into the and whether or not the stom of the holds that is that is that holds that is really not now one last thing that's worth mentioning before we part and that is that this of which is the topic of the entirety of today's it's in the it's only the of the carbon that were brought in the that were brought on and those were all right so it's only in the as it relates to the carbonas that were brought there's not even a discussion whether should should not be the the whole shil is only the the thing that's worth mentioning and that is that there's a big sh on the when we say does that mean that if I have it's for me to do or does mean that I have an obligation to make sure that I'm going to leave over a little bit of dance I should be able to do the basic in terms of understanding whether or not that's the extent of the rage that we're going to speak out and really from here we're going to jump right into the and by the way if you want a highlevel sketch of today's daf this was just the introduction really today's is a tale of three braces the first one's and then the gar is going to bring two additional bryes a little bit of fun these braces but it's a a tale of three bryes all dealing with the of. So first things first is that your so it says in the Tory regarding the and the end of the P is so one of the five times that the T mention regarding the is by the and it says says the why does have to mention right we're talking about a it's very much in the context of the so why does the have to say that the leftover of the it's coming to teach us rabbi said that it's coming to teach us that the of the also requires. Now, why do I need a P to teach me that the also requires? to refer to the introduction of the DAFF because as much as the term mentioned it five times by the but none of those five times was the and as much as we said the third of is coming to teach me but it's only the br so it leaves me without a source for the says that's this extra mention of to the parour right I don't need it for the so for a different got involved and he said he said it bothers me a little bit why you would need a to tell me that regarding the shouldn't you know from the what's the by the And even whose dam does not have a den to enter the as it relates to the didn't enter the at all as it relates to the it didn't enter at all the enter the but only if there was a of some sort there's no there's no day on the calendar that says on this day you have to bring a on this day you have to bring a so that's where there is a date on the calendar that says you have to take the D and bring it inside. What's that date? So certainly it should requires also got involved. Notice the parallel between this pricer and the previous all of these with the mentions all of them forget forget mitzvah none of them have a to go right even they went to but they didn't go behind the curtain right they didn't go to Certainly as it relates to enter certainly it should require. So we're going to go back now to only because the next words are. So it's interesting and then so just interjected of this but ultimately the of this part of the price is so now goes back like this I don't understand the said the word is extra you're telling me but I don't really understand why do I need a to tell me that is by the I would know from right so is talking and says maybe what the is coming to tell me is that it should be what's the because if I know it from the and now the tells it to me it's and when it comes to anytime I tell you something twice now this is an interesting because the didn't tell it to me twice the only told to me once but once I know from is now becoming a one so that if I have a one it becomes but the bottom line is said it can't be because it says regarding and we learn from there that as long as you go ahead and you do all theap of that you're gonna get the way Rash explains this it means all theaparas that are furish in the of the right we have to be familiar with the it's over the goes to the whole of and it doesn't mention a word about meaning even if you're going to tell me that there's a re of when it comes to the based on or based on a but it's not mafurish anywhere and being that it's not mafurish anywhere I actually then have a that tells me it's not because The says and we learn from there as long as he do all theaparas that are mentioned before in this going to be okay and nothing else is is going to be. Now the truth is we could stop right here because really this is the papa. What do you see from here? You see hold is not because if holds that is anyways. So this whole conversation is a moot pointing that why does the player have to mention that even the anyways know it from maybe it's to tell me that is it can't be because I have what do you mean if then is the terrorist is not that is the right drop by the way the bryson continues there's a safer to the price continues and says that just like that why do I need to be right it's you can make the same exact argument why do I need the to even mention by the I should be able to learn it from the whole par which is the first par of the mentioned by the first kas that's mentioned in the parash that whole par is superflous you know why because I can learn it from where from the from the now that I have this I should be able to apply the methodology of the to so that I should know from the why is have to mention what would be who did not have to enter the not as an obligation, not as a mitzvah on your side. It requires mitzvah. as it relates to the parcoy mashiach that has a den form to enter. don't have a problem with the gear. I thought the parks we said did not have a den for it to go as right that was the original has a as opposed to does not have but either way so certainly it should require so again the same that we're asking why do I need a forim says the I can also ask why do I need a parish for the pariah so says the price of the same maybe you're right And the reason the mention the parish of