Zevachim 99

Today's we are in the beginning of a new per the 12th per 10 lines from the bottom of so the topic of the first Mishna in perim is a little bit the But more a bit the idea that once upon a time so the kahan would do the and one of the perks that the khanim got was that they got to divide different kohuna that was being distributed in the bdash. So a carbon was brought and there was baser from that carbon very often distributed to a min was brought there was going to be that was going to be distributed was distributed. So there were a lot of different benefits that the khanim got just from working at the bdash. Now how exactly was the matnus kahuna divided? The short answer is every member of the Mishmar got to partake in the matuna. So we know all the kayan were divided into misharas. The misharas were then subdivided into bav. But the point is regardless of whether I did the avoid today or didn't do the avoid today whether I was active in this particular carbon or I wasn't active in this particular carbon the fact that I'm a member of this mish I'm a member of this b entitles me now to get a little bit of a portion of the mat. Our mission is going to discuss and really different types of people whether or not they were entitled to partake in the matuna or whether they were not entitled to partake in the matnuna. One thing I think it's to make clear before we start the Mishna. We're going to be discussing whether these were were in the matuna whether they were entitled to a whether they got a portion not so much whether they were able to eat the matuna. Meaning it's possible that I could eat muskahuna but I'm not. It's certainly possible that I'm in the matuna despite the fact that I have no ability to eat it. So our discussion is not so much can these people eat or not eat. The discussion is more were they are they entitled to their portion? What are they going to do with it? Maybe they'll eat it when they're able to eat. Maybe they'll give it to somebody else. They'll get sign off from it. I don't know. But the discussion is whether they were not so much whether they were either way. On that note, and they did not partake in the of for them to be able to eat in the evening. So a few definitions what's somebody that was taught he went to the mikvah the says this person will not become until the sun sets as a matter of fact this is the basis for the very first the first in So the who were and were would not be allowed to eat truma and certainly then not until the sun sets from the time that they go to the mikvah until the sun sets they're known as because their is not completed until the sun sets. However, being that they went to the mikvah already, their tum is considered to be somewhat diluted. And it's for that reason their albeit with this special name known as somebody that in order for him to become has to bring a there's a kachum component to his. This person did everything he needed to do in order to become tar went to the mikvah. the sun already set. The only thing he didn't do is he didn't bring his carbon. He too like the tulim is still tame but at the same time his toma is qualitatively somewhat weaker and as a result there's certain that you find in his world of stating that's they were not entitled to a portion of the now notice what's the even though they're going to be able to eat that evening But they're going to be the son's going to set it's going to be at that point he's going to be allowed to eat the even before that just has to bring his carbon. As soon as he brings his carbon at that point he's going to be allowed to eat. So you would have thought that being that during this of this these people are going to be allowed to eat. So maybe they should be nowish and there's a not entitled to a portion of the we see it's learned out from a as it relates to an so is someone that lost a relative a relative that he has an obligation to mourn the day that the relative dies. We'll see maybe the night after and it could be if the kur didn't happen that day maybe the following day as well. It's going to be very much the topic of tomorrow's but that person is considered says he's allowed to touch he's not as it relates to the core topic of the he is not he's not entitled to as it relates to it doesn't matter if this is a it's a transient or if it's a this is a that is not going to go anywhere is they and they're allowed to eat as well. They were not allowed to do the mikdum. We know is not allowed to do the mikd that's 101101. But as it relates to again the topic of the Mishna whether or not he's the answer is he's and by the way the Mishna throws in he could be as well. So if you look at the Mishna the Mishna gave you three groupings. We have the we have the and we have the iso that's all the said about the the said a few touch the macro if he can't do the just like the as it relates to the so he can't do the he could be he could even be so here's a rule any kind that can't do the in the md he's to do the he's a he's someone like that is not going to be what about is not do avoid yet the Mishna said that he is so says the is going to ask that the continues and says that any was not entitled to because he's not like we just said he wasn't entitled to a of the skin the hides of the animal as well. So another one of the kalucas that took place in the basikt was with the hide. So the hides of the bamed was distributed as well. It's a little different than the baser because the basa you eat the hides you don't eat. So you would think that it could be the of who gets to partake in the of the is maybe different than who gets to partake in the distribution of the baser specifically being that so maybe you have to be a royal I don't know maybe it's a it's a different uh set of rules to Mishna it's not a different set of rules any person that wasn't entitled to the basera wasn't entitled to the iris if you got basa then