Zevachim 76

We've all learned Kish, maybe even thought we understood. But now with his trademark depth and clarity and his signature uptempo daffomi style, Rapsuri Bournestein uncovers the layers beneath the words, revealing a world of meaning, relevance, and beauty in every line. Where the deraim of the bass medish meets pushup shot. Discover the shear that's redefining how people learn Kumish. Reprly Bournestein's Kishar. Find it on the Lakewood Dafyomi app or wherever this shear is being heard. Today's DA is invas. So the Mishna is concluding its discussion of the first Mishna in the Per and that is the of. So you have and something got a little bit mixed up. The question is how do you go about with the so the first few cases in the Mishna discussed were that's with and then the Mishna got involved we're all but being that different have different as a result so what do you do with that got mixed up and then the Mishna concludes by saying all can get mixed up and can never get mixed up. Meaning it's not physically possible for a to get mixed up. Says the what's the reason for it? presumably the highest because a was always and a was always if that's the case and an should also never be able to get mixed up was also always by zar meaning if a katas and an got mixed up you would know which one is which one is a male one's a female that's something that physically you can identify a kat and ana have the same physical characteristics the katas is always ana and the is always but the says There is a and that is the mel if he would do he too would bring a carbon but his katus would be different than the ordinary person the ordinary person's katus a had to be a koa b it had to be either a or a kisbas he had two options there was a menu he could choose from if you want you could bring the female sheep if you want it could be the female goat whereas if the nasi is the one that did the aa it had to be the s it had to be of the goat variety. Number one. Number two, it had to be a male. But the point is, it's possible then for a kas to be nare with an if the is ai it's a z. The is always a z. So that's why the mishna didn't say that it's not possible for to bear. It is possible. How is it possible if it was a but the gar says but for the same price? Then why does the mission say that and asham can never get mixed up? say it's not true could be the but theor says no there it's different because because the type of animal that the asham is is an animal that has wool as a result even though the asham is a z and the of the is but they're different animals so being that they're different animals you're going to be able to know which one is which whereas the could be bo as So it's possible for a and to get mixed up. They could be both the is always the is and the could be as a result there it's possible is when it comes to the it's never going to be possible because if it's a it's going to be a the only time it's a is if it's a never as a result it's not possible says how is it possible for the carbon and the carbon to be the said any other permutation of two carbon it's possible to have au even though they were both they were both but one had to be up to one years old the other one had to be two years old the carbon had to be whereas the so can you tell the difference between an animal that's one years old and an animal that's 2 years old says doesn't say anywhere in that it has to be and as a result interesting. So we could assume therefore that it's ben like the carbon. So it could be mixed up. You're right. The standard ash maybe can't get mixed up with the carbon because the would know that this one is one years old. This one's two years old like this. They'll be able to sort it out. But there's the where the doesn't say two years old. It says which is one there could be alternatively it's possible that you would not be able to determine the difference between an animal that's one years old and animal that's 2 years old. As a result there it's possible that it will not be able to be sorted out. That's why the Mishna refers to it as so there's some rate to speak out but let's get the moving and we'll pick it up a little bit later with the carbon with what do you do says there's actually an option meaning you don't have to do what the previous Mishna said previous Mishna said that anytime so what you do is you let the animals graze until they get a When they get a you're the animals, right? You can't be poach unless it has a so you wait for it to get a once you get a m you're what does p mean? You sell it. You sell the animal. By selling the animal, you transfer the kadusha from the animal onto the money that you just got to muras, the animal, the money that you got in exchange for the animal. So let's say the animals were worth $1,000. You're gonna now transfer the kadusha from the animals to the $10 bills. This $1,000 now has kadusha. You take that money that has kadusha, you buy and you bring those behem as carbon. So at the end of the day, you're going to have a be you're going to take the long scenic route. Instead of just being mak of these animals, you're going to transfer the kadusha from the animals to the money to the money back to an animal. You're going to end up bringing the kaban. There was no other option. What else were you supposed to do? If an is on the dollar is here, right? There's always going to be issues stating that the Mishna says if an was said, you don't have to do this. What you could do is bring both of them. What's the problem? Okay. But means even soften. So you could bring both animals but soften in terms of so you'll just eat it. What's the problem? Point is you can bring both. Both the doesn't speak the are so you're not going to have a problem with this either. They both have the same. It's not like one of them has a the other one has to be. So what's the problem? You could do both. You're right. The are different. But as long as