Zevachim 72

Today's daf is d and we will be learning d and we will begin 12 lines from the bottom of we began on Friday the new per the e it's called but in shas it's really referred to as peraru and the Mishna talks about different situations of taru where is were mixed up together and we don't know now what's is what's so ordinarily is that if of the is so the in its entirety is viewed as stating that the Mishna discussed the laws of taru in the context of kachen and we saw there are many exceptions to the basic rule the first two of the which is going to be the topic of today's dath was what would be if something that's ushered to go on the misbeh so the first case of the mishna was you have one is that not only can't they go on the even they were with others other to go on the so is that the entire voice is awesome meaning ordinarily you would say that as long as there's that would be enough to make the stating that it's just the opposite what we say is that even if there's one is to 10,000 is the entire becomes the second was we are something that's to go on the it's not like one of the where it's but it is something that you can't bring on the such as their is that if it's again you don't have of stating that despite the fact that you don't have the you don't have to get rid of it the reason you don't have to get rid of it is because even The draer is not something that you have to destroy with the isisk or one of so being that the draer is so now that the whole now that there's no the whole becomes but in the second case of the mission of the is not the is just something that can't go on the what's if you have such an animal so now the entire gets the den of either way these were the two first cases of this Mishna And the gar now is going to analyze it in rather great detail. The first of the was that if one of the was there's no the entire voice now gets the of the becomes why do I need a to tell me this I know it from somewhere else. It's a somewhere else in a says anything that's going on is the whole becomes meaning there's no and then the Mishna gives two examples but the bottom line is doesn't the Mishna already say this that anytime something that's to the is with things that are to the is you don't say the whole iscome Also that's essentially the so why do I need isn't it was trying to comm I said over this and he explained it to me that's he told me you know why you need both the only I would have thought maybe the only time you have this that if something's and it becomes the whole is now that's when the whole of the is strictly is not it's only being that it's only I would think it's a that if it's with things that are to the now the whole becomes to the but let's say this thing that's also such as which is or the is you can't even benefit from it So I would think that being that if you're going to tell me there's no so this will be even maybe you don't have that maybe it doesn't become so not when the only one that's going to lose out from it is but maybe if even going to lose out from it maybe you don't have that so just from having a I wouldn't necessarily know this and we had we only had I would have thought that's part no no here we're discussing which is more than it's even so maybe something that's more used to there you have that it's not but as it relates to maybe there it is that's why you need the ratio theor asks the very obvious follow-up question you're telling me that from the ratio of the I only know I only know I only know I don't That's why I need another to tell me it's true. I don't know it from the but I know it from the next does isn't that the next so it's true you can't ask me a why do I need the in our and the each one so let's tweak the question why do I need the or really the second case in our isn't that the same as the both are discussing something that's not it's not it's only such Our mentions that Mishna mentions even the same example. So we're talking about the same case. So why do I need the mission to tell me twice that there's no of the says although it's true our Mishna says that there's no ordinary B when it comes to something that's even if it's only it's not but the Mishna doesn't say how far this goes meaning maybe it's not maybe it's not maybe it's not like you find shroom. Maybe it's not like you find that and is but maybe there is a maybe it's just not the ordinary you know what the says it it's that there is no B at all that's not something I know from our Mishna that's something I only know from that Mishna that's why despite the fact that our Mishna already said the is not I still need the to tell me that it's not just not et But then the says okay so let the just say this is not it's why do I need the right here what's the second case in the mission teaching me so says what I need is to tell me that meaning there is one detail that our mission said that the didn't say the didn't say what you do with this once it was The Mishna says there's no the Mishna says it's even but what do you do with the Mishna didn't say our Mishna did say what you do with the Mishna said you treat all the as if they were the and just like the so is all are going to be but the Gar asks going back to the first discuss why do you need the and isn't that the said no of the first case of the mission is it's even when it's not just going to impact