Zevachim 83

We've all learned Kish, maybe even thought we understood. But now with his trademark depth and clarity and his signature uptempo daffomi style, Repsuri Bournestein uncovers the layers beneath the words, revealing a world of meaning, relevance, and beauty in every line. Where the deraim of the bass medish meets pushup shot. Discover the shear that's redefining how people learn Kumish. Reprly Bournestein's Kishar. Find it on the Lakewood Dafomi app or wherever this shear is being heard. Today's D is and we are about 20 lines from the top of B as we come to the conclusion of a very difficult perk. So the end of is a digression from the coreis of and it discusses the so we know there were many different things that could happen to a of a carbon that would render the carbon possible. One of them is niknas. So what does niknas mean? Dam that was supposed to go that was quote unquote into the or is that the dam is posing just like this. So if or leave the of the go outside of the azara onto the or some other part of the is is that that the carbon that was would become possible. The same is true if it's if it goes in the reverse order. If it enters, it goes closer to the it enters the ent to the extent that this belongs on there. We saw in yesterday's that there's that has overnight applies not only to but to the as well. that has over is the of the and that is that if of the dam would be according to the all the dam would be possible whereas if mikas of the dam was only the mikas that was y would be possible but the mikas that was not y would not be possible either way so we saw a whole with regards to the of today's picks up on that note it says says in the so one of the two times that the Torah mentions the in the context of it was passed away and because he was an felt that although there was a that he was able to eat from the that were the and the special that was brought because it was but the was brought because it was being that that was he thought didn't apply didn't understand why he didn't eat from the carbas this was the mistake that Rabenu had made he didn't realize that an would not be allowed to eat from from those cultures he got very upset at he told why he eat from the carbas is it because the dam was it's not True. says when describes the fact that this wasn't see the double he said the white the double had it only said I would have thought it means only that is only true if the dam enters the real it says so the double of teaches me that the is not only to the but even if the D enters the for that alone you'd already have the so you're telling me that the wordesh means the word means so why do you have to say both the only way to get into the is by going through the so once you tell me that there's when the dam enters the doesn't that by definition means if the dam enter the keshak because the way to get to the shakadash from is to go via the you walk through the to the so why does it have to say you know why because really kesh doesn't mean intrinsically doesn't necessarily means somewhere inside with his and means the same thing now had it only said either I would have assumed it meant the kesh it's from the double that I know that it means And so you can't ask me a let it say one. Let it say one would mean if the real definition of the word kesh is kesh doesn't mean. So had it only said kesh I would have assumed it meant kures kadashim just like had it only said pima I would have assumed it meant kures kadash. Only way for me to know that the is true whether the enter the or the is by it saying the and this precedence for such an idea where the says two things where each one inherently doesn't necessarily describe what the wants to say but the said two so that from the we'll get the gist of what the is trying to say. What does that mean? So the context over there is the of the says we know that is not allowed to eat truma a bigger is that whereas the of a is allowed to eat truma of a kayen is not allowed to eat chuma. The reason is because Evyri even though he belongs to the Cayenne and the Tyra says even the behemoth of a cayenne are allowed to buty and go on the same level and it's for that reason the of a of a is not and the says it doesn't matter if this is avoid I forever I thought an goes out after six years if he was a nerd. So if he went through the process of he becomes a that's a regular that goes out to say it says the whether he's a or he's a regular either way he's not allowed to eat why just say and doesn't eat and not have to say to the doesn't certainly shouldn't says because had it only said I would have assumed that the definition of is not I would have thought that it's therefore maybe only is not but is the same thing and don't by definition they don't inherently mean they both meany from the fact that says of it must be it's coming the rabbis that I wouldn't have otherwise known meaning not only it's in that very same vein when the Tyra says doesn't mean doesn't mean but there of the double I know not only but the as well but as he said by and at the end of the day the said that a doesn't eat and a shim doesn't eat now although I know him once I know but at the same time it's okay for the to say both why is it okay because they're two different people and even though could have just said and had it said the word not spoken in riddles you would known I would have known for sure but you find someone write something that I would anyways know from said at the end of the day now that I know that means and it's okay that the wrote both because even though I know once I know but over here said it doesn't make sense because at the end of the day I get it. But right now after everything so I have a that tells me that if the dam enters the it's possible and if the dam enters the it's also possible says it doesn't make sense why the would say that because he can't get into the without entering the so why would the have to say and you can't tell me because the same thing once it enters the by definition it enter the so why would the have to tell me the if the dam enters the it's possible it should have just said that if the dam