the specifically even though it's for says it can't be because it says in the lion of what the Torah did was the made it meaning that all it is is like a extra mitzvah. to teach me that that is not going to be. What does this mean? So Rashi explains that if you look at all the avoid so the Tory says the Torah tells you as a what you're supposed to do here just the gram the grammar of the word is a little bit different and the Tor doesn't say the T says that's the and from that this is not something that you're obligated to do this is more of a mitzvah so again the price leaves us hanging but at the end of the day we have a cash that why do I need the mention of by the parsiah couldn't I have learned it with a from the maybe it's a that's something that's not possible the reason it's not possible is is because there's a as opposed to and that's how I know that all it's going to be is so we spoke out already what was but just to make a secum on this first of three bryes that we're going to learn and that is the first price was getting involved in some of the nitty-gritty related to the mitzvah of specifically it was ding the extra word part that it says regarding the what's coming to be it's and then what emerged from that was really two cases two cases that the bry didn't answer and very very similar kashes kash is based on first question was why do I need to be I shall learn it from a from all the other and they weren't an answer suggested maybe the answer is that it's coming to tell me that it's can't be that it's there's a that it's not so what is the answer I don't know doesn't answer another question that the asked and didn't answer again a very similar question is why do I need the par by the mashiach learn from the is it maybe coming to tell me that it's it can't be what is the answer again I don't know what the answer is but either way this is the first B now before we see the second B is just going to be one more explain the original that he is not but he is but the says it can't be that we have a BC that came from Rabish says You say regarding the what it means is that if you have meaning if there's leftover dam in the then there's a mitzvah mitzy but if not then there's no mitzvah. Now if you're telling me that if there's no leftover dam then there's no mitzvah of it sounds a little bit like what it sounds a little bit like the because if the is there should be to have leftover that's related to the we mentioned earlier there should be to have leftover for you to be able to do but this is a how can you tell me is with right it's it's not that that's the way it would be but the says you have to sayan I believe it's true. these two. So must be there were two different tan that was saying over the in the name of here comes the second the following is of the opinion that is the because we learned in says in theor regarding the carbon For we need these words the that's doing the he gets to eat from the carbonas and the is addressing why have to say what does mean? So says the it's coming to teach me that the only time is if it's if you did it exactly the way you're supposed to do it. What does it mean? It means you did the you did as opposed to doing it. So we know that the divided it into two parts the part that's the top part of the misbeh and the lam part naturally that's the bottom part of the misb. We also know different had to be put on different parts of the as it relates to the specifically went on the it went on the corners of the so says the is coming to teach me that that if you take from the carb and you would put the damato meaning you did it in the wrong place you would not be able to eat from the carbs. Now at first glance this price very much is related to the right of but for now we're just going to take the price at face value. Price continues and says I am why would you have thought otherwise meaning you need to tell me that if you get it right only then you'll let the car what you would have had that if you get it wrong obviously you have to get it right. No, I'll tell you why I would have thought so. Because it says in the And what do we learn from that word? We learn from which is we learn from there that dominion is right. This was the in the beginning of I would have thought I would have thought that the same should be true in the reverse. That's why I need a to tell me that even though as it relates to the minion where the says four if you do one it's okay but when it comes to the already there you have to do it at the very least one right but if you're going to do it over there if you're going to get the wrong place it's not going to be okay the continues and the bryer says why do I need a mar to tell right? That if you do the in the wrong place it's something I should know something I should know. I mean we just said the reason need is because I would have thought that if the minion is not so maybe the mock is not but the garra says I think I have a from that should reveal to me that if you put it in the wrong place it's not going to be okay. Well, I never done with never done with there is a that goes, right? That's the but there's also a that goes. What's the go? It's the just relates to beer and that's already based on a that we're going to see. Rashi brings it in. So, wouldn't it make sense that if you take the that's supposed to go and you put it should also not be okay. So why do I need a to tell me that if you take the dam you put then there's no I know it I know it from I know from the par of because there's a that's supposed to go and that one when it goes there's a that says it's possible so doesn't it make perfect sense it's very logical that the supposed to go if I end up putting it's not going to be okay but the say could be the that's supposed to go if you put a It's possible and the reason is because even the even the of that is not going to go. There's no part of that goes. So if you go ahead and you do the it's going to be possible and that's why it's if you did it as