it's going to impact as well even the says I know that from another seems to say that is So if these things are and there we're discussing even we're not discussing the over there we're discussing even so you see that even one in 10,000 and even so again why do I need the isn't that we only had that I would have thought that maybe that is only discussing where business with meaning is as far to say that he is more because if you're going to ple the entire voice where you know this kachchum and this voice and what's going to happen you're going to be mach now that is discussing nothing do nothing to do with so maybe we're with you would say that the whole is also I there's an element where we're going to be ruining the whole who cares but inv where the context of course is the context is in our it wasn't just the within the was with if you're going to say that the whole isser and it's being maybe over there we don't do that that's why I need okay it's not just say I would have thought maybe the only time you have is if it's because it's to have voice or to bring a carbon that was part of au where there was also a voice. But when you're dealing with something that was where there's no element of maybe even says the need for that's why you need the ratio of the you need to say for the meaning the first two cases you need if you just want to recap a summary essentially what came out from this is that the ratio the first case of our which discusses or one of the where the is there's no the entire isser what we saw was a few things number one you see in that is not bottle even if it's going to mean that is going to have h from it and even if it means that heish is going to lose out meaning you see both extremes that we're willing And not just that, we're also willing to be to make it nobody can have any benefit from it whatsoever. The reason we had the second case of the mission over here was to teach me that if not where there's an that's something that we didn't know from the is that that's not something you see from our you see you don't have the regular laws of but that it's culture that you don't see and the is that you see that that's even if there's no you don't have the even if there's no is never bottled either way. So the first again was that if one of the orisco was in the so has 10 they're all hectish and then he has a sharisco and the shares somehow got together with all the animals that are kosher animals. So the question is do you say that's the first in the ethic of is that if or one of the is there's not going to be why not the obvious question. So we're taking for granted that that's but the right here is why not and this question is going to take us literally through the gimbals. It's not a lot of gar but it's going to take us through the base and the giml says the gum again. And why is it says if you're going to tell me that maybe the reason it's not is because there's a rule that something that's is not whether it's a barrier you find that things that are are not bottled. It says the if you're going to tell me that the reason the is not bottled to the it's not that's all good according to says that anything that people sometimes count it's not so based on that is something that people sometimes count as a result it wouldn't be but says the only time something is considered in the sense that it's not bottle is if it's not something that people sometimes count, but it's something that people always count. Meaning all people count because even though people sometimes will count their but people don't always count their says the what's the context of this is or so the is going to digress now but before the digression so what the essentially saying is is that the rule is that anything that's is not bottle one way to determine the of a thing is do people count it? So, for example, you're going to go over to somebody and you're going to buy uh grain from him. He's not going to start counting every strand of grain. It's just not what people do. Put it in a little bucket, they'll sell it to you. He's not going to know if he has a thousand or 2,000 or 3,000. It's not it's not something that everybody counts. And being that it's not something that people count, it's not as it relates to the laws of contrast that let's say with a diamond. Everybody counts. You know, say I'll take three diamonds. Hey, you know, you want four. That's the most things. That's something that of course everybody counts. Those are the two extremes. But then there's things in between. The Gumar discusses what about eggs? So back in the day you went to the shook, you bought eggs. Did people count them or did they not count them or in this case animals? So if you were going to go buy a whole herd of animals. So sometimes the mah would count the animals and sometimes he would say, you know what, just take the take all the just take it all. So sometimes they counted and sometimes they didn't count it. That's one of those things that it's not like a strand of grain. It's also not a diamond. It's something that people sometimes count and it's something that people don't always count. And it's when we say that something that people count is not. Does it mean it's something that everybody always counts or is it something that sometimes people count? What would be enough? The Gmorra holds that a is something