you're as long as you do the both and as long as you eat both, it shouldn't be an issue. a very important principle which we're going to see soon has implications and that is there's a rule that you're not allowed to take something that's do something to it that may cause it to become possible. So you're not allowed to make truma or kshim anything that has kadusha you can't go ahead and make it possible from the same vein you can't do something that may expedite the process of it becoming possible by saying that this schlam which is one of the two animals you don't know which one is which can only be eaten what happens once the day and the night passes you're going to have to get rid of the schlum you're not going to have a choice cuz m suffic that it might be asham which is in which case the bus would be nicer in which case the bus would carry a you wouldn't be able to eat it. So you're expediting you're being maybe so to speak. So the said this is not a good option. You cannot go and eat aim as if it's a carbon. What do you mean I'm being very sounds like a wonderful? I'm going to only eat. I'm very from. No, it's just the opposite because you're potentially bring this a double-edged sword and as a result there's aus over here said I'm not comfortable with this. I need you to eat a schlam like a schlam and a nam like anam. So what then are you supposed to do? You do what the previous mission said. Anytime you have au of you let them get a you pay to them. You buy a new you buy a a new what if they a new schlam and a new ash. What if they weren't the same amount of money? So you have to lay out money out of your own pocket and assume that the most expensive animal was both the asham and the schlam. It wasn't both. But you have to assume either as a result you'll end up bringing both carbonis. You'll bring the ashum like an ashum and the slum like a but to bring the slum like an ashum. Yeah, you could sh the itself and that's not the point. That's not the issue. The issue is is eating being and setting a more stringent time frame to be able to eat the carbon is what happens if the was done. Everything was done. And now you have a buser of an. So there the is here even just eat all the argued they argued in the because there was an alternative option right we have to give you an option. So in the what's the option the option is let them get sell them and bring two carbonas where you'll know which is which. But over here where you have the there's nothing you could do with it. So the only option is to eat it or get rid of it. That's not a good option. As a result, just be for both of them. But to go to and be for both, that's not something that you do. So at first glance, it would seem from this that is not so much. It's a fundamental where the seem to say you're not allowed to do anything to him that may expedite the process of it becoming possible. Whereas didn't seem to be so sensitive to that idea. Rabim didn't have such an issue as we're going to see now. The garra is going to bring a whole block gum. At the end it's going to digress to the sugl we'll see how we get there. But for now the gumar is going to digress with a whole block of garum of different places in shas non is related where this is and appears to there was a that was standing in front of and he told him the following if somebody has you're not allowed to take the money and buy truma with it and the reason is because by doing that you're going to be that you have. Now, we know that you're not allowed to do business with perish, but it doesn't mean you can't ever sell perish means you can't on a commercial level sell and mass manufacture and produce perish. That's not something you're allowed to do. But if you have and you want to sell it in a in a barter economy, it's something that you're allowed to do. Stating that with many limitations. Additionally, the kadusha of the perish is going to transfer from the pay onto the money that you got in exchange for selling the perish. If you now take that money and you buy something else, the kaduca is going to continue to transfer. It's going to go now from the money to follow the the paper trail. Follow the money. So the kaduca is now going to go from the money onto the new pis that you bought. So if you sell peris take the money and buy truma, the truma that you're buying has kaducas. Now parents that have kadusha are limited in terms of this you have to eat it before this man beer once this man beer comes at that point is you have to get rid you have to burn the perish you have to you have to destroy it doesn't have doesn't have any limitations you could have shuma today and you could eat it in 10 years from now there's no such issue says this in front of based on that I'm going to tell you that that you're not allowed to buy truma with money that you got for selling because now you're going to have chuma that has limitations in terms of when you're allowed to eat it. You could only eat the truma up to this mir. What happens if this m beer passes? You're going to have to get rid of the truma. You're going to be bringing that's not something you're allowed to do. So says told this to and you know said it's a very nice but I know would not have agreed with this because said you're just like argued in would argue in that as well like we pointed out is not a parac It's it's a it has global implications. It's it would be says well but says the told him I don't think would argue over here because only said is between an so what are my options? Either I could let them both get a be to them and buy two new carbonas or I'll bring both of them and I'll eat the as if it's a carbon I maybe holds that this is a better option but we find ourselves in avid situation over here it's not I have money that money should I go buy even wouldn't tell you to buy agrees as an idea in our he doesn't know what to Do the let them get like that says that true doesn't hold