Zevachim 71

Today's daf is walking and we are about 10 lines from the top of so really rather difficult was a if a coin does so that's that the animals going to be off-limits in the event that the you do with an that was straight for obviously you can't be if somebody an that's obviously you can't eat the it's a the question however is as it relates to the the unique that an contracts [snorts] when it's in a do you say that being that there was being that there was so even though this is off-limits but at the same time from a standpoint the work to be from the so the is that it's going to be as well now one thing is clear somebody a not an somebody the straight for that's one down from a that even though it was straight for so that you can't eat this animal but the is from so there was no discussion no as it relates to a the what is or the same thing do you say just like by there's no straight for so to when it comes to an there's going to be no straight for base or between a and an and by the there's no straight for but when it comes to an there is going to be straight for the mission said on the bottom of that the in such a case in the base of just like a not Thomas but also by it's not going to be Thomas of Thomas base but we argued but we said so we learned the more difficult part of this yesterday now we come to the lighter the tail end of this said that I will be by the woman even that said that if somebody the or somebody is an or somebody is like an or straight for the is that even though the straight for the wasn't really but it did work to be from Thomas that's only if the animal was at the very least a common but if the animal was about over there is going to agree that the straight for and the are not going to work to be this Thomas argued and he said I feel about and no said is in other words the I'm right the how far took his straight like straight for with the is that there's no Thomas what if the animal was about they said that said is regarding what if it was that's over here said the said about meaning that said is that was said even the woman but not only did say that the said is the woman said [snorts] that said is I feel about what does that mean if somebody would do with an a goose or a a chicken that's an that ordinarily doesn't have a the is that the would work it would constitute a enough that there shouldn't be any Thomas that's already very big because especially of an straight for the says the says he could bring us a carbon so there's a of that was said regarding such now it's true over here the was a because it was straight for or it was but at the very least there's some between the that was done and its ability to be me the but if you do with a goose you do with a chicken what is that that's like putting a bullet in its head that's nothing on this that being that the was a by even though you got the wrong it doesn't matter at the end of the day the is going to work to be from Thomas says the throughout shots ask questions he posed that the had a very difficult time understanding and he declared a let's apply the same methodology of and let me ask you the following question what would be if we're all familiar with the instead of doing the would take not an but rather they would take a goat and they would behead the goat so they would go through the whole they would say what they're supposed to say but instead of doing it with a they would do it with a goat what's the would you say that the would be the goat or would you say that is not so what's the background the background is that after the was done the is that the animal was technically not viewed as an which is very big because how did they kill the they beheaded it that's what means they would behead the animal they didn't do they didn't do it should be an but there's a that the itself has an ability to be from Thomas so if you want to know what would be if they did with a with a with a goat with an instead of with an do you say that that if somebody would do with a goose even though there's no with a but the was a of with an even if it's with the wrong type of it would work to be from the so the same would be if you did with an or maybe it's going to be different so explained the two time of my time of my what's the reason we said is by the end of the at the end of the day the types of if that's the case an is not the same species as an one is an one is not the same thing or maybe cuz at the end of the day it's a so was drawing a parallel in one side of his between doing with a a goose and doing with a goat either way yes a couple of said over over there told the over here clearly is presupposing in his question that the itself was there was no so the is what would be if you did the not with a but rather with an but clearly it's implied that if you do it with an it would be that's the what if you didn't do it with an so told yes that's the case and the market that is because it says in the of capital I said the purpose of the was was the purpose was atonement is a bigger term and it's from this word that the uses in the of that we learn a lot of applied to in this context the of that will apply is that just like the that does with or does with it's this animal right now obviously so to [snorts] the by the is going to be the animal as well