that people sometimes count. As a result, there may be an easy answer to this cash. is why is not maybe the reason it's not is not because it's maybe the reason it's not is because it's it's why is it because it's but it's if you hold something that people sometimes count is enough for it to be then that's a very easy answer but if you hold it has to be something that people always count what's the begins with If somebody had bundles of spices and it was so if you have a vineyard and you plant certain grains or certain vegetables inside the vineyard is it becomes it's the says and we learn from there brings the you have to burn it. So what's the that's very easy you burn it. What happens if it was nisar? So your spices, your black pepper, your tavlin that you had that was kim was nar within which was now again you have this whole what do you do with the wholeish says you have to burn the whole thing. No you don't have to burn the whole thing but rather there's a bit what's the you have to have 200 of connected the kilarim and then it's going to be motor. There's an interesting rash here. Rashi says the what? What's the methodology? How do you come up with that formula that you need 200 of so says very because we know that it's not it's not it's trumil it's notarium is also so we doubled the so to speak in over and so it's two times as much as a result the sheer bit is twice as much as well. So it's not it's either way says there's no there's no way to dream of apple say no there is why should these why should these spices not be bottle because used to say that anything that people sometimes count that gives it a bottle bundles of spices not everybody's but some people are some people counted as a result it's a double argue say I don't know about this there's six things I know that are considered and what are the six things said but I think we still would know what it means but either way said even the loaves of the some of the affformentioned things are fruits some of The affforementioned things are grains the royal kilakar. The bottom line is these things in the taras would have bought because these things are really however holds says no not only those six or seven things holds that anything that people count that's and being that that's those things are never bought. Soon can never be bought. Says the head on the stand said that you know what meant when he said something that people count he meant something that everybody counts and he obviously held something everybody counts. No it's not something that everybody counts. As long as some people count it that's enough of something that bottom line is you want to know the to this of it's the context was explaining in a discussing bottom line says good whose garrison mayor was he said as long as some people count it that's So our mission which is a mission or a mayor will be going to a mayor. It's a that's one of the that's why there's no B. You want to know why there's no B is who said that even mayor only said it where it's not everybody's on how you going to understand this said you have to say you know the t of our it's not from the but rather tano so you have to say It's the Tana of another Mishna. It's the Tana of Mishna. The Mishna of But before we see the next just to exhale for one moment one that is that we all know Rashi in the beginning and Rashi is in a few places where says and then the says 697. So the Tory counts the went to right in the beginning of says the first even though Hashem had already counted the already counted in the end of Hashem counted them again to show how muchem loves the are compared to stars. that counts the again and again and again. says this also the beginning of but why does he count the so much to show the how much he loves them that the I heard it once as well said that how does Hashem show that he loves the by counting them so it's to show that every every matters that's the he said because a yid might think that who am I I'm one fish in this massive ocean I'm one yid that's intimished in au of so many yid but we know that a dash is not bottle. So, Hashem counts the to show that they're someone that's counted is not bottle. Either way, on that note says the Gmorra as we make our way onto that really the to the reason there's no is because we're dealing with a and a is a and it's true it's not a that everybody counts. It's a that some people count but it's not but rather it's the question is who is this holds you want to tell me it's from the said it's anything that people sometimes count even for it's not certainly when you're dealing with such as ano. So the context over here is that once upon a times figs was a very important staple. It was something that everybody would eat. You'd eat fig cakes, fig this, figs that. So figs figs was was a very very important part of of people's diet. And the way they used to make figs is you would cut figs. You leave them out in the field to dry. Afterwards, they would cut off this stem and they would then bunch all the figs together and they had certain molds. So, think of a round mold like you're making a cake, a round mold. They would put it on top of this bundle of figs and it would take on a shape, you know, depending on the the shape of the mold. That would be the shape of this cake and then they would sell it in the shock people. They would have