enters the it's possible and I would know because that if it enters the it's possible not because it's one the other one's two different people now doesn't eat when he belongs to okay so for that I can tell you so you want to know why the didn't say why it's spoken riddles I hear but it's okay because it's consistent with the of the whereas over here this isn't consistent it makes no sense to have to tell me that if it enters the it's possible if the already says that when it enters the it's possible because you can't enter the entering I'll explain it to you it's possible it is noa for the terror to tell me that if the enters thees is possible even though I already know that if it enters the it's possible. How so? What if you went into the in a in a funny way? You went in you went in. If you go in the way you're supposed to go, but if you went in in a funny way, so over there, you didn't go through the maybe is only in the maybe there's no that there's an intrinsic to just like there is in you can't say that because it says in the it says it has to be if it's It's not going to be a problem. We mentioned yesterday that the only time is if the dam entered with the intent of it going on the took that's supposed to go and he brought it into the with the intention of using it. That's where it's a problem. The P says it was brought in with the intention of we'll see soon the end of the mission already mentioned some of you actually have to do this in order to have but for sure you have to have brought it in with the intention. So what would be if a cen brought the dam into the with the intention of doing a you wouldn't have of bringing it into the because being that your intention wasn't there's no for that you have to come on to the so two reasons why you would the would have to mention even though it already mentions is I can't is it not possible possible to get into the without going through the no it's not true either because you went in or if you brought the d with the intention of doing this then merely bringing it into the wouldn't render it a few regarding of said what would be if you took one of the and you brought it into the would you have or would you not have in other words the That's is when you take dam that's supposed to go in and you bring it into if the dam is anyway supposed to go in it's not possible to have because it's to be in the said no maybe there is what would be if you took the dam and you brought it further inside into the we just said that there's a when it enters the right very good and there's a when it enters the the right Morty's saying that if if the answer to that question what is that Even when it enters the Kurdish then maybe that's the the terrors of the why do you need to tell me that there's a neg that's supposed to go now there is no by being it's when it enters the but the bottom line is that was there what's the do you say it says and it says together so if you're going to have bringing it you're going to have for bringing it into but that don't have bring you're not going to have it or no as long as you bring it further inside that's enough to have that was first said Rob if you're going to tell me there is I'll ask you another what would be with the what's unique about those that they had in the had a den to take the dam even in the kesh. So you're going to tell me you can't have in the because there's a what would be if the and then he took them out of the and he brought to the and then he brought it in. Do we say of course there's no because there's a this is once the leaves it's not anymore. So maybe now you could have what about what about those do you say that being that they had a to go into the so certainly there's no in the or no maybe once the did in the now it's like a regular that there could be if you're going to tell me that yeah it is possible to have he said I'll ask you even a What would be if the took the dam added the he did now the on the soim that the did you had the 16 that were done with the power and the another 16 that were done on the there was still more that had to be done right 43 minus 32 there's still 11 that had to be done where were those 11 done they were done on the on the misb so the last 11 were going to be done on the misbeh seven on the itself and then you had the ones that were done. So what happened? What would be if the would take the dam after he did this on the and he would bring it to the he's all in the is in the standing he does the on the now he walks to the and he and he brings it back to the You can tell me what what's the because you went from the to the within the it's all the same place. Oh, maybe not. Maybe this is called the why should it be called? It's a very rash says because the describes the going from the to do the see you see the as if to say with regards to this within the of the and then there's the and by the way says we learn from and that is that the when he did the he couldn't be standing ing between the and the he had to be standing between the and the he had to be on the other side of the and that's what the is as if there's two parts to the there's between the and then there's between the and the so if there two as the suggests when it says what would be if the go take the bring it back to that would be or would there not And the gammor says take. So before we go just one and that is I saw in the mish he brings a he brings a from the briskarov. Says that somebody wrote him a letter and he told him that he was dabbing shab this morning with the briskar. And after the went over to the and he showed the but before the just one brief and that is the says in par it says says in the you're not allowed to eat anything that's a that's interesting if you take a look at the context of the peric Paris begins your children as a result and then you have period. Then the goes on and mentions five that deal with the first of which is says that the is also going back meaning just like clearly it's an intro and if you look at this all the explained that the coming to say that meaning that you're a child you're a prince so you have to act that way there's a certain way