relates to that if you put a maybe there it's different because you do have that goes and being that you have that goes so you could have had that being that of this carbon is going to go it's going to be okay as well that you have to get in the same place was need that you need to put it in the right place. If the has to be in the right place, why should the be any different? The ter is no is much more it's much more for the than is for the regular because there's no that will ever go but there is a of the regular that's going to go being that it's very much a be for the so you could have had a you could have had a a that maybe if you put it there even the it's not what you're supposed That's why I need a P. But the Gar continues and the Gar has another I still don't understand why I need a P of to tell me that if I do the in the wrong place it's not going to be okay. I should be able to be without a from the what does mean from the how so? Because as it relates to the there's a of it that's the right was but if you put the it's not going to be a right so if that's the case why do I need a to tell me that if I would do the there's no I could have learned it from the if I do on the wrong miss is it's a problem and the areas so you would argue that the same should be true regarding the if I put it in the wrong place it should also be a problem what are you going to tell me no could be if you take the and you put a link that is a m for the of the because the went so maybe there it's different well the misbeh is also a place for the so you see that that's not a so if that's the case again I need I should learn from the first said let's learn from the but that was because that's a PLACE THAT HAS NO to the as opposed to the by the does have a here that kash is not a kasha But what about this? What about this? The you put on the is also that's also a problem. And the is a mock for the for what? for the but says no you can't bring any from there is different because the is not now what the words means the gmor is going to discuss but for now means that doesn't finish the job it very very loosely doesn't finish the job as opposed to regular that you But we're the finish the job being that it finishes the job. I would have thought that if it's gonna be the reason I needed and I can't simply learn it from the has a that the is not as opposed to the is now says that whatever means again we said it means it finishes the job the point of is is that from the fact that by the itself is not Americ that makes it a is that it's not enough that I just do the I have to do something else there's a that has to be done is not doesn't finish the job it requires an there's two that are being done with the that's the there's no extrav that's being done and essentially what the means to say the is that you can't I would say there's no as opposed to by if I was supposed to go I did over there it it's not on the same level of and therefore maybe if you did it's It's going to be okay. The between the isra the is that it requires a second how does the express that itself is not as opposed to when it comes to the over there it's so says the here's the punch line. What do we mean when we say that the when you do the the doesn't finish the job does not mean because you still have to do and if that's the case what do you see from here that is oh that's come full circle we're interrupting that's the objective of this second that's the mission statement where do you see this is where you see it he took it from one nuance because the was being between the and the said that the has what's the is what does that mean? It doesn't finish the job. Yeah, you have to do another what other could you possibly have to do the see clearly that must be really that's the only line of this that we needed said if that's what the Bryson means meaning the B is being and the Bryson is saying that you can't learn that the is by the was the from the fact that the mo is by the that was born specific ally that if you take the you put on it would be possible because there there's a what's the is that it requires a second a what's that is that there there's a it's that you put the dam on the now the point of this is is very tricky the point is that that's the fact you have to do another to take the dam put it on another and it's of that's a grace of I can't one the other opinion is when the two things are similar. If the thing I'm trying to learn from the is much more than the then obviously I can't learn the from the according to all 16 permutations of the last that doesn't work right. So the bottom line is that's saying but attacks it a little bit from a different angle. He said if that's what the means are you trying to say I'm telling you now but at the same time he said if that's the case I think you just made the even better if you hold and this is when it comes to the then I don't know how the was the the from the I think he made it even better. How so? You turned it into like a where the is that you're going to have to put it on the it's actually but if you did the of it's not okay. meaning the the have such a shy to the that there's an on that you have to do that IF YOU DON'T DO IT YOU DON'T get and still even though I'm so shy to this but if I go ahead I do the on this it's not going to be okay well if that's the case if you would take a regular that goes where there's never going to be a that it's to put Because even if it's only the that's going to be this that's why all those conations we spoke at in the introduction to were important in the but as it relates to the was put in that was never going to be can't understand this it was never going to be well if that's the case then certainly if you would keep so says what are you trying to say you're just trying to say you can't that because that's more I know but in your you just gave me you walked me into a you you you walked into a trap you're trying to deflect the and you know you did you created a you created a much bigger