these big cakes of figs. You'd cut off a little bit, you'd buy the whole thing, you know, whatever it is. And you'd end up buying this fix. What happened over here was there was a liter of kitas. Liter is a sh like a liter of kitas of dried and cut figs alagle and somebody took this round mold and he that had figs in it and he took the mold and he put it on top of figs. And here's the punchline. That was Truma. But this person is running a commercial factory. He has a whole bunch of these eagles and he just doesn't know which one of them was the one that he put the truma on. So he knows that the top mish the top of one of these molds has a little bit of truma in it. He just doesn't know which one. He has a hund of them. He has 200 of them. Whatever it is he has a massive factory and he knows that one of them has in it a little bit of truma. So what are you supposed to do with it? Or instead of using an eagle he used a barrel. Same difference. He used a barrel to give the fig cake this form. used the beehive. People would sometimes use beehives to make these fig cakes. They said that it was so you often in you find had to understand the it's not often in you find the so we have here in this Mishna had to understand so says the said is that is not it's It's made. So if you have 100 times the would be. Now what's interesting over here is that we know for sure that the truma is on the edge of the eagle. It's on the edge of the it's on the edge of of this. So the sh is can you use everything that's in the eagle to go now and be what's on the edge or maybe no because being that I know what's on the edge anyway. It's not viewed as being what's inside the eagle. Let's say the eagle is this deep. It goes it's a foot deep. So, and I know for sure the Truma is on the edge. So, why should I say that the Truma on the edge is with what's above it? It doesn't make any sense. So, you can argue that there's no reason to allow me to use all that to give me the mayor of to now go be stating that it's not the way it works. He says, you look at the top part, that's where the pigle is. That's where the truma is. You look as if it's separated. and everything beneath it. It counts for the sheer to be the true says absolutely not. No way. I know for sure it's on the pivar. What's then the may if this this hadund of these molds and we know or 101 of these molds one of them had truma 100 of them didn't have truma. So then you could say the hundred PS pith of the eagles could be mato the one that has truma but to use everything inside the eagle to be mato I know for sure that the tuma is not there so we don't look at it as being part of the so if there'sund and one of these things meaning 100 kg the one then if not the pum are going to be the flip side is that all the is going to be motor as well meaning what's on the bottom of the path what's on the bottom of the bottom of the eagle shouldn't be also because we know for sure there's no truth with it. That's the way explained the meaning according to there's a that says a very big that says that you can everything in the 100 times says no there's no reason you should be able to starve everything that's in the says he had a different beer he had in Yehuda's version of the washu in's version there's no such sheet as says that you can be and prove that doesn't make any sense why should you be able to do that but rather what it means is is held that at least if you have a hundred the 100 P could be rebu Yeshua is even if you have 300 is it's still not going to work. What's the beer? What's the beer before we finish the bryer? The beer is because Rab Yehuda understood in Rabbi Yeshua that you can never be mato shuma that's on the pit of a of an eagle that if you have these figs at the mouth of one of these de you cannot you cannot be the reason you can't be is because it's now even if it's not it's not something that everybody counts it's something that people sometimes count so you want to have a that holds that there's no by something that people sometimes count. I just found it. You know who it is? It's who learned in the Mishna of that there's no B at all. Not only can you bear to be even if you have 100, you still wouldn't be able to move it. The reason is because what's on the piv is not something you can be mat. Why can't you be mat? There's ble and everything. If milk falls into your meat, there's B. There's always BL. Why in the world shouldn't there be B? The ter is because it's not a this is a double. Why is it a double? Because some people count it, but only some people count it. Oh, here's the T. So, you wanted the T that holds that it's and there's no B that will be the T of Mishna our said that said that why aren't they? The reason B is because they're is something that people sometimes count. Who's the T that holds that people some that something that people sometimes count is that it shouldn't be. So the first attempt that was the first attempt was that it's the second attempt that's it's in the of literature continues and the price says what would be if eagle if a person was that had in it with the eagle but he doesn't know what part of this eagle might have been very big right he doesn't know where exactly the eagle it was he doesn't know if it was so I feel a little Everybody agrees in that case that that the whole eagle would be because here