you have to act says the guy and it's posit that parish is also what does the What can you eat? You're not allowed to eat. So the thing that you're not allowed to eat is it's disgusting. Why can't you eat something disgusting? You're a prince. And a prince doesn't eat something that's disgusting. A prince sits down and he eats a dinner with fine wines and eat steaks. That's the way you're supposed to eat. So as a result that says just like it's very that's the emphasis of It's to that as well. But the question is what does it mean? What is take a look at the says the follows any carbon that's possible whether the carbon became possible because there was a such or it was a or if a something happened physically to the carbon that rendered it or or something else happened. It wasn't it wasn't says if anybody eats a of this carbon gets it says in the says that this you want to know what it's referring to it's referring to that's clearly describing the we don't know what exactly it's referring to the says for that reason if a person eats from any carbon that's possible says it's going to be possible if we screw off went over to the and And he said right yeah yeah yeah so he went over he said I don't understand this ra the ram has three categories of that it became it became and then the ra has other or it became what's other what else is there either it's or it's if there was no on this carbon and nothing happened to the carbon so how else could it be possible So scrub looked around said is based on a that we learned yesterday says that there's a and that is that if mitzah's dam of a carbon would be nickn the entire carbon would be possible even the dam that wasn't said there nothing happened to it there was no on that dam and there was no on that except there was no and there was no on that dam that's the third bucket that the ra is referring to it wasn't it It wasn't how was it? It was but the end this is and Mishma of Schulzinger has a a tremendous on this from the brisker of and he asks if you think about it a rather obvious question he says maybe the rama meant was more maybe the ra was referring to that come up over and over and over again when a carbon is did anything happen to it nothing it's something that's not it's not a it's you just left it there and as a Ed it became nicer. How why would that not be so it's in if you want to see it inside the I have he has 10 pages it's a nice maybe we should get to it another day but either way a little bit more so in theish there is regarding the rebel says that in order for to be when it's it need it needed to have been with the intention of doing with it in other words you actually have to do the talk says how do I know that doesn't require an actual as long as the dam was with the intention of there being a that's enough for it to be possible It says the word and it says and what's the context over there? It's referring to the who's doing the wasn't allowed to be anybody in the when the was referring to when he was going to do the nobody was allowed to be even in it had to be 100% quiet and just like over there that means that as soon as the entered even though we didn't start doing the there was already an is So too over here when it says the word it doesn't mean that the is actually taking place but as long as the enter with the intention of that's already enough for there to be says that I agree I also hold that but I have a different it says over here the word so the context over there is also the and And the Pik says that the Sawyer and the P that the brought was were of course because they were the so it's for that reason they they had a ofen and being that they were so says that now when did that happen? When did the or the take the and the and burn those param the terrorist says what does the mean after this he didn't do it before this he did it after this just like in other words has learned his learned from the question is which are we learning it from are we learning it from that is before was or is it from which is after that was already learn from it makes more sense to learn it from these are both there's a that is supposed to be you brought it into the there's a that the people are supposed to be the Torah says you have to make sure they don't enter the so between the two is not just the word it's in context of something that's supposed to be and it's entering it makes more sense to learn it from the that's describing the being taken outside because both as which is referring to the continued and the said if the dog enters it's going to be it's clear that if an enters it's going to be position keep wants to know does he hold like or does he hold like meaning in that he agrees only gets but it's going to be keeper like or even keeper like now what was the rebel and the head of so the gar is going to now prove from here until the end of the per based on another of Rabuda how he the word and that's going to be a to which it says in the so that's supposedly just mentioned that the were they were and as a result the says what do you do with it the burnt it that's what you had to do you had to burn it and then the says He's supposed to wash his clothes. Says, why does the have to say that the person that burns it? What do you mean? You need to tell me this that the person that burns it, he is going to need to have to wash his clothing. He's going to be Tommy. That was the It says the word twice. The only time you find this that the burnt became that he had to wash himself and his clothing. You only find that in by the how do you know that that was true for all of the extra you don't have to learn it from this is different have to say the word why say the word same I agree it only says this that the had to burn his clothing and was by the parents How do I know? I know it from the word according to how do I know that became I know it from according to I know it from it sounds like didn't want to learn it from why probably because he uses the word for something else because he probably used the word already he used it for to the discusses from that that means he holds like because that is talking about after the