you were able to get iris Mishna concludes and says What would be with regards to the in the event that they were at the time of the but they were at the time of the so do we say that right now they're and therefore they would not be entitled to or maybe look at them as because they were at the very least at the time they had maybe they can get they're still not going to get the that's and we learn from there someone that's someone that's part of the he's the person that he's the person that's going to be entitled to the someone that was not even though he was Roy at the time of the he's not going to be entitled to any either way this is a pretty dense Mishna that said a lot of things leaves us hanging a little bit. If you look at Rashi, there's a lot of mafar because the is very much going to unpack this mission. So what was the first of the as a result they're not entitled to partake in the it's an extra because really at night which is still within this they're going to be able to eat. So you would think let them be now even though they can't eat now because they're tummy but they'll be able to eat it later says the and the seem to give a to it as well. the last words of the and it sounds like from there any that's able to be he's going to be but if you're not so I think if you were learning right now 12 you would say I have and I even have a pretty straightforward The reason is because this is a stating that the garra begins and the garra says what's the first and then later came and said I'm going to tell you oh my success Now this is a Pik that we became familiar with in the previous bar because it was quoted more than once. This is inrose. This is in parish. It's in the parish of which was the theme of the 11th. But either way, now you look at this at first glance. What does it sound like? The is talking about the so that he has to eat from the ber of the right sounds like the actually does this he gets to eat but the do he does not get says this is all part of says is that a real principle What about the entire Mish? They don't do this. One does this, right? He's the but it's not the whole that does yet and they get to eat. So, we have to take a step back over here. You can't take this P too literally because that would sound like the physically did the he's the one that gets to eat. And we know that's not true because there's one kind that physically does the yet the entire is with the of the said maybe what the means to say is as follows. Maybe it means not a but that's to do the so any that's able to do this and is part of the he's going to get to eat. So not who physically did the but he's qualified. He's a royal. He's someone that's able to do it to the extent that he's able to do it. So that gives him a now to be able to partake. Meaning in the event he's a member of the mish but he's not that's where he gets excluded. But the says that's not a true statement. Again is talking a cotton is not able to yet the cotton was he was allowed to eat gets to eat. Allah said you have to say like this what does the mean when it says the word is a little bit of a misnomer. You know what it means? What it means is not gets to eat but rather gets to be and when we say we don't mean the that's actually doing the because the whole for sure is included in the in the okay so then how do you read the someone that's he's gonna be someone that's not gonna said the says if you were learning now you would think that the means to say as follows the he gets to eat the sounds very reasonable and that's what you would think the is saying but after further review what's the really saying not the but the that's to do this and not he gets to eat he gets to be but here's the bottom line someone that's to do this he gets to be that's to the first of means. So, we have to hit the pause button for one second. Ask what's going on over here. It's a we set this up. says a different is bringing a when the Mishna already gave him a car. This is what refers to as what's going on over here. The Mishna already gave him a car. Just to complicate the situation a little bit further, if you take a look at So this is going back on the brings who took out the last lines of the Mishna. So the reenu wasn't perfect. Reenu didn't have the gears. Rish probably also didn't have the gears. And that's why you know what the problem is explained why he wasn't and it was based on based on a whole different reason not based on the fact that seemingly didn't have the rich had the why would he have said took these words out of the Mishna but for a whole another reason either way says the okay so according The to the first is because it says in the we learn from there only some which means what as a follow-up question what about the said it doesn't matter if it's a that says then how could included something was because it says the end of the is and this by the way is also in the par of a lot of that we spent a lot of time on last week are being here but it's coming to be and it's coming to be now there's one rational That's to speak out and that is the literal t of the words means that whatever the is coming to it's coming to we're be using this to tell me that is which we spoke in the is not the same as being but says that even though the literal meaning of the is that is not regarding because the fact that is allowed to eat k that's a elsewhere It's not even l from a boy. That's that's something that we know 100%. So if there's a re here of are attributing the boy to the it's not to tell me that the is because I know he's must be the so despite the fact that we have a rabbis. How do you know that is coming to me? Maybe it's coming to me. There's no mention of the word. It just says the rabbis. So maybe it's coming to be meaning and should be excluded from say take the boy and apply it to a maybe take the boy and apply it to a says it makes sense that we should use the boy to be