the that you could be maybe I'll ask you says so it's interesting is not allowed to eat kachar that eats kachum it's really bad a tummy that eats kachch that's there's plenty of really difficult sugis in that deal with a tummy that eats kachum a kayen he's the one that eats kachin so you would think that maybe when Kay eats kachin, right? He should be sensitive. He should do it when no one's looking. Should do it discreetly, quietly. Mean, after all, this is something that's off limits to the whole world. It's just the opposite. When the cayenne ate, he ate it. He could eat it however he wants. If he prefers it, roast it. That's fine. He likes it rear medium rear. Well done. He could do whatever he wants. But if he wants, he could put spices in it. And the spices could be either or it could be it could be chum as well. What's how could you take and spice has a limited amount of time of how long you're allowed to eat it? You could eat either for a day and a night if it's you could eat forever. So by you taking the putting truma into his. So what's happening? He's knocking off this man. I thought you not let her bring the soul says the he told him asking from is only there's very few things that have other say that have many what kind of is but for sure doesn't have that there's no so That's why that's don't make me rise with money. That's so has he was he now has he's allowed to eat. He wants to buy he's not allowed to take his and buy truma with it because he's being says because only you can eat wherever you want. So is like it's only you only eat anyway. So by you now having trauma that has again you're limiting it's in this case it's not the it's the but it's the same thing you're creating some limitation to the that's something that's wrong says it's now here seems to be telling you that it's okay you're allowed to do it this should be not like again we started off right that number one number two you see something that's going to be okay. So we had spoken out when the Tana told that you're not let to buy Truma. So what was Ra's comment? It's not like because is not sensitive to the idea of so they told who said you're over reading and overanalyzing never said that he's insensitive to the idea said when you have a you don't know what to do he prefers this option but I think even would say you're not let with it because you're being potentially being this is checkmate because here you that said that it's okay to buy with even though you're being which means that you're being soar says when heard that Ra was crying said I hear you're right I thought only said in a case of I see over here he said it in a case it's going to be when this whole was presented to said I don't know why you didn't ask him please I would have asked you another cook a vegetable that has with oil of and the reason is says it's like the same exact case we're discussing and it's so of course of course says the isn't it would say it's okay said I'll tell you why I didn't ask from there cuz we had already asked from Tavlin and what did he answer when I told him that the from the fact that the is spice his with truma he saidon he deflected me he said don't bring me ras from cases of dabon's discussing we're discussing cases of I know he would have told me the same thing that's why I didn't ask the he would have told me his vegetables only have but says these What do you mean the bryer didn't discuss or that Mishna is is is not discussing where the truma was a yerk? What was the case of the Mishna? The case of the Mishna was where the was and the sheman was by the way if the was the true it should have said it says just the opposite. It says what's the difference? Rashi says is she is for sure something that's so for sure where it's and still you see is m but the says so said I hear so you're right but it still wouldn't have been a good kasha you know why because we asked from in our shim was mal and what did he Hey that our mission is different. Don't bring me is insensitive to the idea of because the reason in the he said that you could it's because it's it was already in the case of the case was where it was meaning you're not going and taking a and then pouring in. It's talking about where the were already mixed up. They were ready. It's just a question of cooking it. But the says if they're anyways mixed up, why would anybody argue? You're not bringing anything. So the says, but the says what does that have to do with over there? There is an you tell me that mixed up already. If they're mixed up, what option do you have? I mean says the if anything shouldn't the precedence be the safe of our where the of the happened after the we already have the we're over there there's no at all there's no option so why would argue says I'll tell you why we have you don't know what's what there is no option This here there is an option. What's the option? The Rabonan held that there was an option. You can't cook it cuz you could try to squeeze out the sheen of the shell and as a result there is a ton. That's why the Rabon aren't happy with you going ahead and cooking it who held not that way cuz he held how you going to squeeze it. How you going to squeeze a lot? you're going to ruin the should you squeeze it a little bit. It's you're not going to be able to take it out as a result is not a real option. If is not a real option. So you can't say it's talking about where it was already because if it was already the would have argued must be it wasn't it didn't find itself in this original and still you see this is not a case of it's a case of the it's a case of and still mater you know I heard this exchange you had you were trying to figure out and and was he had a riot from Khan is and this is the best here. You see clearly we're dealing with something. We're dealing with she is everybody agrees by she's a we're not discussing this you literally you can line up your ingredients and you're you're