was already done. So says the you want to know who Rhuda holds like does he hold like does he hold like I know this from a roundabout way because I know from another that did not want to the word for some other that all the become presumably because he used the word for something else what did he use it for there's another that we find in sh that another we find that used this for something else probably that's how we know that he must have held that way. So before we go and we start the next peric a real festive per just one more and that is so we just mentioned a says that when was doing nobody was allowed to be in it had to be 100% quiet nobody was allowed to appear there's a well-known gar in a few places in one of the places is that the over there describes the 40 years that Shimatic was. So we know was he was the gelatan the great sadikim that ever lived and he was for 40 years kufas circa the beginning of of bayeni and the says in different places that during the 40 years that was kango there were tremendous miracles and shea that took place in bay after shimatic passed away it was a whole different story and and a lot of and sudukim started becoming And the story was very very different. So that's the context says the died. So he went to and he told him he said he's going to die this year. They told him how do you know that he told him every year when I'm about to go into the comes he's wearing white clothing. His head is covered with a white head covering and he would enter the Kurdish with me and he would exit with me. This year when I went to the I saw a man but he was dressed differently. Yeah, you need a guitar. I agree. He went in with me but he didn't come out with me. So I know it must be a bad sign and as a result I'm telling you this is not going to be a good year at the end of became sick for seven days. He died and they stopped using and really quotes. This is a how could there have been a person that entered the together with doesn't it say in the says maybe it wasn't really a person it was a malik and this malik was dressed up like a person but says that's got not good you know why describes the he said so you see that even a malik is called so even a malik is called who is this that entered into together with the maybe it wasn't a person. It wasn't even a would enter together with every year. What came to mind was an even more famous. You definitely need a guitar for this. Yeah. And I saw if you look at He had two words, one word. This wasn't a one-time event, but every single year when he would see the Andina would say, so it's interesting the is there and the is communicating with it. It stems a little with this because in this you see that the is there but it's it's it's in a where it's possible to communicate ordinarily. How would you communicate with the sound like there's some sort of there's some sort of that's taking place between the only difference is said he was said I entered he was sitting there already but beginning of the end of no they're both but the beginning of end but the bottom line is so who was it says the it was it was but one thing is clear that a malik even wasn't allowed to enter. Malik wasn't allowed to enter the it was that was done such that even the even the weren't allowed to be there. So that note a classic the know that sent hugger out of his house. The truth is sent hugger out twice. It's in parish and it's again in parish. The first time is in in par where S wasn't pleased with Hagar and she comes to and basically tells S listen you know you want to get rid of her you can do whatever you want this is before you is born so S sends hugger out and hugger eventually comes back and yes is born and then since fate and mo when starts causing problems that time ss hugger out and this time it's for good both times s that hugger was sent out. She was so to speak communicated with her. The says in par this is the first time this is the first time that s sent hugger out comes to her and says what are you doing here I'm running away from my master from from gives her a big comes has this whole conversation with Hagar tells Hagar go back I'm going to give you you're going to have a child and I want you to name the child Ishmael the same exact thing repeated itself in par this is already aftersh was born and again the sends and again sends her out and the says she's she's thirsty and they're dying and she starts crying And heard the this is the famous and water appears and the rest is history. So twice hog was thrown out both times to this incredible with this communication that came along with the first time it was something that's playing itself out right now in in in real time. and she gets this bra that she's going to have a child and name the childish and comes from brought on the floor and then a second time after born where's dying and and hunger can't even look so she goes to the other side and says I don't want to watch him die and again she to this this where the malik comes and and it's unbelievable a classic he says if you look in the there's one in paral when the malik is talking to hugger The says doesn't say it says what's the says fellow the first time hugger left she was going to go back it was that was what was supposed to happen in Abramu's house it was pure it was normal to have communication with Malik that that's the way it was. This is this is Abrau's house. So as long as Hagar was the shif of Abrau as long as she was still Abra. So the Malik was able to communicate with Hagar. Hugers communicate with the Malik. They were mish they were next to each other. There was a certain his between the Malik and between Hagar. Thus it doesn't say which would suggest it's coming from some very far place. It was just the same way you have a throughout Tanakh where two people are having a conversation. It was in that same context that the malik is communicating with her parishes va which she sent away together with for good over there. She was already distanced from she was distanced from house now already she doesn't have the of having this open line of communication together with she could be but that is already