mess for yourself because if you're telling me and you're telling me that had to be done with the that means the is so sh it's so intertwined with the and still if you do the on the it's not going to be okay, right? It's gonna be well then certainly if you would take from the that's supposed to go and instead of putting you put where the part of the is not nearly as intertwined because there'll never be a where it's to go ahead and put the that's but that's not something that's going to be right. So if that's the case then certainly what's the point is telling the it can't mean because if it means not only did you not answer the you made the even stronger so what then does it mean it means something completely different also needed That's that's a separate and being that that's a separate that's what the that's and that's what's going on over here in this but you have no that is from the words of said there's no way in the world that the Bryce says it now let's look at the price does it say it or does it not say it but like many fun prices it's very very cryptic it's very sus Right? There's uh no clear gly one way or the other. Right? Very often the incases is is the prices were not edited as properly. Right? Sometimes you just don't know what the price means. And because you don't know what the means and sometimes we have to back into solutions looks at this don't know what this means. So maybe right you have a such what does it mean? So maybe what it means is that's not what it means and I'll prove to you that's not what it means. It means something completely different. Bottom line is here comes the third bra by far the easiest. So it says so again we should have a little bit of with these. What does mean? It means right. So so this is so this is already 20. you did all the and the terrorist says and you know you have to finish doing all the so says the price and we had this price already earlier in the says that the way you read this is that you read the word first and the word kilo second if you did all the all the that I mentioned in the parish of then kilo then you're done you don't have to do anything else then if you didn't finish like kilo then you're not done Why are you reading the the Pic backwards first keeper then? You should read it straight for straight words, right? If you finish doing everything you're supposed to do, you get and if not not bottom line is says that if one of the matonist were not done you didn't do anything says the what is the between so again this is not a hard but it is very understand what's going on here because said sounds like you have to do everything. What does it mean in keeper? He did the which is he did that's usually the and said like you like if you finish doing what you're supposed to do you get read finishing what you're supposed to do is the last thing mentioned is the right so they're both saying the same thing so what then is the who said what we don't know once said that not arguing and it's just a sh how do you read the do you read it this way? Do you read it that way? It's just like in the context of how do you read the that's all that's going on. There is no the other one said no there is whether or not what does that mean says what's the ordinarily so as long as he did that's going to be okay says you have to finish the job what does it mean you have to finish the job you even have to do the now how do you know the by the first of the three bices of But the bottom line is the once said other one said no keeper means means everything and everything means that even is going to be I'll prove to you that is the one that said that they are arguing and they're arguing whether how do I know that said once said this according to the host So he's talking about where before I imagine this god was doing and he did the and he did all and he comes right now to do the and all of a sudden oops this is right this is like the antithesis and this was like at the end of a long day of all says according to the holds. No, you got to maybe start all over again. So what do you see holds his probably in this but says you're telling me from the fact says that hold it must be this is the way he understood as if to say according to there is no in the whole world that holds I'll prove to you that's not true that if you in the world of that if you do the is that the is that you're going to be and said that said he was going according to the is so what do you see that even holds that is you want to be there's one that holds that because he said there's a mand somewhere in the world that is close they both agree there's a mand in the world that holds your mak And yet they're still arguing whether this is the is right here meaning according to you that it's how would you be of that you would say that holds there is such a mand but it's not this mand it's not done this well if that's the case and there's no time because I could always tell you that also holds that there is such a mandar however That mando omar is not this mando omar exhale. So as promised before this year continuing along with the theme of the raid of this week which has been the it's the par specifically the components of the I think it's to beerish the we said over the other day from Brisker that Yeshua says over in David used to say over in May used to say over in it's an idea that permeates the the brisk it's a big it's a little bit of a game change or a paradigm shift in terms of understanding the net result of the kim component of the I think it's to go through it one more time rashi in the parish of the aada says says that after was told and he said he says I have to pour my heart out to you a little bit. I'm very very I'm very very confused. Yesterday only yesterday you told me that through I'm going to be all the I was given and then you came to me and you told me you told me to take that through whom I was going to get all these grace and I should bring him as a carbon. I said, "Okay, and now you're telling me, what's