cooking and one of your ingredients could be how do I know it's would never argue if it's and still is so it's clear it tells that it's so posh to me that says in our there's no problem being maybe It's not only in the case of our Mishna we're at some super case. No, it would be true. That's basically how he comes out. Exhale. So just uh to lighten up uh a rather complicated D and that is so this idea of is something that underlies that we're all familiar with that is the says in talking about that you say when you says, "See, you're supposed to say it with a niggan." Why? Cuz it's a say. So is going a little out of character and little muser, little insight into the future. So this is a song that's going to be with the forever. The only niggan we're going to have is the the as a result. When you say it, you should say it with a niggan. It says you don't say you also don't say it on you don't say the reason is because the carbon wasn't brought on those days it wasn't brought on additionally you shouldn't do it either you shouldn't say and that is the meaning it says the Rama in that is a beautiful beautiful and it's a it's a and that's why it's a stating that there are certain days you have to read the fine print literally the Rama there are days when you don't say when you say you don't say it on you don't say it on Pes you also don't say it on Pes And you don't say it in Arabic. Why? Cuz those were all days where you didn't bring the carbon tide. There was no carbon on Shabas. That's easy because Shabas and Yontiff you can't bring and the was a carbon. There's no carbon on P because along with the came some of which were can't have on PES. As a result, there's no carbon on PES. There's also no carbon on PES and oner. Why not pes? So now you have to look at the even finer print says the you want to know why there's no carbon ones. It's very simple because you're ready not allowed to eat. the carbon was if you're going to bring a carbon first thing in the morning on you're going to limit the amount of time that you have to eat the carbon we just learned. So being that you're not allowed to bring in a way where you're going to limit it's because you may thereby being expediting this idea of being that's not something you can go do and you have a much smaller just like you can't bring the if it's as if it's an asham you cannot bring a carb when you know you're not going to have the full to be able to eat it. It's the same reason says the that the concludes and says that you don't say cuz you're going to make a carbon you know why cuz the carbon was always follows the so that night after who's going to sit down and eat the carbon no one's allowed to eat so being that you couldn't eat it either so you have the same issue on kipper as you do on the reason you don't say kipper is the same reason you don't say it on on pes right I has to do with Yeah, it does. It's because eating the after is eating after after that's not something you're allowed to do. This is the underlying reason for that in everybody's something that everybody knows. It's interesting. It's interesting, right? Right. Right. It's a good point. It's not so simple by the way. It's so posh that there was no tish in the time of the B mikdash. Second BTS, right? There's avah in the rash where the says that there were times during the second mik where they used to mourn because never really replace. So there was a concept of mourning during so in that case you would have an issue but this is but the bottom line is this the bottom line is that this is this stating that there's a there's an interesting discussion in the and there were that were written by about this that you don't say on meaning that we know and it's really based on the fact that the discusses the days that the were brought We know but the garra says there was no pes and there was no carbon but the garra does not say that same doesn't mention anything about and others were very very bothered why is it then if right that you don't say based on a nice that you have the same problem why then didn't say they didn't bring the carbon tida it's mash they did bring the they did bring the carbon tida it's mash they did bring the carbon tida I what happened to so if you go through the and you summarize there's really two that the have the first is maybe there's a difference between the carbon which could only be eaten a few hours into the day versus the versus the carbon on where you would have the whole day to eat it. And the is really based on the fact that even though the or the says that you have a right to eat the carbon but it's more to eat it during the day. It's not to wait until the night. So by the carbon by where you have the whole of to eat it. So the fact that you're not going to be able to eat it during the time maybe that shouldn't bother me so much as opposed to ones where I don't even have the whole day to eat it. I have however many hours into the day that I'm allowed to eat was also we ready. We're mocked in a few hours before that. So you're not going to have the full day to eat it. So there it's going to be different has a whole on this saying on and has a very big problem with this argument. He brings that others wanted to make this argument made this argument. Others argued it as well. But he says I have a very big problem with that. You know why? cuz what was the starting point of this whole discussion of being maybe it was a carbon that was within the it's by you now eating the as if it's an you're being says I want to tell you it's on the talks about Listen what the says that's the let's say it's not a it's a regular you should eat it the day that you brought the carbon and you could also eat it the next day meaning if there's anything left over the next day to put the cameas in this Pik It's okay. Interesting. So, the you have an extra day. If something is left over, it's not a problem. You could eat it. But listen