going to be it's going to be from a distance. What does that have to do with what we're learning? An unbelievable punch line. What happened? So has his son and he's on the and he literally takes the knife range of motion. It's on's neck. He's about to slaughter and he says no. Why was this? This is I understand why it was cuz she was already outside of Abra's house. So she's not but by the no less it's that implies it's coming from a distance. You know what the is said that was a and that happened on this wasn't just an it wasn't just he spoke at all but this was a says and places go means even the name is the wasn't allowed to be there this was an the had to go away it had to be an avoid of They were but they were from a distance. They couldn't get too close to the action. So it was from far away they couldn't be close because this was an it was an as a result it had to be and on that note we begin a classic classic per and that's per anything that's what is this referring to? So this is an idea that we've already seen many times in the mak and that is that when a carbon is possible you can't do z with the carbon you can't do with the carbon right a ple carbon by definition means that you're not allowed to do any with the right in the beginning says what does it mean it means that you can't eat the you can't be you can't do you can't do with a of a carbon that's possible. stating that if a of a carbon that's possible touches the misbeh the is that do a repostle and now the is that you can keep that on the so you're not going to put this ple on the but once it's on the see what that means says what does it mean anything that's anything that goes on the fire of the such as the it's only that if the as we'll see in a moment that teaches us the is the and as a result Yeshua says that the only time applies if it's something that's right to go on the m of the says, "No, it doesn't have to be is something that goes on the rather even if it's not just like goes on the part of it goes on the fire of the but part of it also goes on the not on the fire of the anything that's it doesn't matter whether it goes on the fire or doesn't go on the fire." In other words, Yeshua what goes on the besides for the things that went into the fire there were two things that went they didn't go on the fire number one and number two so those were things that went but they didn't go on the firebu if it's possible and it goes on the you keep it on the is if it's royally but if it's not so that are not that they're not royally you don't have a whereas according It's called Even if it's not says a third if somebody brought a carbon that came together with so sometimes were brought by themselves and the sometimes came along with a carbon. You have a carbon together with the if the zeb is the beame and then the went on the oracle or the was again went on the even if both of them were possible in other words holds that even though he holds like but he holds the only time it's but to the extent that are not bought in but rather they're bought together with the ze then anything that's bought together with the zak does not have the of other words this mission the first mission of which is an introduction really for the discusses the of what's the background to it's really based on two one is the says is anything that touches the becomes. In other words, the has an ability to bead learned from there that what it's referring to is apostle that touches the misbehad. The misbeh is nowad. But there's another Pik. It's these are two that complement each other that teaches them. The second is in pares it's in where the says and we learn from there regarding something that is so means a carbon but regarding something that's once it's on the he so there's an idea that the is you also find this idea that something that goes on the hey you should just leave it on the and from those two we learn the idea we'll see more about this in the but from these two we learn the concept of this that we had in our is that being that that says it says doesn't just say it says is the fire. So the only time you say is if it's something that's really something that's supposed to go on the says no dash in that what does we'll see that in the right now either way so the mentions it said so it sounds like wasn't everything it was always only something that's something that's fit for the what is an example of something that's not that's coming to be a that wasn't a Scottish. So we know that after the kit was done so you had to put it into a if the wasn't put into a so it's considered in a doesn't have the kadusha that it needs to be considered fit for the so if it was so the is you don't have that but only if it's royally mascul if someone as and he put it on before as soon as it touches it becomes we'll see what that means but it becomes in other words even though the of the column didn't have to make it and fit for still with the concept of meaning what's the difference with like and they're both things that technically are supposed to go to the goes on the but didn't have the proper kadusha that it needs to go on the it didn't have the kesh versus the kach which also has it didn't go on the but it first needs this ro to give it the proper kadusha in order for it to be able to go on the says I'll tell you the difference isn't just missing a it's missing the the putting it in the is something that happens in the it's missing something in it that's considered any and as a result you don't have whereas even though it's missing a but doesn't happen in it happens in the happens in the over there end up becoming but it's not it's not the same only uh only whereas according to it's everything anything that's holds only if it's royally only if it goes on the fire of the whereas according to anything that goes on the what was how do you know once it's leave it there but then it says doesn't say the word it does and I use teach me another it's coming to teach me they have a carbon not a possible carbon that was in the fire of the was in the and now a piece of the carbon fell out of the so to put it back in or not to put it back in teaches