going on over here? I'm so confused. I thought I was so happy. Then you told me, okay, it's a tremendous, but I'm ready to be what happened to I don't know. And now you're telling me we're reinstating. Please explain to me what's going on. Told him and that's an excerpt from a in capital. I never intended to be my and I never lied. Every single thing that I said was 100% with the way I meant it. How's that possible? When I told you I wasn't changing my original why I never told you I TOLD YOU TAKE AND PUT IT ON THE Okay you put him on the now you took him off the misb you didn't understand me maybe but I didn't lie comes to the he tells him, "I'm so confused." You told me, "Wow, I'm going to have Then you tell me there's going to be no." And then you tell me there is going to be a What's going on over here? THERE'S A FLIP-FLOP HAPPENING. I'm not flip-fpping. Everything I told you was consistent. Everything I told you I told then I TOLD HIM TAKE HIM UNDER. OKAY. Why is that? Now you WERE GOING TO SHOCK THEM. I HAD TO TELL you but there was no steer between and because put him on his back but there was never an intention for you to go ahead and check him there was never intention for you to go ahead and check them so there was no steer in my words I appreciate that I appreciate the honesty and the vulnerability says, "You made a mistake." The idea was always Yeah. and put him on, but at the same time, you should go ahead and take it off. Brisk said that there were two things that bothered him tremendously with this kazal. The first thing that bothered very much with this is it comes out that what is telling Abrau is that when I said I never told you to go ahead and I never told you to go ahead and to bring him as a a carbon. What I said was I said put him on HIS AND THEN TAKE HIM OFF. THAT'S what my INTENTION WAS. YOU PULLED OUT A MESSER. OKAY, BECAUSE YOU PULLED OUT A MESS. I HAD TO stop you. BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT I TOLD YOU. I wanted you to put him on and then take him off. That was the objective. And if that's the case, it was never a ste. Well, if that's the case, it emerges that was never really an of this home never really happened. It was a figment of the imagination of Abrau. It was A MISINTERPRETATION OF never toldu to go ahead and check. He told him put him on the muzz. Is that an ass? If somebody tells you take your kid, PUT HIM ON THE I MEAN is maybe if he's afraid of heights I DON'T KNOW THEN THEN TAKE HIM BACK OFF. WHAT'S the grace of? I don't know what the is. And really there wasn't nervos. What is the abrau misunderstood? He misinterpreted him and he thought that meant that he should go and put him on the and what he thought it was a tremendous messiah and was prepared. He was to go and be it comes out it was all a is a mistake. It's a mistake. It's clapping the misunderstanding of that of the whole of the right. I thought you wanted me to do something. I was moist enough to do it and I'm going to get it. It just doesn't feel right. But but how is it possible that the great would misunderstand so much tells take understands means be of him as a carbon. No, that's not what I meant. I MEANT PUT HIM ON THE MISBEH I DIDN'T mean like do a do a with him be him on a fire which would require and that's not what I meant I meant that's what I meant I meant put him on and TAKE HIM OFF THAT'S ALL I MEANT THAT MEANS COMPLETELY misunderstood the in the words of DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE TIT VAL WAS PUT HIM ON HIS BACK AND TAKE HIM OFF AND THOUGHT PUT HIM ON HIS bay go ahead and shack him right to say it a little heard immediately he jumped to he ran to says what does mean oh right all the references of that you find in hal is an that was done with a carbon and that's what understood now the word is a little bit of a giveaway, right? It sounds like that's what's going on over here. It's not put him on the it's to bring him as a carbon is coming and is telling that's never what I meant just put him on. Put him on and take him off. Now, what does the word mean? See, you have to know. But for right now, is completely misunderstanding. And if that's the case, how's it possible? So two cautious. Number one, it comes out the way and Rashi explained what really meant when he said that there was never an intention for the if that's the case there was never really of the if that's the case the is a figment of the imagination of the was one big mistake and that Abrau was never really tested with the of the ku of is not like ava. Right? How is it possible that completely misunderstood what the told him does not understand the t of the word he made such a mistake. So said it's from these two gashes it's from these two gashes that got the right and he understood 100% what the told him to do and in essence what the told him to do when he said was not just put him on the misb and take him off but it was to put him on the carbon in and to actually bring him as a a carbon. Well, if that's the case, then how could the to say when says he's very much backing off of what he said? Because the the was supposed to be a of a well that would require that it be preceded by a and a minute says well that means now you're not doing the and if you're not doing you can't be and if you can't be so you're changing now all of a sudden it's Now you want to tell me yeah I'm going to reinterpret that that's not what says he said I'm telling you this is what I said this is what I meant it's consistent I'm never flip-flopping I'm never changing my mind what do you mean the minute tells him now there's no way of being if there's no way of being you just change the whole narrative so here's the punch line here's the that you have to say that the whole of was a very where do you find anywhere that of a person right is one of the most things in the world that involves such an Indian this is not something you're allowed to do this was all part of the like but the bottom line is is that this was a