so you're right this of the is is presupposing in his is is true and the it is the and that's where it comes from it says so just like by is so to the by the is going to be the as well I would yes the from the following yesterday the in it says the of the of and we saw a very big and it's a in the but it's a and that is that even though is a part of an animal of a animal that you're not allowed to eat but counterintuitively ironically when a becomes an then the which you're not allowed to eat when the animal is a is from Thomas so the of an animal that you're allowed to eat when the animal is is when the animal is an the of the animal that you're not allowed to eat when it's such as the is not when the animal is an so says the it must be I would it says in that the so even though the itself [clears throat] is not but at the same time you're not allowed to eat it you're never allowed to eat you can't even eat from an animal that's a and we have the but the says the is emphasizing that the is also by national emphasis on only as opposed to or is on this how do you know how do you know that the of an animal that's not only but it's also such as an two examples of an animal that's how do you know that it's is also going to be that that is also going to be true we learned it from what's the very obvious if you're going to tell me an is there's no at all by he >> The animal itself is tall. constitutes should be Thomas. there was an actual refer. Because a refer is to the egg lot refer there's no conversation. There's no relevance to that It's not that the price that had an arifa. itself would be talking about you didn't do the arifa with that lot refer. But rather you didn't follow the ordinary guidelines. Over there there's too much available. Time is the Gamora and if there's too much available maybe there should be too much available for the Caleb as well. The Gamora says that doesn't make any sense. Why should there be too much available? should certainly work. Why should that's not be met by the regular refer. Shouldn't be met by the regular refer. Says the Gamora you're The price a positive under the premise that in egg lot refer is somehow unavailable. And if you did certainly there shouldn't be too much available. I ask you what there was an egg lot refer. But before they had a chance to be headed. Before anybody had an opportunity to check it. It just died by itself. Being that it just died by itself. Being that it just died by itself. So now already it is an available. But being that it's an egg lot refer. So it's also the so you would have thought that over here the Caleb is also going to be also available. And that itself that the Caleb is not also available wouldn't apply to this egg lot refer. Come ask for one that it applies. But the Gamora says if that's the case. So come join up then that when the price says discussing an egg lot refer. That's also available. Thus there's a have a minute that maybe the Caleb should be also available or that the Caleb should be Tommy. It's clear then that that when the egg lot refer becomes also available becomes also available behind. It becomes also available behind because it's not much for that the Mesa itself is what makes it also available. The arifa doesn't make it also available. The arifa is met by the arifa. Schita would be met by the arifa. It died now we're viewing it as a suri thus we have a have a minute that maybe this type of Caleb will be Tommy like the price of the discount. So it would must be says I was told exactly what point that the egg becomes also But then my told me that they think As soon as the egg lot comes to the says not to barren that's when it becomes also available. The bottom is an egg lot refer is also It's only also being that it's also available there would have been a have a minute that maybe this egg lot refer is Caleb when it died by itself. Because if there was an arifa it's not an available. If there was a schita it wasn't available. But if it died in some other way. There maybe the Caleb which ordinarily is also available but maybe over here being that we're dealing with the suri available. So over here the Caleb should be met by the arifa come ask for one Caleb that the Caleb is never met by the arifa. Caleb of a ordinary animal is not met by the arifa and even the Caleb of a certain discount animals that are suri available even there they're not going to be met by the arifa either. Had you not allowed very difficult to have this So before we go back there just want to So one of the things that emerged in this Sugya is very big because we know that in order for us to eat meat in order for meat to be kosher it has to be prepared in a certain way. It's not enough that the animals are kosher animals. You have to prepare it in in a way that's kosher and the >> [snorts] >> most basic elementary Halacha is you need schita. So if you do schita you're getting an animal. If you don't do schita if the animal died in some other way it's going to be also available. Stating that there are some exceptions to the rule. The first exception is Malika. And that was the topic of the entire week of that year. Malika where the tire was that the way you're supposed to prepare an earth. But the which was that earth never had schita. There was no schita that was