you don't know where it is. If you know it's on the piv what's on the bottom of it can't bear to be but if you don't know where it is then the whole eagle all the contents of the eagle is considered the all the contents of eagle considered the p over there that everything would bear to be going back to the original question why is the why is the why is you don't have to say that it's going according to the mand that holds whether it's railson whether it's in the lit it's everybody I feel everybody could hold that way why is not yeah when you're dealing with eggs you're dealing with tavlin you're dealing with literature then you have to declare it is it's not what's the How could you tell me a person even a how could you tell me it's not finished? So we said the first here in one of the is there's no says there's no why not either because I have an I have a way to be able to be this voice be able to bring carbon from this voice without having to come on What's the why can't I just shle out one animal from this the and let me say and let me assume that this obviously came from the and really in order to properly understand the gar need a little bit of an intro not a long intro but the point is is that we know that the word comes up in many places in shas but not all were created equally the theory of roy is all the same and all are learned from the same ping in the tyra But there's a lot of different manifestations of the of the concept of right the one that we've been discussing this morning is where you have au I have a a pot or I have a bunch of animals I know most of them are one of them is problematic I don't know which one is which so we say that the isle to the and I now look at the whole everything inside the taru as if it's what the re It's a phenomenal kadesh, right? If something non-coosher falls into a pot where you have kosher food, then non-coosher becomes kosher. According to many, you can eat it all. You could certainly eat it all. But according to some he could even eat because it's to be like the but the point is there's a concept of of then there's an idea where I have something in front of me and I don't know where it came from and I know is a certain way like for example the classic case of the is there were 10 stores in the city. Nine of the stores sold kosher meat. One of the stores sold non- kosher meat. I have a piece of meat in front of me. I don't know if it came from the kosher store or the non-coosher store. Being that roy the stores are are kosher. So I could assume that it probably came from there. It's not a question of pickle. There's no pickle over here. There's no it's just a piece of meat that has a suffix. I don't know where it came from. So there's a bit of and then there's a concept of that's there's a people are right. There's a whole bunch of different that you find in the over here is the and that the Mishna said there's no if of that are a can't be bottle can't be b can't become tough to au why not either or because it's let's forget about you're right bet is a very big what happens is things are changing there's nepak over here forget about bit forget about nepak Leo, let's keep it simple. Why don't we just yank out one sh from this voice say I don't need the to become bottle. I took it out of the voice. But let me say that just like if there's 10 stores in the city, nine of them sell kosher me, one sells non kosher. The piece of meat is assumed to have come from the des. So let me pull out one and say the parish ruba parish. And why can't I have that right? And for that is no for that is no. I don't need I can work with the other with the call says the let's pull out one of let's be the and we'll assume that doesn't work that's true that the says but the also says the basic understanding of take the same case there were 10 stores in a city Nine of them sold kosher meat and one of them sold non-coosher meat. So what's that? Is that if you find a piece of meat, you could assume it came from the nine, not from the one, we can assume it's kosher meat. What would be if I bought the meat from one of the stores? I physically walked in, I swiped my credit card, I bought the piece of meat, I just don't remember which store I bought it from. Did I buy it from the kosher one or the non- kosher one? I myself take the that was pished from the now how works and how you reconcile it with so many in anytime you see the word you know you're going to have long which means shorten but you know you're going to see long it it always comes along because a is a but that's the olive base that the only time the of the parish is is if it was parish when I found it when I picked it up it was already not part of the but if I kicked it out of the voice then the way we look at it is is we look at the as if it's as if it made up half of the and we don't say that it was it was you don't have of call so the is saying what do you want you want to go ahead and pull one out I mean this is 101 this is called the parish 101 says you're right that's not what I meant what I meant was what we should do is we should force the animals to go away we're not going to pull out one animal the animals are all cooped up somewhere we're going to knock it down if it's like a type of Mishna. We're going to knock down the the fence, let the animals go and then we'll take one out. But when I