and the reason is because the is so if you're allowed to eat and I have a boy that could be also allowed to be IT MAKES SENSE THAT the person that's allowed to eat is allowed to be as opposed to the who can't eat. So it's that so too they're not able to be meaning as much as not the same thing. They're eerily similar. So if I can be or I could be the it makes more sense to be because the because he could eat as opposed to not to say I could argue that it makes more sense because the at night not only is he going to be able to eat, he's even going to be able to do as opposed to the who at night won't even be able to do the so you could argue that the more than the is because at the very least which by the way is not just oh tomorrow and a year from now that's this of what right now so really in a couple of hours he's going to be someone that's going to be a posted is not even going to be again maybe says at the end of the day we prefer the mil that has over then the has over because the balum's right now when you're doing the he's able to eat as opposed to the right now at the time they're doing the is not able to eat he's also not able to do the the fact that later he'd be able to is fine but I prefer over later and it's for that reason if we have a we're going to be we're not going to be had a different a different why it is from we're being and we're not being and's based on a dict says let's take a step back right the says and already told So what does the mean? It means right that was the little bit of surgery that did in the beginning of the to this. Well, if that's the case, so if the Torah wants to say, why you telling me, you know what the Torah wants to say that at the end of the day, if we're going to go now and we're going to be somebody from we'd rather be the person that's than be the person that's not that there's a a angle into when you're and when you're not and as a result if we have a and I'm not sure to use the to be the who's not to be that is from the fact that the use the word to describe that's an insight that's a that the person that's more he's the person he's the person that at the end of the day we are going to include. So the bottom line is we have two to explain at the end of the day why it is that yet the are the underlying reason why the would be that certain people should not be able to be is because it says And it's for that reason that are not are not going to be why is it that the is the same the short answer is because it says and that's a and it's coming to be why is maybe so for that we have two roots the first terret of the gmorra was because The balm is more sh to the Indian of is the and the reason is because the balm can eat as opposed to the can. Now also has a milo. His mil is he'll be as opposed to the won't be but the mile of is better than the milo that's going to be a little bit later. said that there's actually a giloy in the ofen that if you're going to be the one to be is the means which creates this very deep bond between being to teach me that someone that's is more of a for him to be now if all you had was the would be excluded right this is a very important point red because at the end of the day the is not but now that I have a and I know to be something so the relationship is a it's an insight what to be don't be who really is mu What happens if you have a co that's a he's also is he going to be or is he not going to be so he has he's okay he's also a as in or maybe even just a full-fledged so the question is could he be or could he not be now he could be he can't be you would think this sh would be dead on arrival of course he can't be I mean it's very nice that the fact that he's a not So it's not a reason for him not to be able to be because the rabbis but at the end of the day he's not able to be what's even the explain do we say being that he's someone that should not be why not because he's not yet the went ahead and the and the said despite the fact that really you have no to being able to be we're going to include you well if that's the case maybe it meaning really he should be excluded. But the Tyra went ahead and the gave him an incredible mulligan. The said despite the fact you shouldn't be we'll let you be. So the fact that I have another I should not be the fact that I have the fact that right now it was that all of a sudden I have another problem or perhaps at the end of the day what's the reason that the is the reason the is maybe because he's someone that's and being that at the end of the day could be The reason he's is because he's so is so that would be enough. But to the extent that right now he's also told me now he's not. So maybe over there he would not be able to be. Now if you look at there's a lot of uh in terms of understanding what's the sh of the gum and really there's a lot of different ways to explain it. I think the simplest shot that I saw is the gimmar wants to know in this what's the reason what's the reason at the end of the day that is not able to be in the is the reason because he's sounded like this was even the marishna or is the reason because he's not able to eat would be when we say that a is able to be is it aes or is it not aes if the reason that a is not able to be is because he can't do the so it's that is because he also is not able to do the if the reason that a is not is because he's not able to eat well then there's no in the fact that is able to be because from that would then be This sh what would be if you have a that's also if the is excluded because the reason why is not is because he's not and that's something that's to the as well that he's going to be included. Well, if you're telling me there's a that he's included, so maybe he should be included, even if he's also Tommy. But if the reason why the Tom is excluded is because he's not able to eat, which is a reason that doesn't apply to the balum, that means the was