done. What was done was Malika. You do Malika with a chicken you put it in a in a baguette. That's a big you're eating available. You're not allowed to do that. But in the base of they used to do Malika with the This was a very very big deal. This was an of Kadusha. And it was an earth that never had schita. The tire says Malika works in lower schita. Malika works in lower schita. So there's a even though the earth never had schita but the Malika is going to work. Another example is is the egg lot refer. You see over here that the egg lot refer this egg lot was beheaded. It was beheaded. There was no schita that was done. There was no Malika that was done. But the point is there was no schita. Stating that by beheading this animal it would constitute schita. Now in our Sugya what's the context? eating the egg lot. But what you're doing is is there's no too much available. There's no too much available but the point is that you see that the arifa works like schita to be met by the arifa from too much available. Another example the sort of the layer. So there was the sort of the layer so that's more the topic it's one of the five And then there was the that's the sort that was thrown down the mountain right? So the sort that went down the mountain and then it died. The Gamora says that when it was thrown down the mountain it was pushed down. It constituted a it constituted a schita. I think I did a very big with this said that that to be a parent and a child on the same day. So what would be if the sort of the child you want to check on Yom Kippur. I don't know how that works. But the point would there be a nice that's And says yeah. Because is a nice schita. It's a nice schita. It constitutes schita. So it's almost like schita is not there are other things that can work. There are other things that can work in lower schita. The Caleb in the end of this says that he thinks is based on a measure said that the whole purpose is for us. It's it's to purify the people that that follow these myths. Says Rav. Listen to this lotion. The really cares the the doesn't care. I do a mitzvah we make a pretty big deal about it. I mean if you check it from the right place it's great. And if not it's very very bad. Have the That's true. I mean it's not that Hashem really cares if you do it The point is Hashem wants us to follow his rules. Because by us doing what we're supposed to do that's it's interesting that Rav mentioned it in the context of schita. So the context of schita does Hashem really care about the No. He just wants you to do the mitzvah. That's the point. The punchline is not the versus the earth. The punchline is that you are being a kind of Hashem. So something that means of schita is doing what the tire told you to do. So ordinarily you're supposed to check. But if the tire says that when it comes to do Malika So that's what the tire now wants you to do. If the tire says egg lot refer do arifa WITH THE EGG LOT. SO NOW THAT'S WHAT THE TIRE WANTS YOU TO DO. IF THE TIRE TELLS YOU TAKE THE SORT OF THE AND THROW IT DOWN THE WHAT THE TIRE WANTS YOU TO DO. THAT IS THE MITZVAH that was given the sort of the arifa. If there was something about the sort of the arifa so the definition of schita would be schita of the arifa. But Rav said the Then why is there What's the of schita? The of schita is that you are fulfilling the commandment of Hashem. So okay. So if the commandment is schita do schita. If the commandment is Malika. If it's arifa it's whatever the commandment is going to be that's what it's going to be. And that premise Yesterday we spoke about two questions. One from a Mendel of Slutzk and the other one from the and the safer. So another question and now we'll start the next part. And that is based on that we all know the when you learn Baba Kama. Baba Kama It says regarding the sort of the go that you're not allowed to eat the sort of the go. So the Gamora If the tire says you're supposed to stone the sort. Give it skila. Any idea available available is so I know it's available. Why then The Gamora says a why the tire had to say the available after it says The tire says what do you do with the sort of the go? You give it skila. So now that you gave the sort of skila it's dead. And it was killed not via schita via skila. So the tire I want you to know the available. Don't eat this sir. Fake the Gamora. Why do I need the tire to tell me the available Every little child >> This was so. Thank you tomorrow. Why do I need a terror to tell me that I have to sorry every little child knows that the only time you let it eat meat of an animal is through shita. There was no shita. There was I was like the tomorrow and the tomorrow says I'm shocked. Thank them in cautiously and he ends the question with sorry in rough interesting lotion. It's very very sorry here. Thank them I don't understand the tomorrow's kasha. I you want to know why the terror had to say this was sorry because I would have a mean that being that the mitzvah is to take the shore and to do skiva with it. So the skiva of the shore and this guy is the equivalent of Malika with the hot side. It's the equivalent of the with it's the equivalent of the which we just saw even though they are not in the generic sense but at the same time being that that is the and the mitzvah is