to how the says it. Eat it the first day. What about the next day? Okay. If there was something left over on that next day, you should eat it too. says the Raan the way I'm reading the P the Torah didn't just say and eat it for two days in a night the Torah says just like it said it regarding the supposed to eat it the first day it just so happens I woke up in the morning and there's still basel left over okay you should eat it it's not yet it's not you don't have to worry about it you could you could eat it but when are you supposed to eat it supposed to eat it day one the every is the same way this man of when you're supposed to eat the carbon is the first day when the is with the I could be my I could eat it like an which is what can't I do I can't eat it the second day the second day shouldn't be any different than the and just like over here it's there's a problem that's where his by the fact that I won't be able to eat the second day then the fact that I can't eat the carbon should be a problem as well. Either way, that's how the maritime shu knocked out the first. The second aura that's discussed by the and this was said to inu and that is that could be there's a between eating pes and eating bleium kipper and what's that? You're not allowed to give a cotton on PES. And the reason you can't give a p number one is you have to get rid of your so you pos can't even have right you say oh he's a child he's not you can eat ones right think about that right you ever see a cut eating a sandwich on on what do you mean he's a what's the difference he's not okay I could be I can't be you go you get involved in all the super duper raid that involves no there's there's no person in the world that has a anywhere in that says they give a cut a sandwich on on PES. What's the reason? Because you can't have on PES. It has to be gone. There's this about number one. There's another reason. It's also about No, you can't be na. So if your four-year-old is going to eat lunch and it's going to be pes you, the god are benefiting from the fact that he's eating. He's not hungry anymore. He's not clutching. So as a result, you're benefiting from it. is also food is not so by the way this is a classic classic there's a lot in this we've spoken out this truth from the many many times regarding completely unrelated but says is a build has a rash in and aug is invit it's in this right here that's this is but either way later in the so that I know what the difference is you know what the difference is you can't eat from the carbon at all so it's gone I can give it to says you wouldn't be able to give it to and says says that how do you make a shako on right we make a shako on yum yum it's part of the shaku is supposed to be so discuss goes works it through how do you make a shaku on yumipper should you drink it you're not allowed to drink should you make the and not drink and one of the suggestions theor says why do you make a shak the same way you make it on yum all and then give it to the cotton to drink a cotton's allowed to drink even to a cotton who's not fasting it shouldn't be a problem and the garra says The gummor says that if you're going to give this to a c it's going to be a problem. Why? And the way the explain it that ordinarily you don't have to be worried that a cut eats him kipper he may eat when he's a god also. He knows now he's a cut and when he's when he gets older he'll start being and then eventually he'll understand that he's not allowed to eat him kipper. Nothing bad is going to come from that. But if you're going to go and give him he may think in his cot mind that even though you're not eating him kipper but maybe yitz is different. Maybe this is an exception to the rule. He may not be able to make that. So when you give him a you can't even give it to a says just like not let give the and that's why not because when the works through all the options this option was shot down. So for the same reason he wouldn't be able to give him kachcha because now the cousin's going to think that kacham is okay when I get older. I what I no he may not be able to make says wrote back to the I hear the why you want to argue like many did with bottom line is many came out not like you have to look in your to see what your meaning is but the bottom line is is that he says it again with that just like you don't say you don't say and it's both for the same reason therefore you shouldn't have been able to bring the carbon on Arab just like you weren't able to bring the carbon on PES either way. So the has been discussing this sh could you be maybe could you not and specifically so we discussed it in the context of two types of that were we discussed it in the context of and we discussed it in the context of and we're now going to discuss it again in the context of kachchin but this time the carbonos that a mitzra used to bring. So a mitzyra can be and come in two shapes and sizes. He could be a mitzra ml. He could be a a mitzyra musker. Mitsyra musker is when someone goes to the k and he has seen one of a mits. The ms is not short. It is a nega. It's not a nega. So what he would do is he would lock him up for seven days temporarily and during that interim period of time you know he had to be he had to be cast away at the end of the seven days if everything was okay. So there was a very brief tah process that he had to follow and as long as he followed that process he was okay. If a mitz is found to be a real full-fledged mitz so then he becomes what's called a a mitsra ml and when he completes his now he's meaning the nega goes away. So he has to go through a much more intense Tahra process. What he has to do is number one he has to wash his clothing. He has to shave his head. He has to go away for another seven days. On the eighth day he brings two carbon. Then he brings he brings the part of went on the part of went on the So the process gets much more complicated. What