very one of the said was that when the came to and he told him I want you to take and bring him as a carbon he never told him What he told him was take while he's alive and bring him as a carbon not then do the which is the of a regular carbon but right now you should go ahead and you should do a when tells He means that was the that was given to understood it perfectly well. He got it. He said that's what I'm supposed to do. I'm supposed to take and I'm supposed to put him on the It's not that the men just put him on the and thought it should be the men put him on and understood it and he understood you're supposed to put him on the and when took and he put him on the misbeh of in this carbon that was and that is a of a carbon. Now ordinarily the only time you could do a carbon was but it was in the even before even though was there was it was that you can go ahead and you could take and you could be mim with him. You could do a lot right now with now on top of them is Abrau understood and rightfully so that if I was just M within still alive cuz I was only the I was the He's still alive. He's on the he's so what am I supposed to do now? I'm probably supposed to go I have an What do you do with you do understood that it's that the next move is to go ahead and do and that was a good it was a very good because if you have a law then it's you're talking and it's that that's the and that's what you're supposed to do and by the way that's what the of the was that after You're going to be val you're going to now go a step fighter and you're going to do the and by you going ahead and doing that now you're going to lose your that's with the of the playing itself out but here's the point the never told specifically do the he just told him the valu which was and once he was maleo he understands that that's the next move so what does He takes out the and he's about to go ahead and he's about to do the and then all of a sudden don't do the what do you mean don't do the he's I have to do the in those words of the was the that followed the And is saying that you're right really now that was brought he was brought he was so it's still alive you have to go ahead and fear you're always supposed to fear when you have an but the obligation to go ahead and do that at this point it's going to be I don't want you to go fight I don't want you to do the I don't want you to do the kabalo I don't want you to do I don't want you to do this. I don't want you to fear. I want don't want you to do the the rest. As soon as hears that he turns, let's revisit rashing and he says I'm so confused. Yesterday you told me so I thought I'm going to have the you tell me go bring as an oiler. I'm going to lose him and now you're telling me I'm going to have him. What's going on over here? told him, "No, I was consistent all along. I never lied to you. When I told you I never told you, what did I say?" I said, "HOW ARE YOU?" EVERYBODY learns this ration that what the is telling him now is, "I NEVER TOLD YOU TO BRING HIM AS A CARBON." I JUST SAID, "PUT HIM ON THE MAK AND THEN you're going to TAKE HIM OFF. THEN I'M THEN YOU'RE GOING TO TAKE HIM OFF SAID IF THAT'S what the is telling now he meant I didn't SAY I SAID YOU THOUGHT I MEANT YOU WHY YOU JUMP INTO I JUST MEANT PUT HIM ON PUT HIM UNDER WELL IF THAT'S THE CASE THAT MEANS THERE was never a din on that means there was never really even an implied n of the can't be it can't be there was no of the it can't be there was no implied of the it's impossible that that's THE CASE CAN'T BE THAT IN the there was no of taking right there was because when the says I told you he didn't mean just put him on I MEANT BRING HIM AS A CARBON I MEANT bring him brought him as a carbon and if I meant bring him as a carbon well then by definition then by definition what you're going going to have to do is you're going to have to go ahead and check them. The reason it's is because I never said the whole was only it was only something that you were able to extrapolate if he's an and he's alive then obviously that's what you're going to do but I never said that that's what you're supposed to do and being that I never said murish that that's what you're supposed to do. So it's for that reason so now there's there's no steer it's it's not going to be okay. What was the second? The second was the was because it sounds like when the told him what he meant to say was he meant to say just PUT HIM ON THE bring him as a carbon say meant bring him as a carbon. It meant bring him as a carbon. One second meant bring him as a carbon. So now that you're saying and you're going to tell me oh it's semantics. I just said no you said alo as a carbon and now when you tell me comes out I was not as a carbon that's where the punch line comes in you were as a carbon because and being that he added so it's for that reason when was he was real and was not being there okay if the would end up meaning just put him on the Misbayak and then take him off and Abrau understood that he was supposed to shack them well then Abramov completely didn't understand what he was supposed to do it would mean that Abramu never really had of the if it would mean well let's be that when said he meant but now that he said NOW WE'RE GOING TO BACK into an interpretation just means put him on the That's A COMPLETE AIRA OF WHAT THE ho was really supposed to be because that was supposed to be and this was not supposed to be the terret is you have to say that was supposed to be and is but what does that mean where do you have if you didn't first have the that's the punch line it was that even though he was alive still that was a of it was of and that's where this big for the brisk that it was you see because saying that when I said I meant it has to be a meant again it can't be that at the end of the day does not mean because if doesn't mean it means one of two things. Either David should flip-flop changed his mind and Hashem says no or it means he MEANT IT ALL ALONG AND JUST DIDN'T