and really I shouldn't care if you do and then at the end of the day you just have to fulfill the commandment of as a So we have all the shita you have this is shita to be a matter of [laughter] this is even allowed to be eaten. So the point is is that you see a constituted shita. So of course the terror has to say because if the terror not say I would have thought that being that the mitzvah the din ego of this shore is you suckle so skiva is shita just like is and is so would it make sense to make the same after the terror is allowed to be sorry says the he doesn't understand he does not understand kasha but the common amount of why the terror had to say didn't you already say suckle you suckle I don't even have a mean the other mean would have been that the skiva constitutes the master shita in a way. On that note so the mission right call has walking to begin the eighth peric on the eighth peric of walking is a digression. It actually is a digression from the course of walking and obviously begins with a commission that discusses hard course walking and the backdrop of the entire peric is walking but really the subject the topic of the peric is not so much as walking it doesn't talk about people and and and the matter or the wisdom is or the wisdom is something or or Malika and that's not the that's not the the backdrop that's the backdrop but the topic is matter of fact we should refer to this peric this peric you have to say face to say commission of peric it's referring to the eighth peric of walking it's known as it's known as peric and it discusses coaching that when the in a so that you had an animal that was coaching and you're not really sure where that animal is exactly how you're supposed to deal with it so over the next 10 days or so we'll get into some wonders as it relates to but for now let's start the mission call commission somebody had a carbon you had a carbon us that he had to bring because he was and he designated his his carbon and he's waiting for the next time he's going to go up to the and he's going to fulfill his obligation to bring a carbon and his carbon us and his carbon us deer with a with a and it was it got mixed up with other animals it got mixed up with animals that were and so this animal was also a but it had a that this animal was uh was was you weren't able to be actually brings right away this us us you don't have to go into them right now but there are five times where a carbon us was which means carbon us and right now that of this carbon us is is you're not allowed to be you can't be you have to wait until it dies meaning it's it's it's it's something that's completely off limits so this good us was with other us whose din is and it was with and I feel like we're boy even if there's only one of the us or one that was with a whole bunch of that is that you have to kill all these animals meaning we don't say that the one us that's or the one is bottle to the rest of the of animals but rather we have to now view the entire of animals as if they are as if they are meaning that they're going to be and you can't be them as because is not allowed to go on the base of is not allowed to go on the bear you have to view them all as if they are thus you leave them out you you have to wait for them to die and then you follow the of what you would do with us in other words the is is that a carbon is not bottle or the us and the is not bottle in the is not bottle to the of the that's the first second this is what would be what would be if a animal was in the with a shore that was and was done with it or you say or it killed somebody that ordinarily if shore was by or if it killed somebody it's it becomes that would be a repeat of the but it's the same as even though it was or it killed someone but there was only that sort or the himself walked into and the was the one that said that my shore killed somebody where actually says the we can't believe him because although he does but actually says this is I'm not sure why it is but I'll go upon him actually says that this would be a case of so it's we're not going to believe him but at the same time actually quotes the that says that if ordinarily is not believed but ordinarily usually you need to wait him but is believed enough to say that a shore was so now the shore is going to be possible or a person even though but if he walks into we have to take him seriously enough that we can't allow this animal at the very least to go on the or the means the animal was set aside and it was actually used as it was used as an or or it was used as payment to buy a dog the or it was born unnaturally so the is right now if one of these animals were mixed up with kosher animals and like the mission said in the I feel it doesn't matter the is there's no again there's no when it comes to the kosher and what's the so what do you do with it so you have to treat all the animals as if they're animals that are possible as if they are as if they are and and what is the what do you do if you have an animal like that so if you have an animal that's kosher but it's a but it's a you have an animal that's kosher but it's a what do you do with it you don't have to let it die it's not like the or the what you do is you you let it graze actually until it gets a once it gets a