take it, it won't be coming out of the anymore. So it's it's not a let's force them to move. And we could say, you know what we're worried about? We're worried that what's going to happen? You're going to take an animal and you're going to be, let's say there were 10 animals. Nine of them were good and one of them was a we just don't know what's why, right? So what are you going to do? You're going to go and you're going to make it a parish. You're going to take one. You're going to bring a carbon. What's going to happen if another k's going to go afterwards? He's going to bring another one and then another kind is going to go after us. He's going to bring another one and you're going to end up bringing 10. You're going to end up bringing so many that now we're ready. You were the versus the now it's going to be that what the one that I wasn't anymore from the because to the contrary I we already the you have a right to be to be m so we're concerned that maybe after you are mak this one parish other going to go and they're going to do the same thing. But the say you should be worried that that's it. I can't bring the carbon now. I have to worry that maybe the D will be possible will be possible. It's the Gumar's way of saying that do you Rashi says right? What does the Gar mean to say to say that there's no such thing as once we bring one under the premise of call nothing can happen afterwards that can mess me up. So the Garra says I hear I hear but the Garra says there still Maybe they'll do it at the same time. Oh, if 10 people will do it at the same time, so then you're not going to have the parishes. But the Gmorra says it at the same exact second presumably won't happen at the same second. Each one is going to happen individually. If each one happens individually for each you do have to call the parish said, you're right. What I'm saying is is that I'm worried that if you're going to go ahead and be makovit in this context, you may be makovit even without first spreading them apart. If I take one out after I spread it, that's called the parish. But if I leave them together and then I take one out, that's called the why don't we just take spread them out and then take one out. It should work, but it's because it only works if you do it perfectly. You have to first spread them out and then slap it out. But if I don't first spread them out and slap it out, then I was m something. I'm not allowed to be mak. So we're not going to take chances. We're not going to take any risks. That's why you want to know if there's an is not is called the parish. But it's only going to work if you follow the guidelines. The very very strict guidelines. If you don't follow the strict guidelines, you can mess it up. Stakes are very high. You do it right, it's called the parish. If you do it wrong, it's called we don't want to take chances. There's no because it's or because the reason you can't take all the is because you would have to work it out perfectly and were not willing to take that risk. In theory, could you do it? Yes. But at the same time, the weren't willing to take that risk. That's why the Mishna said exhale. So before we go v or before we end just uh a little bit of red that is that the Mishna is discussing of and the Mishna says and the question is why we touched on some of the the as it relates to the of mask asks it but other as well that what's the of the should be of on that should be bottled to all this that are you can't be if I can't beh how in the world could you say and that the is to the in this voice how could you take something that's not heish and make it has powers but should take a that doesn't have kadusha and give it that's not something that should be able to be done. Now you could always say the mish is discussing where it was hectish beforehand. He discusses that but the pis is not that way. The pases were discussing that's not hectish. It's not hectish. It was with animals that are hectish. Ordinarily the vishna starts off by saying you would think there should be of all mean that every single animal in this is now a kosher animal. How could you have every animal be a kosher animal? In order for an animal to be kadesh you have to be makdasha. There's one animal in this taru that never had kadusha. So never had kadusha and when it's a short on this you can't be mocked this So how in the world is there even a that there should be a now in order to fully appreciate this kasha in order to fully appreciate this kasha we have to take three steps backwards and we have to speak out some raid and then we'll come back to the kasha and really the raid begins with a well-known from discuss the following shil we know that sits have to be made and the shila was where somebody was uh he made sits that's what he did for a living and he had sits that had not been lishma and he had a lot of other tits that were lishma and the tits that weren't got mixed up with the tit that were and the sh was can I sell the tites or can I not sell the I have here that are possible because if it's not the are going to be possible but it was the so maybe just like there's so here two say the same thing. Let the sites that were not be buckled to the titas that were says he declare very similar. We know that matzah has to be made as well. Matzah has to be made. What would be if somebody had matzah that