UNDERSTAND what was talking about. That can't either be and it can't be all in the imagination of either is changing the that's not an option because says right or it means that completely misunderstood it that is not changing his mind and that's what always meant just put him on the terret says the terret is Abra is not changing his mind means do That's what it means. Ordinarily, a would require that it be preceded by which would then mean if it was never that was done. So now you never preceded it with so there's no way to be. So all the valu could possibly be is just some regular basic of well if that's the case it's the ter is it was so the valu ends up being a now where did the come in never told him to do why does think to do no he's right because in his not in his in his at when said don't He's just being but he's not changing the words of the now not doing is has cosmic ramifications in the but in the it doesn't alter it doesn't alter the initial the initial was tak but this is the vert here's the punch line how we get there is a little hard this is a real it's like a cafer but the the punchline of this is is said that everyone Everyone knows that was an Rashi says throughout his didn't marry aka right married maybe and married but is the one of the that you don't find married why not cuz he was anah and because he was a carbon so it's for that reason he couldn't avoan yakavinu lives in basan for decades right yitzk was about to go by in the beginning of parish has told us and told them no I'll right he was going to do what his father did but you're not let it go why not why can't I go because you're and is not let so everyone understands was what does it mean he was an he was an he was supposed to be he could have would have been now the was there right if somebody says you're not he's STILL AN SO EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS he's like an almost right he was supposed to be brought as carbon level never ended up bringing this carbon statement was actually brought as an there was a there was really it was ACTUALLY A HE WASN'T just there was not the not the which is That's what was in the sky. That's an avoided that start in carbon and that avoiding carbon was done. We mentioned that used to say over this and he said two based on this. The first that said is that is always referred to as an why as opposed to what as opposed to an why would you think that was anything other than an said because in it was that even when he was alive and he was he could be a mitzvah of ordinarily the part of the has to come after the taking an animal that's already dead right can't even be it has to be So you're taking an animal that's already dead and it's only then that you're going ahead and you're doing the was of Allah's and he was in the said is that the says the malik comes and says means don't brings told him I came for nothing. Let me make and I'll take out a little bit of das don't do anything. So said that what did Abramu so badly want to go ahead and to take out a little bit of D? Why does he want to take out D? What was the purpose of taking out this little bit of D? So this say different reasons but because really was and he was already brought and right you have to do with an oil. Now what avoidance do you have to do? When the mak said he was being like said to go ahead and do that maybe is only but maybe I still have a den to go ahead and do a now usually comes after but I was already told but let me go ahead and make a I'll extract a little bit of l and I'll go ahead and I'll do a that was that don't even take out but The bottom line is the reason Abraov wanted to take out a little bit of dab said the brisker up right again there's a lot of but A VERY BRISK SHOT THAT'S WHY IT was part for but let me go ahead and do I saw another in the brisk I saw this in the from he brings in the name of his brother the father of from Yeshua salvation and said that could be one more based We'll end with this and that is that the one of the kashes that everyone asks on the on the kum of the is is that why did put on before he did the right it was clear the was going to be done and the question is why did it have to be there so in pris they say it's because and was soften and there was no because there was no so it's for that reason he put him on top of based on has the barrel it's because when told he was to do a had to go first he had to go for the push it you learn again let's do this one last time that the was going to be after the after the after the after this that's where the val was going to be so do the on the floor and when it comes time to the then you bring him up. Why is he doing the it's because said that really the was to do that was the if the is to go ahead and to do well the first thing you have to do is now you're going to go ahead and you're going to do the he had to put him on to do Allah you can't take him off right you can't take him off to once he's there he has to stay there so at that point once he's there already the had to be done another that's so the bottom line is we had to go through some of the the brisket is not the easiest rate in the world but some of the brisket as it relates to the and really two big to permeate all the one is what we spoke about earlier in the week and that is that even though the took place really on a misbeh that that was a bummer and The of the should be governed by the says and was from this that the governed was the mikdash not second is the valu was meant bring him on as even before the never told him to do the is something that was understood and it was going to happen after the where he ever have heal before here. This is the only place you have it. this is a I mean the whole idea of taking your son and him is so without question this was a but this is it was if that's the case it explains the lion of it explains maybe why wants to fetch out a little bit of dam it's for it explains why the had to be that it's very much and we're going to stop Yeah.