you're able to be you you sell it so what you do is is when you have an animal that's possible so the ideal thing to do with it is to be you would want to exchange the transfer the from from the animal put it on money then take that money that has the buy an animal with it and put that animal on the problem with this is you're not allowed to be you can't just go redeem you can be you can't just be it's not something you can do when could you be once it has a so that's whenever the tomorrow says actually what it means is you're waiting for it let it sit outside eventually this animal is going to get a it's very hard to keep an animal pristine and perfect shape so eventually it's going to trip up somewhere and it's going to end up with a once it gets its it's what's known as an animal with a you could be you you take the money you go ahead and you and you buy with it the tomorrow just adds one piece and that is may being that we're not really sure which animal over here was the was the kosher animal so you have to assume that the most expensive animal was the kosher animal and therefore you take the value of the most expensive animal that was in the deer and that's the one that you're now going to go ahead and and be but the but the point of the second of the mission is the same as the point of the first of the mission and that is that there's no bottle when it comes to so so whether the was one of the or where it's it's completely off limits whether it's just something that's as it relates to being able to go on the if it's in a right now with a regular kosher there is no bottle we don't say that the of that are kosher have an ability to be this carbon that's possible as a result you have to treat every single animal in this as as if it's possible as if it's as if it's one of the what do you do so whatever the is with that possible animal in this that's what you have to do with all the animals in the another case third this to me what would be the if you had a regular animal that's kosher and it was with so and cut him when the so that very simple you don't know what's what there's no so you do is you can have to use all the everything is going to have to be used so all the now we're going to have to be used as a as a carbon as well so what you do just find someone that's looking to buy an sell this animal to him and let him be as a as an like this be brought as again there's no fourth case cut what if two animals that were cut him when so remember me know if it was so two people were after and now the two were were so you don't know what's Ruben's you don't know which one is so it's not such a big deal so the issue who is that you have a shame me show who and says that even though there's a of you have to know the but we also know so it's not a big deal let the and bring the two so bring it one of them is Ruben's one of them is it's true we don't know which one is we don't know which one is but it doesn't matter is an is an there's one way to be the fact that we don't know who it is doesn't bother me because the is anyways but what if it would be but it's two different meaning two different animals one's an one's a one's an one's a so you have to do you have to do it on the and like that's not all right they're different animals so what do you do you don't know which one is which says the meaning you actually have a rule you have to you can't be any one of them so if you can't be you can't be any one of them so if you can't be you have to wait until it gets a then you it you take the money you buy a and you buy another the problem is you don't know which was the which was the so let's say there were two animals one was worth a thousand dollars one was worth five hundred dollars so the is fifteen hundred dollars but one was a thousand one was five hundred you were you got your fifteen hundred dollars I have to replace the animal so do I put the thousand dollars towards the do I put the thousand dollars towards the I don't know which one was which it was the two animals I don't know which was the which was the so you need to do is you have to buy a thousand dollar you have to buy a thousand dollar now it comes out now you're losing five hundred dollars this is true the is and you're going to have to take the five hundred dollar loss cuz the end of the day you have to replace the animal and you have to assume that each one was the more expensive one the last case is the so what would be if was meaning but the was the so you had an that was with a that was with so there's two different you actually have a you can't be you can't be being that you you can't be they're unique in that they are that you can't be so this trick that we had to just go ahead and be is not an option so you need to follow the rules of a so so what you do is you wait for it to get a you can eat it when it gets a moment could could be eaten so you eat the animals could be either way I explain it in a little more detail bottom line is I call you so all different types of animals could be so all the two animals that can't be it's not possible for and to be and the reason is cuz the is always in a cave and is always a bottom line is is that the point of the first mission in and it's definitely insight into what this paragraph is going to look like is discussing cut