never that aum despite the fact really shouldn't be able to eat, he's able to eat anyways. So maybe the only time he's allowed to eat is when there's no but to the extent that there's aesh because of the fact that he's maybe he wouldn't be able to be included. But the point is according to this explanation of the is a very very broad and that is what is the reason is it or is it and from that would be also and on that very simple from a That's talking about a we know one of the is he's allowed to do the even when he's however that's an is not let him the additionally the when he's not is not what do you see from here you see from that what's the reason that the and are excluded from being the reason they're excluded is is because they're not has nothing to do with not being because if it's related to not being a that's now the Mishna had said that is right for the same reason it's because can't do the he can't eat right he has whatever that relates to is going to relate to the as well. But is allowed to do the and yet we have a that says the so what's the if the reason that and for this that matter the reason the wouldn't be is related to the fact that he's not able to do the well then the who is allowed to do the should be if the reason however is because they're not able to eat well is not allowed to eat what's That's all posit. You see he's not what's the main reason obviously the reason is based on and if it's based on so there's no is and if that's the case that's would not be able to be a similar sh it's a different sh but it's really based on the same we'll see it's the same what would be if you have That's to a full-fledged and doing a now from a carbon. So the question is could he partake or could he not partake again? What about if the carbon was not a carbon but rather was a carbon? What's the sh Why would this be different? Do we say over here this is right to do the because we know so being that the carbon that's being brought is a carbon over here the tommy actually is a royal if and what determines whether you get to eat or don't get to eat is whether you're not well that that's the case this person would be or maybe it's not totally whether you're royal it's whether you're And the bottom line is someone that is tummy is not allowed to eat even from a carbon right carbon is unique that you have the dopite the fact that you not let from the so again whether or not that's could be from the carbon or is in the same if it's about over here in this specific case he's a royal if it's about in this case he's biting the same that's is allowed to do the but he's not let yet when it comes to being he's what do you see from here that being is totally not in rather it's this is a either way just to make one half a on this first and that is again the started off interesting and it became even more interesting as we made it to the finish line because you know started with what's and the gave a reason because then completely with surgery and that's the reason that is different because a boy but other than that a different to the that the Mishna already gave a too and then these last two shas and by the way one of the shilas was butish And by all of a sudden the ising a whole new at least the way we explain the a whole new in terms of what's that and are excluded from being is it the fact that they're not to do the or is it the fact that they're not to eat from the I thought for sure it's about Roy to do the avoid as a matter of fact didn't himself bring him a car in the top of the oven and by the way didn't the Mishna already give him a So again the is leaving us needing and wanting more. This is a dense we are going to go back. So the Mishna mentioned not only the but the is also not and then the Mishna threw him that even though the is not he's also not allowed to do the unless he's a but he's allowed to touch is allowed to touch. Now that's in contrast to the that certainly can't touch but as it relates to an isue very many I'll ask you a and this is from aishna in the third paraso so the third it's called right it's a lot of kum in the third par and certainly a lot of tyrus in the third parico but anyway in that over there it says as follows required. Now the assumes now that what does it mean to even touches? So can only touches if they are first we need our Mishna said here it says it's blatant flat out contradiction between two when the Mishna says it's talking about where he was when the Mishna says that he wasn't that's why it says but says I don't understand if there's a requires then he could be it's not going to help you know why because after It's the of that requires somebody goes to the doesn't. So if he's going to emerge in he's going to need a say how's the going to help me means that you can't touch it. That's what it should mean. Doesn't mean literally goal because when you you're going to be the same anyways. And in fact, if you're not sure this is like you have to say you have to say that says that requires it's talking about where he was from watching his golf. Once upon a time, people used to watch themselves to make sure they're not going to become tummy. You would think would be less sensitive and less careful to watch himself. What do you mean? Think he maybe has to be more says the reason is cuz he knows on that day anyways not letting catch him. So if I'm not letting him today anyways, I'm going to worry about today. Tomorrow I'll go to the I'll be good to go. But it's not something that he's being so sensitive to. So the Mishna over there that says that the requires the reason he requires is here's the punch line. It's not because he's a and requires he needs because we're talking about from watching himself says that's the reason why he requires just like the requires because he's he needs as well but our mish talk about that wasn't that's meaning you're the only reason makes it into that as requiring is