happened over here was we had a we have a suffic he was locked away he doesn't remember why they put him away he's not sure was I ml or was I musker if he was a ml he asked to bring the carbon the problem is maybe he was never a ml maybe he was only a musker if he was a musker then he doesn't have to bring the carbonas so is there any way to get this person out of his misery where we have this suffic he's not sure if he's a m and this whole process or not so the garra says like says from old and we need he said I can work it out maybe what you could do is is he can bring his carbon the and together he can bring the and he can say the following make the make the here it is and if shall The ash shouldn't be an it should be a can be or it could be in a cave could be anything. So I want this to be instead of and now that what we'll do is we'll bring it but what's the big deal and what we're going to do is is we're going to do the we're going to treat it like a and we're going to treat it like like an but the bottom line is is that what do you see? You see the was to be maybe said it's okay because he's telling you that you're bringing a carb and you're not sure if it's an or what do you mean that he's not a he's not really it's a and eating isn't this another riot that holds okay so the says don't bring me riots from here so over here this is a man that we said we're trying to put him out of his misery he doesn't know could he he wants to be tar and he has no way of ever being tar. So even shim was was going to work out a way for him to find to make him tired. The point is he can't tell this to all the other because here we're trying to help the mench over here it's going to be different says the gar. So we mentioned this we mentioned it because of the sh of and the say is no problem you could have a suffic to bring the just bring the on the aslim and it's all good. So the gar works this all out. So the you figure out how to do it. You bring it either as an or like what about the like the like you could be of the but if it's not how you so the Gar says and it's based really on a on a later in the where the gar says if a person wanted to bring a carbon and the whole carbon was she carbon she could do it you could bring a carbon eight right it's different types of carbonas that are unconventional that if you know the rest of the story you know you could bring so one of the carbonas that you were allowed to bring was a shem they did with the she incidentally there was a whole is going to talk about now that was done with the she could bring the and you can say if I'm a so this is part of my of not being a anymore if not it's a there was no with that it's doesn't he have to do says the mitz do what's the You have to take the shemen and make seven a regular of you don't do that. So what am I supposed to do? So says why can't you do it? It's not a problem. So you do both. You'll do on the side that it's and you'll do on the side that he's a he's a it's still not so simple because what's going to happen is is as soon as you do the kam you're not going to have all the and there's a that in order to bring the had to be complete at the time that you did the z so you're going to first do the kam then you're going to do the zhaz when you do the z you don't have the full cuz you did the kamitzah as a result going to be puzzled. So the says do the and then bring a little bit more and make up that difference of what you just took out and that says before the it's not a problem. You can pray to the mitz doesn't have but on that it's a she doing kam you're going to have to do a hakar you're going to have to take some of the oil you're going to have to put it on the m so how do you what are you supposed to do so says right just do the say now I'll tell you this is a trick question because when exactly you supposed to do thear matva if you do it after you did the matva so you do the mat MV and then you do the benit. So it comes out you did kamitzah then you did matva and now you could do the actara. So you don't have all the you don't have all the shemen at the time of that you had at the time of the because you had to do the on the side it was and you're not allowed to do if you're missing a little bit of the and if you're going to do it before you do the matva so you're going to do the kam and then you're going to do the hakara and then you're going to do the matva you can't do that either cuz you're not let something that you still have to do and there's a possibility over here that you're going to have to under that you have to do. You have no right to do yet. So the bottom line is you can't do after the matva. You can't do it be before the matva. So the question is when exactly do you do it? What you do is is you before the you tell me how can I be mate before the isn't there of the what you do is you have in mind that you're not doing you have in mind that you're just adding fuel to the fire you're just adding the times this is just means if you want to put it on the this is a trick the had in another but the bottom line is you could put it on you do it beforeh you're running into a problem. You're not going to have a problem because you have in mind that I'm not doing you have in mind that what I'm really doing is I'm doing so before we end just one final. So really going back to the beginning of the d the first d before the of we discussed the last of the first mishna of the paric and that was all different types of carbonas can get mixed up with the exception of the and the reason the kas and the asham can't get mixed up because one is a zar and one is a said to what about the said no the kas and the could get mixed up because even though the kus was usually in a ka but there was one kas that was a z which kas was a being that the was so the can get mixed up with the and as a result it would be possible to have this mixup just one and that is why is it that the was