him meeting so this is meets where we're discussing a of an animal that's possible either it's a the and it's the so it's a and it's a here or it could be cut him that was with or it could be Ruben's was with or Ruben's was with with Ruben's so what if it was a and a and exactly what you're supposed to do but the main point of the mission is the main point of the mission is that there is no let's just see the first my so the mission started off and said she the and so it's so even the even if it's one in the ten thousand the is it's going to be your it sounds like even if there was one that that was in ten thousand and in ten thousand so so the so my and the way explains the even the so even if there's ten thousand bad ones even then it should be just the opposite even if there's less bad ones still it's it's not the so the says you're right so the and I show not so she the so that's the way the mission it's just the opposite into the ones so the so the so the point of the mission is is that even if it was only one that's even if it was only one even if it was only one animal that's possible that was in ten thousand animals you think at that point for sure it should be so the mission that there is no of it's just end with one you may have noticed it's a very long from that starts on base and it takes up most of so it gets into real faster so at the very end skipping to the end of so asks a so see it inside it's about eight lines from the bottom of that very long and so so so so one of the asks the following question so so has a in the divine and so if you had animals that are or you had person I'm sorry it was and it would be that people that were so this is death row and somehow the inmates got mixed up and now doesn't know who's supposed to get and and who's supposed to get so so you don't know the is that you give them all the reason give them all is that is cuz is more even though we that is the most of the doesn't in other words is more than so is that is actually more than so being that is more than and right now you don't know what to give them so you can't give someone a that's that's more so you have no choice you have to give everybody so if and were the the is that you give everyone so so it's from the that we're not taking into account sounds like if there was a if there's a it doesn't matter what the ratio what the proportion of the is you always are meaning so according to you're always going to get according to you're always going to get so asks why don't you go by the in the event that the were the and the were the so why don't we say that the of the should be to the of the so so why don't we go by the so why don't we go by the so >> [laughter] >> and said don't tell me that you don't go by the when it comes to meaning maybe wasn't said for cuz it's a so if somebody if somebody stabs somebody to death the is that this person is going to be why is he why aren't we concerned that maybe in the place that he stabbed him this person already had a hole he was already a he was going to die if someone's a he's so why aren't we concerned that maybe he was a how can you give him the is right most people aren't so you see you go by the to give somebody so here too there's people here that are and there's people here that are but there's also there's also so why don't we say that the of the are to the and just go ahead and give everybody so so said so and then brings in so another so you can't go by the so so you can go by the you can only but you can't go by the to do something that you know for sure is not true so to go ahead and do something that you know for sure is not true over there you don't have a right to give somebody here you don't have a right to go by the so and being that over here there's someone that for sure was so so you want to say now and you so you know for sure is not so can't force you to do something that you know for sure is not true I understand you found the loophole you found a way to give someone who you know for sure is not so so how because he was in a there's a concept of so based on the rules of you're going to go ahead and do it so that said you can't do that I can't stomach that it's not possible you could have that I agree there's a concept of but to say and to do something that you know for sure is not meaning to give somebody when he stabbed somebody on the side that maybe the person that he killed was a you don't know for sure that it was a maybe it was a okay so is going to tell me that he wasn't a that's how that's going to work mechanically that's something I don't have a problem with but to go ahead and give someone that you know for sure is not you know he's but because he was with other people that are to give him that's that's not something that I'm comfortable doing so in the safer he brings one of the of who who explained his with a very very profound and that is based on a word that he had heard from his who had said over the name of of the and that is asked the question that he doesn't understand we know the rule is in you can't use to be from somebody In the moment how are you to you need to come and say that you have money based on that say this is the we're going to go ahead and be mighty moment. But if you have is a life then you're not going to be able to do it. Anytime