because sometimes that's going to have this issue regular but the Gar says if we're talking about in the talking about then he should need a ready one second I didn't realize That's what we're talking about. You mean a guy who completely was bashirus for a day and he says I'm not thinking about this is the last thing I'm going to worry about today. That's what we're talking about. That guy needs the from right again who's engaging in the concept of says somebody like that for sure would require it's talking about where he was but not like we're getting a little excited right this person he was a little bit he was from I'm not going to make sure that I don't come in contact with one of the from back in the day but not coming in contact with but the says Tommy Sher even that's an issue because if he was from Tommy Sher then Tommy then He's a regular as it relates to at the very least and he should require and it's not that way from the says doesn't say a word about and not just that he should be as it relates to and if you look at that says one of the is requires but it's only if he was really be from Well then he should be considered a regular as it relates to who by the way usually has a buas like this here he has an akinta like this this is like but like right talking about where the person said so this person was watching himself like a little bit but he wasn't watching himself 100%. Let's read inside. This person watched himself. He said this is a London and a right. So obviously if you don't know I don't know how you can pull this off. So he said I know what a day is. I know the type of that would require a I'm watching myself. Not just that, not just that, I'm also gonna watch myself with regards to that would mess me up with regards to truma which is a lower threshold but with regards to that I didn't watch myself. So his nar like stopped at some point. So he said that I'm willing to be and even within the it's only with regards to the bottom line is if you have a guy like this who's able to slice and dice and he's carving out what his was and what it wasn't says come on is there even such a make sense says Somebody had a basket of on his head and there was a shovel inside of it and he said he said I'm watching this. Yeah. I want to make sure come tell me I'm not watching the it's the same is the same. He's the same from this guy. So he has this whole capich on top of his head and he has and he has the and he says and the m is going to be so first analyzes this for a second before we come full circle why don't we say that to the extent that is shouldn't it be says that's not a problem can be okay Let the that's inside that's already here's the punch linear said even when he said he meant that I'm not watching the for it not to become but I am watching the for it not to become in a way we'd be able to transmit to on the meaning he's worried about the cell. He's worried about the tame doesn't care so much about the migra. So he's again he's with a he's slicing and dicing how much he's having right now on this ma that it's to watch the it shouldn't become where it be able to be that I'm going to watch but if it's going to become for itself not but what's the bottom line you see from here the says right this guy has a cousin who's has the same where he also Liro over here. The bottom the reality is is there is such a and therefore this is going to work. Bottom line is let's just go back to where we started cuz I'm getting a little said I'll ask you what's going on over here. So what's the first of the first of the is there's nothing inherently about that required but the sometimes would let their guard down a little bit because they knew they were anyways. So if you have an who let his guard down then he's not let touch. If you have an that did not let his guard down then he could touch Kachcham. is talking about a regular is talking about we let his guard down. If that's the case, why is it only but so the Garra says we're talking about a guy who little but let his guard down but some of the he kept his guard up says this shil made its rounds literally and it landed at the desk of heard this was tumbling between two and heard the stem who he told the doesn't said in the name of if somebody eats he's not let moving forward but he's allowed to touch what do you see from here sometimes made certain when it comes to eating when it comes to eating but when it comes to touching not so much so was talking about was if somebody ate. So we know that can be an only or can be a only can be a can be an avat and a shen. But once the tum dilutes and it transmits already to the point where it's ai at that point cannot become a so if someone tells you that I saw and it was a he's lying there's no such mas you can't have that's a truma yeah even is more than when it comes to a reveal the bottom line is what would be if somebody ate that's could be somebody ate it say you become I'm quoting also moving forward we would treat his goof as so that he's not allowed to eat but at the same time if he wanted to touch he'd be able to touch. We just want one thing from here. You see from here there's a mus that a person could be t regarding eating but he's not tummy with regards to touching. At first glance what's the difference? You're right. We need a precedent for that. But we have a precedent for that. There is such a concept where you could be tummy for touching, not touching, not tummy for eating. So said you want to know the terret to the steer between these two that says that's saying he's allowed to be he's not allowed to be the says it says what we assume that means probably right noes means not you're going to tell me there's between being a yeah you see is so you see there's already a concept of such a mus that is the between these two so the first terret to answer these two the talking about regular says the second is that is talking about