me the of that you do have to put back it's not coming to teach me of how does know the he uses to tell me is only true for learn from a different and from that it's actually the next in the you should do from that's actually obviously you're going to be made from the dash from the fire and the ashes that were consumed by the fire. Why does it have to say that's coming to teach me about says I need to teach me a different that the only time you have the is so of the fell out of then you have the meaning something that you're being that's where you have this but which was also consumed by the if a little bit of the would jump out of the fire there'd be no dent to go to bed. It says and it's talking about the carbon and we learn from there only he says I need to say I agree I also hold that way I hold that is coming to teach me but just like I know it to teach me not I certainly also know what to teach me because what's so at the end of I could learn out both from there. I have extra says to teach me that only do you have said it's not only but anything that's royal and how does he know so asks in the reverse who learns only what about the word isn't anything on the you know why the ter says to teach me what's apostle. It's the meaning you would have thought maybe only the mic is what's maybe is apostle that goes that's royal that goes on the fire the fire is what's but right there's a concept of of fire being but as it relates to the misbeh the rest of maybe not but we know the truth is the entire msb was mkadish even the kvish of the was mkadesh the of the misbeh was maybe mikadish we'll see these gammoras the entire mb is mikadesh that's what mb is teaching So is teaching me is teaching me that it's the misbeh That's how does the other know that it's the that's it twice one to teach me that's possible that was once says for example once and something happened that made it possible the other ones coming to teach me would have never had a rash says like says the it's coming to teach me both says no I don't need to come to teach me because the says either way so we just began very quickly there's a lot of lumbus a lot of raid in inadesh not such a long per but it's a really really fest really really We'll get to some of the raid in the coming days. But just to end on a on a light note that ties into something that we've spoken about in the past. So what's the in the beginning of parish and the words are extra. The words are extra to teach me that once something is on not once something on them it could stay there. the thing that was it's allowed to be there in one of his so the says a different and he's aasha that we've spoken out from the in the past is the first time I saw it inside so ask that we all know the says he accidentally violated and he came he was learning with said one of the not supposed to learn and he was he moved the fire and he wrote on his pinkus and asks the gash why have to write when a person's in a carbon it's as if he brought the carbon so when a person's sick and pious just carbon he learned So from said learn the parish of anymore. So what's this emphasis? Why did he say so said a few but one says that in his pinkish he said that we spoke out from hamburger and that is that it's true that if a person But the only time you have that's only with the that went but that's not something you can have for that you have to eat. If you ate then you had if you didn't eat you can't learn and say it's as if I ate right you find that says even according to that hold but there's no for why because the is the one that was so you can't say ate then it's whoever has the ate if you didn't have that's what is because when it comes to it's all in as a result when it comes to you don't have So he was able to be and it would have been but it was only it was only but it wasn't that it wasn't going to happen his carbon was going to be because his carbon was going to be he said that I need to be but what did he have to be so to highlight that to emphasize that he said if it sounds familiar because we once spoke this out the shame I himself said this terrace that's coming and that's why said that he's going to have to bring because he's going to have to be hamburger said with this he said this to answer the when he brings every morning so the brings all the supposed to say and then he brings and the says I was asked why did the bring first and then shouldn't brought first and then based on the mission the beginning of parac something that we've seen so many times we had it even in yesterday's d where the is that the is always before the is the that comes after you get theap but the always comes before the so why the when he says say carbon did he say first and then shouldn't he have said first and then said hamburger if you're bringing a in when there's a mikas comes before the that's to say first the kas and then the but We don't have the real carbon. What do we have? We're going to read parishes. That's what the is talking about says when you read it's as if you were of the carbon. But that only works for the it doesn't work for the even the for says if that's the case the when you're being you're not bringing the because you only have the but that you don't have whereas when you bring the which is like it didn't anyways didn't have a that was being that there was no that was the entire was the so you could bring. So it's a should I first say the which I can't bring or should I say the which I could bring? Of course the is that's what you should say first before the but today it's going to be the before the he can't bring the and here's the punch line and this is the although this reads repeating right it's uh what does what does the always say it he has a good line anyways so says the says the yeah yeah no no says the that the says felt that the word is it's extra it's extra right why is it extra there's a whole parades that's on that extra word you should know that when you're the it's the same they were able to ring by and all these other Not the same because you're missing a which are you missing? You're missing the but it's you're not missing And he said,