different so it's interesting the ordinarily was a whereas when it comes to the over there it was the the said that the is as follows based on a in days on the days over there is discussing another well-known. So we know that why there's one time by the way out loud. It's brought down either way. The reason is not to be because you're gonna hear and you know maybe a person's because of that he did and he's inserting things in the middle of and just said everybody just be quiet everyone can leave their issues between them and so simply to protect the dignity of people made across the board just says the and this is the safe of this which when you learning is I'll prove to you there's such a concept not to be a cuz where they bring the carbonas bit of soften where they bring the carbon bit of soften now the is brought is not brought maybe on the to but it's not really person that's bring and still you see they brought them in the same place wouldn't you think there should be a special place for the katas the territory. No, we don't want a person who's bringing a carbon kas to walk in. He should have to be embarrassed. So they said, "Bring it the same place you're bringing the island LIKE THIS. NO ONE'S GOING TO IF YOUR CARBON IS A KATAS, your carbon is an so you see how sensitive the was to protect the dignity of the is for that same reason. It's supposed to be is that true and the are brought exactly the same." Again, when you're learning, but when you learn, what about the goes? So the Gmorra says the only one that knows what's going on at the time of this is the but the the didn't really know and as a result no one's going to really what about is so you're going to see a guy's walking with an animal he's going to know is it a male animal or is it a female animal right you're going to be able to see so if you're so worried about protecting this person and that's why the of both are in the same place because that's something that the ham would be able to see and they'll know what kind of carbon you're bringing. So why did we make one a male and one a female? So the gumar says it's true that the is a female but at the same time it has a tail and it's very hard unless you look very closely it's very hard to know if it's a zer and a and being that it's going to be hard to know nothing bad is is going to happen. That's true. If it's a Kevas, it has this tail that's covering it. But if it's a because you have an option when you bring you can either bring a kib or you can bring a says no. You know, he embarrassed himself. He could have brought a he chose to see he embarrassed himself. You don't have to worry about the person that chose to bring us here. What about where it has to be a that's what the terrorist says. You don't have the option of you're right. You just got it. Now you know why he brings the reason he brings because he want everybody to know that he was you know he was that's the bottom line and because he was we want the world to know that and that's why he has to bring the so ordinarily it could be a why it has the tail to cover it to protect the dignity of the when it comes to it's going to be different. Bottom line is bottom line is said. So you see that the ni whose carbon had to be a had it been a everybody would have noticed. Everybody would have noticed and even if the ni would have brought a kizva it would have been possible to know that the nasi just did an ara. So he says like this it's important for every year to be dignified right you always have to look at people and and see them in the in in the most optimum light. But when it comes to a ni who's the nasi thei is the melik. If you're going to see the walk into the base of Mikd and you're going to see that he's bringing a carbon and you're going to know from the carbon that he's bringing that he was it could be it's going to diminish the cover that you're going to have for him and you have to have cover for him. So what's he supposed to do? He should bring a sira. That's not good because then everyone's going to know he did an aa. Should he bring a kisvas even though it has a tail that's covering but at the same time if you remove the tail you're going to know that it's an aa. We can't take those chances when it comes to a. So what do we say by the means? If it brings a zar it's the same. It could be bring no one's going to know that's going to protect the so you're not going to run into an issue of just end. We're talking about the so just to end with one and that and that is the said that we know the wellknown we've spoken it out many times in the where the says that so asked this and I've been around at the time of the md as a and I would have done what kind of carbon would I have brought would I have brought the kusi the male version or would I have brought a kisbarus Which carbon would I have brought? Now, at first glance, it's what exactly Rebi Shiloh was? Because what's the definition of NSI? Melik. Rebi wasn't a mel. Rebi was a ni in the in the looser sense. He was the leader, but he wasn't a mel. So, we've spoken now. It's also I think it's but either way, that's ra that we've spoken about in the past. But says that why did he want to know? Oh, why did he was just curious? I mean what what this was shield curiosity says I wonder what would be and I says good because you have to say carbonus every day and would you say carbonus if you wrote a carbon one of the carbon he say in the morning is a carbon kas rebi wanted to know which para the he supposed to read am I supposed to read the para of the regular or maybe rebi held I'm supposed to read the para of the had I had a to bring the the time of the mdash so every morning said rabbi when I I'm going to have a special carbon special insert in my right if you're supposed to read you know that was he says it was this wasn't a theoretical hypothetical what would be could be would be type of this was very much had a Oh corporalness.