you have a day them. Do you know if the are kosher or not? No, you don't really know. We don't know these you know that this is a up to hit the you have no way of knowing that. Hello my is a person has a cashes. In other words, the whole cashes of is all predicated on the fact that there's a that the themselves have a cashes. If if certainly cashes because this is 101. If that's the case how could you ever trust if that's the case how could you ever trust the cashes of the is based on the fact that they have a cashes. If cashes then cashes and you need a cashes to establish the cashes of the so if you need the cashes to establish the cashes of the how in the world could you ever trust the don't work in a vacuum they only work with the cashes cashes can't work to be mighty moment because life can't work to be mighty moment and if life can't work to be mighty moment then cashes shouldn't be able to work to be mighty moment either. That the said to answer this cashes is a very very important one this. And he said that there's two types of life and there's two types of cashes. There's the classic life and the classic cashes is where you have a there's a life in front of you right now this piece of meat is a kosher meat not kosher meat. I don't know. There's a real life in front of you life is life cashes is life and cashes is then there's a life and a cashes that says that you want to now be mighty life. You want to question there's a kosher piece of meat. You walked into a kosher restaurant you see a piece of meat over there. Maybe it's not kosher. Life can tell me that you don't have a right to be mighty life on this piece of meat. Cashes can tell you you don't have a right to be mighty life on this piece of meat. There's a life and cashes that come after the life was already established and then there's a preemptive life. There's a preemptive cashes that says that you want to start clearing life. There's a cashes there's a life. Life cashes don't allow you to go ahead and clear life. Say the life this the cashes said in the moment I had life. That's after this is in front of you. We have a in front of us. You want to be mighty life in front of you with a life. You can't do that. Life in the moment I had life. Life can't pass life in the moment. Life cashes certainly by extension can't pass life in the moment. But if you don't have a life you don't have a and somebody walks into with a life flying. You don't want I just hit me that maybe these are possible make a taste of their cashes. You know for sure that maybe no I don't know I don't know what you're talking about never met THE GUY. BUT I cashes cashes says that you have no right to go ahead and clear a life. There's no if you had A YOU SHOW ME THE PIECE of meat and two said it was kosher meat two said it was possible meat. So now already there's a a real life with regards to the cashes of the in such a case so they need a cashes to be mighty life. They need a life to be mighty life. There if it impacted moment it would be a problem. It'd be a good cashes. But how could you ever use for moment in the moment I had life the whole cashes of the is cashes. But that's if you have a real life. The whole point of the cashes cashes of THE IS IS THAT MAKE A TASTE OF CLEAR LIFE. A PERSON has a cashes CASHES YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE MIGHTY LIFE. IN THAT context the cashes that's being used to not clear a life. The life that's being used to not clear a life. That could work. That could work even. That could work even to be mighty moment. So said the that's the cashes. There's a between a scholar man and then and the moment that discusses somebody killed somebody stabbed him maybe in the moment where he put the the sword where he put the knife maybe he had a hole over there. In the case of the there's a life in front of you. We're not sure we know for sure that someone is we know for sure that someone is I don't know who's who. Are you you have are you have are you have that life. You can't be mighty life. You can't be mighty a real life even by in the moment I had life in the moment I had life either. I the moment we know somebody killed somebody and most people ARE NOT SOMEBODY. YOU WANT TO CLEAR A LIFE maybe this person is a can't make a taste of why would you assume he's a so the that type of life that you can go by moment I had life you can go by also. A tremendous tremendous moment that is an between a life and a cashes that are coming to be life and between a life and a cashes that are just telling me don't clear the life. So you could sit down and talk going through which cashes would fall into which category. But it's a very very profound moment that a life that a life and a cashes that's coming to be mighty life. In the moment I had life. Yeah first glance it sounds like you know like life CASHES THAT WHY WOULD you how could you ever trust by moment life you need a cashes to establish the in the moment I had life. So certainly cashes I had life. That said over the cashes of the life. And now that he said over the cashes of the life he was mighty tremendous a super duper moment in the world of life and the world of cashes. But could be that's a beer a level two understanding in the cashes right in front of us right here in the final of the moment.