touching and the says that is talking not about touching but rather that Mishna is talking about eating. Let's go a little bit. So again we're talking about started with it and now we've shifted our focus to the so the says it sounds like is not but he's eaten right it sounds like if he wants to eat then he's going to be allowed to Now what do you mean he's the says then what it means is that night he's going to be allowed to eat right the is he now or could he not be the Mishna says he's but to eat if somebody else invites him and says you want to take a little bit from what I got today you were and you couldn't get what I got so do you want to have a little bit of mine it sounds like that's something you'd be allowed to Right. It's come out of Mishna said he can't be to be able to eat but to eat he could. So if he doesn't need to be to eat because someone else is inviting him then it sounds like certainly it's going to be okay to come over. I'll ask you a question from so he isful and he's eat but if he wants the regular this is not something that he's allowed to do that is not it's amazing we threw in a few regarding the and You have a that says that even if he went to the already it doesn't matter he's the carbon p but regular he's not now what be the difference between the carbon p regular kchum that's posh the carbon p is an as opposed to regular is just a regular but it sounds like what the is saying is that even though the carbon but regular doesn't which seems to say that But in itself he's allowed to do this. You have to say one Mishna is talking about the carbon on PES and the other Mishna is talking about the rest of the year being that he's eat the rest of the year where he's not able to eat the carbon because it's not of the carbon. So then he's not to be able to eat from as well. So one Mishna is talking about and the other is talking about now which is talking about what? So let's say the says that he's which would seem to imply that he's allowed to be you're allowed to eat from the carbon. Oh that's talking about so the we started with right today's but really we started with the this is a that's what's going on over here. That's the best THAT'S CLEARLY TALKING ABOUT THAT'S talking about obviously but when we say that means it's a little right. So you have to say that what does the mean when it says again? You know what means not that night because the part is for sure talking about night is talking about our counterintuitively is talking about the said a differenti says learned that both are talking PES. So our mission is talking about the PES and the talking for sure is talking about the PES. Okay. So what's the ter says the is talking about we this person became because his relative died on PE on and they buried him on as well. Right. So the mis and the kur all happened on pes. This person at night despite the fact it's the night after the mis and the is allowed to eat from the carbon because carbon isos but at the same time he's not let and the reason is because the anos that follows the and it's to the point that you're not let as opposed to our is talking about where the person died on your giml the only reason he was an on Dal is because the kur didn't happen on your gimmel. The kura first happened on your dal that night. The person is still annoying. He's still annoying. But that anos is a anos. The reason is because it's an anos of that follows only the not the more cooler anos. So it's for that reason that if he wants to eat kachch he's going to be allowed to eat k. Let's see it inside again. What's this? It's referring to the Whereas the is talking about where he died in the is not such a serious day for it's night to suddenly forbid one to be able to eat kachchum even regular kachum. And it's for that reason if he wants to be able to be. So really we have to answer this next as relates to an is at night. It's not but he's allowed to eat that says he's allowed to eat the carbon he's not allowed to eat gave two one is one's talking about the pes the other's talking about pes migu that he's allowed to eat from the carbon pes he's allowed to eat from you don't have the migu therefore you're not going to be allowed to our counterintuitively is talking about pes and the counterintuitively is talking about like the speaks out of It means the second is that both are talking about this is important says both are talking about where it's both. you technically have this migu that being that you're allowed to eat from the car, I should be allowed to eat from stating that the only time we invoke this migu is in the event that it's an anus that's following only the if however it's following the miso then it's and then you're not even going to say and despite the fact that from the carbon he's still not going to be able to eat from. Now what emerges from the second mahalak of diskar is that really understanding our mishna requires us to understand anos a little bit better right that's what emerges now because it sounds like for sure from the last words of the gamar that the aninos of that follows the is more kic than the follows the amisa like toughest lei the lashar was midana it sounds like whatever it is it's only rabbitic we're throwing migus moves into the equation. So really I think we have to ask ourselves is Anosa is an what really is the between also this anos of the night after it sounds like that's a little bit more cool again it jumps out from the gumar if you want to understand this properly we have to know the answers to some of these questions and the very truth is if you look at the next words of the gar next words of the gumar it's really the next discussion of the garra it's going to segue knee deep into tomorrow's d because The Gomorra is t taking this queue and the Gmorra sees over here that really this discussion is totally in how you understand the concept of aminos and that's something we will get to