was not made and it was in a with matz that were prepared? Could I eat the matas bel? Could I sell it for $100 a pound or or could I not? What's the sh I know there's mis over here that weren't made but then again it was a voice we're the masses were made that always is that you go buster so go buster over here and maybe say that the of that want to make the should be bought to the masses that were made says a tremendous this is a that was marish this is a kdish that's quoted by the pkim over and over and over again it's one of the most basic fundamental principles that you have to have when you go through sugu and we're learning right now says that that's true that has a to take something that's something that's ple and say that if it was doesn't have that doesn't have that is we're going to now view this as if it takes on the den of the which is it's not going to have the it's not going to have this stating that if I have something that was the and I want it to take on the den of the of the but in order for it to really get that den it would f a you would have needed a in order for this status to be on this thing to so I need the to remove a remove but when I need to sue something that's something I cannot do. So it says that the person that's preparing the tites has to have in mind in order for the tit to be considered. I need to do something in order for it to be can't be as if I did it. And as a result, you can't say that the that's not that was the thing that was somehow is going to get the it can't do that. If there's a kasar, you have chuma, you're not allowed to eat chuma. So if I have truma, which I'm not allowed to eat, there's a there's an isser attached to truma. Truma is kadesh. But for the man on the street, it's a problem. The fact that it's kadesh, that results in. So b's going to say that if doesn't have this is okay. So now the d the mood won't have this is either I have a I'm going to remove the kasar. That's something that could do. But if I'm missing something, if I'm lacking something can something that I'm lacking. So doesn't have an ability to give it doesn't have an ability to give. How is this matzah becoming how are these becoming assumed that for one of the things that says when he goes through this is he explains that answers the we spoke about on Friday. We mentioned on Friday that asks right here in the end of but this is really a many place in says that the says that if there were people that were on death row and they got mixed up we don't know who's the skull we don't know who's the so is they always get the so says coin that holds that is so what's you give them you don't give them and it sounds like that is going to be true even if of the people were of and so is you're still going to give them why because you always give them says that you're always going to give school. Why not? Why don't you say don't tell me you don't go bust when it comes to that was Friday's raid because we we know from the days that you do go bus and answer. So imagine one of the malist he's sitting in front of a fate why aren't in the skull and bled to the and say that everybody should get said that you don't go to determine what misa a person is supposed to get very very s being that anyways they're getting either skila it's just a shila skil ora but we anyways know you're getting mis to determine what misa you're supposed to get when it comes to that you don't go buster Right. We know that that's she gets so ordinarily she gets she ends up getting straight every how do you know she's a bas her father's a it's all based on I thought when it comes to determining which you're supposed to get you don't go right from that skull to Why not? Because we don't use to determine being that anyways. It's just for that there's no every gets she's going to get she's going to get she's going to get like an ordinary as no because she's a bas so now we say no instead you're going to get the whole is because of her which is it boils down to arrive so isn't this the biggest in the world that you do go bust arrive to determine the how could say you don't go bust the cash at the cash because what mean you don't go works for everything with but to determine that that's where the buck stops what's in saying he's saying he's saying that could only take away but can't create a for a person to be you need aim Being that you need a B can't create a B could say that there's an if it's we remove the but can't say that if of the people in this have a they have this that now the also going to have that he's also going to have that he's also going to be that's not something B has an ability to do and just like BL can't make that were not told and B can't make that weren't prepared can't take someone that doesn't HAVE never meant to say that you can't use to determine why should you be able to use and it's all based on me had to say something else he might say here we're dealing with a bit which works with lness of of nep with a mu gets the den of the in which it was that doesn't work to create a that's why you're not going to have this over here. It's interesting the invas as well. So the sent the same exact sh that was sent to and that is he wanted to know if somebody has that weren't or that weren't and it was with things that weren't prepared. You could or you can't. So the first thing that the discusses is do you even say when it comes to mitzvah interesting even you could you use you find regarding you have the trum and you have and you always find it in the context of can I rely on a to create avah so that I should be able to go ahead and do a mitzvah and he says it's to me does that you would be able to then he says the but then he says one other thing the The sh had an interesting he said that by him there was a safety and the safe had a they had a mistake there was a mistake in the safe and they were trying to find the mistake in the safety they couldn't find the mistake in the safe so he wanted to know that with his that you could save even for mitzvah maybe you could say that even though this has in its but being that we can't find it let the in the be bottle to all the in that are and let's say needless to say that was not happy with the said what no way why not and this far is very possible there's no sharp possible the whole that are kosher that are possible so you didn't tell me that the tenses that are possible maybe could be bottled to the titer the matson that are possible maybe could be bottled to the mats that are kosher Maybe good. We have a we have super dupus to maybe be whatever. Maybe you can go down that line. But you need to establish that this and this ple and the bustle is going to be bottled to the what's being bottled TO WHAT OVER HERE THE isle once you have the possible you can tell me the words that are words are bottled to the words the word that's possible is ble to the words that are words is not a that you can say this word is ble to that word is is that to say is I mean that to by the apostle you're not going to have it. I'll just we'll end with this and that is you know it's interesting there's a troop from the where the was that something else there was a where they had a kesh they had eight kaidesh one say was possible and they can't remember which is possible and they're missing backwards and forwards and they can't find it they part can't find the gra they don't know what to do oh say here ready the wanted to know he said can I rely on could I say you're right eight seven of them are kasha one is possible let's say I'll pull one out call the pirate Maybe you know okay that's you may have eight kes I'm not sure how you're going to work this out but but the point is that was the shil the shil was is could you say that this is already something that we already discussed he brings that there's a ch from the adalo where the ado is asked the same shil and the ado wanted to be make listen to what he said listen toesh the adalo said because even though at first glance what are you going to tell me a safe is there a more dber in the world that a satyra so being that a satra is a double eggs. What's the sh? So, of course is not a minion. >> It's a double minion. Yeah. So, what's the question? Of course. Of course. is not good. What's the safety should be but the said he wanted that is that if you have a literally right piece of meat and this piece of meat is so it's a double if it's not stating that there's a let's say listen to this there's a kosher piece of meat and inside of it there's a of non-coosher food then the is you don't have the d of the Only time you have the den of is if theer is but if theer is a that's inside of we don't look at the as being the we look at the as being a and a is not the itself is not a so you don't have brings us by the way he wanted that say that has a to is the same thing because the is not the issue. It's the mistake in the that's the issue. The mistake is not to the contrary it's a mistake. it just pass the so he said that the to in the is like the in the and just like in the if the is the in the you don't have the it's not bottled because the is not in the in the in the here too the is not in the this is is in the either way the brings this and he says like this he thinks that this time of the said what is he the reason if there's a there's no problem is because in that case we're obviously discussing with the didn't make the whole if the whole became then the whole you have a of that's living inside in that case we say that even though it's in the but being that the is only the is not the itself there's no problem but over here once there's a mistake in the It's the same sword then it's the whole isser and being that the whole isser what's the difference if the satyra is a because the whole isra is or the satra is a because there's one letter one in the that's possible at the end of the day I don't have a kra so the the is the and the of course is a based on that said it'd be a big problem he ended up coming up with a with a maybe to be able to work out if you find yourself in such situation. So you should be able to land and create based on that's already in but the bottom line is is coming back to the kasha started off with a what seemed like an adasha was that's not hectish was let it so that you can be afraid of it should be totally all this because can only take away can't something and in order for to be you'd have to stoutish we would need it to Just like you can't create you can't create matz there's no maybe when it comes to and etc etc based on that there should not be a bit on to give to the soil end with this what's the should be with the how in the world is there going to be to create Comes.